GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CNVD-2015-01100

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-02-12
VLAI
Title
Microsoft Word内存破坏漏洞(CNVD-2015-01100)
Description
Microsoft Word是一款微软开发的文字处理系统。 Microsoft Word存在内存破坏漏洞。允许远程攻击者通过一个精心Office文档,执行任意代码或引起拒绝服务(内存崩溃)。
Severity
Patch Name
Microsoft Word内存破坏漏洞(CNVD-2015-01100)的补丁
Patch Description
Microsoft Word是一款微软开发的文字处理系统。 Microsoft Word存在内存破坏漏洞。允许远程攻击者通过一个精心Office文档,执行任意代码或引起拒绝服务(内存崩溃)。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下供应商提供的安全公告获得补丁信息: http://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-012

Reference
http://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-012 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72465
Impacted products
Name
Microsoft Word 2007 SP3
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "72465"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-0065"
    }
  },
  "description": "Microsoft Word\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u5fae\u8f6f\u5f00\u53d1\u7684\u6587\u5b57\u5904\u7406\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nMicrosoft Word\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u901a\u8fc7\u4e00\u4e2a\u7cbe\u5fc3Office\u6587\u6863\uff0c\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u6216\u5f15\u8d77\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1(\u5185\u5b58\u5d29\u6e83)\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Ben Hawkes of the Google Security Team",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u83b7\u5f97\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff1a\r\nhttp://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-012",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-01100",
  "openTime": "2015-02-12",
  "patchDescription": "Microsoft Word\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u5fae\u8f6f\u5f00\u53d1\u7684\u6587\u5b57\u5904\u7406\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002 \r\n\r\nMicrosoft Word\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u901a\u8fc7\u4e00\u4e2a\u7cbe\u5fc3Office\u6587\u6863\uff0c\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u6216\u5f15\u8d77\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1(\u5185\u5b58\u5d29\u6e83)\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Microsoft Word\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2015-01100\uff09\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Microsoft Word 2007 SP3"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://technet.microsoft.com/security/bulletin/MS15-012\r\nhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72465",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2015-02-11",
  "title": "Microsoft Word\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2015-01100\uff09"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…