GHSA-9RJ9-5WCV-XGF2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:38 – Updated: 2024-04-01 19:31
VLAI
Summary
Roundup Improper Access Control
Details

The EditCSVAction function in cgi/actions.py in Roundup 1.2 before 1.2.1, 1.4 through 1.4.6, and possibly other versions does not properly check permissions, which allows remote authenticated users with edit or create privileges for a class to modify arbitrary items within that class, as demonstrated by editing all queries, modifying settings, and adding roles to users.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Roundup"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.2"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.4.6"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Roundup"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.4"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-2737"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-01T19:31:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-08-11T10:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The EditCSVAction function in `cgi/actions.py` in Roundup 1.2 before 1.2.1, 1.4 through 1.4.6, and possibly other versions does not properly check permissions, which allows remote authenticated users with edit or create privileges for a class to modify arbitrary items within that class, as demonstrated by editing all queries, modifying settings, and adding roles to users.",
  "id": "GHSA-9rj9-5wcv-xgf2",
  "modified": "2024-04-01T19:31:05Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:38:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2737"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489355"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/roundup-tracker/roundup/blob/d24abceaa19072b28e5c8ae0db4dd341597d14fc/CHANGES.txt#L2356"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/roundup/code/ci/4081"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00429.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00439.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518768"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://issues.roundup-tracker.org/issue2550521"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34192"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1754"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/56368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34059"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Roundup Improper Access Control"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.