CVE-2026-13597 (GCVE-0-2026-13597)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-27 06:00 – Updated: 2026-07-27 13:52
VLAI
Title
QRcode Login for WeChat <= 1.3 - Unauthenticated Account Takeover
Summary
The 微信二维码登陆 WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not properly validate WeChat webhook requests, as its signature check always passes, and it discloses the generated login code in the webhook response. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a login event for any existing username, read the login code, and redeem it through an unauthenticated AJAX action to log in as that user, including an administrator, without a password.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: yes Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/5e856219-ece5-4d… exploitvdb-entrytechnical-description
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Unknown 微信二维码登陆 Affected: 0 , ≤ 1.3 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
João Ramos Maciel WPScan
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 9.1,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-13597",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-27T13:52:00.780073Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-287",
                "description": "CWE-287 Improper Authentication",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T13:52:26.324Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "\u5fae\u4fe1\u4e8c\u7ef4\u7801\u767b\u9646",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jo\u00e3o Ramos Maciel"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "WPScan"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The \u5fae\u4fe1\u4e8c\u7ef4\u7801\u767b\u9646 WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not properly validate WeChat webhook requests, as its signature check always passes, and it discloses the generated login code in the webhook response. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a login event for any existing username, read the login code, and redeem it through an unauthenticated AJAX action to log in as that user, including an administrator, without a password."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-287 Improper Authentication",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T06:00:03.687Z",
        "orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
        "shortName": "WPScan"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "exploit",
            "vdb-entry",
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/5e856219-ece5-4d79-8375-fc0cbdc37d6c/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "QRcode Login for WeChat \u003c= 1.3 - Unauthenticated Account Takeover",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
    "assignerShortName": "WPScan",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-13597",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-27T06:00:03.687Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-29T07:36:53.053Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T13:52:26.324Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-13597\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-27T07:16:25.127\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-27T20:33:01.673\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The \u5fae\u4fe1\u4e8c\u7ef4\u7801\u767b\u9646 WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not properly validate WeChat webhook requests, as its signature check always passes, and it discloses the generated login code in the webhook response. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a login event for any existing username, read the login code, and redeem it through an unauthenticated AJAX action to log in as that user, including an administrator, without a password.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Unknown\",\"product\":\"\u5fae\u4fe1\u4e8c\u7ef4\u7801\u767b\u9646\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"1.3\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":9.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-27T13:52:00.780073Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-13597\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"poc\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-287\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/5e856219-ece5-4d79-8375-fc0cbdc37d6c/\",\"source\":\"contact@wpscan.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-13597\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-27T13:52:00.780073Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-287\", \"description\": \"CWE-287 Improper Authentication\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T13:52:21.991Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"QRcode Login for WeChat \u003c= 1.3 - Unauthenticated Account Takeover\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jo\\u00e3o Ramos Maciel\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"coordinator\", \"value\": \"WPScan\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Unknown\", \"product\": \"\\u5fae\\u4fe1\\u4e8c\\u7ef4\\u7801\\u767b\\u9646\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"1.3\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/5e856219-ece5-4d79-8375-fc0cbdc37d6c/\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\", \"vdb-entry\", \"technical-description\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"WPScan CVE Generator\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The \\u5fae\\u4fe1\\u4e8c\\u7ef4\\u7801\\u767b\\u9646 WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not properly validate WeChat webhook requests, as its signature check always passes, and it discloses the generated login code in the webhook response. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a login event for any existing username, read the login code, and redeem it through an unauthenticated AJAX action to log in as that user, including an administrator, without a password.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"description\": \"CWE-287 Improper Authentication\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81\", \"shortName\": \"WPScan\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T06:00:03.687Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-13597\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T13:52:26.324Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-29T07:36:53.053Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-27T06:00:03.687Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"WPScan\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…