CERTA-2012-AVI-736

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Deux vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans IBM Lotus Fondations. La première concerne des injections de codes indirectes à distance (XSS). La seconde permet une injection de code arbitraire dans le paramètre QUERY_STRING pouvant mener un utilisateur malintentionné à exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Versions antérieures à IBM Lotus Fondations 1.2.2c

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eVersions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 IBM Lotus Fondations 1.2.2c\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-4848",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-4848"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-1823",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-1823"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-736",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-12-14T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eIBM\nLotus Fondations\u003c/span\u003e. La premi\u00e8re concerne des injections de codes\nindirectes \u00e0 distance (XSS). La seconde permet une injection de code\narbitraire dans le param\u00e8tre \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eQUERY_STRING\u003c/span\u003e\npouvant mener un utilisateur malintentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 ex\u00e9cuter du code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans IBM Lotus Fondations",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM swg21620314 du 12 d\u00e9cembre 2012",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21620314"
    },
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM swg21620319 du 12 d\u00e9cembre 2012",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21620319"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.