BREW-PYTHON-LSP-SERVER-C… (GHSA-3J69-69WJ-XQX2)
Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-08-13 17:29 – Updated: 2026-09-17 20:04 – Source websiteSummary
ujson.dumps() (or ujson.dump() or ujson.encode()) have a reject_bytes=False option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues.
Details
The expected behavior is that for x being any bytes string, x == ujson.loads(ujson.dumps(x, reject_bytes=False)).encode(errors="surrogatepass") should always either be true or ujson.dumps() will throw an exception. In reality, some strings which should've been errors are silently rewritten as other strings:
- Invalid continuation bytes are replaced with valid ones:
b'\xcf\x13'->b'\xcf\x93' - Unterminated sequence completes the sequence:
b'\xc3'->b'\xc3\x80' - ... or leads to reading past the end of string:
b'\xf0\x90\x94'->b"\xf0\x90\x94\x80inxcontrib'"
Impact
An application relying on reject_bytes=False for UTF-8 handling may experience:
- Data integrity issues
- Experience validation bypass if said validation occurs before serialisation
Remediation
The missing/broken UTF-8 validation checks were added/fixed in https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/commit/169eaf36b1116fece5034ee79a7a0ef3f6deedcf. We recommend upgrading to UltraJSON 5.13.0.
Workarounds
Decoding bytes to strings in Python before passing them to ujson.dumps() avoids this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"fix": "bump",
"range_state": "fixed",
"resource": "ujson",
"resource_purl": "pkg:pypi/ujson@5.13.0",
"upstream_fixed_in": "5.13.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Homebrew",
"name": "python-lsp-server",
"purl": "pkg:brew/python-lsp-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.14.0_3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"confidence": "high",
"source": "matched",
"strategy": "registry",
"upstream_evidence": [
{
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"key": "pkg:pypi/ujson@5.13.0",
"name": "ujson",
"resource": "ujson",
"strategy": "registry",
"subject_version": "5.13.0"
}
]
},
"details": "### Summary\n`ujson.dumps()` (or `ujson.dump()` or `ujson.encode()`) have a `reject_bytes=False` option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues.\n\n### Details\n\nThe expected behavior is that for `x` being any bytes string, `x == ujson.loads(ujson.dumps(x, reject_bytes=False)).encode(errors=\"surrogatepass\")` should always either be true or `ujson.dumps()` will throw an exception. In reality, some strings which should\u0027ve been errors are silently rewritten as other strings:\n\n* Invalid continuation bytes are replaced with valid ones: `b\u0027\\xcf\\x13\u0027` -\u003e `b\u0027\\xcf\\x93\u0027`\n* Unterminated sequence completes the sequence: `b\u0027\\xc3\u0027` -\u003e `b\u0027\\xc3\\x80\u0027`\n* ... or leads to reading past the end of string: `b\u0027\\xf0\\x90\\x94\u0027` -\u003e `b\"\\xf0\\x90\\x94\\x80inxcontrib\u0027\"`\n\n### Impact\n\nAn application relying on reject_bytes=False for UTF-8 handling may experience:\n\n- Data integrity issues\n- Experience validation bypass if said validation occurs before serialisation\n\n### Remediation\n\nThe missing/broken UTF-8 validation checks were added/fixed in https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/commit/169eaf36b1116fece5034ee79a7a0ef3f6deedcf. We recommend upgrading to [UltraJSON 5.13.0](https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/releases/tag/5.13.0).\n\n### Workarounds\n\nDecoding bytes to strings in Python before passing them to `ujson.dumps()` avoids this issue.",
"id": "BREW-python-lsp-server-CVE-2026-54911",
"modified": "2026-09-17T20:04:46Z",
"published": "2026-08-13T17:29:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/security/advisories/GHSA-3j69-69wj-xqx2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/commit/169eaf36b1116fece5034ee79a7a0ef3f6deedcf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/ujson/PYSEC-2026-2294.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/releases/tag/5.13.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.3",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "UltraJSON: Malformed/Truncated UTF-8 Accepted and Silently Rewritten in ujson.dumps()",
"upstream": [
"GHSA-3j69-69wj-xqx2",
"CVE-2026-54911",
"PYSEC-2026-2294"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.