CERTA-2006-AVI-109
Vulnerability from certfr_avis

Une vulnérabilité dans Metamail permet à un utilisateur distant mal intentionné de provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter du code arbitraire sur la machine vulnérable.

Description

Une vulnérabilité de type débordement de tampon dans Metamail permet à un utilisateur distant mal intentionné de provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter du code arbitraire sur la machine vulnérable par le biais d'un courrier électronique malicieusement construit.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité des éditeurs pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Metamail 2.7.x.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website


{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eMetamail 2.7.x.\u003c/p\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type d\u00e9bordement de tampon dans Metamail permet \u00e0\nun utilisateur distant mal intentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service\nou d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire sur la machine vuln\u00e9rable par le biais\nd\u0027un courrier \u00e9lectronique malicieusement construit.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des \u00e9diteurs pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2006-0709",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-0709"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2006-03-14T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2006-03-20T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 RedHat RHSA-2006:0217 du 21 f\u00e9vrier    2006 :",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0217.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA 995 du 13 mars 2006 :",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/dsa-995"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA 200603-16 du 17 mars 2006    :",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200603-16.xml"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2006:047 du 22 f\u00e9vrier    2006 :",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:047"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SuSE-SA:2006:005 du 03 mars 2006    :",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_05_sr.html"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-109",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2006-03-14T00:00:00.000000"
    },
    {
      "description": "ajout de la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo.",
      "revision_date": "2006-03-20T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Metamail permet \u00e0 un utilisateur distant mal\nintentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service ou d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code\narbitraire sur la machine vuln\u00e9rable.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Metamail",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Rapport d\u0027erreur Debian du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2006",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352482"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…