CVE-2025-1716 (GCVE-0-2025-1716)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-02-26 14:51
Modified
2025-03-03 15:58
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-184 - Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
Summary
picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat 'pip' as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mmaitre314 | picklescan |
Version: 0.0.1 ≤ 0.0.20 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1716",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-26T15:49:26.250624Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-26T15:49:33.626Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/picklescan/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "picklescan",
"repo": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan",
"vendor": "mmaitre314",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.0.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.0.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Trevor Madge (@madgetr) of Sonatype"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat \u0027pip\u0027 as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic."
}
],
"value": "picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat \u0027pip\u0027 as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-184",
"description": "CWE-184 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-03T15:58:37.163Z",
"orgId": "103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11",
"shortName": "Sonatype"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://sites.google.com/sonatype.com/vulnerabilities/cve-2025-1716"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/78ce704227c51f070c0c5fb4b466d92c62a7aa3d"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v"
}
],
"title": "picklescan - Security scanning bypass via \u0027pip main\u0027",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11",
"assignerShortName": "Sonatype",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1716",
"datePublished": "2025-02-26T14:51:38.085Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-26T12:08:39.343Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-03T15:58:37.163Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-1716\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\",\"published\":\"2025-02-26T15:15:24.653\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-30T18:53:18.217\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat \u0027pip\u0027 as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Las versiones anteriores a la versi\u00f3n 0.0.21 de picklescan no tratan a \u0027pip\u0027 como una variable global insegura. Un atacante podr\u00eda manipular un modelo malicioso que use Pickle para incorporar un paquete PyPI malicioso (alojado, por ejemplo, en pypi.org o GitHub) a trav\u00e9s de `pip.main()`. Debido a que pip no es una variable global restringida, el modelo, al analizarse con picklescan, pasar\u00eda los controles de seguridad y parecer\u00eda ser seguro, cuando en realidad podr\u00eda resultar problem\u00e1tico.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"PASSIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-184\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mmaitre314:picklescan:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.0.22\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A932F445-B2D1-431D-B3CD-937CFB9523BD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/78ce704227c51f070c0c5fb4b466d92c62a7aa3d\",\"source\":\"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v\",\"source\":\"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://sites.google.com/sonatype.com/vulnerabilities/cve-2025-1716\",\"source\":\"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mitigation\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"collectionURL\": \"https://pypi.org/project/picklescan/\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"product\": \"picklescan\", \"repo\": \"https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan\", \"vendor\": \"mmaitre314\", \"versions\": [{\"lessThanOrEqual\": \"0.0.20\", \"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.0.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}]}], \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Trevor Madge (@madgetr) of Sonatype\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"base64\": false, \"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat \u0027pip\u0027 as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic.\"}], \"value\": \"picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat \u0027pip\u0027 as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic.\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"PASSIVE\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"format\": \"CVSS\", \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-184\", \"description\": \"CWE-184 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\", \"shortName\": \"Sonatype\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-03T15:58:37.163Z\"}, \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"], \"url\": \"https://sites.google.com/sonatype.com/vulnerabilities/cve-2025-1716\"}, {\"tags\": [\"patch\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/78ce704227c51f070c0c5fb4b466d92c62a7aa3d\"}, {\"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v\"}], \"title\": \"picklescan - Security scanning bypass via \u0027pip main\u0027\", \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-1716\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-02-26T15:49:26.250624Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-26T15:49:30.635Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-1716\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Sonatype\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-02-26T12:08:39.343Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-02-26T14:51:38.085Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-03T15:58:37.163Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…