CVE-2026-1518 (GCVE-0-2026-1518)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-02 07:17 – Updated: 2026-07-24 14:07
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. After further review by the Keycloak project and Red Hat, the reported SSRF via client registration/backchannel notification URIs was determined not to constitute a security vulnerability. The reported behavior is expected administrator-controlled functionality, and Keycloak provides documented mitigations through Client Policies, including the Secure Client URIs Pattern executor. Therefore, this CVE has been rejected.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-24T14:07:33.181Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. After further review by the Keycloak project and Red Hat, the reported SSRF via client registration/backchannel notification URIs was determined not to constitute a security vulnerability. The reported behavior is expected administrator-controlled functionality, and Keycloak provides documented mitigations through Client Policies, including the Secure Client URIs Pattern executor. Therefore, this CVE has been rejected."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-1518",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-02T07:17:46.557Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-07-24T14:07:33.181Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-28T08:08:15.419Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-24T14:07:33.181Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-1518",
      "date": "2026-07-24",
      "epss": "0.00236",
      "percentile": "0.14728"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-1518\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2026-02-02T08:16:06.217\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-24T15:17:13.450\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. After further review by the Keycloak project and Red Hat, the reported SSRF via client registration/backchannel notification URIs was determined not to constitute a security vulnerability. The reported behavior is expected administrator-controlled functionality, and Keycloak provides documented mitigations through Client Policies, including the Secure Client URIs Pattern executor. Therefore, this CVE has been rejected.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-28T11:52:41+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-1518",
      "id": "CVE-2026-1518",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "3",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "keycloak: Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via CIBA Backchannel Notification Endpoint in Keycloak",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-1518.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. After further review by the Keycloak project and Red Hat, the reported SSRF via client registration/backchannel notification URIs was determined not to constitute a security vulnerability. The reported behavior is expected administrator-controlled functionality, and Keycloak provides documented mitigations through Client Policies, including the Secure Client URIs Pattern executor. Therefore, this CVE has been rejected.\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"shortName\": \"redhat\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-24T14:07:33.181Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-1518\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"redhat\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-01-28T08:08:15.419Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-02-02T07:17:46.557Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-24T14:07:33.181Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2026-07-24T14:07:33.181Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.