GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-76059 (GCVE-0-2026-76059)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-10 21:43 – Updated: 2026-09-11 13:46
VLAI
Title
Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution due to multiple incomplete code security controls and missing execution guards
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.
Severity
8.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-11 13:06 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-693 - Protection Mechanism Failure
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666 vendor-advisorypatch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
IBM Langflow OSS Affected: 1.0.0 , ≤ 1.11.5 (semver)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.11.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-76059",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-11T13:06:06.662528Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T13:46:23.876Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.11.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "product": "Langflow OSS",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.11.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-693",
              "description": "CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-10T21:43:50.333Z",
        "orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
        "shortName": "ibm"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading \u003ca href=\"https://pypi.org/project/langflow/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLangflow OSS to version 1.11.6\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading  Langflow OSS to version 1.11.6 https://pypi.org/project/langflow/"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution due to multiple incomplete code security controls and missing execution guards"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
    "assignerShortName": "ibm",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-76059",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-10T21:43:50.333Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-18T20:36:39.545Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T13:46:23.876Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-76059",
      "date": "2026-09-11",
      "epss": "0.00487",
      "percentile": "0.40406"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-76059\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"psirt@us.ibm.com\",\"published\":\"2026-09-10T22:16:59.590\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-11T14:56:50.613\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Undergoing Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"psirt@us.ibm.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"IBM\",\"product\":\"Langflow OSS\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.11.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"],\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"1.0.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"1.11.5\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"psirt@us.ibm.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-09-11T13:06:06.662528Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-76059\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"psirt@us.ibm.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-693\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666\",\"source\":\"psirt@us.ibm.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-76059\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-11T13:06:06.662528Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-11T13:39:03.555Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution due to multiple incomplete code security controls and missing execution guards\", \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.11.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"IBM\", \"product\": \"Langflow OSS\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"1.11.5\"}]}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading  Langflow OSS to version 1.11.6 https://pypi.org/project/langflow/\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading \u003ca href=\\\"https://pypi.org/project/langflow/\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\"\u003eLangflow OSS to version 1.11.6\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"patch\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-693\", \"description\": \"CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522\", \"shortName\": \"ibm\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-10T21:43:50.333Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-76059\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-11T13:46:23.876Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-08-18T20:36:39.545Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-10T21:43:50.333Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"ibm\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.