GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-16241 (GCVE-0-2026-16241)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-13 13:00 – Updated: 2026-08-29 23:07
VLAI
Title
PostgreSQL ECPG integer underflow can crash the client
Summary
Integer underflow in PostgreSQL ECPG allows a database server administrator to achieve temporary denial of service against the ECPG client via sending a bytea value lacking the mandatory prefix. The client overwrites a huge memory region with bytes outside attacker knowledge or control. This typically yields a simple SIGSEGV, but rare cases might achieve client-specific integrity impact via the write. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.6, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-13 13:30 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-191 - Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
n/a PostgreSQL Affected: 18 , < 18.6 (rpm)
Affected: 17 , < 17.11 (rpm)
Affected: 16 , < 16.15 (rpm)
Affected: 15 , < 15.19 (rpm)
Affected: 0 , < 14.24 (rpm)
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-16241",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-13T13:30:50.360487Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T15:38:45.795Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "PostgreSQL",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "18.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "18",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "17.11",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "17",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "16.15",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "16",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "15.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "14.24",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "attacker operates the server; victim operates the ECPG client"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The PostgreSQL project thanks ylwangtju for reporting this problem."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Integer underflow in PostgreSQL ECPG allows a database server administrator to achieve temporary denial of service against the ECPG client via sending a bytea value lacking the mandatory prefix.  The client overwrites a huge memory region with bytes outside attacker knowledge or control.  This typically yields a simple SIGSEGV, but rare cases might achieve client-specific integrity impact via the write.  Versions before PostgreSQL 18.6, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 3.8,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-191",
              "description": "Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-29T23:07:30.439Z",
        "orgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
        "shortName": "PostgreSQL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-16241/"
        }
      ],
      "title": "PostgreSQL ECPG integer underflow can crash the client",
      "x_postgresql": {
        "component": "client"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
    "assignerShortName": "PostgreSQL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-16241",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-13T13:00:13.697Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-20T01:55:34.563Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-29T23:07:30.439Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-16241",
      "date": "2026-09-16",
      "epss": "0.00198",
      "percentile": "0.09855"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-16241\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"published\":\"2026-08-13T13:17:46.670\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-29T23:17:19.957\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Integer underflow in PostgreSQL ECPG allows a database server administrator to achieve temporary denial of service against the ECPG client via sending a bytea value lacking the mandatory prefix.  The client overwrites a huge memory region with bytes outside attacker knowledge or control.  This typically yields a simple SIGSEGV, but rare cases might achieve client-specific integrity impact via the write.  Versions before PostgreSQL 18.6, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"n/a\",\"product\":\"PostgreSQL\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"18\",\"lessThan\":\"18.6\",\"versionType\":\"rpm\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"17\",\"lessThan\":\"17.11\",\"versionType\":\"rpm\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"16\",\"lessThan\":\"16.15\",\"versionType\":\"rpm\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"15\",\"lessThan\":\"15.19\",\"versionType\":\"rpm\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"14.24\",\"versionType\":\"rpm\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":3.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.2,\"impactScore\":2.5}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-08-13T13:30:50.360487Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-16241\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-191\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"14.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"14.24\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6BEE5714-C2EF-48DC-8613-C3EAA149E12E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"15.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"15.19\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F433746A-733F-4ED0-9913-8AF69E0C8BF2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"16.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"16.15\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1996B91F-E0B2-4A78-8788-E17EA68D179C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"17.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"17.11\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3D04E642-71D7-4979-AA19-B9CCDEFD8C31\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"18.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"18.5\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8494F67B-673A-4E1F-8F40-D24DCC1F8DA4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-16241/\",\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-02T11:49:52+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-16241",
      "id": "CVE-2026-16241",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-08-13T13:00:13.697000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "162",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "27",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "postgresql: PostgreSQL ECPG: Denial of Service via integer underflow",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-16241.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-15T02:13:46Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-16241",
      "id": "CVE-2026-16241",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-08-14T23:58:53Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "144",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "360",
      "product_status:recommended": "1014",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-16241",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-16241.json",
      "version": "12"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-16241\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-08-13T13:30:50.360487Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-13T15:38:39.642Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"PostgreSQL ECPG integer underflow can crash the client\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The PostgreSQL project thanks ylwangtju for reporting this problem.\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 3.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"PostgreSQL\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"18\", \"lessThan\": \"18.6\", \"versionType\": \"rpm\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"17\", \"lessThan\": \"17.11\", \"versionType\": \"rpm\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"16\", \"lessThan\": \"16.15\", \"versionType\": \"rpm\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"15\", \"lessThan\": \"15.19\", \"versionType\": \"rpm\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"14.24\", \"versionType\": \"rpm\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-16241/\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Integer underflow in PostgreSQL ECPG allows a database server administrator to achieve temporary denial of service against the ECPG client via sending a bytea value lacking the mandatory prefix.  The client overwrites a huge memory region with bytes outside attacker knowledge or control.  This typically yields a simple SIGSEGV, but rare cases might achieve client-specific integrity impact via the write.  Versions before PostgreSQL 18.6, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-191\", \"description\": \"Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)\"}]}], \"x_postgresql\": {\"component\": \"client\"}, \"configurations\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"attacker operates the server; victim operates the ECPG client\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\", \"shortName\": \"PostgreSQL\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-29T23:07:30.439Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-16241\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-29T23:07:30.439Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-20T01:55:34.563Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-13T13:00:13.697Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"PostgreSQL\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…