Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-36924 (GCVE-0-2024-36924)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-30 15:29 – Updated: 2026-05-11 20:17| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851 , < 6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd
(git)
Affected: 92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851 , < e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683 (git) Affected: 92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851 , < ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f (git) Affected: 92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851 , < ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.23
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.23 (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.91 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.31 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.8.10 , ≤ 6.8.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.9 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-12T19:15:38.409036Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-12T19:15:46.255Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T03:43:50.073Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.23"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.23",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.91",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.31",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.91",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.31",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\n\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:17:06.736Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
}
],
"title": "scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-36924",
"datePublished": "2024-05-30T15:29:18.113Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-30T15:25:07.069Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:17:06.736Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-36924",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00193",
"percentile": "0.0934"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C7F044DD-06F0-44B2-8185-DCA23913A970",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.91",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CDDB1F69-36AC-41C1-9192-E7CCEF5FFC00",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.31",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6A6B920C-8D8F-4130-86B4-AD334F4CF2E3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "22BEDD49-2C6D-402D-9DBF-6646F6ECD10B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\n\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: scsi: lpfc: Libere hbalock antes de llamar a lpfc_worker_wake_up() lpfc_worker_wake_up() llama a la rutina lpfc_work_done(), que toma el hbalock. Por lo tanto, no se debe llamar a lpfc_worker_wake_up() mientras se mantiene presionado el hbalock para evitar un posible punto muerto."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"lastModified": "2025-01-10T18:29:03.477",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-30T16:15:15.723",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-31T15:12:37.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-36924",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2024-36924",
"initial_release_date": "2024-05-02T07:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "3",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2024/msrc_cve-2024-36924.json",
"version": "4"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.23"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.23",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.91",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.31",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C7F044DD-06F0-44B2-8185-DCA23913A970",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.91",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CDDB1F69-36AC-41C1-9192-E7CCEF5FFC00",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.31",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6A6B920C-8D8F-4130-86B4-AD334F4CF2E3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "22BEDD49-2C6D-402D-9DBF-6646F6ECD10B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\n\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: scsi: lpfc: Libere hbalock antes de llamar a lpfc_worker_wake_up() lpfc_worker_wake_up() llama a la rutina lpfc_work_done(), que toma el hbalock. Por lo tanto, no se debe llamar a lpfc_worker_wake_up() mientras se mantiene presionado el hbalock para evitar un posible punto muerto."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:37:22.270",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-12T19:15:38.409036Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-30T16:15:15.723",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2025-11-21T14:03:48+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-36924",
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"initial_release_date": "2024-05-30T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "1869",
"product_status:known_affected": "80",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "79",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-36924.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-03T16:41:38Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-36924",
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"initial_release_date": "2024-06-04T02:25:40Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "497",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "114",
"product_status:recommended": "801",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2024-36924.json",
"version": "94"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T03:43:50.073Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-12T19:15:38.409036Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-12T19:15:42.846Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.23"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.23",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.91",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.31",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.91",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.31",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.23",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\n\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-05T10:36:27.020Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
}
],
"title": "scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-36924",
"datePublished": "2024-05-30T15:29:18.113Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-30T15:25:07.069Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-05T10:36:27.020Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2980-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242980-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2940-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242940-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2944-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242944-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2943-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242943-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2948-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242948-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2973-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242973-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242947-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-03-19 - Updated: 2026-03-19
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | N/A | NodeJS Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.82 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu for MySQL sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.1.1 | ||
| VMware | N/A | Java Buildpack versions antérieures à 4.90.0 | ||
| VMware | N/A | NGINX Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.2.71 | ||
| VMware | N/A | HWC Buildpack versions antérieures à 3.1.91 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Foundation Core for VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.1.9 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "NodeJS Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.82",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu for MySQL sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Java Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.90.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "NGINX Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.2.71",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "HWC Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.91",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Foundation Core for VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-8660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-7445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-7445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-17977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1010204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-34034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-34034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-0256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-0537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-6952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-4542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-4542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9301"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-19T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-03-19T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-03-19T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37219",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37219"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37211",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37211"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37215",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37215"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37218",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37218"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37220",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37220"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37216",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37216"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37221",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37221"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37213",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37213"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37217",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37217"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37212",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37212"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37214",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37214"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37222",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37222"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-03-20 - Updated: 2026-03-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.26+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.6.9 | ||
| VMware | N/A | Python Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.83 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.1.9 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu RabbitMQ sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.4 | ||
| VMware | N/A | PHP Buildpack versions antérieures à 4.6.69 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.2.5 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.9+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.5.17 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu RabbitMQ pour Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.1.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 1.16.18 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu for Valkey sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.26+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.9+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.6 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.26+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.6.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Python Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.83",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu RabbitMQ sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.4",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "PHP Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.6.69",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.5",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.9+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.5.17",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu RabbitMQ pour Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.2",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.16.18",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu for Valkey sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.2",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.26+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.9+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-8660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-65637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-7445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-7445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-17977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1010204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-34034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-34034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-67735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-10782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-0256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-0537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-6952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-4542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-4542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37233",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37233"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37237",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37237"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37236",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37236"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37246",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37246"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37235",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37235"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37229",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37229"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37226",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37226"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37230",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37230"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37242",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37242"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37228",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37228"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37240",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37240"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37243",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37243"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37234",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37234"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37231",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37231"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37239",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37239"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37227",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37227"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37232",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37232"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37247",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37247"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37241",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37241"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37238",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37238"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37244",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37244"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37245",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37245"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-09-11 - Updated: 2026-09-11
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Common Container sans le correctif de sécurité 1159cn3 | ||
| IBM | Informix Dynamic Server | Informix Dynamic Server versions 15.0.x antérieures à 15.0.1.14 | ||
| IBM | QRadar Hub | QRadar Hub versions antérieures à 3.9.1 | ||
| IBM | WebSphere Application Server | WebSphere Application Server Liberty versions antérieures à 26.0.0.10 (disponibilité prévue pour le quatrième trimestre 2026) | ||
| IBM | Informix Dynamic Server | Informix Dynamic Server versions 12.10 antérieures à InformixHQ 3.3.1 | ||
| IBM | Informix Dynamic Server | Informix Dynamic Server versions 14.10.x antérieures à 14.10.xC14 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 versions V11.5.x sans le correctif de sécurité DT495924, DT474170, DT495462, DT470425 et DT501356 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.2.4.x antérieures à 6.2.4.5 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Bridge versions antérieures à 1.1.5.2 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data versions antérieures à v5.4 patch 6 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition versions 6.2.4.x antérieures à 6.2.4.5 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Developer Extension versions 1.1.x antérieures à 1.1.2 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.3.0.x antérieures à 6.3.0.3 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 on Cloud Pak for Data versions antérieures à v5.4 patch 6 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 versions V12.1 sans le correctif de sécurité DT495924, DT495462 et DT474170 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Db2 Common Container sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 1159cn3",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Informix Dynamic Server versions 15.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 15.0.1.14",
"product": {
"name": "Informix Dynamic Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "QRadar Hub versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.9.1",
"product": {
"name": "QRadar Hub",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "WebSphere Application Server Liberty versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 26.0.0.10 (disponibilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9vue pour le quatri\u00e8me trimestre 2026)",
"product": {
"name": "WebSphere Application Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Informix Dynamic Server versions 12.10 ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 InformixHQ 3.3.1",
"product": {
"name": "Informix Dynamic Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Informix Dynamic Server versions 14.10.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 14.10.xC14",
"product": {
"name": "Informix Dynamic Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 versions V11.5.x sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 DT495924, DT474170, DT495462, DT470425 et DT501356",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.2.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.2.4.5",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 Bridge versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.5.2",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 v5.4 patch 6",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition versions 6.2.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.2.4.5",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 Developer Extension versions 1.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.2",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.3.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.3.0.3",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 on Cloud Pak for Data versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 v5.4 patch 6",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 versions V12.1 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 DT495924, DT495462 et DT474170",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-75595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-5588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-125087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-125087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-5237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-71290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-71290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-10099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-56200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-56200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-4055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-33814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-73088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-73088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-73089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-73089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-11358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-5516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-46337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-46337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-20676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-4800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-4410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-48978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-75596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-33671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-5598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-35091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-20677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-84305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-73180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-73180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-62243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-62243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-33012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-9492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-57819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-70907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-70907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-48589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-6811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-35092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-33672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-75838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-16487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-10735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-18214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-61308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-61308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-48043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-87958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-87958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-9480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2011-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-60589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-33134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-9251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-9251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-86093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-86093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-5312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-5312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-6708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-6708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-7656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-60147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-71491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-71491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-38969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-38969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-19880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-19880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-09-11T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-09-11T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-09-11T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
},
{
"description": "Injection de requ\u00eates ill\u00e9gitimes par rebond (CSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Falsification de requ\u00eates c\u00f4t\u00e9 serveur (SSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits IBM",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286777",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286777"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286776",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286776"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286990",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286990"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286976",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286976"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286993",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286993"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286782",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286782"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286515",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286515"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286646",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286646"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7287136",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7287136"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286986",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286986"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286982",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286982"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286775",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286775"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286987",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286987"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286910",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286910"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286516",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286516"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286909",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286909"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-36924
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-30 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:37| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f | Patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.9 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "92d7f7b0cde3ad2260e7462b40867b57efd49851",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c",
"drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.23"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.23",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.91",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.31",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C7F044DD-06F0-44B2-8185-DCA23913A970",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.91",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CDDB1F69-36AC-41C1-9192-E7CCEF5FFC00",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.31",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6A6B920C-8D8F-4130-86B4-AD334F4CF2E3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "22BEDD49-2C6D-402D-9DBF-6646F6ECD10B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\n\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: scsi: lpfc: Libere hbalock antes de llamar a lpfc_worker_wake_up() lpfc_worker_wake_up() llama a la rutina lpfc_work_done(), que toma el hbalock. Por lo tanto, no se debe llamar a lpfc_worker_wake_up() mientras se mantiene presionado el hbalock para evitar un posible punto muerto."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:37:22.270",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-36924",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-12T19:15:38.409036Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-30T16:15:15.723",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6503c39398506cadda9f4c81695a9655ca5fb4fd"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ded20192dff31c91cef2a04f7e20e60e9bb887d3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8bf2c05e8ad68e90f9d5889a9e4ef3f6fe00683"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee833d7e62de2b84ed1332d501b67f12e7e5678f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2024-36924
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2024-05-02 07:00 - Updated: 2026-03-31 15:12OESA-2024-1705 (CVE-2021-47236)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-14 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: cdc_eem: fix tx fixup skb leak
when usbnet transmit a skb, eem fixup it in eem_tx_fixup(), if skb_copy_expand() failed, it return NULL, usbnet_start_xmit() will have no chance to free original skb.
fix it by free orginal skb in eem_tx_fixup() first, then check skb clone status, if failed, return NULL to usbnet.(CVE-2021-47236)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: Fix use-after-free in gfs2_glock_shrink_scan
The GLF_LRU flag is checked under lru_lock in gfs2_glock_remove_from_lru() to remove the glock from the lru list in __gfs2_glock_put().
On the shrink scan path, the same flag is cleared under lru_lock but because of cond_resched_lock(&lru_lock) in gfs2_dispose_glock_lru(), progress on the put side can be made without deleting the glock from the lru list.
Keep GLF_LRU across the race window opened by cond_resched_lock(&lru_lock) to ensure correct behavior on both sides - clear GLF_LRU after list_del under lru_lock.(CVE-2021-47254)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netrom: Decrease sock refcount when sock timers expire
Commit 63346650c1a9 ("netrom: switch to sock timer API") switched to use sock timer API. It replaces mod_timer() by sk_reset_timer(), and del_timer() by sk_stop_timer().
Function sk_reset_timer() will increase the refcount of sock if it is called on an inactive timer, hence, in case the timer expires, we need to decrease the refcount ourselves in the handler, otherwise, the sock refcount will be unbalanced and the sock will never be freed.(CVE-2021-47294)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
memory: fsl_ifc: fix leak of IO mapping on probe failure
On probe error the driver should unmap the IO memory. Smatch reports:
drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c:298 fsl_ifc_ctrl_probe() warn: 'fsl_ifc_ctrl_dev->gregs' not released on lines: 298.(CVE-2021-47315)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
watchdog: Fix possible use-after-free in wdt_startup()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47324)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix resource leak in case of probe failure
The driver doesn't clean up all the allocated resources properly when scsi_add_host(), megasas_start_aen() function fails during the PCI device probe.
Clean up all those resources.(CVE-2021-47329)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipack: ipoctal: fix module reference leak
A reference to the carrier module was taken on every open but was only released once when the final reference to the tty struct was dropped.
Fix this by taking the module reference and initialising the tty driver data when installing the tty.(CVE-2021-47403)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: dwc2: check return value after calling platform_get_resource()
It will cause null-ptr-deref if platform_get_resource() returns NULL, we need check the return value.(CVE-2021-47409)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: Fix freeing of uninitialized misc IRQ vector
When VSI set up failed in i40e_probe() as part of PF switch set up driver was trying to free misc IRQ vectors in i40e_clear_interrupt_scheme and produced a kernel Oops:
Trying to free already-free IRQ 266 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1731 __free_irq+0x9a/0x300 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn RIP: 0010:__free_irq+0x9a/0x300 Call Trace: ? synchronize_irq+0x3a/0xa0 free_irq+0x2e/0x60 i40e_clear_interrupt_scheme+0x53/0x190 [i40e] i40e_probe.part.108+0x134b/0x1a40 [i40e] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x158/0x1c0 ? acpi_ut_update_ref_count.part.1+0x8e/0x345 ? acpi_ut_update_object_reference+0x15e/0x1e2 ? strstr+0x21/0x70 ? irq_get_irq_data+0xa/0x20 ? mp_check_pin_attr+0x13/0xc0 ? irq_get_irq_data+0xa/0x20 ? mp_map_pin_to_irq+0xd3/0x2f0 ? acpi_register_gsi_ioapic+0x93/0x170 ? pci_conf1_read+0xa4/0x100 ? pci_bus_read_config_word+0x49/0x70 ? do_pci_enable_device+0xcc/0x100 local_pci_probe+0x41/0x90 work_for_cpu_fn+0x16/0x20 process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360 worker_thread+0x1cf/0x390 ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0 kthread+0x112/0x130 ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
The problem is that at that point misc IRQ vectors were not allocated yet and we get a call trace that driver is trying to free already free IRQ vectors.
Add a check in i40e_clear_interrupt_scheme for __I40E_MISC_IRQ_REQUESTED PF state before calling i40e_free_misc_vector. This state is set only if misc IRQ vectors were properly initialized.(CVE-2021-47424)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix data corruption after conversion from inline format
Commit 6dbf7bb55598 ("fs: Don't invalidate page buffers in block_write_full_page()") uncovered a latent bug in ocfs2 conversion from inline inode format to a normal inode format.
The code in ocfs2_convert_inline_data_to_extents() attempts to zero out the whole cluster allocated for file data by grabbing, zeroing, and dirtying all pages covering this cluster. However these pages are beyond i_size, thus writeback code generally ignores these dirty pages and no blocks were ever actually zeroed on the disk.
This oversight was fixed by commit 693c241a5f6a ("ocfs2: No need to zero pages past i_size.") for standard ocfs2 write path, inline conversion path was apparently forgotten; the commit log also has a reasoning why the zeroing actually is not needed.
After commit 6dbf7bb55598, things became worse as writeback code stopped invalidating buffers on pages beyond i_size and thus these pages end up with clean PageDirty bit but with buffers attached to these pages being still dirty. So when a file is converted from inline format, then writeback triggers, and then the file is grown so that these pages become valid, the invalid dirtiness state is preserved, mark_buffer_dirty() does nothing on these pages (buffers are already dirty) but page is never written back because it is clean. So data written to these pages is lost once pages are reclaimed.
Simple reproducer for the problem is:
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 2000" -c "pwrite 2000 2000" -c "fsync" \ -c "pwrite 4000 2000" ocfs2_file
After unmounting and mounting the fs again, you can observe that end of 'ocfs2_file' has lost its contents.
Fix the problem by not doing the pointless zeroing during conversion from inline format similarly as in the standard write path.
akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace, per Joseph
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: ni_usb6501: fix NULL-deref in command paths
The driver uses endpoint-sized USB transfer buffers but had no sanity checks on the sizes. This can lead to zero-size-pointer dereferences or overflowed transfer buffers in ni6501_port_command() and ni6501_counter_command() if a (malicious) device has smaller max-packet sizes than expected (or when doing descriptor fuzz testing).
Add the missing sanity checks to probe().(CVE-2021-47476)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
isofs: Fix out of bound access for corrupted isofs image
When isofs image is suitably corrupted isofs_read_inode() can read data beyond the end of buffer. Sanity-check the directory entry length before using it.(CVE-2021-47478)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
staging: rtl8712: fix use-after-free in rtl8712_dl_fw
Syzbot reported use-after-free in rtl8712_dl_fw(). The problem was in race condition between r871xu_dev_remove() ->ndo_open() callback.
It's easy to see from crash log, that driver accesses released firmware in ->ndo_open() callback. It may happen, since driver was releasing firmware before unregistering netdev. Fix it by moving unregister_netdev() before cleaning up resources.
Call Trace: ... rtl871x_open_fw drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:83 [inline] rtl8712_dl_fw+0xd95/0xe10 drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:170 rtl8712_hal_init drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:330 [inline] rtl871x_hal_init+0xae/0x180 drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:394 netdev_open+0xe6/0x6c0 drivers/staging/rtl8712/os_intfs.c:380 __dev_open+0x2bc/0x4d0 net/core/dev.c:1484
Freed by task 1306: ... release_firmware+0x1b/0x30 drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c:1053 r871xu_dev_remove+0xcc/0x2c0 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:599 usb_unbind_interface+0x1d8/0x8d0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458(CVE-2021-47479)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Fix possible memory leak in probe and remove
When ACPI type is ACPI_SMO8500, the data->dready_trig will not be set, the memory allocated by iio_triggered_buffer_setup() will not be freed, and cause memory leak as follows:
unreferenced object 0xffff888009551400 (size 512): comm "i2c-SMO8500-125", pid 911, jiffies 4294911787 (age 83.852s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 e2 e5 c0 ff ff ff ff ........ ....... backtrace: [<0000000041ce75ee>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x16d/0x360 [<000000000aeb17b0>] iio_kfifo_allocate+0x41/0x130 [kfifo_buf] [<000000004b40c1f5>] iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext+0x2c/0x210 [industrialio_triggered_buffer] [<000000004375b15f>] kxcjk1013_probe+0x10c3/0x1d81 [kxcjk_1013]
Fix it by remove data->dready_trig condition in probe and remove.(CVE-2021-47499)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: pcm: oss: Fix negative period/buffer sizes
The period size calculation in OSS layer may receive a negative value as an error, but the code there assumes only the positive values and handle them with size_t. Due to that, a too big value may be passed to the lower layers.
This patch changes the code to handle with ssize_t and adds the proper error checks appropriately.(CVE-2021-47511)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: fix potential NULL pointer deref in nfc_genl_dump_ses_done
The done() netlink callback nfc_genl_dump_ses_done() should check if received argument is non-NULL, because its allocation could fail earlier in dumpit() (nfc_genl_dump_ses()).(CVE-2021-47518)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: Fix rxrpc_local leak in rxrpc_lookup_peer()
Need to call rxrpc_put_local() for peer candidate before kfree() as it holds a ref to rxrpc_local.
DH: v2: Changed to abstract the peer freeing code out into a function
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx4_en: Fix an use-after-free bug in mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources()
In mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources(), mlx4_en_copy_priv() is called and tmp->tx_cq will be freed on the error path of mlx4_en_copy_priv(). After that mlx4_en_alloc_resources() is called and there is a dereference of &tmp->tx_cq[t][i] in mlx4_en_alloc_resources(), which could lead to a use after free problem on failure of mlx4_en_copy_priv().
Fix this bug by adding a check of mlx4_en_copy_priv()
This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations (e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or the callers, so they constitute bugs.
Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed the bug.
Builds with CONFIG_MLX4_EN=m show no new warnings, and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.(CVE-2021-47541)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: qlogic: qlcnic: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in qlcnic_83xx_add_rings()
In qlcnic_83xx_add_rings(), the indirect function of ahw->hw_ops->alloc_mbx_args will be called to allocate memory for cmd.req.arg, and there is a dereference of it in qlcnic_83xx_add_rings(), which could lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of the indirect function like qlcnic_83xx_alloc_mbx_args().
Fix this bug by adding a check of alloc_mbx_args(), this patch imitates the logic of mbx_cmd()'s failure handling.
This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations (e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or the callers, so they constitute bugs.
Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed the bug.
Builds with CONFIG_QLCNIC=m show no new warnings, and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.(CVE-2021-47542)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2021-47543)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: fix page frag corruption on page fault
Steffen reported a TCP stream corruption for HTTP requests served by the apache web-server using a cifs mount-point and memory mapping the relevant file.
The root cause is quite similar to the one addressed by commit 20eb4f29b602 ("net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from memory reclaim"). Here the nested access to the task page frag is caused by a page fault on the (mmapped) user-space memory buffer coming from the cifs file.
The page fault handler performs an smb transaction on a different socket, inside the same process context. Since sk->sk_allaction for such socket does not prevent the usage for the task_frag, the nested allocation modify "under the hood" the page frag in use by the outer sendmsg call, corrupting the stream.
The overall relevant stack trace looks like the following:
httpd 78268 [001] 3461630.850950: probe:tcp_sendmsg_locked: ffffffff91461d91 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1 ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27 ffffffff9139814e sock_sendmsg+0x3e ffffffffc06dfe1d smb_send_kvec+0x28 [...] ffffffffc06cfaf8 cifs_readpages+0x213 ffffffff90e83c4b read_pages+0x6b ffffffff90e83f31 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1c1 ffffffff90e79e98 filemap_fault+0x788 ffffffff90eb0458 __do_fault+0x38 ffffffff90eb5280 do_fault+0x1a0 ffffffff90eb7c84 __handle_mm_fault+0x4d4 ffffffff90eb8093 handle_mm_fault+0xc3 ffffffff90c74f6d __do_page_fault+0x1ed ffffffff90c75277 do_page_fault+0x37 ffffffff9160111e page_fault+0x1e ffffffff9109e7b5 copyin+0x25 ffffffff9109eb40 _copy_from_iter_full+0xe0 ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0 ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0 ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27 ffffffff9139815c sock_sendmsg+0x4c ffffffff913981f7 sock_write_iter+0x97 ffffffff90f2cc56 do_iter_readv_writev+0x156 ffffffff90f2dff0 do_iter_write+0x80 ffffffff90f2e1c3 vfs_writev+0xa3 ffffffff90f2e27c do_writev+0x5c ffffffff90c042bb do_syscall_64+0x5b ffffffff916000ad entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65
The cifs filesystem rightfully sets sk_allocations to GFP_NOFS, we can avoid the nesting using the sk page frag for allocation lacking the __GFP_FS flag. Do not define an additional mm-helper for that, as this is strictly tied to the sk page frag usage.
v1 -> v2: - use a stricted sk_page_frag() check instead of reordering the code (Eric)(CVE-2021-47544)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: tulip: de4x5: fix the problem that the array 'lp->phy[8]' may be out of bound
In line 5001, if all id in the array 'lp->phy[8]' is not 0, when the 'for' end, the 'k' is 8.
At this time, the array 'lp->phy[8]' may be out of bound.(CVE-2021-47547)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_event_init()
kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory which can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52686)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix underflow in second superblock position calculations
Macro NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES, which computes the position of the second superblock, underflows when the argument device size is less than 4096 bytes. Therefore, when using this macro, it is necessary to check in advance that the device size is not less than a lower limit, or at least that underflow does not occur.
The current nilfs2 implementation lacks this check, causing out-of-bound block access when mounting devices smaller than 4096 bytes:
I/O error, dev loop0, sector 36028797018963960 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 2 NILFS (loop0): unable to read secondary superblock (blocksize = 1024)
In addition, when trying to resize the filesystem to a size below 4096 bytes, this underflow occurs in nilfs_resize_fs(), passing a huge number of segments to nilfs_sufile_resize(), corrupting parameters such as the number of segments in superblocks. This causes excessive loop iterations in nilfs_sufile_resize() during a subsequent resize ioctl, causing semaphore ns_segctor_sem to block for a long time and hang the writer thread:
INFO: task segctord:5067 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-syzkaller-00015-gf6feea56f66d #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:segctord state:D stack:23456 pid:5067 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x1409/0x43f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xc3/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0xfcf/0x14a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1190 nilfs_transaction_lock+0x25c/0x4f0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357 nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2486 [inline] nilfs_segctor_thread+0x52f/0x1140 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2570 kthread+0x270/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 </TASK> ... Call Trace: <TASK> folio_mark_accessed+0x51c/0xf00 mm/swap.c:515 __nilfs_get_page_block fs/nilfs2/page.c:42 [inline] nilfs_grab_buffer+0x3d3/0x540 fs/nilfs2/page.c:61 nilfs_mdt_submit_block+0xd7/0x8f0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:121 nilfs_mdt_read_block+0xeb/0x430 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:176 nilfs_mdt_get_block+0x12d/0xbb0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:251 nilfs_sufile_get_segment_usage_block fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:92 [inline] nilfs_sufile_truncate_range fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:679 [inline] nilfs_sufile_resize+0x7a3/0x12b0 fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:777 nilfs_resize_fs+0x20c/0xed0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:422 nilfs_ioctl_resize fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1033 [inline] nilfs_ioctl+0x137c/0x2440 fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1301 ...
This fixes these issues by inserting appropriate minimum device size checks or anti-underflow checks, depending on where the macro is used.(CVE-2023-52705)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference of timing generator
[Why & How] Check whether assigned timing generator is NULL or not before accessing its funcs to prevent NULL dereference.(CVE-2023-52753)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: imon: fix access to invalid resource for the second interface
imon driver probes two USB interfaces, and at the probe of the second interface, the driver assumes blindly that the first interface got bound with the same imon driver. It's usually true, but it's still possible that the first interface is bound with another driver via a malformed descriptor. Then it may lead to a memory corruption, as spotted by syzkaller; imon driver accesses the data from drvdata as struct imon_context object although it's a completely different one that was assigned by another driver.
This patch adds a sanity check -- whether the first interface is really bound with the imon driver or not -- for avoiding the problem above at the probe time.(CVE-2023-52754)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2023-52756)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/dasd: protect device queue against concurrent access
In dasd_profile_start() the amount of requests on the device queue are counted. The access to the device queue is unprotected against concurrent access. With a lot of parallel I/O, especially with alias devices enabled, the device queue can change while dasd_profile_start() is accessing the queue. In the worst case this leads to a kernel panic due to incorrect pointer accesses.
Fix this by taking the device lock before accessing the queue and counting the requests. Additionally the check for a valid profile data pointer can be done earlier to avoid unnecessary locking in a hot path.(CVE-2023-52774)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: Fix RPC client cleaned up the freed pipefs dentries
RPC client pipefs dentries cleanup is in separated rpc_remove_pipedir() workqueue,which takes care about pipefs superblock locking. In some special scenarios, when kernel frees the pipefs sb of the current client and immediately alloctes a new pipefs sb, rpc_remove_pipedir function would misjudge the existence of pipefs sb which is not the one it used to hold. As a result, the rpc_remove_pipedir would clean the released freed pipefs dentries.
To fix this issue, rpc_remove_pipedir should check whether the current pipefs sb is consistent with the original pipefs sb.
This error can be catched by KASAN:
[ 250.497700] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.498315] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a2ab804 by task kworker/0:18/106503 [ 250.500549] Workqueue: events rpc_free_client_work [ 250.501001] Call Trace: [ 250.502880] kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 [ 250.503209] ? dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.503561] dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.503897] ? __pfx_rpc_clntdir_depopulate+0x10/0x10 [ 250.504384] rpc_rmdir_depopulate+0x1b/0x90 [ 250.504781] rpc_remove_client_dir+0xf5/0x150 [ 250.505195] rpc_free_client_work+0xe4/0x230 [ 250.505598] process_one_work+0x8ee/0x13b0 ... [ 22.039056] Allocated by task 244: [ 22.039390] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.039758] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [ 22.040109] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x59/0x70 [ 22.040487] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0xf0/0x240 [ 22.040889] __d_alloc+0x31/0x8e0 [ 22.041207] d_alloc+0x44/0x1f0 [ 22.041514] __rpc_lookup_create_exclusive+0x11c/0x140 [ 22.041987] rpc_mkdir_populate.constprop.0+0x5f/0x110 [ 22.042459] rpc_create_client_dir+0x34/0x150 [ 22.042874] rpc_setup_pipedir_sb+0x102/0x1c0 [ 22.043284] rpc_client_register+0x136/0x4e0 [ 22.043689] rpc_new_client+0x911/0x1020 [ 22.044057] rpc_create_xprt+0xcb/0x370 [ 22.044417] rpc_create+0x36b/0x6c0 ... [ 22.049524] Freed by task 0: [ 22.049803] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.050165] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [ 22.050520] kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50 [ 22.050921] __kasan_slab_free+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 22.051306] kmem_cache_free+0xa5/0x390 [ 22.051667] rcu_core+0x62c/0x1930 [ 22.051995] __do_softirq+0x165/0x52a [ 22.052347] [ 22.052503] Last potentially related work creation: [ 22.052952] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.053313] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8e/0xa0 [ 22.053739] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x6b/0x8b0 [ 22.054209] dentry_free+0xb2/0x140 [ 22.054540] __dentry_kill+0x3be/0x540 [ 22.054900] shrink_dentry_list+0x199/0x510 [ 22.055293] shrink_dcache_parent+0x190/0x240 [ 22.055703] do_one_tree+0x11/0x40 [ 22.056028] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x61/0x140 [ 22.056461] generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0x590 [ 22.056879] kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 [ 22.057234] rpc_kill_sb+0x121/0x200(CVE-2023-52803)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: wmi: Fix opening of char device
Since commit fa1f68db6ca7 ("drivers: misc: pass miscdevice pointer via file private data"), the miscdevice stores a pointer to itself inside filp->private_data, which means that private_data will not be NULL when wmi_char_open() is called. This might cause memory corruption should wmi_char_open() be unable to find its driver, something which can happen when the associated WMI device is deleted in wmi_free_devices().
Fix the problem by using the miscdevice pointer to retrieve the WMI device data associated with a char device using container_of(). This also avoids wmi_char_open() picking a wrong WMI device bound to a driver with the same name as the original driver.(CVE-2023-52864)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt6797: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52865)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: llcc: Handle a second device without data corruption
Usually there is only one llcc device. But if there were a second, even a failed probe call would modify the global drv_data pointer. So check if drv_data is valid before overwriting it.(CVE-2023-52871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
efi/capsule-loader: fix incorrect allocation size
gcc-14 notices that the allocation with sizeof(void) on 32-bit architectures is not enough for a 64-bit phys_addr_t:
drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c: In function 'efi_capsule_open': drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:295:24: error: allocation of insufficient size '4' for type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} with size '8' [-Werror=alloc-size] 295 | cap_info->phys = kzalloc(sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); | ^
Use the correct type instead here.(CVE-2024-27413)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal
A race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove() callback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an unhandled page fault [1].
The problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running after pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn't really guarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks will not be running when it returns.
However, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when pm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM status of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without waiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for .runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it arguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly prohibited).
Thus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs to protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after pm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after pm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it has started earlier.]
One way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier() after pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the runtime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from being invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should it be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in pci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the driver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which will prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr driver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks.(CVE-2024-35809)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: brcmfmac: Fix use-after-free bug in brcmf_cfg80211_detach
This is the candidate patch of CVE-2023-47233 : https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47233
In brcm80211 driver,it starts with the following invoking chain to start init a timeout worker:
->brcmf_usb_probe ->brcmf_usb_probe_cb ->brcmf_attach ->brcmf_bus_started ->brcmf_cfg80211_attach ->wl_init_priv ->brcmf_init_escan ->INIT_WORK(&cfg->escan_timeout_work, brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker);
If we disconnect the USB by hotplug, it will call brcmf_usb_disconnect to make cleanup. The invoking chain is :
brcmf_usb_disconnect ->brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb ->brcmf_detach ->brcmf_cfg80211_detach ->kfree(cfg);
While the timeout woker may still be running. This will cause a use-after-free bug on cfg in brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker.
Fix it by deleting the timer and canceling the worker in brcmf_cfg80211_detach.
arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com: keep timer delete as is and cancel work just before free
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
erspan: make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb->head
syzbot reported a problem in ip6erspan_rcv() [1]
Issue is that ip6erspan_rcv() (and erspan_rcv()) no longer make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb linear part (skb->head) before getting @ver field from it.
Add the missing pskb_may_pull() calls.
v2: Reload iph pointer in erspan_rcv() after pskb_may_pull() because skb->head might have changed.
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610 pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline] pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline] ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline] gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1d4c/0x2ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438 ip6_input_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_input+0x15d/0x430 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492 ip6_mc_input+0xa7e/0xc80 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:586 dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline] ip6_rcv_finish+0x955/0x970 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xde/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5538 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5652 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5738 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5798 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1549 tun_get_user+0x5566/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 tun_alloc_skb drivers/net/tun.c:1525 [inline] tun_get_user+0x209a/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:1846 tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 5045 Comm: syz-executor114 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00021-g962490525cff #0(CVE-2024-35888)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: validate user input for expected length
I got multiple syzbot reports showing old bugs exposed by BPF after commit 20f2505fb436 ("bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc in cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt")
setsockopt() @optlen argument should be taken into account before copying data.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627 Read of size 96 at addr ffff88802cd73da0 by task syz-executor.4/7238
CPU: 1 PID: 7238 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-next-20240403-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x29/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:105 copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627 nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a RIP: 0033:0x7fd22067dde9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fd21f9ff0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd2207abf80 RCX: 00007fd22067dde9 RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fd2206ca47a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000020000880 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd2207abf80 R15: 00007ffd2d0170d8 </TASK>
Allocated by task 7238: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4069 [inline] __kmalloc_noprof+0x200/0x410 mm/slub.c:4082 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd47/0x1050 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869 do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802cd73da0 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 1-byte region [ffff88802cd73da0, ffff88802cd73da1)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88802cd73020 pfn:0x2cd73 flags: 0xfff80000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0xfff) page_type: 0xffffefff(slab) raw: 00fff80000000000 ffff888015041280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 raw: ffff88802cd73020 000000008080007f 00000001ffffefff 00 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35896)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: smbus: fix NULL function pointer dereference
Baruch reported an OOPS when using the designware controller as target only. Target-only modes break the assumption of one transfer function always being available. Fix this by always checking the pointer in __i2c_transfer.
wsa: dropped the simplification in core-smbus to avoid theoretical regressions
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation
Each attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least of sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes. The current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes) which is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation is not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands read access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller
Generic sdhci code registers LED device and uses host->runtime_suspended flag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn't set this flag, which causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime suspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.(CVE-2024-36029)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init
net_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is called without any locking. It reads max_gen_ptrs, which is changed under pernet_ops_rwsem. It is read twice, first to allocate an array, then to set s.len, which is later used to limit the bounds of the array access.
It is possible that the array is allocated and another thread is registering a new pernet ops, increments max_gen_ptrs, which is then used to set s.len with a larger than allocated length for the variable array.
Fix it by reading max_gen_ptrs only once in net_alloc_generic. If max_gen_ptrs is later incremented, it will be caught in net_assign_generic.(CVE-2024-36883)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fib6_rules: avoid possible NULL dereference in fib6_rule_action()
syzbot is able to trigger the following crash [1], caused by unsafe ip6_dst_idev() use.
Indeed ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, and must always be checked.
[1]
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 PID: 31648 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240417-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:__fib6_rule_action net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:237 [inline] RIP: 0010:fib6_rule_action+0x241/0x7b0 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:267 Code: 02 00 00 49 8d 9f d8 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f9 32 bf f7 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 e0 32 bf f7 4c 8b 03 48 89 ef 4c RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fc1f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1a772f98c8186700 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8bcac4e0 RDI: ffffffff8c1f9760 RBP: ffff8880673fb980 R08: ffffffff8fac15ef R09: 1ffffffff1f582bd R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f582be R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: 0000000000000080 R14: ffff888076509000 R15: ffff88807a029a00 FS: 00007f55e82ca6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b31d23000 CR3: 0000000022b66000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> fib_rules_lookup+0x62c/0xdb0 net/core/fib_rules.c:317 fib6_rule_lookup+0x1fd/0x790 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:108 ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2637 [inline] ip6_route_output_flags+0x38e/0x610 net/ipv6/route.c:2649 ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:93 [inline] ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x189/0x11a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1120 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0xb9/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250 sctp_v6_get_dst+0x792/0x1e20 net/sctp/ipv6.c:326 sctp_transport_route+0x12c/0x2e0 net/sctp/transport.c:455 sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x614/0x15c0 net/sctp/associola.c:662 sctp_connect_new_asoc+0x31d/0x6c0 net/sctp/socket.c:1099 __sctp_connect+0x66d/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1197 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36902)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: Fix potential uninit-value access in __ip6_make_skb()
As it was done in commit fc1092f51567 ("ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()") for IPv4, check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl6->flowi6_flags instead of testing HDRINCL on the socket to avoid a race condition which causes uninit-value access.(CVE-2024-36903)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()
There is no check for overflow of 'start + len' in blk_ioctl_discard(). Hung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param: start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000; Add the overflow validation now.(CVE-2024-36917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()
lpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the hbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the hbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix a possible memleak in tipc_buf_append
__skb_linearize() doesn't free the skb when it fails, so move '*buf = NULL' after __skb_linearize(), so that the skb can be freed on the err path.(CVE-2024-36954)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/9p: only translate RWX permissions for plain 9P2000
Garbage in plain 9P2000's perm bits is allowed through, which causes it to be able to set (among others) the suid bit. This was presumably not the intent since the unix extended bits are handled explicitly and conditionally on .u.(CVE-2024-36964)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2406.2.0.0281.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: cdc_eem: fix tx fixup skb leak\r\n\r\nwhen usbnet transmit a skb, eem fixup it in eem_tx_fixup(),\nif skb_copy_expand() failed, it return NULL,\nusbnet_start_xmit() will have no chance to free original skb.\r\n\r\nfix it by free orginal skb in eem_tx_fixup() first,\nthen check skb clone status, if failed, return NULL to usbnet.(CVE-2021-47236)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngfs2: Fix use-after-free in gfs2_glock_shrink_scan\r\n\r\nThe GLF_LRU flag is checked under lru_lock in gfs2_glock_remove_from_lru() to\nremove the glock from the lru list in __gfs2_glock_put().\r\n\r\nOn the shrink scan path, the same flag is cleared under lru_lock but because\nof cond_resched_lock(\u0026amp;lru_lock) in gfs2_dispose_glock_lru(), progress on the\nput side can be made without deleting the glock from the lru list.\r\n\r\nKeep GLF_LRU across the race window opened by cond_resched_lock(\u0026amp;lru_lock) to\nensure correct behavior on both sides - clear GLF_LRU after list_del under\nlru_lock.(CVE-2021-47254)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetrom: Decrease sock refcount when sock timers expire\r\n\r\nCommit 63346650c1a9 (\u0026quot;netrom: switch to sock timer API\u0026quot;) switched to use\nsock timer API. It replaces mod_timer() by sk_reset_timer(), and\ndel_timer() by sk_stop_timer().\r\n\r\nFunction sk_reset_timer() will increase the refcount of sock if it is\ncalled on an inactive timer, hence, in case the timer expires, we need to\ndecrease the refcount ourselves in the handler, otherwise, the sock\nrefcount will be unbalanced and the sock will never be freed.(CVE-2021-47294)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmemory: fsl_ifc: fix leak of IO mapping on probe failure\r\n\r\nOn probe error the driver should unmap the IO memory. Smatch reports:\r\n\r\n drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c:298 fsl_ifc_ctrl_probe() warn: \u0026apos;fsl_ifc_ctrl_dev-\u0026gt;gregs\u0026apos; not released on lines: 298.(CVE-2021-47315)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwatchdog: Fix possible use-after-free in wdt_startup()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47324)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: megaraid_sas: Fix resource leak in case of probe failure\r\n\r\nThe driver doesn\u0026apos;t clean up all the allocated resources properly when\nscsi_add_host(), megasas_start_aen() function fails during the PCI device\nprobe.\r\n\r\nClean up all those resources.(CVE-2021-47329)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipack: ipoctal: fix module reference leak\r\n\r\nA reference to the carrier module was taken on every open but was only\nreleased once when the final reference to the tty struct was dropped.\r\n\r\nFix this by taking the module reference and initialising the tty driver\ndata when installing the tty.(CVE-2021-47403)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: dwc2: check return value after calling platform_get_resource()\r\n\r\nIt will cause null-ptr-deref if platform_get_resource() returns NULL,\nwe need check the return value.(CVE-2021-47409)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni40e: Fix freeing of uninitialized misc IRQ vector\r\n\r\nWhen VSI set up failed in i40e_probe() as part of PF switch set up\ndriver was trying to free misc IRQ vectors in\ni40e_clear_interrupt_scheme and produced a kernel Oops:\r\n\r\n Trying to free already-free IRQ 266\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1731 __free_irq+0x9a/0x300\n Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn\n RIP: 0010:__free_irq+0x9a/0x300\n Call Trace:\n ? synchronize_irq+0x3a/0xa0\n free_irq+0x2e/0x60\n i40e_clear_interrupt_scheme+0x53/0x190 [i40e]\n i40e_probe.part.108+0x134b/0x1a40 [i40e]\n ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x158/0x1c0\n ? acpi_ut_update_ref_count.part.1+0x8e/0x345\n ? acpi_ut_update_object_reference+0x15e/0x1e2\n ? strstr+0x21/0x70\n ? irq_get_irq_data+0xa/0x20\n ? mp_check_pin_attr+0x13/0xc0\n ? irq_get_irq_data+0xa/0x20\n ? mp_map_pin_to_irq+0xd3/0x2f0\n ? acpi_register_gsi_ioapic+0x93/0x170\n ? pci_conf1_read+0xa4/0x100\n ? pci_bus_read_config_word+0x49/0x70\n ? do_pci_enable_device+0xcc/0x100\n local_pci_probe+0x41/0x90\n work_for_cpu_fn+0x16/0x20\n process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360\n worker_thread+0x1cf/0x390\n ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0\n kthread+0x112/0x130\n ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40\r\n\r\nThe problem is that at that point misc IRQ vectors\nwere not allocated yet and we get a call trace\nthat driver is trying to free already free IRQ vectors.\r\n\r\nAdd a check in i40e_clear_interrupt_scheme for __I40E_MISC_IRQ_REQUESTED\nPF state before calling i40e_free_misc_vector. This state is set only if\nmisc IRQ vectors were properly initialized.(CVE-2021-47424)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: fix data corruption after conversion from inline format\r\n\r\nCommit 6dbf7bb55598 (\u0026quot;fs: Don\u0026apos;t invalidate page buffers in\nblock_write_full_page()\u0026quot;) uncovered a latent bug in ocfs2 conversion\nfrom inline inode format to a normal inode format.\r\n\r\nThe code in ocfs2_convert_inline_data_to_extents() attempts to zero out\nthe whole cluster allocated for file data by grabbing, zeroing, and\ndirtying all pages covering this cluster. However these pages are\nbeyond i_size, thus writeback code generally ignores these dirty pages\nand no blocks were ever actually zeroed on the disk.\r\n\r\nThis oversight was fixed by commit 693c241a5f6a (\u0026quot;ocfs2: No need to zero\npages past i_size.\u0026quot;) for standard ocfs2 write path, inline conversion\npath was apparently forgotten; the commit log also has a reasoning why\nthe zeroing actually is not needed.\r\n\r\nAfter commit 6dbf7bb55598, things became worse as writeback code stopped\ninvalidating buffers on pages beyond i_size and thus these pages end up\nwith clean PageDirty bit but with buffers attached to these pages being\nstill dirty. So when a file is converted from inline format, then\nwriteback triggers, and then the file is grown so that these pages\nbecome valid, the invalid dirtiness state is preserved,\nmark_buffer_dirty() does nothing on these pages (buffers are already\ndirty) but page is never written back because it is clean. So data\nwritten to these pages is lost once pages are reclaimed.\r\n\r\nSimple reproducer for the problem is:\r\n\r\n xfs_io -f -c \u0026quot;pwrite 0 2000\u0026quot; -c \u0026quot;pwrite 2000 2000\u0026quot; -c \u0026quot;fsync\u0026quot; \\\n -c \u0026quot;pwrite 4000 2000\u0026quot; ocfs2_file\r\n\r\nAfter unmounting and mounting the fs again, you can observe that end of\n\u0026apos;ocfs2_file\u0026apos; has lost its contents.\r\n\r\nFix the problem by not doing the pointless zeroing during conversion\nfrom inline format similarly as in the standard write path.\r\n\r\n[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace, per Joseph](CVE-2021-47460)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncomedi: ni_usb6501: fix NULL-deref in command paths\r\n\r\nThe driver uses endpoint-sized USB transfer buffers but had no sanity\nchecks on the sizes. This can lead to zero-size-pointer dereferences or\noverflowed transfer buffers in ni6501_port_command() and\nni6501_counter_command() if a (malicious) device has smaller max-packet\nsizes than expected (or when doing descriptor fuzz testing).\r\n\r\nAdd the missing sanity checks to probe().(CVE-2021-47476)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nisofs: Fix out of bound access for corrupted isofs image\r\n\r\nWhen isofs image is suitably corrupted isofs_read_inode() can read data\nbeyond the end of buffer. Sanity-check the directory entry length before\nusing it.(CVE-2021-47478)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nstaging: rtl8712: fix use-after-free in rtl8712_dl_fw\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported use-after-free in rtl8712_dl_fw(). The problem was in\nrace condition between r871xu_dev_remove() -\u0026gt;ndo_open() callback.\r\n\r\nIt\u0026apos;s easy to see from crash log, that driver accesses released firmware\nin -\u0026gt;ndo_open() callback. It may happen, since driver was releasing\nfirmware _before_ unregistering netdev. Fix it by moving\nunregister_netdev() before cleaning up resources.\r\n\r\nCall Trace:\n...\n rtl871x_open_fw drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:83 [inline]\n rtl8712_dl_fw+0xd95/0xe10 drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:170\n rtl8712_hal_init drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:330 [inline]\n rtl871x_hal_init+0xae/0x180 drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c:394\n netdev_open+0xe6/0x6c0 drivers/staging/rtl8712/os_intfs.c:380\n __dev_open+0x2bc/0x4d0 net/core/dev.c:1484\r\n\r\nFreed by task 1306:\n...\n release_firmware+0x1b/0x30 drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c:1053\n r871xu_dev_remove+0xcc/0x2c0 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:599\n usb_unbind_interface+0x1d8/0x8d0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458(CVE-2021-47479)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Fix possible memory leak in probe and remove\r\n\r\nWhen ACPI type is ACPI_SMO8500, the data-\u0026gt;dready_trig will not be set, the\nmemory allocated by iio_triggered_buffer_setup() will not be freed, and cause\nmemory leak as follows:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff888009551400 (size 512):\n comm \u0026quot;i2c-SMO8500-125\u0026quot;, pid 911, jiffies 4294911787 (age 83.852s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 e2 e5 c0 ff ff ff ff ........ .......\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;0000000041ce75ee\u0026gt;] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x16d/0x360\n [\u0026lt;000000000aeb17b0\u0026gt;] iio_kfifo_allocate+0x41/0x130 [kfifo_buf]\n [\u0026lt;000000004b40c1f5\u0026gt;] iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext+0x2c/0x210 [industrialio_triggered_buffer]\n [\u0026lt;000000004375b15f\u0026gt;] kxcjk1013_probe+0x10c3/0x1d81 [kxcjk_1013]\r\n\r\nFix it by remove data-\u0026gt;dready_trig condition in probe and remove.(CVE-2021-47499)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: pcm: oss: Fix negative period/buffer sizes\r\n\r\nThe period size calculation in OSS layer may receive a negative value\nas an error, but the code there assumes only the positive values and\nhandle them with size_t. Due to that, a too big value may be passed\nto the lower layers.\r\n\r\nThis patch changes the code to handle with ssize_t and adds the proper\nerror checks appropriately.(CVE-2021-47511)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: fix potential NULL pointer deref in nfc_genl_dump_ses_done\r\n\r\nThe done() netlink callback nfc_genl_dump_ses_done() should check if\nreceived argument is non-NULL, because its allocation could fail earlier\nin dumpit() (nfc_genl_dump_ses()).(CVE-2021-47518)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrxrpc: Fix rxrpc_local leak in rxrpc_lookup_peer()\r\n\r\nNeed to call rxrpc_put_local() for peer candidate before kfree() as it\nholds a ref to rxrpc_local.\r\n\r\n[DH: v2: Changed to abstract the peer freeing code out into a function](CVE-2021-47538)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx4_en: Fix an use-after-free bug in mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources()\r\n\r\nIn mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources(), mlx4_en_copy_priv() is called and\ntmp-\u0026gt;tx_cq will be freed on the error path of mlx4_en_copy_priv().\nAfter that mlx4_en_alloc_resources() is called and there is a dereference\nof \u0026amp;tmp-\u0026gt;tx_cq[t][i] in mlx4_en_alloc_resources(), which could lead to\na use after free problem on failure of mlx4_en_copy_priv().\r\n\r\nFix this bug by adding a check of mlx4_en_copy_priv()\r\n\r\nThis bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs\ndifferential checking to identify inconsistent security operations\n(e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the\ninconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or\nthe callers, so they constitute bugs.\r\n\r\nNote that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false\npositive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed\nthe bug.\r\n\r\nBuilds with CONFIG_MLX4_EN=m show no new warnings,\nand our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.(CVE-2021-47541)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: qlogic: qlcnic: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in qlcnic_83xx_add_rings()\r\n\r\nIn qlcnic_83xx_add_rings(), the indirect function of\nahw-\u0026gt;hw_ops-\u0026gt;alloc_mbx_args will be called to allocate memory for\ncmd.req.arg, and there is a dereference of it in qlcnic_83xx_add_rings(),\nwhich could lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of the\nindirect function like qlcnic_83xx_alloc_mbx_args().\r\n\r\nFix this bug by adding a check of alloc_mbx_args(), this patch\nimitates the logic of mbx_cmd()\u0026apos;s failure handling.\r\n\r\nThis bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs\ndifferential checking to identify inconsistent security operations\n(e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the\ninconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or\nthe callers, so they constitute bugs.\r\n\r\nNote that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false\npositive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed\nthe bug.\r\n\r\nBuilds with CONFIG_QLCNIC=m show no new warnings, and our\nstatic analyzer no longer warns about this code.(CVE-2021-47542)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2021-47543)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: fix page frag corruption on page fault\r\n\r\nSteffen reported a TCP stream corruption for HTTP requests\nserved by the apache web-server using a cifs mount-point\nand memory mapping the relevant file.\r\n\r\nThe root cause is quite similar to the one addressed by\ncommit 20eb4f29b602 (\u0026quot;net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from\nmemory reclaim\u0026quot;). Here the nested access to the task page frag\nis caused by a page fault on the (mmapped) user-space memory\nbuffer coming from the cifs file.\r\n\r\nThe page fault handler performs an smb transaction on a different\nsocket, inside the same process context. Since sk-\u0026gt;sk_allaction\nfor such socket does not prevent the usage for the task_frag,\nthe nested allocation modify \u0026quot;under the hood\u0026quot; the page frag\nin use by the outer sendmsg call, corrupting the stream.\r\n\r\nThe overall relevant stack trace looks like the following:\r\n\r\nhttpd 78268 [001] 3461630.850950: probe:tcp_sendmsg_locked:\n ffffffff91461d91 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1\n ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27\n ffffffff9139814e sock_sendmsg+0x3e\n ffffffffc06dfe1d smb_send_kvec+0x28\n [...]\n ffffffffc06cfaf8 cifs_readpages+0x213\n ffffffff90e83c4b read_pages+0x6b\n ffffffff90e83f31 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1c1\n ffffffff90e79e98 filemap_fault+0x788\n ffffffff90eb0458 __do_fault+0x38\n ffffffff90eb5280 do_fault+0x1a0\n ffffffff90eb7c84 __handle_mm_fault+0x4d4\n ffffffff90eb8093 handle_mm_fault+0xc3\n ffffffff90c74f6d __do_page_fault+0x1ed\n ffffffff90c75277 do_page_fault+0x37\n ffffffff9160111e page_fault+0x1e\n ffffffff9109e7b5 copyin+0x25\n ffffffff9109eb40 _copy_from_iter_full+0xe0\n ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0\n ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0\n ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27\n ffffffff9139815c sock_sendmsg+0x4c\n ffffffff913981f7 sock_write_iter+0x97\n ffffffff90f2cc56 do_iter_readv_writev+0x156\n ffffffff90f2dff0 do_iter_write+0x80\n ffffffff90f2e1c3 vfs_writev+0xa3\n ffffffff90f2e27c do_writev+0x5c\n ffffffff90c042bb do_syscall_64+0x5b\n ffffffff916000ad entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65\r\n\r\nThe cifs filesystem rightfully sets sk_allocations to GFP_NOFS,\nwe can avoid the nesting using the sk page frag for allocation\nlacking the __GFP_FS flag. Do not define an additional mm-helper\nfor that, as this is strictly tied to the sk page frag usage.\r\n\r\nv1 -\u0026gt; v2:\n - use a stricted sk_page_frag() check instead of reordering the\n code (Eric)(CVE-2021-47544)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: tulip: de4x5: fix the problem that the array \u0026apos;lp-\u0026gt;phy[8]\u0026apos; may be out of bound\r\n\r\nIn line 5001, if all id in the array \u0026apos;lp-\u0026gt;phy[8]\u0026apos; is not 0, when the\n\u0026apos;for\u0026apos; end, the \u0026apos;k\u0026apos; is 8.\r\n\r\nAt this time, the array \u0026apos;lp-\u0026gt;phy[8]\u0026apos; may be out of bound.(CVE-2021-47547)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_event_init()\r\n\r\nkasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory\nwhich can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52686)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix underflow in second superblock position calculations\r\n\r\nMacro NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES, which computes the position of the second\nsuperblock, underflows when the argument device size is less than 4096\nbytes. Therefore, when using this macro, it is necessary to check in\nadvance that the device size is not less than a lower limit, or at least\nthat underflow does not occur.\r\n\r\nThe current nilfs2 implementation lacks this check, causing out-of-bound\nblock access when mounting devices smaller than 4096 bytes:\r\n\r\n I/O error, dev loop0, sector 36028797018963960 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0\n phys_seg 1 prio class 2\n NILFS (loop0): unable to read secondary superblock (blocksize = 1024)\r\n\r\nIn addition, when trying to resize the filesystem to a size below 4096\nbytes, this underflow occurs in nilfs_resize_fs(), passing a huge number\nof segments to nilfs_sufile_resize(), corrupting parameters such as the\nnumber of segments in superblocks. This causes excessive loop iterations\nin nilfs_sufile_resize() during a subsequent resize ioctl, causing\nsemaphore ns_segctor_sem to block for a long time and hang the writer\nthread:\r\n\r\n INFO: task segctord:5067 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\n Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-syzkaller-00015-gf6feea56f66d #0\n \u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\n task:segctord state:D stack:23456 pid:5067 ppid:2\n flags:0x00004000\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline]\n __schedule+0x1409/0x43f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6606\n schedule+0xc3/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682\n rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0xfcf/0x14a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1190\n nilfs_transaction_lock+0x25c/0x4f0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357\n nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2486 [inline]\n nilfs_segctor_thread+0x52f/0x1140 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2570\n kthread+0x270/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n folio_mark_accessed+0x51c/0xf00 mm/swap.c:515\n __nilfs_get_page_block fs/nilfs2/page.c:42 [inline]\n nilfs_grab_buffer+0x3d3/0x540 fs/nilfs2/page.c:61\n nilfs_mdt_submit_block+0xd7/0x8f0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:121\n nilfs_mdt_read_block+0xeb/0x430 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:176\n nilfs_mdt_get_block+0x12d/0xbb0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:251\n nilfs_sufile_get_segment_usage_block fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:92 [inline]\n nilfs_sufile_truncate_range fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:679 [inline]\n nilfs_sufile_resize+0x7a3/0x12b0 fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:777\n nilfs_resize_fs+0x20c/0xed0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:422\n nilfs_ioctl_resize fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1033 [inline]\n nilfs_ioctl+0x137c/0x2440 fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1301\n ...\r\n\r\nThis fixes these issues by inserting appropriate minimum device size\nchecks or anti-underflow checks, depending on where the macro is used.(CVE-2023-52705)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference of timing generator\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nCheck whether assigned timing generator is NULL or not before\naccessing its funcs to prevent NULL dereference.(CVE-2023-52753)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: imon: fix access to invalid resource for the second interface\r\n\r\nimon driver probes two USB interfaces, and at the probe of the second\ninterface, the driver assumes blindly that the first interface got\nbound with the same imon driver. It\u0026apos;s usually true, but it\u0026apos;s still\npossible that the first interface is bound with another driver via a\nmalformed descriptor. Then it may lead to a memory corruption, as\nspotted by syzkaller; imon driver accesses the data from drvdata as\nstruct imon_context object although it\u0026apos;s a completely different one\nthat was assigned by another driver.\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a sanity check -- whether the first interface is\nreally bound with the imon driver or not -- for avoiding the problem\nabove at the probe time.(CVE-2023-52754)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2023-52756)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/dasd: protect device queue against concurrent access\r\n\r\nIn dasd_profile_start() the amount of requests on the device queue are\ncounted. The access to the device queue is unprotected against\nconcurrent access. With a lot of parallel I/O, especially with alias\ndevices enabled, the device queue can change while dasd_profile_start()\nis accessing the queue. In the worst case this leads to a kernel panic\ndue to incorrect pointer accesses.\r\n\r\nFix this by taking the device lock before accessing the queue and\ncounting the requests. Additionally the check for a valid profile data\npointer can be done earlier to avoid unnecessary locking in a hot path.(CVE-2023-52774)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: Fix RPC client cleaned up the freed pipefs dentries\r\n\r\nRPC client pipefs dentries cleanup is in separated rpc_remove_pipedir()\nworkqueue,which takes care about pipefs superblock locking.\nIn some special scenarios, when kernel frees the pipefs sb of the\ncurrent client and immediately alloctes a new pipefs sb,\nrpc_remove_pipedir function would misjudge the existence of pipefs\nsb which is not the one it used to hold. As a result,\nthe rpc_remove_pipedir would clean the released freed pipefs dentries.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, rpc_remove_pipedir should check whether the\ncurrent pipefs sb is consistent with the original pipefs sb.\r\n\r\nThis error can be catched by KASAN:\n=========================================================\n[ 250.497700] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.498315] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a2ab804 by task kworker/0:18/106503\n[ 250.500549] Workqueue: events rpc_free_client_work\n[ 250.501001] Call Trace:\n[ 250.502880] kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0\n[ 250.503209] ? dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.503561] dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.503897] ? __pfx_rpc_clntdir_depopulate+0x10/0x10\n[ 250.504384] rpc_rmdir_depopulate+0x1b/0x90\n[ 250.504781] rpc_remove_client_dir+0xf5/0x150\n[ 250.505195] rpc_free_client_work+0xe4/0x230\n[ 250.505598] process_one_work+0x8ee/0x13b0\n...\n[ 22.039056] Allocated by task 244:\n[ 22.039390] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.039758] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30\n[ 22.040109] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x59/0x70\n[ 22.040487] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0xf0/0x240\n[ 22.040889] __d_alloc+0x31/0x8e0\n[ 22.041207] d_alloc+0x44/0x1f0\n[ 22.041514] __rpc_lookup_create_exclusive+0x11c/0x140\n[ 22.041987] rpc_mkdir_populate.constprop.0+0x5f/0x110\n[ 22.042459] rpc_create_client_dir+0x34/0x150\n[ 22.042874] rpc_setup_pipedir_sb+0x102/0x1c0\n[ 22.043284] rpc_client_register+0x136/0x4e0\n[ 22.043689] rpc_new_client+0x911/0x1020\n[ 22.044057] rpc_create_xprt+0xcb/0x370\n[ 22.044417] rpc_create+0x36b/0x6c0\n...\n[ 22.049524] Freed by task 0:\n[ 22.049803] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.050165] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30\n[ 22.050520] kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50\n[ 22.050921] __kasan_slab_free+0x10e/0x1a0\n[ 22.051306] kmem_cache_free+0xa5/0x390\n[ 22.051667] rcu_core+0x62c/0x1930\n[ 22.051995] __do_softirq+0x165/0x52a\n[ 22.052347]\n[ 22.052503] Last potentially related work creation:\n[ 22.052952] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.053313] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8e/0xa0\n[ 22.053739] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x6b/0x8b0\n[ 22.054209] dentry_free+0xb2/0x140\n[ 22.054540] __dentry_kill+0x3be/0x540\n[ 22.054900] shrink_dentry_list+0x199/0x510\n[ 22.055293] shrink_dcache_parent+0x190/0x240\n[ 22.055703] do_one_tree+0x11/0x40\n[ 22.056028] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x61/0x140\n[ 22.056461] generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0x590\n[ 22.056879] kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60\n[ 22.057234] rpc_kill_sb+0x121/0x200(CVE-2023-52803)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: wmi: Fix opening of char device\r\n\r\nSince commit fa1f68db6ca7 (\u0026quot;drivers: misc: pass miscdevice pointer via\nfile private data\u0026quot;), the miscdevice stores a pointer to itself inside\nfilp-\u0026gt;private_data, which means that private_data will not be NULL when\nwmi_char_open() is called. This might cause memory corruption should\nwmi_char_open() be unable to find its driver, something which can\nhappen when the associated WMI device is deleted in wmi_free_devices().\r\n\r\nFix the problem by using the miscdevice pointer to retrieve the WMI\ndevice data associated with a char device using container_of(). This\nalso avoids wmi_char_open() picking a wrong WMI device bound to a\ndriver with the same name as the original driver.(CVE-2023-52864)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt6797: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52865)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: llcc: Handle a second device without data corruption\r\n\r\nUsually there is only one llcc device. But if there were a second, even\na failed probe call would modify the global drv_data pointer. So check\nif drv_data is valid before overwriting it.(CVE-2023-52871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nefi/capsule-loader: fix incorrect allocation size\r\n\r\ngcc-14 notices that the allocation with sizeof(void) on 32-bit architectures\nis not enough for a 64-bit phys_addr_t:\r\n\r\ndrivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c: In function \u0026apos;efi_capsule_open\u0026apos;:\ndrivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:295:24: error: allocation of insufficient size \u0026apos;4\u0026apos; for type \u0026apos;phys_addr_t\u0026apos; {aka \u0026apos;long long unsigned int\u0026apos;} with size \u0026apos;8\u0026apos; [-Werror=alloc-size]\n 295 | cap_info-\u0026gt;phys = kzalloc(sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);\n | ^\r\n\r\nUse the correct type instead here.(CVE-2024-27413)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal\r\n\r\nA race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove()\ncallback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an\nunhandled page fault [1].\r\n\r\nThe problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running\nafter pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn\u0026apos;t really\nguarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks\nwill not be running when it returns.\r\n\r\nHowever, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when\npm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM\nstatus of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without\nwaiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for\n.runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it\narguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly\nprohibited).\r\n\r\nThus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs\nto protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after\npm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after\npm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it\nhas started earlier.]\r\n\r\nOne way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier()\nafter pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the\nruntime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from\nbeing invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should\nit be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in\npci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the\ndriver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which\nwill prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr\ndriver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks.(CVE-2024-35809)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: brcmfmac: Fix use-after-free bug in brcmf_cfg80211_detach\r\n\r\nThis is the candidate patch of CVE-2023-47233 :\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47233\r\n\r\nIn brcm80211 driver,it starts with the following invoking chain\nto start init a timeout worker:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_probe\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_probe_cb\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_attach\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_bus_started\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_cfg80211_attach\n -\u0026gt;wl_init_priv\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_init_escan\n -\u0026gt;INIT_WORK(\u0026amp;cfg-\u0026gt;escan_timeout_work,\n\t\t brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker);\r\n\r\nIf we disconnect the USB by hotplug, it will call\nbrcmf_usb_disconnect to make cleanup. The invoking chain is :\r\n\r\nbrcmf_usb_disconnect\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_detach\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_cfg80211_detach\n -\u0026gt;kfree(cfg);\r\n\r\nWhile the timeout woker may still be running. This will cause\na use-after-free bug on cfg in brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker.\r\n\r\nFix it by deleting the timer and canceling the worker in\nbrcmf_cfg80211_detach.\r\n\r\n[arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com: keep timer delete as is and cancel work just before free](CVE-2024-35811)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nerspan: make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb-\u0026gt;head\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported a problem in ip6erspan_rcv() [1]\r\n\r\nIssue is that ip6erspan_rcv() (and erspan_rcv()) no longer make\nsure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb linear part (skb-\u0026gt;head)\nbefore getting @ver field from it.\r\n\r\nAdd the missing pskb_may_pull() calls.\r\n\r\nv2: Reload iph pointer in erspan_rcv() after pskb_may_pull()\n because skb-\u0026gt;head might have changed.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610\n pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline]\n pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline]\n ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline]\n gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610\n ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1d4c/0x2ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438\n ip6_input_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_input+0x15d/0x430 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492\n ip6_mc_input+0xa7e/0xc80 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:586\n dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline]\n ip6_rcv_finish+0x955/0x970 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xde/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5538 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5652\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5738 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5798\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1549\n tun_get_user+0x5566/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n tun_alloc_skb drivers/net/tun.c:1525 [inline]\n tun_get_user+0x209a/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:1846\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5045 Comm: syz-executor114 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00021-g962490525cff #0(CVE-2024-35888)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: validate user input for expected length\r\n\r\nI got multiple syzbot reports showing old bugs exposed\nby BPF after commit 20f2505fb436 (\u0026quot;bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc\nin cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nsetsockopt() @optlen argument should be taken into account\nbefore copying data.\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627\nRead of size 96 at addr ffff88802cd73da0 by task syz-executor.4/7238\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 7238 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-next-20240403-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n __asan_memcpy+0x29/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:105\n copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline]\n do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627\n nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\nRIP: 0033:0x7fd22067dde9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fd21f9ff0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd2207abf80 RCX: 00007fd22067dde9\nRDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007fd2206ca47a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000020000880 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd2207abf80 R15: 00007ffd2d0170d8\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 7238:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline]\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387\n kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline]\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4069 [inline]\n __kmalloc_noprof+0x200/0x410 mm/slub.c:4082\n kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline]\n __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd47/0x1050 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802cd73da0\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\nThe buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of\n allocated 1-byte region [ffff88802cd73da0, ffff88802cd73da1)\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88802cd73020 pfn:0x2cd73\nflags: 0xfff80000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0xfff)\npage_type: 0xffffefff(slab)\nraw: 00fff80000000000 ffff888015041280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122\nraw: ffff88802cd73020 000000008080007f 00000001ffffefff 00\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35896)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni2c: smbus: fix NULL function pointer dereference\r\n\r\nBaruch reported an OOPS when using the designware controller as target\nonly. Target-only modes break the assumption of one transfer function\nalways being available. Fix this by always checking the pointer in\n__i2c_transfer.\r\n\r\n[wsa: dropped the simplification in core-smbus to avoid theoretical regressions](CVE-2024-35984)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation\r\n\r\nEach attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least\nof sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes.\nThe current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes)\nwhich is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation\nis not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands\nread access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller\r\n\r\nGeneric sdhci code registers LED device and uses host-\u0026gt;runtime_suspended\nflag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn\u0026apos;t set this flag,\nwhich causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime\nsuspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.(CVE-2024-36029)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init\r\n\r\nnet_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is called without any\nlocking. It reads max_gen_ptrs, which is changed under pernet_ops_rwsem. It\nis read twice, first to allocate an array, then to set s.len, which is\nlater used to limit the bounds of the array access.\r\n\r\nIt is possible that the array is allocated and another thread is\nregistering a new pernet ops, increments max_gen_ptrs, which is then used\nto set s.len with a larger than allocated length for the variable array.\r\n\r\nFix it by reading max_gen_ptrs only once in net_alloc_generic. If\nmax_gen_ptrs is later incremented, it will be caught in net_assign_generic.(CVE-2024-36883)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fib6_rules: avoid possible NULL dereference in fib6_rule_action()\r\n\r\nsyzbot is able to trigger the following crash [1],\ncaused by unsafe ip6_dst_idev() use.\r\n\r\nIndeed ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, and must always be checked.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 0 PID: 31648 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240417-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:__fib6_rule_action net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:237 [inline]\n RIP: 0010:fib6_rule_action+0x241/0x7b0 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:267\nCode: 02 00 00 49 8d 9f d8 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f9 32 bf f7 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 e0 32 bf f7 4c 8b 03 48 89 ef 4c\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000fc1f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1a772f98c8186700\nRDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8bcac4e0 RDI: ffffffff8c1f9760\nRBP: ffff8880673fb980 R08: ffffffff8fac15ef R09: 1ffffffff1f582bd\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f582be R12: dffffc0000000000\nR13: 0000000000000080 R14: ffff888076509000 R15: ffff88807a029a00\nFS: 00007f55e82ca6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b31d23000 CR3: 0000000022b66000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n fib_rules_lookup+0x62c/0xdb0 net/core/fib_rules.c:317\n fib6_rule_lookup+0x1fd/0x790 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:108\n ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2637 [inline]\n ip6_route_output_flags+0x38e/0x610 net/ipv6/route.c:2649\n ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:93 [inline]\n ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x189/0x11a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1120\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0xb9/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250\n sctp_v6_get_dst+0x792/0x1e20 net/sctp/ipv6.c:326\n sctp_transport_route+0x12c/0x2e0 net/sctp/transport.c:455\n sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x614/0x15c0 net/sctp/associola.c:662\n sctp_connect_new_asoc+0x31d/0x6c0 net/sctp/socket.c:1099\n __sctp_connect+0x66d/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1197\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36902)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: Fix potential uninit-value access in __ip6_make_skb()\r\n\r\nAs it was done in commit fc1092f51567 (\u0026quot;ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in\n__ip_make_skb()\u0026quot;) for IPv4, check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl6-\u0026gt;flowi6_flags\ninstead of testing HDRINCL on the socket to avoid a race condition which\ncauses uninit-value access.(CVE-2024-36903)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()\r\n\r\nThere is no check for overflow of \u0026apos;start + len\u0026apos; in blk_ioctl_discard().\nHung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param:\n start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000;\nAdd the overflow validation now.(CVE-2024-36917)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\r\n\r\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix a possible memleak in tipc_buf_append\r\n\r\n__skb_linearize() doesn\u0026apos;t free the skb when it fails, so move\n\u0026apos;*buf = NULL\u0026apos; after __skb_linearize(), so that the skb can be\nfreed on the err path.(CVE-2024-36954)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/9p: only translate RWX permissions for plain 9P2000\r\n\r\nGarbage in plain 9P2000\u0026apos;s perm bits is allowed through, which causes it\nto be able to set (among others) the suid bit. This was presumably not\nthe intent since the unix extended bits are handled explicitly and\nconditionally on .u.(CVE-2024-36964)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1705",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:10Z",
"published": "2024-06-14T11:07:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1705"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47254"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47294"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47315"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47324"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47329"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47409"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47424"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47460"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47476"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47478"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47479"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47511"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47518"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47541"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47543"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47544"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52705"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36964"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47236",
"CVE-2021-47254",
"CVE-2021-47294",
"CVE-2021-47315",
"CVE-2021-47324",
"CVE-2021-47329",
"CVE-2021-47403",
"CVE-2021-47409",
"CVE-2021-47424",
"CVE-2021-47460",
"CVE-2021-47476",
"CVE-2021-47478",
"CVE-2021-47479",
"CVE-2021-47499",
"CVE-2021-47511",
"CVE-2021-47518",
"CVE-2021-47538",
"CVE-2021-47541",
"CVE-2021-47542",
"CVE-2021-47543",
"CVE-2021-47544",
"CVE-2021-47547",
"CVE-2023-52686",
"CVE-2023-52705",
"CVE-2023-52753",
"CVE-2023-52754",
"CVE-2023-52756",
"CVE-2023-52774",
"CVE-2023-52803",
"CVE-2023-52864",
"CVE-2023-52865",
"CVE-2023-52871",
"CVE-2024-27413",
"CVE-2024-35809",
"CVE-2024-35811",
"CVE-2024-35888",
"CVE-2024-35896",
"CVE-2024-35984",
"CVE-2024-36017",
"CVE-2024-36029",
"CVE-2024-36883",
"CVE-2024-36902",
"CVE-2024-36903",
"CVE-2024-36917",
"CVE-2024-36924",
"CVE-2024-36954",
"CVE-2024-36964"
]
}
OESA-2024-1706 (CVE-2021-47247)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-14 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix use-after-free of encap entry in neigh update handler
Function mlx5e_rep_neigh_update() wasn't updated to accommodate rtnl lock removal from TC filter update path and properly handle concurrent encap entry insertion/deletion which can lead to following use-after-free:
[23827.464923] ================================================================== [23827.469446] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.470971] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881d132228c by task kworker/u20:6/21635 [23827.472251] [23827.472615] CPU: 9 PID: 21635 Comm: kworker/u20:6 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #5 [23827.473788] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [23827.475639] Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_rep_neigh_update [mlx5_core] [23827.476731] Call Trace: [23827.477260] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107 [23827.477906] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x140 [23827.478896] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.479879] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.480905] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [23827.481701] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.482744] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 [23827.493112] mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.494054] ? mlx5e_tc_tun_encap_info_equal_generic+0x140/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.495296] mlx5e_rep_neigh_update+0x41e/0x5e0 [mlx5_core] [23827.496338] ? mlx5e_rep_neigh_entry_release+0xb80/0xb80 [mlx5_core] [23827.497486] ? read_word_at_a_time+0xe/0x20 [23827.498250] ? strscpy+0xa0/0x2a0 [23827.498889] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [23827.499638] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 [23827.500537] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2c0/0x2c0 [23827.501359] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [23827.502116] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220 [23827.502831] ? process_one_work+0x14e0/0x14e0 [23827.503627] kthread+0x328/0x3f0 [23827.504254] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [23827.505065] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x90/0x90 [23827.505912] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [23827.506621] [23827.506987] Allocated by task 28248: [23827.507694] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.508476] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7c/0x90 [23827.509197] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xde1/0x1d40 [mlx5_core] [23827.510194] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x397/0xc40 [mlx5_core] [23827.511218] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x519/0xb30 [mlx5_core] [23827.512234] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x191c/0x4870 [mlx5_core] [23827.513298] tc_setup_cb_add+0x1d5/0x420 [23827.514023] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x382/0x6a0 [cls_flower] [23827.514975] fl_change+0x2ceb/0x4a51 [cls_flower] [23827.515821] tc_new_tfilter+0x89a/0x2070 [23827.516548] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x644/0x8c0 [23827.517300] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 [23827.518021] netlink_unicast+0x42b/0x700 [23827.518742] netlink_sendmsg+0x743/0xc20 [23827.519467] sock_sendmsg+0xb2/0xe0 [23827.520131] _syssendmsg+0x590/0x770 [23827.520851] _sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x160 [23827.521552] __sys_sendmsg+0xb7/0x140 [23827.522238] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70 [23827.522907] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [23827.523797] [23827.524163] Freed by task 25948: [23827.524780] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.525488] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 [23827.526187] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 [23827.526968] __kasan_slab_free+0xed/0x130 [23827.527709] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xcf/0x1d0 [23827.528528] kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x33a/0x6e0 [23827.529317] kfree_rcu_work+0x55f/0xb70 [23827.530024] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [23827.530770] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220 [23827.531480] kthread+0x328/0x3f0 [23827.532114] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [23827.532785] [23827.533147] Last potentially related work creation: [23827.534007] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.534710] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0 [23827.535492] kvfree_call_rcu+0x31/0x7b0 [23827.536206] mlx5e_tc_del ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47247)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA: Verify port when creating flow rule
Validate port value provided by the user and with that remove no longer needed validation by the driver. The missing check in the mlx5_ib driver could cause to the below oops.
Call trace: _create_flow_rule+0x2d4/0xf28 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_create_flow+0x2d0/0x5b0 [mlx5_ib] ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x4cc/0x624 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0xd4/0x150 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs.isra.7+0xb28/0xc50 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x158/0x1d0 [ib_uverbs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xd0/0xaf0 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb4 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0xc4 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa4/0x254 el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xa0 el0_svc+0x10/0x26c Code: b9401260 f9615681 51000400 8b001c20 (f9403c1a)(CVE-2021-47265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: fix possible use-after-free in HFC_cleanup()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47356)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: stmmac: Disable Tx queues when reconfiguring the interface
The Tx queues were not disabled in situations where the driver needed to stop the interface to apply a new configuration. This could result in a kernel panic when doing any of the 3 following actions: * reconfiguring the number of queues (ethtool -L) * reconfiguring the size of the ring buffers (ethtool -G) * installing/removing an XDP program (ip l set dev ethX xdp)
Prevent the panic by making sure netif_tx_disable is called when stopping an interface.
Without this patch, the following kernel panic can be observed when doing any of the actions above:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001238d040 [....] Call trace: dwmac4_set_addr+0x8/0x10 dev_hard_start_xmit+0xe4/0x1ac sch_direct_xmit+0xe8/0x39c __dev_queue_xmit+0x3ec/0xaf0 dev_queue_xmit+0x14/0x20 [...] [ end trace 0000000000000002 ]---(CVE-2021-47558)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more than queues
There are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.
Commit a632b2a4c920 ("ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config for DCB") already disallow setting less queues than TCs.
Another case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs config due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty num_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid pointer access.
[ 95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated. [ 95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)! [ 95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0 [ 95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G U W O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1 [ 95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021 [ 95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60 [ 95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 <8b> 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c [ 95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0 [ 95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200 [ 95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000 [ 95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100 [ 95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460 [ 95.970981] FS: 00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 95.971108] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [ 95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 95.971530] PKRU: 55555554 [ 95.971573] Call Trace: [ 95.971622] ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice] [ 95.971695] ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice] [ 95.971774] ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice] [ 95.971843] ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice] [ 95.971919] ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice] [ 95.971987] ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice] [ 95.972082] ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice] [ 95.972154] ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice] [ 95.972220] dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230 [ 95.972279] ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150 [ 95.972341] dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0 [ 95.972392] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0 [ 95.972457] ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0 [ 95.972510] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280 [ 95.972591] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100 [ 95.972661] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0 [ 95.972720] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220 [ 95.972781] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0 [ 95.975891] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50 [ 95.979032] syssendmsg+0x2e4/0x300 [ 95.982147] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190 [ 95.985242] ? wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90 [ 95.988338] ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0 [ 95.991440] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30 [ 95.994539] ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0 [ 95.997619] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80 [ 96.000664] __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80 [ 96.003747] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0 [ 96.006862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
Only update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup queue map failed.(CVE-2022-48652)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
aio: fix mremap after fork null-deref
Commit e4a0d3e720e7 ("aio: Make it possible to remap aio ring") introduced a null-deref if mremap is called on an old aio mapping after fork as mm->ioctx_table will be set to NULL.
jmoyer@redhat.com: fix 80 column issue
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: Check if the code to patch lies in the exit section
Otherwise we fall through to vmalloc_to_page() which panics since the address does not lie in the vmalloc region.(CVE-2023-52677)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: scarlett2: Add missing error checks to *_ctl_get()
The ctl_get() functions which call scarlett2_update() were not checking the return value. Fix to check the return value and pass to the caller.(CVE-2023-52680)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_event_init()
kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory which can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52686)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: openvswitch: fix possible memory leak in ovs_meter_cmd_set()
old_meter needs to be free after it is detached regardless of whether the new meter is successfully attached.(CVE-2023-52702)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix underflow in second superblock position calculations
Macro NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES, which computes the position of the second superblock, underflows when the argument device size is less than 4096 bytes. Therefore, when using this macro, it is necessary to check in advance that the device size is not less than a lower limit, or at least that underflow does not occur.
The current nilfs2 implementation lacks this check, causing out-of-bound block access when mounting devices smaller than 4096 bytes:
I/O error, dev loop0, sector 36028797018963960 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 2 NILFS (loop0): unable to read secondary superblock (blocksize = 1024)
In addition, when trying to resize the filesystem to a size below 4096 bytes, this underflow occurs in nilfs_resize_fs(), passing a huge number of segments to nilfs_sufile_resize(), corrupting parameters such as the number of segments in superblocks. This causes excessive loop iterations in nilfs_sufile_resize() during a subsequent resize ioctl, causing semaphore ns_segctor_sem to block for a long time and hang the writer thread:
INFO: task segctord:5067 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-syzkaller-00015-gf6feea56f66d #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:segctord state:D stack:23456 pid:5067 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x1409/0x43f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xc3/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0xfcf/0x14a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1190 nilfs_transaction_lock+0x25c/0x4f0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357 nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2486 [inline] nilfs_segctor_thread+0x52f/0x1140 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2570 kthread+0x270/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 </TASK> ... Call Trace: <TASK> folio_mark_accessed+0x51c/0xf00 mm/swap.c:515 __nilfs_get_page_block fs/nilfs2/page.c:42 [inline] nilfs_grab_buffer+0x3d3/0x540 fs/nilfs2/page.c:61 nilfs_mdt_submit_block+0xd7/0x8f0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:121 nilfs_mdt_read_block+0xeb/0x430 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:176 nilfs_mdt_get_block+0x12d/0xbb0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:251 nilfs_sufile_get_segment_usage_block fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:92 [inline] nilfs_sufile_truncate_range fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:679 [inline] nilfs_sufile_resize+0x7a3/0x12b0 fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:777 nilfs_resize_fs+0x20c/0xed0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:422 nilfs_ioctl_resize fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1033 [inline] nilfs_ioctl+0x137c/0x2440 fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1301 ...
This fixes these issues by inserting appropriate minimum device size checks or anti-underflow checks, depending on where the macro is used.(CVE-2023-52705)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/IPoIB: Fix legacy IPoIB due to wrong number of queues
The cited commit creates child PKEY interfaces over netlink will multiple tx and rx queues, but some devices doesn't support more than 1 tx and 1 rx queues. This causes to a crash when traffic is sent over the PKEY interface due to the parent having a single queue but the child having multiple queues.
This patch fixes the number of queues to 1 for legacy IPoIB at the earliest possible point in time.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000036b PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 4 PID: 209665 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.1.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2022_12_12_17_02 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_alloc+0xcb/0x450 Code: ce 7e 49 8b 50 08 49 83 78 10 00 4d 8b 28 0f 84 cb 02 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 c2 02 00 00 41 8b 44 24 28 48 8d 4a 01 49 8b 3c 24 <49> 8b 5c 05 00 4c 89 e8 65 48 0f c7 0f 0f 94 c0 84 c0 74 b8 41 8b RSP: 0018:ffff88822acbbab8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000070 RBX: ffff8881c28e3e00 RCX: 00000000064f8dae RDX: 00000000064f8dad RSI: 0000000000000a20 RDI: 0000000000030d00 RBP: 0000000000000a20 R08: ffff8882f5d30d00 R09: ffff888104032f40 R10: ffff88810fade828 R11: 736f6d6570736575 R12: ffff88810081c000 R13: 00000000000002fb R14: ffffffff817fc865 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f9324ff9700(0000) GS:ffff8882f5d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000036b CR3: 00000001125af004 CR4: 0000000000370ea0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> skb_clone+0x55/0xd0 ip6_finish_output2+0x3fe/0x690 ip6_finish_output+0xfa/0x310 ip6_send_skb+0x1e/0x60 udp_v6_send_skb+0x1e5/0x420 udpv6_sendmsg+0xb3c/0xe60 ? ip_mc_finish_output+0x180/0x180 ? __switch_to_asm+0x3a/0x60 ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x60 sock_sendmsg+0x33/0x40 __sys_sendto+0x103/0x160 ? _copy_to_user+0x21/0x30 ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0xd/0x10 ? ktime_get_ts64+0x49/0xe0 __x64_sys_sendto+0x25/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7f9374f1ed14 Code: 42 41 f8 ff 44 8b 4c 24 2c 4c 8b 44 24 20 89 c5 44 8b 54 24 28 48 8b 54 24 18 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 74 24 10 8b 7c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 ef 48 89 44 24 08 e8 68 41 f8 ff 48 8b RSP: 002b:00007f9324ff7bd0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9324ff7cc8 RCX: 00007f9374f1ed14 RDX: 00000000000002fb RSI: 00007f93000052f0 RDI: 0000000000000030 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f9324ff7d40 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000012a05f200 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007f9374d57bdc </TASK>(CVE-2023-52745)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfrm/compat: prevent potential spectre v1 gadget in xfrm_xlate32_attr()
int type = nla_type(nla);
if (type > XFRMA_MAX) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
@type is then used as an array index and can be used as a Spectre v1 gadget.
if (nla_len(nla) < compat_policy[type].len) {
array_index_nospec() can be used to prevent leaking content of kernel memory to malicious users.(CVE-2023-52746)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference of timing generator
[Why & How] Check whether assigned timing generator is NULL or not before accessing its funcs to prevent NULL dereference.(CVE-2023-52753)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline
We found a data corruption issue during testing of SMC-R on Redis applications.
The benchmark has a low probability of reporting a strange error as shown below.
"Error: Protocol error, got "\xe2" as reply type byte"
Finally, we found that the retrieved error data was as follows:
0xE2 0xD4 0xC3 0xD9 0x04 0x00 0x2C 0x20 0xA6 0x56 0x00 0x16 0x3E 0x0C 0xCB 0x04 0x02 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x20 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xE2
It is quite obvious that this is a SMC DECLINE message, which means that the applications received SMC protocol message. We found that this was caused by the following situations:
client server ¦ clc proposal -------------> ¦ clc accept <------------- ¦ clc confirm -------------> wait llc confirm send llc confirm ¦failed llc confirm ¦ x------ (after 2s)timeout wait llc confirm rsp
wait decline
(after 1s) timeout (after 2s) timeout ¦ decline --------------> ¦ decline <--------------
As a result, a decline message was sent in the implementation, and this message was read from TCP by the already-fallback connection.
This patch double the client timeout as 2x of the server value, With this simple change, the Decline messages should never cross or collide (during Confirm link timeout).
This issue requires an immediate solution, since the protocol updates involve a more long-term solution.(CVE-2023-52775)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvlan: add ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() helper
Inspired by syzbot reports using a stack of multiple ipvlan devices.
Reduce stack size needed in ipvlan_process_v6_outbound() by moving the flowi6 struct used for the route lookup in an non inlined helper. ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() needs 120 bytes on the stack, immediately reclaimed.
Also make sure ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() is not inlined.
We might also have to lower MAX_NEST_DEV, because only syzbot uses setups with more than four stacked devices.
BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000e803ff8 (stack is ffffc9000e804000..ffffc9000e808000) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 13442 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.1.52-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023 RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x4/0x2a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:188 Code: 48 01 c6 48 89 c7 e8 db 4e c1 03 31 c0 5d c3 cc 0f 0b eb 02 0f 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 cc 00 00 cc cc 00 00 cc cc 55 48 89 e5 <41> 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 b0 01 48 85 f6 0f 84 a4 01 00 00 48 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000e804000 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff817e5bf2 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff887c6568 RBP: ffffc9000e804000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 1ffff92001d0080c R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff87e6b100 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fd0c55826c0(0000) GS:ffff8881f6800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000e803ff8 CR3: 0000000170ef7000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> [<ffffffff81f281d1>] __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/shadow.c:31 [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:72 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] cpumask_test_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h:506 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] cpu_online include/linux/cpumask.h:1092 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:24 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] lock_acquire+0xe2/0x590 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5632 [<ffffffff8563221e>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x2e/0x40 include/linux/rcupdate.h:306 [<ffffffff8561464d>] rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline] [<ffffffff8561464d>] ip6_pol_route+0x15d/0x1440 net/ipv6/route.c:2221 [<ffffffff85618120>] ip6_pol_route_output+0x50/0x80 net/ipv6/route.c:2606 [<ffffffff856f65b5>] pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:584 [inline] [<ffffffff856f65b5>] fib6_rule_lookup+0x265/0x620 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:116 [<ffffffff85618009>] ip6_route_output_flags_noref+0x2d9/0x3a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2638 [<ffffffff8561821a>] ip6_route_output_flags+0xca/0x340 net/ipv6/route.c:2651 [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:100 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_process_v6_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:473 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_process_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:529 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xc33/0x1be0 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:677 [<ffffffff838c2909>] ipvlan_start_xmit+0x49/0x100 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:229 [<ffffffff84d03900>] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4966 [inline] [<ffffffff84d03900>] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3644 [inline] [<ffffffff84d03900>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x320/0x980 net/core/dev.c:3660 [<ffffffff84d080e2>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x16b2/0x3370 net/core/dev.c:4324 [<ffffffff855ce4cd>] dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3067 [inline] [<ffffffff855ce4cd>] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:529 [inline] [<f ---truncated---(CVE-2023-52796)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath11k: fix dfs radar event locking
The ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the DFS radar event handling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a read-side critical section.
Mark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid any potential use-after-free issues.
Compile tested only.(CVE-2023-52798)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf
Currently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there is an array out of bounds while getting element in tp->dm_stree. To add the required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type of dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type of tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.(CVE-2023-52799)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath11k: fix htt pktlog locking
The ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the htt pktlog handling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a read-side critical section.
Mark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid any potential use-after-free issues.
Compile tested only.(CVE-2023-52800)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: Fix RPC client cleaned up the freed pipefs dentries
RPC client pipefs dentries cleanup is in separated rpc_remove_pipedir() workqueue,which takes care about pipefs superblock locking. In some special scenarios, when kernel frees the pipefs sb of the current client and immediately alloctes a new pipefs sb, rpc_remove_pipedir function would misjudge the existence of pipefs sb which is not the one it used to hold. As a result, the rpc_remove_pipedir would clean the released freed pipefs dentries.
To fix this issue, rpc_remove_pipedir should check whether the current pipefs sb is consistent with the original pipefs sb.
This error can be catched by KASAN:
[ 250.497700] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.498315] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a2ab804 by task kworker/0:18/106503 [ 250.500549] Workqueue: events rpc_free_client_work [ 250.501001] Call Trace: [ 250.502880] kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 [ 250.503209] ? dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.503561] dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.503897] ? __pfx_rpc_clntdir_depopulate+0x10/0x10 [ 250.504384] rpc_rmdir_depopulate+0x1b/0x90 [ 250.504781] rpc_remove_client_dir+0xf5/0x150 [ 250.505195] rpc_free_client_work+0xe4/0x230 [ 250.505598] process_one_work+0x8ee/0x13b0 ... [ 22.039056] Allocated by task 244: [ 22.039390] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.039758] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [ 22.040109] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x59/0x70 [ 22.040487] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0xf0/0x240 [ 22.040889] __d_alloc+0x31/0x8e0 [ 22.041207] d_alloc+0x44/0x1f0 [ 22.041514] __rpc_lookup_create_exclusive+0x11c/0x140 [ 22.041987] rpc_mkdir_populate.constprop.0+0x5f/0x110 [ 22.042459] rpc_create_client_dir+0x34/0x150 [ 22.042874] rpc_setup_pipedir_sb+0x102/0x1c0 [ 22.043284] rpc_client_register+0x136/0x4e0 [ 22.043689] rpc_new_client+0x911/0x1020 [ 22.044057] rpc_create_xprt+0xcb/0x370 [ 22.044417] rpc_create+0x36b/0x6c0 ... [ 22.049524] Freed by task 0: [ 22.049803] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.050165] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [ 22.050520] kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50 [ 22.050921] __kasan_slab_free+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 22.051306] kmem_cache_free+0xa5/0x390 [ 22.051667] rcu_core+0x62c/0x1930 [ 22.051995] __do_softirq+0x165/0x52a [ 22.052347] [ 22.052503] Last potentially related work creation: [ 22.052952] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.053313] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8e/0xa0 [ 22.053739] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x6b/0x8b0 [ 22.054209] dentry_free+0xb2/0x140 [ 22.054540] __dentry_kill+0x3be/0x540 [ 22.054900] shrink_dentry_list+0x199/0x510 [ 22.055293] shrink_dcache_parent+0x190/0x240 [ 22.055703] do_one_tree+0x11/0x40 [ 22.056028] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x61/0x140 [ 22.056461] generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0x590 [ 22.056879] kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 [ 22.057234] rpc_kill_sb+0x121/0x200(CVE-2023-52803)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix out-of-bounds access may occur when coalesce info is read via debugfs
The hns3 driver define an array of string to show the coalesce info, but if the kernel adds a new mode or a new state, out-of-bounds access may occur when coalesce info is read via debugfs, this patch fix the problem.(CVE-2023-52807)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt6797: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52865)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xen-netfront: Add missing skb_mark_for_recycle
Notice that skb_mark_for_recycle() is introduced later than fixes tag in commit 6a5bcd84e886 ("page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB recycling").
It is believed that fixes tag were missing a call to page_pool_release_page() between v5.9 to v5.14, after which is should have used skb_mark_for_recycle(). Since v6.6 the call page_pool_release_page() were removed (in commit 535b9c61bdef ("net: page_pool: hide page_pool_release_page()") and remaining callers converted (in commit 6bfef2ec0172 ("Merge branch 'net-page_pool-remove-page_pool_release_page'")).
This leak became visible in v6.8 via commit dba1b8a7ab68 ("mm/page_pool: catch page_pool memory leaks").(CVE-2024-27393)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: l2cap: fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_chan_timeout
There is a race condition between l2cap_chan_timeout() and l2cap_chan_del(). When we use l2cap_chan_del() to delete the channel, the chan->conn will be set to null. But the conn could be dereferenced again in the mutex_lock() of l2cap_chan_timeout(). As a result the null pointer dereference bug will happen. The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:
[ 472.074580] ================================================================== [ 472.075284] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000158 by task kworker/0:0/7 [ 472.075308] [ 472.075308] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36 [ 472.075308] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4 [ 472.075308] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout [ 472.075308] Call Trace: [ 472.075308] <TASK> [ 472.075308] dump_stack_lvl+0x137/0x1a0 [ 472.075308] print_report+0x101/0x250 [ 472.075308] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x77/0x160 [ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] kasan_report+0x139/0x170 [ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0 [ 472.075308] mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x181/0x300 [ 472.075308] process_one_work+0x5d2/0xe00 [ 472.075308] worker_thread+0xe1d/0x1660 [ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 472.075308] kthread+0x2b7/0x350 [ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0 [ 472.075308] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 [ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0 [ 472.075308] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 472.075308] </TASK> [ 472.075308] ================================================================== [ 472.094860] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 472.096136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000158 [ 472.096136] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 472.096136] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 472.096136] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 472.096136] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 472.096136] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G B 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36 [ 472.096136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4 [ 472.096136] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout [ 472.096136] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0 [ 472.096136] Code: be 08 00 00 00 e8 f8 23 1f fd 4c 89 f7 be 08 00 00 00 e8 eb 23 1f fd 42 80 3c 23 00 74 08 48 88 [ 472.096136] RSP: 0018:ffff88800744fc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 472.096136] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11000e89f8f RCX: ffffffff8457c865 [ 472.096136] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88800744fc78 [ 472.096136] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: ffff88800744fc7f R09: 1ffff11000e89f8f [ 472.096136] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1000e89f90 R12: dffffc0000000000 [ 472.096136] R13: 0000000000000158 R14: ffff88800744fc78 R15: ffff888007405a00 [ 472.096136] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 472.096136] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 472.096136] CR2: 0000000000000158 CR3: 000000000da32000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 472.096136] Call Trace: [ 472.096136] <TASK> [ 472.096136] ? __die_body+0x8d/0xe0 [ 472.096136] ? page_fault_oops+0x6b8/0x9a0 [ 472.096136] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x20c/0x2a0 [ 472.096136] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1027/0x1340 [ 472.096136] ? _printk+0x7a/0xa0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? add_taint+0x42/0xd0 [ 472.096136] ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x1b0 [ 472.096136] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0 [ 472.096136] l2cap_chan_timeo ---truncated---(CVE-2024-27399)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use
The receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not the socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly returning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack
conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges.
Example: macvlan0 | br0 / \ ethX ethY
ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table.
- skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting. -> skb->_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry
- skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge interface.
- skb gets passed up the stack.
-
In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices.
The clone skb->_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS. 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb.
The Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race.
This race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that case later steps perform skb_clone() with skb->_nfct already confirmed (in hash table). This works fine.
But such confirmation won't happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the packets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting.
Pablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn't allow use of stateful nat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call conntrack again.
This doesn't work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat transformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting via 'sabotage_in' hook.
Work around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN time, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry.
The downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers.
Alternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with unconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this opens up other problems, for example:
-m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4 -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5
For multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be created, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings.
Users should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic NOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass them, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already, so user-visible behaviour would change.(CVE-2024-27415)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: altmodes/displayport: create sysfs nodes as driver's default device attribute group
The DisplayPort driver's sysfs nodes may be present to the userspace before typec_altmode_set_drvdata() completes in dp_altmode_probe. This means that a sysfs read can trigger a NULL pointer error by deferencing dp->hpd in hpd_show or dp->lock in pin_assignment_show, as dev_get_drvdata() returns NULL in those cases.
Remove manual sysfs node creation in favor of adding attribute group as default for devices bound to the driver. The ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro is not used here otherwise the path to the sysfs nodes is no longer compliant with the ABI.(CVE-2024-35790)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal
A race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove() callback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an unhandled page fault [1].
The problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running after pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn't really guarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks will not be running when it returns.
However, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when pm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM status of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without waiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for .runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it arguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly prohibited).
Thus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs to protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after pm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after pm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it has started earlier.]
One way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier() after pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the runtime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from being invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should it be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in pci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the driver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which will prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr driver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks.(CVE-2024-35809)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix memory leak during rehash
The rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another. This is done by iterating over all chunks (all the filters with the same priority) in the region and in each chunk iterating over all the filters.
If the migration fails, the code tries to migrate the filters back to the old region. However, the rollback itself can also fail in which case another migration will be erroneously performed. Besides the fact that this ping pong is not a very good idea, it also creates a problem.
Each virtual chunk references two chunks: The currently used one ('vchunk->chunk') and a backup ('vchunk->chunk2'). During migration the first holds the chunk we want to migrate filters to and the second holds the chunk we are migrating filters from.
The code currently assumes - but does not verify - that the backup chunk does not exist (NULL) if the currently used chunk does not reference the target region. This assumption breaks when we are trying to rollback a rollback, resulting in the backup chunk being overwritten and leaked [1].
Fix by not rolling back a failed rollback and add a warning to avoid future cases.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1063 at lib/parman.c:291 parman_destroy+0x17/0x20 Modules linked in: CPU: 5 PID: 1063 Comm: kworker/5:11 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00784-gc6a05c468a0b #14 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:parman_destroy+0x17/0x20 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_region_fini+0x19/0x60 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x49/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x1f1/0x470 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-35853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during rehash
The rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another according to the number of available credits.
The migrated from region is destroyed at the end of the work if the number of credits is non-negative as the assumption is that this is indicative of migration being complete. This assumption is incorrect as a non-negative number of credits can also be the result of a failed migration.
The destruction of a region that still has filters referencing it can result in a use-after-free [1].
Fix by not destroying the region if migration failed.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881735319e8 by task kworker/0:31/3858
CPU: 0 PID: 3858 Comm: kworker/0:31 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00782-gf2275c2157d8 #5 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120 print_report+0xce/0x670 kasan_report+0xd7/0x110 mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230 mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_entry_del+0x2e/0x70 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_del+0x81/0x210 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3cd/0xb50 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
Allocated by task 174: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_create+0xdf/0x9c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x954/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Freed by task 7: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170 __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30 kfree+0xc1/0x290 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x272/0x310 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x731/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35854)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during activity update
The rule activity update delayed work periodically traverses the list of configured rules and queries their activity from the device.
As part of this task it accesses the entry pointed by 'ventry->entry', but this entry can be changed concurrently by the rehash delayed work, leading to a use-after-free [1].
Fix by closing the race and perform the activity query under the 'vregion->lock' mutex.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881054ed808 by task kworker/0:18/181
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00781-gd5ab772d32f7 #2 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120 print_report+0xce/0x670 kasan_report+0xd7/0x110 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140 mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work+0x219/0x400 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
Allocated by task 1039: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x7b/0x1f0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x30d/0xb50 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Freed by task 1039: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170 __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30 kfree+0xc1/0x290 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3d7/0xb50 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done().
syzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during netlink socket destruction. [1]
From the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then the response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump for IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due to the fault injection. [0]
12:01:34 executing program 3: r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0) sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...) recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8)
Here, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done, and the next call of inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped receiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct() called nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done().
fib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() if it is still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() by nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling itself recursively and hitting the stack guard page.
To avoid the issue, let's set the destructor after kzalloc().
[0]: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 CPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153) should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733) kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992) inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662) rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029) netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269) netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988) _sysrecvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801) _sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846) do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943) __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034)
[1]: BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work RIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570) Code: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd <53> 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3 RDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358 RBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) ... fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401) __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2)) sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224) __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235) sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue. ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35886)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
erspan: make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb->head
syzbot reported a problem in ip6erspan_rcv() [1]
Issue is that ip6erspan_rcv() (and erspan_rcv()) no longer make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb linear part (skb->head) before getting @ver field from it.
Add the missing pskb_may_pull() calls.
v2: Reload iph pointer in erspan_rcv() after pskb_may_pull() because skb->head might have changed.
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610 pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline] pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline] ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline] gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1d4c/0x2ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438 ip6_input_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_input+0x15d/0x430 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492 ip6_mc_input+0xa7e/0xc80 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:586 dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline] ip6_rcv_finish+0x955/0x970 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xde/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5538 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5652 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5738 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5798 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1549 tun_get_user+0x5566/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 tun_alloc_skb drivers/net/tun.c:1525 [inline] tun_get_user+0x209a/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:1846 tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 5045 Comm: syz-executor114 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00021-g962490525cff #0(CVE-2024-35888)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem
syzkaller started using corpuses where a BPF tracing program deletes elements from a sockmap/sockhash map. Because BPF tracing programs can be invoked from any interrupt context, locks taken during a map_delete_elem operation must be hardirq-safe. Otherwise a deadlock due to lock inversion is possible, as reported by lockdep:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&host->lock); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); <Interrupt> lock(&host->lock);
Locks in sockmap are hardirq-unsafe by design. We expects elements to be deleted from sockmap/sockhash only in task (normal) context with interrupts enabled, or in softirq context.
Detect when map_delete_elem operation is invoked from a context which is not hardirq-unsafe, that is interrupts are disabled, and bail out with an error.
Note that map updates are not affected by this issue. BPF verifier does not allow updating sockmap/sockhash from a BPF tracing program today.(CVE-2024-35895)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: validate user input for expected length
I got multiple syzbot reports showing old bugs exposed by BPF after commit 20f2505fb436 ("bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc in cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt")
setsockopt() @optlen argument should be taken into account before copying data.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627 Read of size 96 at addr ffff88802cd73da0 by task syz-executor.4/7238
CPU: 1 PID: 7238 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-next-20240403-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x29/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:105 copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627 nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a RIP: 0033:0x7fd22067dde9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fd21f9ff0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd2207abf80 RCX: 00007fd22067dde9 RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fd2206ca47a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000020000880 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd2207abf80 R15: 00007ffd2d0170d8 </TASK>
Allocated by task 7238: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4069 [inline] __kmalloc_noprof+0x200/0x410 mm/slub.c:4082 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd47/0x1050 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869 do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802cd73da0 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 1-byte region [ffff88802cd73da0, ffff88802cd73da1)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88802cd73020 pfn:0x2cd73 flags: 0xfff80000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0xfff) page_type: 0xffffefff(slab) raw: 00fff80000000000 ffff888015041280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 raw: ffff88802cd73020 000000008080007f 00000001ffffefff 00 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35896)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size
This patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack memory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result of overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually happen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should protect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections (fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array accesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the verification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.
This check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly removed in a833a17aeac7.(CVE-2024-35905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1][2]:
nci_rx_work() parses and processes received packet. When the payload length is zero, each message type handler reads uninitialized payload and KMSAN detects this issue. The receipt of a packet with a zero-size payload is considered unexpected, and therefore, such packets should be silently discarded.
This patch resolved this issue by checking payload size before calling each message type handler codes.(CVE-2024-35915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: ucsi: Limit read size on v1.2
Between UCSI 1.2 and UCSI 2.0, the size of the MESSAGE_IN region was increased from 16 to 256. In order to avoid overflowing reads for older systems, add a mechanism to use the read UCSI version to truncate read sizes on UCSI v1.2.(CVE-2024-35924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: prevent division by zero in blk_rq_stat_sum()
The expression dst->nr_samples + src->nr_samples may have zero value on overflow. It is necessary to add a check to avoid division by zero.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35925)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
syzbot reported sco_sock_setsockopt() is copying data without checking user input length.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sco_sock_setsockopt+0xc0b/0xf90 net/bluetooth/sco.c:893 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88805f7b15a3 by task syz-executor.5/12578(CVE-2024-35967)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
geneve: fix header validation in geneve[6]_xmit_skb
syzbot is able to trigger an uninit-value in geneve_xmit() [1]
Problem : While most ip tunnel helpers (like ip_tunnel_get_dsfield()) uses skb_protocol(skb, true), pskb_inet_may_pull() is only using skb->protocol.
If anything else than ETH_P_IPV6 or ETH_P_IP is found in skb->protocol, pskb_inet_may_pull() does nothing at all.
If a vlan tag was provided by the caller (af_packet in the syzbot case), the network header might not point to the correct location, and skb linear part could be smaller than expected.
Add skb_vlan_inet_prepare() to perform a complete mac validation.
Use this in geneve for the moment, I suspect we need to adopt this more broadly.
v4 - Jakub reported v3 broke l2_tos_ttl_inherit.sh selftest - Only call __vlan_get_protocol() for vlan types.
v2,v3 - Addressed Sabrina comments on v1 and v2
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030 geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline] geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547 __dev_queue_xmit+0x348d/0x52c0 net/core/dev.c:4335 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline] packet_xmit+0x9c/0x6c0 net/packet/af_packet.c:276 packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3081 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x8bb0/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 packet_alloc_skb net/packet/af_packet.c:2930 [inline] packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3024 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x722d/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 0 PID: 5033 Comm: syz-executor346 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00005-g928a87efa423 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024(CVE-2024-35973)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: check for NULL idev in ip_route_use_hint()
syzbot was able to trigger a NULL deref in fib_validate_source() in an old tree [1].
It appears the bug exists in latest trees.
All calls to __in_dev_get_rcu() must be checked for a NULL result.
[1] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 2 PID: 3257 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:fib_validate_source+0xbf/0x15a0 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:425 Code: 18 f2 f2 f2 f2 42 c7 44 20 23 f3 f3 f3 f3 48 89 44 24 78 42 c6 44 20 27 f3 e8 5d 88 48 fc 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 48 89 44 24 18 <42> 80 3c 20 00 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 d2 15 98 fc 48 89 5c 24 10 41 bf RSP: 0018:ffffc900015fee40 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88800f7a4000 RCX: ffff88800f4f90c0 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000004001eac RDI: ffff8880160c64c0 RBP: ffffc900015ff060 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88800f7a4000 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88800f4f90c0 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88800f7a4000 FS: 00007f938acfe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888058c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f938acddd58 CR3: 000000001248e000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ip_route_use_hint+0x410/0x9b0 net/ipv4/route.c:2231 ip_rcv_finish_core+0x2c4/0x1a30 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:327 ip_list_rcv_finish net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612 [inline] ip_sublist_rcv+0x3ed/0xe50 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:638 ip_list_rcv+0x422/0x470 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:673 __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:5572 [inline] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x6b1/0x890 net/core/dev.c:5620 __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:5672 [inline] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x9f9/0xdc0 net/core/dev.c:5764 netif_receive_skb_list+0x55/0x3e0 net/core/dev.c:5816 xdp_recv_frames net/bpf/test_run.c:257 [inline] xdp_test_run_batch net/bpf/test_run.c:335 [inline] bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x1818/0x1d00 net/bpf/test_run.c:363 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x81f/0x1170 net/bpf/test_run.c:1376 bpf_prog_test_run+0x349/0x3c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3736 __sys_bpf+0x45c/0x710 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5115 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5201 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199(CVE-2024-36008)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation
Each attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least of sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes. The current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes) which is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation is not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands read access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix kernel crash when devlink reload during pf initialization
The devlink reload process will access the hardware resources, but the register operation is done before the hardware is initialized. So, processing the devlink reload during initialization may lead to kernel crash. This patch fixes this by taking devl_lock during initialization.(CVE-2024-36021)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller
Generic sdhci code registers LED device and uses host->runtime_suspended flag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn't set this flag, which causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime suspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.(CVE-2024-36029)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init
net_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is called without any locking. It reads max_gen_ptrs, which is changed under pernet_ops_rwsem. It is read twice, first to allocate an array, then to set s.len, which is later used to limit the bounds of the array access.
It is possible that the array is allocated and another thread is registering a new pernet ops, increments max_gen_ptrs, which is then used to set s.len with a larger than allocated length for the variable array.
Fix it by reading max_gen_ptrs only once in net_alloc_generic. If max_gen_ptrs is later incremented, it will be caught in net_assign_generic.(CVE-2024-36883)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix UAF in error path
Sam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported a UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034
CPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88 dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377 print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601 kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026 skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094 __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108 kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144 kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244 tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186 tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324 tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824 tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159 tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346 __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254 dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461 ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534 __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648 process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645 net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781 __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553 do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454 do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381 local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851 __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378 dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169 neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526 neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540 ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235 __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313 __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295 ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323 NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303 ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451 ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492 udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963 udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250 inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850 sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730 __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203 __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 do_syscall_ ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect
Christoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8 8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe <0f> 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4 RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000 R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline] mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline] __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615 mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767 process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline] worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 </TASK>
When fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt is not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value into snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level re-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send buffer cleanup using 'bad' snd_una values.
We could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such dumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very low to zero impact in practice.
Instead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq, for consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpiolib: cdev: fix uninitialised kfifo
If a line is requested with debounce, and that results in debouncing in software, and the line is subsequently reconfigured to enable edge detection then the allocation of the kfifo to contain edge events is overlooked. This results in events being written to and read from an uninitialised kfifo. Read events are returned to userspace.
Initialise the kfifo in the case where the software debounce is already active.(CVE-2024-36898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpiolib: cdev: Fix use after free in lineinfo_changed_notify
The use-after-free issue occurs as follows: when the GPIO chip device file is being closed by invoking gpio_chrdev_release(), watched_lines is freed by bitmap_free(), but the unregistration of lineinfo_changed_nb notifier chain failed due to waiting write rwsem. Additionally, one of the GPIO chip's lines is also in the release process and holds the notifier chain's read rwsem. Consequently, a race condition leads to the use-after-free of watched_lines.
Here is the typical stack when issue happened:
[free] gpio_chrdev_release() --> bitmap_free(cdev->watched_lines) <-- freed --> blocking_notifier_chain_unregister() --> down_write(&nh->rwsem) <-- waiting rwsem --> __down_write_common() --> rwsem_down_write_slowpath() --> schedule_preempt_disabled() --> schedule()
[use] st54spi_gpio_dev_release() --> gpio_free() --> gpiod_free() --> gpiod_free_commit() --> gpiod_line_state_notify() --> blocking_notifier_call_chain() --> down_read(&nh->rwsem); <-- held rwsem --> notifier_call_chain() --> lineinfo_changed_notify() --> test_bit(xxxx, cdev->watched_lines) <-- use after free
The side effect of the use-after-free issue is that a GPIO line event is being generated for userspace where it shouldn't. However, since the chrdev is being closed, userspace won't have the chance to read that event anyway.
To fix the issue, call the bitmap_free() function after the unregistration of lineinfo_changed_nb notifier chain.(CVE-2024-36899)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()
According to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev() returns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack deal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.
syzbot reported:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7] CPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237 Code: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0 R13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358 sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248 sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653 sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783 sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline] sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212 sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline] sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169 sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73 __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fib6_rules: avoid possible NULL dereference in fib6_rule_action()
syzbot is able to trigger the following crash [1], caused by unsafe ip6_dst_idev() use.
Indeed ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, and must always be checked.
[1]
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 PID: 31648 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240417-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:__fib6_rule_action net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:237 [inline] RIP: 0010:fib6_rule_action+0x241/0x7b0 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:267 Code: 02 00 00 49 8d 9f d8 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f9 32 bf f7 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 e0 32 bf f7 4c 8b 03 48 89 ef 4c RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fc1f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1a772f98c8186700 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8bcac4e0 RDI: ffffffff8c1f9760 RBP: ffff8880673fb980 R08: ffffffff8fac15ef R09: 1ffffffff1f582bd R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f582be R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: 0000000000000080 R14: ffff888076509000 R15: ffff88807a029a00 FS: 00007f55e82ca6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b31d23000 CR3: 0000000022b66000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> fib_rules_lookup+0x62c/0xdb0 net/core/fib_rules.c:317 fib6_rule_lookup+0x1fd/0x790 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:108 ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2637 [inline] ip6_route_output_flags+0x38e/0x610 net/ipv6/route.c:2649 ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:93 [inline] ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x189/0x11a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1120 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0xb9/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250 sctp_v6_get_dst+0x792/0x1e20 net/sctp/ipv6.c:326 sctp_transport_route+0x12c/0x2e0 net/sctp/transport.c:455 sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x614/0x15c0 net/sctp/associola.c:662 sctp_connect_new_asoc+0x31d/0x6c0 net/sctp/socket.c:1099 __sctp_connect+0x66d/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1197 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36902)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets
TCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by cross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers.
In the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide by zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()
A socket makes the following state transitions, without ever calling tcp_init_transfer(), meaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called.
TCP_CLOSE
connect() TCP_SYN_SENT TCP_SYN_RECV shutdown() -> tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN) TCP_FIN_WAIT1
To fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not perform a TCP_SYN_RECV -> TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition, which makes no sense anyway.
When tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state from TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at sk->sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, and send a FIN packet from a sane socket state.
This means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH context, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations.
[1] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767 Code: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 <48> f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da FS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513 tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578 inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068 _sysrecvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803 _sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001(CVE-2024-36905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ARM: 9381/1: kasan: clear stale stack poison
We found below OOB crash:
[ 33.452494] ================================================================== [ 33.453513] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec [ 33.454660] Write of size 164 at addr c1d03d30 by task swapper/0/0 [ 33.455515] [ 33.455767] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.1.25-mainline #1 [ 33.456880] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 33.457555] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c [ 33.458326] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c [ 33.459072] dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x158/0x4a4 [ 33.459863] print_report from kasan_report+0x9c/0x148 [ 33.460616] kasan_report from kasan_check_range+0x94/0x1a0 [ 33.461424] kasan_check_range from memset+0x20/0x3c [ 33.462157] memset from refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec [ 33.463064] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0 from tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick+0x180/0x53c [ 33.464181] tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick from do_idle+0x264/0x354 [ 33.465029] do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x24 [ 33.465769] cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xf0/0xf4 [ 33.466528] rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18 [ 33.467397] [ 33.467644] The buggy address belongs to stack of task swapper/0/0 [ 33.468493] and is located at offset 112 in frame: [ 33.469172] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0x0/0x2ec [ 33.469917] [ 33.470165] This frame has 2 objects: [ 33.470696] [32, 76) 'global_zone_diff' [ 33.470729] [112, 276) 'global_node_diff' [ 33.471294] [ 33.472095] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 33.472862] page:3cd72da8 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x41d03 [ 33.473944] flags: 0x1000(reserved|zone=0) [ 33.474565] raw: 00001000 ed741470 ed741470 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001 [ 33.475656] raw: 00000000 [ 33.476050] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 33.476816] [ 33.477061] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 33.477732] c1d03c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 33.478630] c1d03c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 [ 33.479526] >c1d03d00: 00 04 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 [ 33.480415] ^ [ 33.481195] c1d03d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3 [ 33.482088] c1d03e00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 33.482978] ==================================================================
We find the root cause of this OOB is that arm does not clear stale stack poison in the case of cpuidle.
This patch refer to arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S to resolve this issue.
From cited commit [1] that explain the problem
Functions which the compiler has instrumented for KASAN place poison on the stack shadow upon entry and remove this poison prior to returning.
In the case of cpuidle, CPUs exit the kernel a number of levels deep in C code. Any instrumented functions on this critical path will leave portions of the stack shadow poisoned.
If CPUs lose context and return to the kernel via a cold path, we restore a prior context saved in __cpu_suspend_enter are forgotten, and we never remove the poison they placed in the stack shadow area by functions calls between this and the actual exit of the kernel.
Thus, (depending on stackframe layout) subsequent calls to instrumented functions may hit this stale poison, resulting in (spurious) KASAN splats to the console.
To avoid this, clear any stale poison from the idle thread for a CPU prior to bringing a CPU online.
From cited commit [2]
Extend to check for CONFIG_KASAN_STACK
[1] commit 0d97e6d8024c ("arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison") [2] commit d56a9ef84bd0 ("kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK")(CVE-2024-36906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0
The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns.
Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk.(CVE-2024-36908)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()
lpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the hbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the hbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs
SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be linearized, otherwise they become invalid. Return NULL if such an skb is passed to skb_copy or skb_copy_expand, in order to prevent a crash on a potential later call to skb_gso_segment.(CVE-2024-36929)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
amd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted
If there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first device will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes on all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will start reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been evicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page fault.(CVE-2024-36949)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: avoid off-by-one read from userspace
We try to access count + 1 byte from userspace with memdup_user(buffer, count + 1). However, the userspace only provides buffer of count bytes and only these count bytes are verified to be okay to access. To ensure the copied buffer is NUL terminated, we use memdup_user_nul instead.(CVE-2024-36957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/9p: only translate RWX permissions for plain 9P2000
Garbage in plain 9P2000's perm bits is allowed through, which causes it to be able to set (among others) the suid bit. This was presumably not the intent since the unix extended bits are handled explicitly and conditionally on .u.(CVE-2024-36964)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.79.0.159.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix use-after-free of encap entry in neigh update handler\r\n\r\nFunction mlx5e_rep_neigh_update() wasn\u0026apos;t updated to accommodate rtnl lock\nremoval from TC filter update path and properly handle concurrent encap\nentry insertion/deletion which can lead to following use-after-free:\r\n\r\n [23827.464923] ==================================================================\n [23827.469446] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.470971] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881d132228c by task kworker/u20:6/21635\n [23827.472251]\n [23827.472615] CPU: 9 PID: 21635 Comm: kworker/u20:6 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #5\n [23827.473788] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\n [23827.475639] Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_rep_neigh_update [mlx5_core]\n [23827.476731] Call Trace:\n [23827.477260] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107\n [23827.477906] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x140\n [23827.478896] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.479879] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.480905] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8\n [23827.481701] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.482744] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0\n [23827.493112] mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.494054] ? mlx5e_tc_tun_encap_info_equal_generic+0x140/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.495296] mlx5e_rep_neigh_update+0x41e/0x5e0 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.496338] ? mlx5e_rep_neigh_entry_release+0xb80/0xb80 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.497486] ? read_word_at_a_time+0xe/0x20\n [23827.498250] ? strscpy+0xa0/0x2a0\n [23827.498889] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0\n [23827.499638] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400\n [23827.500537] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2c0/0x2c0\n [23827.501359] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90\n [23827.502116] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220\n [23827.502831] ? process_one_work+0x14e0/0x14e0\n [23827.503627] kthread+0x328/0x3f0\n [23827.504254] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40\n [23827.505065] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x90/0x90\n [23827.505912] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\n [23827.506621]\n [23827.506987] Allocated by task 28248:\n [23827.507694] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40\n [23827.508476] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7c/0x90\n [23827.509197] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xde1/0x1d40 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.510194] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x397/0xc40 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.511218] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x519/0xb30 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.512234] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x191c/0x4870 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.513298] tc_setup_cb_add+0x1d5/0x420\n [23827.514023] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x382/0x6a0 [cls_flower]\n [23827.514975] fl_change+0x2ceb/0x4a51 [cls_flower]\n [23827.515821] tc_new_tfilter+0x89a/0x2070\n [23827.516548] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x644/0x8c0\n [23827.517300] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340\n [23827.518021] netlink_unicast+0x42b/0x700\n [23827.518742] netlink_sendmsg+0x743/0xc20\n [23827.519467] sock_sendmsg+0xb2/0xe0\n [23827.520131] ____sys_sendmsg+0x590/0x770\n [23827.520851] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x160\n [23827.521552] __sys_sendmsg+0xb7/0x140\n [23827.522238] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70\n [23827.522907] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n [23827.523797]\n [23827.524163] Freed by task 25948:\n [23827.524780] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40\n [23827.525488] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30\n [23827.526187] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30\n [23827.526968] __kasan_slab_free+0xed/0x130\n [23827.527709] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xcf/0x1d0\n [23827.528528] kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x33a/0x6e0\n [23827.529317] kfree_rcu_work+0x55f/0xb70\n [23827.530024] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0\n [23827.530770] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220\n [23827.531480] kthread+0x328/0x3f0\n [23827.532114] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\n [23827.532785]\n [23827.533147] Last potentially related work creation:\n [23827.534007] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40\n [23827.534710] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0\n [23827.535492] kvfree_call_rcu+0x31/0x7b0\n [23827.536206] mlx5e_tc_del\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47247)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA: Verify port when creating flow rule\r\n\r\nValidate port value provided by the user and with that remove no longer\nneeded validation by the driver. The missing check in the mlx5_ib driver\ncould cause to the below oops.\r\n\r\nCall trace:\n _create_flow_rule+0x2d4/0xf28 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_create_flow+0x2d0/0x5b0 [mlx5_ib]\n ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x4cc/0x624 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0xd4/0x150 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs.isra.7+0xb28/0xc50 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x158/0x1d0 [ib_uverbs]\n do_vfs_ioctl+0xd0/0xaf0\n ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb4\n __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0xc4\n el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa4/0x254\n el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xa0\n el0_svc+0x10/0x26c\n Code: b9401260 f9615681 51000400 8b001c20 (f9403c1a)(CVE-2021-47265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: fix possible use-after-free in HFC_cleanup()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47356)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: stmmac: Disable Tx queues when reconfiguring the interface\r\n\r\nThe Tx queues were not disabled in situations where the driver needed to\nstop the interface to apply a new configuration. This could result in a\nkernel panic when doing any of the 3 following actions:\n* reconfiguring the number of queues (ethtool -L)\n* reconfiguring the size of the ring buffers (ethtool -G)\n* installing/removing an XDP program (ip l set dev ethX xdp)\r\n\r\nPrevent the panic by making sure netif_tx_disable is called when stopping\nan interface.\r\n\r\nWithout this patch, the following kernel panic can be observed when doing\nany of the actions above:\r\n\r\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001238d040\n[....]\n Call trace:\n dwmac4_set_addr+0x8/0x10\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0xe4/0x1ac\n sch_direct_xmit+0xe8/0x39c\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x3ec/0xaf0\n dev_queue_xmit+0x14/0x20\n[...]\n[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]---(CVE-2021-47558)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more than queues\r\n\r\nThere are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.\r\n\r\nCommit a632b2a4c920 (\u0026quot;ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config\nfor DCB\u0026quot;) already disallow setting less queues than TCs.\r\n\r\nAnother case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs\nconfig due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty\nnum_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid pointer access.\r\n\r\n[ 95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated.\n[ 95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)!\n[ 95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0\n[ 95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n[ 95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G U W O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1\n[ 95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021\n[ 95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60\n[ 95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 \u0026lt;8b\u0026gt; 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c\n[ 95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[ 95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0\n[ 95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200\n[ 95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000\n[ 95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100\n[ 95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460\n[ 95.970981] FS: 00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 95.971108] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0\n[ 95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 95.971530] PKRU: 55555554\n[ 95.971573] Call Trace:\n[ 95.971622] ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice]\n[ 95.971695] ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice]\n[ 95.971774] ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice]\n[ 95.971843] ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice]\n[ 95.971919] ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice]\n[ 95.971987] ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice]\n[ 95.972082] ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice]\n[ 95.972154] ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice]\n[ 95.972220] dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230\n[ 95.972279] ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150\n[ 95.972341] dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0\n[ 95.972392] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0\n[ 95.972457] ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0\n[ 95.972510] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280\n[ 95.972591] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100\n[ 95.972661] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0\n[ 95.972720] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220\n[ 95.972781] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0\n[ 95.975891] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50\n[ 95.979032] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2e4/0x300\n[ 95.982147] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190\n[ 95.985242] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90\n[ 95.988338] ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0\n[ 95.991440] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30\n[ 95.994539] ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0\n[ 95.997619] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80\n[ 96.000664] __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80\n[ 96.003747] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0\n[ 96.006862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca\r\n\r\nOnly update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup\nqueue map failed.(CVE-2022-48652)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\naio: fix mremap after fork null-deref\r\n\r\nCommit e4a0d3e720e7 (\u0026quot;aio: Make it possible to remap aio ring\u0026quot;) introduced\na null-deref if mremap is called on an old aio mapping after fork as\nmm-\u0026gt;ioctx_table will be set to NULL.\r\n\r\n[jmoyer@redhat.com: fix 80 column issue](CVE-2023-52646)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: Check if the code to patch lies in the exit section\r\n\r\nOtherwise we fall through to vmalloc_to_page() which panics since the\naddress does not lie in the vmalloc region.(CVE-2023-52677)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: scarlett2: Add missing error checks to *_ctl_get()\r\n\r\nThe *_ctl_get() functions which call scarlett2_update_*() were not\nchecking the return value. Fix to check the return value and pass to\nthe caller.(CVE-2023-52680)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_event_init()\r\n\r\nkasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory\nwhich can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52686)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: openvswitch: fix possible memory leak in ovs_meter_cmd_set()\r\n\r\nold_meter needs to be free after it is detached regardless of whether\nthe new meter is successfully attached.(CVE-2023-52702)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix underflow in second superblock position calculations\r\n\r\nMacro NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES, which computes the position of the second\nsuperblock, underflows when the argument device size is less than 4096\nbytes. Therefore, when using this macro, it is necessary to check in\nadvance that the device size is not less than a lower limit, or at least\nthat underflow does not occur.\r\n\r\nThe current nilfs2 implementation lacks this check, causing out-of-bound\nblock access when mounting devices smaller than 4096 bytes:\r\n\r\n I/O error, dev loop0, sector 36028797018963960 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0\n phys_seg 1 prio class 2\n NILFS (loop0): unable to read secondary superblock (blocksize = 1024)\r\n\r\nIn addition, when trying to resize the filesystem to a size below 4096\nbytes, this underflow occurs in nilfs_resize_fs(), passing a huge number\nof segments to nilfs_sufile_resize(), corrupting parameters such as the\nnumber of segments in superblocks. This causes excessive loop iterations\nin nilfs_sufile_resize() during a subsequent resize ioctl, causing\nsemaphore ns_segctor_sem to block for a long time and hang the writer\nthread:\r\n\r\n INFO: task segctord:5067 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\n Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-syzkaller-00015-gf6feea56f66d #0\n \u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\n task:segctord state:D stack:23456 pid:5067 ppid:2\n flags:0x00004000\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline]\n __schedule+0x1409/0x43f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6606\n schedule+0xc3/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682\n rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0xfcf/0x14a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1190\n nilfs_transaction_lock+0x25c/0x4f0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357\n nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2486 [inline]\n nilfs_segctor_thread+0x52f/0x1140 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2570\n kthread+0x270/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n folio_mark_accessed+0x51c/0xf00 mm/swap.c:515\n __nilfs_get_page_block fs/nilfs2/page.c:42 [inline]\n nilfs_grab_buffer+0x3d3/0x540 fs/nilfs2/page.c:61\n nilfs_mdt_submit_block+0xd7/0x8f0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:121\n nilfs_mdt_read_block+0xeb/0x430 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:176\n nilfs_mdt_get_block+0x12d/0xbb0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:251\n nilfs_sufile_get_segment_usage_block fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:92 [inline]\n nilfs_sufile_truncate_range fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:679 [inline]\n nilfs_sufile_resize+0x7a3/0x12b0 fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:777\n nilfs_resize_fs+0x20c/0xed0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:422\n nilfs_ioctl_resize fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1033 [inline]\n nilfs_ioctl+0x137c/0x2440 fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1301\n ...\r\n\r\nThis fixes these issues by inserting appropriate minimum device size\nchecks or anti-underflow checks, depending on where the macro is used.(CVE-2023-52705)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/IPoIB: Fix legacy IPoIB due to wrong number of queues\r\n\r\nThe cited commit creates child PKEY interfaces over netlink will\nmultiple tx and rx queues, but some devices doesn\u0026apos;t support more than 1\ntx and 1 rx queues. This causes to a crash when traffic is sent over the\nPKEY interface due to the parent having a single queue but the child\nhaving multiple queues.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes the number of queues to 1 for legacy IPoIB at the\nearliest possible point in time.\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000036b\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0000 [#1] SMP\nCPU: 4 PID: 209665 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.1.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2022_12_12_17_02 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:kmem_cache_alloc+0xcb/0x450\nCode: ce 7e 49 8b 50 08 49 83 78 10 00 4d 8b 28 0f 84 cb 02 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 c2 02 00 00 41 8b 44 24 28 48 8d 4a\n01 49 8b 3c 24 \u0026lt;49\u0026gt; 8b 5c 05 00 4c 89 e8 65 48 0f c7 0f 0f 94 c0 84 c0 74 b8 41 8b\nRSP: 0018:ffff88822acbbab8 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 0000000000000070 RBX: ffff8881c28e3e00 RCX: 00000000064f8dae\nRDX: 00000000064f8dad RSI: 0000000000000a20 RDI: 0000000000030d00\nRBP: 0000000000000a20 R08: ffff8882f5d30d00 R09: ffff888104032f40\nR10: ffff88810fade828 R11: 736f6d6570736575 R12: ffff88810081c000\nR13: 00000000000002fb R14: ffffffff817fc865 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007f9324ff9700(0000) GS:ffff8882f5d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000000000000036b CR3: 00000001125af004 CR4: 0000000000370ea0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n skb_clone+0x55/0xd0\n ip6_finish_output2+0x3fe/0x690\n ip6_finish_output+0xfa/0x310\n ip6_send_skb+0x1e/0x60\n udp_v6_send_skb+0x1e5/0x420\n udpv6_sendmsg+0xb3c/0xe60\n ? ip_mc_finish_output+0x180/0x180\n ? __switch_to_asm+0x3a/0x60\n ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x60\n sock_sendmsg+0x33/0x40\n __sys_sendto+0x103/0x160\n ? _copy_to_user+0x21/0x30\n ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0xd/0x10\n ? ktime_get_ts64+0x49/0xe0\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x25/0x30\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\nRIP: 0033:0x7f9374f1ed14\nCode: 42 41 f8 ff 44 8b 4c 24 2c 4c 8b 44 24 20 89 c5 44 8b 54 24 28 48 8b 54 24 18 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 74 24 10 8b\n7c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 ef 48 89 44 24 08 e8 68 41 f8 ff 48 8b\nRSP: 002b:00007f9324ff7bd0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9324ff7cc8 RCX: 00007f9374f1ed14\nRDX: 00000000000002fb RSI: 00007f93000052f0 RDI: 0000000000000030\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f9324ff7d40 R09: 000000000000001c\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 000000012a05f200 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007f9374d57bdc\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2023-52745)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfrm/compat: prevent potential spectre v1 gadget in xfrm_xlate32_attr()\r\n\r\n int type = nla_type(nla);\r\n\r\n if (type \u0026gt; XFRMA_MAX) {\n return -EOPNOTSUPP;\n }\r\n\r\n@type is then used as an array index and can be used\nas a Spectre v1 gadget.\r\n\r\n if (nla_len(nla) \u0026lt; compat_policy[type].len) {\r\n\r\narray_index_nospec() can be used to prevent leaking\ncontent of kernel memory to malicious users.(CVE-2023-52746)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference of timing generator\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nCheck whether assigned timing generator is NULL or not before\naccessing its funcs to prevent NULL dereference.(CVE-2023-52753)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline\r\n\r\nWe found a data corruption issue during testing of SMC-R on Redis\napplications.\r\n\r\nThe benchmark has a low probability of reporting a strange error as\nshown below.\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;Error: Protocol error, got \u0026quot;\\xe2\u0026quot; as reply type byte\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nFinally, we found that the retrieved error data was as follows:\r\n\r\n0xE2 0xD4 0xC3 0xD9 0x04 0x00 0x2C 0x20 0xA6 0x56 0x00 0x16 0x3E 0x0C\n0xCB 0x04 0x02 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x20 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00\n0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xE2\r\n\r\nIt is quite obvious that this is a SMC DECLINE message, which means that\nthe applications received SMC protocol message.\nWe found that this was caused by the following situations:\r\n\r\nclient server\n \u00a6 clc proposal\n -------------\u0026gt;\n \u00a6 clc accept\n \u0026lt;-------------\n \u00a6 clc confirm\n -------------\u0026gt;\nwait llc confirm\n\t\t\tsend llc confirm\n \u00a6failed llc confirm\n \u00a6 x------\n(after 2s)timeout\n wait llc confirm rsp\r\n\r\nwait decline\r\n\r\n(after 1s) timeout\n (after 2s) timeout\n \u00a6 decline\n --------------\u0026gt;\n \u00a6 decline\n \u0026lt;--------------\r\n\r\nAs a result, a decline message was sent in the implementation, and this\nmessage was read from TCP by the already-fallback connection.\r\n\r\nThis patch double the client timeout as 2x of the server value,\nWith this simple change, the Decline messages should never cross or\ncollide (during Confirm link timeout).\r\n\r\nThis issue requires an immediate solution, since the protocol updates\ninvolve a more long-term solution.(CVE-2023-52775)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvlan: add ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() helper\r\n\r\nInspired by syzbot reports using a stack of multiple ipvlan devices.\r\n\r\nReduce stack size needed in ipvlan_process_v6_outbound() by moving\nthe flowi6 struct used for the route lookup in an non inlined\nhelper. ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() needs 120 bytes on the stack,\nimmediately reclaimed.\r\n\r\nAlso make sure ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() is not inlined.\r\n\r\nWe might also have to lower MAX_NEST_DEV, because only syzbot uses\nsetups with more than four stacked devices.\r\n\r\nBUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000e803ff8 (stack is ffffc9000e804000..ffffc9000e808000)\nstack guard page: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN\nCPU: 0 PID: 13442 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.1.52-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023\nRIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x4/0x2a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:188\nCode: 48 01 c6 48 89 c7 e8 db 4e c1 03 31 c0 5d c3 cc 0f 0b eb 02 0f 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 cc 00 00 cc cc 00 00 cc cc 55 48 89 e5 \u0026lt;41\u0026gt; 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 b0 01 48 85 f6 0f 84 a4 01 00 00 48 89\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000e804000 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff817e5bf2\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff887c6568\nRBP: ffffc9000e804000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 1ffff92001d0080c\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff87e6b100 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007fd0c55826c0(0000) GS:ffff8881f6800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ffffc9000e803ff8 CR3: 0000000170ef7000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;#DF\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;/#DF\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff81f281d1\u0026gt;] __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/shadow.c:31\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:72 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] cpumask_test_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h:506 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] cpu_online include/linux/cpumask.h:1092 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:24 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] lock_acquire+0xe2/0x590 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5632\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8563221e\u0026gt;] rcu_lock_acquire+0x2e/0x40 include/linux/rcupdate.h:306\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561464d\u0026gt;] rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561464d\u0026gt;] ip6_pol_route+0x15d/0x1440 net/ipv6/route.c:2221\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff85618120\u0026gt;] ip6_pol_route_output+0x50/0x80 net/ipv6/route.c:2606\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff856f65b5\u0026gt;] pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:584 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff856f65b5\u0026gt;] fib6_rule_lookup+0x265/0x620 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:116\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff85618009\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output_flags_noref+0x2d9/0x3a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2638\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561821a\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output_flags+0xca/0x340 net/ipv6/route.c:2651\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:100 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_process_v6_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:473 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_process_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:529 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xc33/0x1be0 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:677\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838c2909\u0026gt;] ipvlan_start_xmit+0x49/0x100 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:229\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4966 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3644 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x320/0x980 net/core/dev.c:3660\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d080e2\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0x16b2/0x3370 net/core/dev.c:4324\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff855ce4cd\u0026gt;] dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3067 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff855ce4cd\u0026gt;] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:529 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;f\n---truncated---(CVE-2023-52796)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: ath11k: fix dfs radar event locking\r\n\r\nThe ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the DFS radar event\nhandling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a\nread-side critical section.\r\n\r\nMark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid\nany potential use-after-free issues.\r\n\r\nCompile tested only.(CVE-2023-52798)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf\r\n\r\nCurrently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there\nis an array out of bounds while getting element in tp-\u0026gt;dm_stree. To add\nthe required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type\nof dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type\nof tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.(CVE-2023-52799)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: ath11k: fix htt pktlog locking\r\n\r\nThe ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the htt pktlog handling\ncode calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a\nread-side critical section.\r\n\r\nMark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid\nany potential use-after-free issues.\r\n\r\nCompile tested only.(CVE-2023-52800)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: Fix RPC client cleaned up the freed pipefs dentries\r\n\r\nRPC client pipefs dentries cleanup is in separated rpc_remove_pipedir()\nworkqueue,which takes care about pipefs superblock locking.\nIn some special scenarios, when kernel frees the pipefs sb of the\ncurrent client and immediately alloctes a new pipefs sb,\nrpc_remove_pipedir function would misjudge the existence of pipefs\nsb which is not the one it used to hold. As a result,\nthe rpc_remove_pipedir would clean the released freed pipefs dentries.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, rpc_remove_pipedir should check whether the\ncurrent pipefs sb is consistent with the original pipefs sb.\r\n\r\nThis error can be catched by KASAN:\n=========================================================\n[ 250.497700] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.498315] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a2ab804 by task kworker/0:18/106503\n[ 250.500549] Workqueue: events rpc_free_client_work\n[ 250.501001] Call Trace:\n[ 250.502880] kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0\n[ 250.503209] ? dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.503561] dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.503897] ? __pfx_rpc_clntdir_depopulate+0x10/0x10\n[ 250.504384] rpc_rmdir_depopulate+0x1b/0x90\n[ 250.504781] rpc_remove_client_dir+0xf5/0x150\n[ 250.505195] rpc_free_client_work+0xe4/0x230\n[ 250.505598] process_one_work+0x8ee/0x13b0\n...\n[ 22.039056] Allocated by task 244:\n[ 22.039390] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.039758] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30\n[ 22.040109] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x59/0x70\n[ 22.040487] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0xf0/0x240\n[ 22.040889] __d_alloc+0x31/0x8e0\n[ 22.041207] d_alloc+0x44/0x1f0\n[ 22.041514] __rpc_lookup_create_exclusive+0x11c/0x140\n[ 22.041987] rpc_mkdir_populate.constprop.0+0x5f/0x110\n[ 22.042459] rpc_create_client_dir+0x34/0x150\n[ 22.042874] rpc_setup_pipedir_sb+0x102/0x1c0\n[ 22.043284] rpc_client_register+0x136/0x4e0\n[ 22.043689] rpc_new_client+0x911/0x1020\n[ 22.044057] rpc_create_xprt+0xcb/0x370\n[ 22.044417] rpc_create+0x36b/0x6c0\n...\n[ 22.049524] Freed by task 0:\n[ 22.049803] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.050165] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30\n[ 22.050520] kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50\n[ 22.050921] __kasan_slab_free+0x10e/0x1a0\n[ 22.051306] kmem_cache_free+0xa5/0x390\n[ 22.051667] rcu_core+0x62c/0x1930\n[ 22.051995] __do_softirq+0x165/0x52a\n[ 22.052347]\n[ 22.052503] Last potentially related work creation:\n[ 22.052952] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.053313] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8e/0xa0\n[ 22.053739] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x6b/0x8b0\n[ 22.054209] dentry_free+0xb2/0x140\n[ 22.054540] __dentry_kill+0x3be/0x540\n[ 22.054900] shrink_dentry_list+0x199/0x510\n[ 22.055293] shrink_dcache_parent+0x190/0x240\n[ 22.055703] do_one_tree+0x11/0x40\n[ 22.056028] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x61/0x140\n[ 22.056461] generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0x590\n[ 22.056879] kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60\n[ 22.057234] rpc_kill_sb+0x121/0x200(CVE-2023-52803)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: hns3: fix out-of-bounds access may occur when coalesce info is read via debugfs\r\n\r\nThe hns3 driver define an array of string to show the coalesce\ninfo, but if the kernel adds a new mode or a new state,\nout-of-bounds access may occur when coalesce info is read via\ndebugfs, this patch fix the problem.(CVE-2023-52807)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt6797: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52865)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxen-netfront: Add missing skb_mark_for_recycle\r\n\r\nNotice that skb_mark_for_recycle() is introduced later than fixes tag in\ncommit 6a5bcd84e886 (\u0026quot;page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB recycling\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nIt is believed that fixes tag were missing a call to page_pool_release_page()\nbetween v5.9 to v5.14, after which is should have used skb_mark_for_recycle().\nSince v6.6 the call page_pool_release_page() were removed (in\ncommit 535b9c61bdef (\u0026quot;net: page_pool: hide page_pool_release_page()\u0026quot;)\nand remaining callers converted (in commit 6bfef2ec0172 (\u0026quot;Merge branch\n\u0026apos;net-page_pool-remove-page_pool_release_page\u0026apos;\u0026quot;)).\r\n\r\nThis leak became visible in v6.8 via commit dba1b8a7ab68 (\u0026quot;mm/page_pool: catch\npage_pool memory leaks\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-27393)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: l2cap: fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_chan_timeout\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition between l2cap_chan_timeout() and\nl2cap_chan_del(). When we use l2cap_chan_del() to delete the\nchannel, the chan-\u0026gt;conn will be set to null. But the conn could\nbe dereferenced again in the mutex_lock() of l2cap_chan_timeout().\nAs a result the null pointer dereference bug will happen. The\nKASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:\r\n\r\n[ 472.074580] ==================================================================\n[ 472.075284] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000158 by task kworker/0:0/7\n[ 472.075308]\n[ 472.075308] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36\n[ 472.075308] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4\n[ 472.075308] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout\n[ 472.075308] Call Trace:\n[ 472.075308] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.075308] dump_stack_lvl+0x137/0x1a0\n[ 472.075308] print_report+0x101/0x250\n[ 472.075308] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x77/0x160\n[ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] kasan_report+0x139/0x170\n[ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0\n[ 472.075308] mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x181/0x300\n[ 472.075308] process_one_work+0x5d2/0xe00\n[ 472.075308] worker_thread+0xe1d/0x1660\n[ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0\n[ 472.075308] kthread+0x2b7/0x350\n[ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0\n[ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 472.075308] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n[ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 472.075308] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 472.075308] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.075308] ==================================================================\n[ 472.094860] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint\n[ 472.096136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000158\n[ 472.096136] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n[ 472.096136] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n[ 472.096136] PGD 0 P4D 0\n[ 472.096136] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\n[ 472.096136] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G B 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36\n[ 472.096136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4\n[ 472.096136] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout\n[ 472.096136] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] Code: be 08 00 00 00 e8 f8 23 1f fd 4c 89 f7 be 08 00 00 00 e8 eb 23 1f fd 42 80 3c 23 00 74 08 48 88\n[ 472.096136] RSP: 0018:ffff88800744fc78 EFLAGS: 00000246\n[ 472.096136] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11000e89f8f RCX: ffffffff8457c865\n[ 472.096136] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88800744fc78\n[ 472.096136] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: ffff88800744fc7f R09: 1ffff11000e89f8f\n[ 472.096136] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1000e89f90 R12: dffffc0000000000\n[ 472.096136] R13: 0000000000000158 R14: ffff88800744fc78 R15: ffff888007405a00\n[ 472.096136] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 472.096136] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 472.096136] CR2: 0000000000000158 CR3: 000000000da32000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\n[ 472.096136] Call Trace:\n[ 472.096136] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.096136] ? __die_body+0x8d/0xe0\n[ 472.096136] ? page_fault_oops+0x6b8/0x9a0\n[ 472.096136] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x20c/0x2a0\n[ 472.096136] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1027/0x1340\n[ 472.096136] ? _printk+0x7a/0xa0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? add_taint+0x42/0xd0\n[ 472.096136] ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x1b0\n[ 472.096136] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] l2cap_chan_timeo\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-27399)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use\r\n\r\nThe receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not\nthe socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly\nreturning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack\r\n\r\nconntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing\nthe same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast)\nframes on bridges.\r\n\r\n Example:\n macvlan0\n |\n br0\n / \\\n ethX ethY\r\n\r\n ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing\n an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table.\r\n\r\n 1. skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting.\n -\u0026gt; skb-\u0026gt;_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry\n 2. skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge\n interface.\n 3. skb gets passed up the stack.\n 4. In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb\n and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices.\r\n\r\n The clone skb-\u0026gt;_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the\n original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS.\n 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb.\r\n\r\nThe Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race.\r\n\r\nThis race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that\ncase later steps perform skb_clone() with skb-\u0026gt;_nfct already confirmed (in\nhash table). This works fine.\r\n\r\nBut such confirmation won\u0026apos;t happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the\npackets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting.\r\n\r\nPablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn\u0026apos;t allow use of stateful\nnat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call\nconntrack again.\r\n\r\nThis doesn\u0026apos;t work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat\ntransformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting\nvia \u0026apos;sabotage_in\u0026apos; hook.\r\n\r\nWork around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN\ntime, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry.\r\n\r\nThe downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers.\r\n\r\nAlternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with\nunconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this\nopens up other problems, for example:\r\n\r\n-m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4\n-m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5\r\n\r\nFor multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be\ncreated, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings.\r\n\r\nUsers should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic\nNOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass\nthem, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already,\nso user-visible behaviour would change.(CVE-2024-27415)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: altmodes/displayport: create sysfs nodes as driver\u0026apos;s default device attribute group\r\n\r\nThe DisplayPort driver\u0026apos;s sysfs nodes may be present to the userspace before\ntypec_altmode_set_drvdata() completes in dp_altmode_probe. This means that\na sysfs read can trigger a NULL pointer error by deferencing dp-\u0026gt;hpd in\nhpd_show or dp-\u0026gt;lock in pin_assignment_show, as dev_get_drvdata() returns\nNULL in those cases.\r\n\r\nRemove manual sysfs node creation in favor of adding attribute group as\ndefault for devices bound to the driver. The ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro is\nnot used here otherwise the path to the sysfs nodes is no longer compliant\nwith the ABI.(CVE-2024-35790)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal\r\n\r\nA race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove()\ncallback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an\nunhandled page fault [1].\r\n\r\nThe problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running\nafter pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn\u0026apos;t really\nguarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks\nwill not be running when it returns.\r\n\r\nHowever, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when\npm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM\nstatus of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without\nwaiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for\n.runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it\narguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly\nprohibited).\r\n\r\nThus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs\nto protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after\npm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after\npm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it\nhas started earlier.]\r\n\r\nOne way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier()\nafter pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the\nruntime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from\nbeing invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should\nit be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in\npci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the\ndriver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which\nwill prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr\ndriver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks.(CVE-2024-35809)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix memory leak during rehash\r\n\r\nThe rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another.\nThis is done by iterating over all chunks (all the filters with the same\npriority) in the region and in each chunk iterating over all the\nfilters.\r\n\r\nIf the migration fails, the code tries to migrate the filters back to\nthe old region. However, the rollback itself can also fail in which case\nanother migration will be erroneously performed. Besides the fact that\nthis ping pong is not a very good idea, it also creates a problem.\r\n\r\nEach virtual chunk references two chunks: The currently used one\n(\u0026apos;vchunk-\u0026gt;chunk\u0026apos;) and a backup (\u0026apos;vchunk-\u0026gt;chunk2\u0026apos;). During migration the\nfirst holds the chunk we want to migrate filters to and the second holds\nthe chunk we are migrating filters from.\r\n\r\nThe code currently assumes - but does not verify - that the backup chunk\ndoes not exist (NULL) if the currently used chunk does not reference the\ntarget region. This assumption breaks when we are trying to rollback a\nrollback, resulting in the backup chunk being overwritten and leaked\n[1].\r\n\r\nFix by not rolling back a failed rollback and add a warning to avoid\nfuture cases.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1063 at lib/parman.c:291 parman_destroy+0x17/0x20\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 5 PID: 1063 Comm: kworker/5:11 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00784-gc6a05c468a0b #14\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:parman_destroy+0x17/0x20\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_region_fini+0x19/0x60\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x49/0xf0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x1f1/0x470\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370\n worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0\n kthread+0xd0/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-35853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during rehash\r\n\r\nThe rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another\naccording to the number of available credits.\r\n\r\nThe migrated from region is destroyed at the end of the work if the\nnumber of credits is non-negative as the assumption is that this is\nindicative of migration being complete. This assumption is incorrect as\na non-negative number of credits can also be the result of a failed\nmigration.\r\n\r\nThe destruction of a region that still has filters referencing it can\nresult in a use-after-free [1].\r\n\r\nFix by not destroying the region if migration failed.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff8881735319e8 by task kworker/0:31/3858\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 3858 Comm: kworker/0:31 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00782-gf2275c2157d8 #5\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120\n print_report+0xce/0x670\n kasan_report+0xd7/0x110\n mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230\n mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_entry_del+0x2e/0x70\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_del+0x81/0x210\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3cd/0xb50\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 174:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0\n __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_create+0xdf/0x9c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x954/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\r\n\r\nFreed by task 7:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170\n __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30\n kfree+0xc1/0x290\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x272/0x310\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x731/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35854)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during activity update\r\n\r\nThe rule activity update delayed work periodically traverses the list of\nconfigured rules and queries their activity from the device.\r\n\r\nAs part of this task it accesses the entry pointed by \u0026apos;ventry-\u0026gt;entry\u0026apos;,\nbut this entry can be changed concurrently by the rehash delayed work,\nleading to a use-after-free [1].\r\n\r\nFix by closing the race and perform the activity query under the\n\u0026apos;vregion-\u0026gt;lock\u0026apos; mutex.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff8881054ed808 by task kworker/0:18/181\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00781-gd5ab772d32f7 #2\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120\n print_report+0xce/0x670\n kasan_report+0xd7/0x110\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140\n mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work+0x219/0x400\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 1039:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0\n __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x7b/0x1f0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x30d/0xb50\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\r\n\r\nFreed by task 1039:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170\n __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30\n kfree+0xc1/0x290\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3d7/0xb50\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done().\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during\nnetlink socket destruction. [1]\r\n\r\nFrom the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then\nthe response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump\nfor IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due\nto the fault injection. [0]\r\n\r\n 12:01:34 executing program 3:\n r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0)\n sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...)\n recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8)\r\n\r\nHere, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done, and the next call\nof inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped\nreceiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct()\ncalled nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done().\r\n\r\nfib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done() if it\nis still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done() by\nnlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling\nitself recursively and hitting the stack guard page.\r\n\r\nTo avoid the issue, let\u0026apos;s set the destructor after kzalloc().\r\n\r\n[0]:\nFAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.\nname failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0\nCPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117)\n should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153)\n should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733)\n kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992)\n inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662)\n rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029)\n netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269)\n netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988)\n ____sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801)\n ___sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846)\n do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943)\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034)\r\n\r\n[1]:\nBUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb)\nstack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN\nCPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nWorkqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work\nRIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570)\nCode: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd \u0026lt;53\u0026gt; 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3\nRDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358\nRBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;#DF\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;/#DF\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n ...\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401)\n __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2))\n sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224)\n __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235)\n sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246)\n process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259)\n worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue.\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35886)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nerspan: make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb-\u0026gt;head\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported a problem in ip6erspan_rcv() [1]\r\n\r\nIssue is that ip6erspan_rcv() (and erspan_rcv()) no longer make\nsure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb linear part (skb-\u0026gt;head)\nbefore getting @ver field from it.\r\n\r\nAdd the missing pskb_may_pull() calls.\r\n\r\nv2: Reload iph pointer in erspan_rcv() after pskb_may_pull()\n because skb-\u0026gt;head might have changed.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610\n pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline]\n pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline]\n ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline]\n gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610\n ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1d4c/0x2ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438\n ip6_input_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_input+0x15d/0x430 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492\n ip6_mc_input+0xa7e/0xc80 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:586\n dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline]\n ip6_rcv_finish+0x955/0x970 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xde/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5538 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5652\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5738 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5798\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1549\n tun_get_user+0x5566/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n tun_alloc_skb drivers/net/tun.c:1525 [inline]\n tun_get_user+0x209a/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:1846\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5045 Comm: syz-executor114 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00021-g962490525cff #0(CVE-2024-35888)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem\r\n\r\nsyzkaller started using corpuses where a BPF tracing program deletes\nelements from a sockmap/sockhash map. Because BPF tracing programs can be\ninvoked from any interrupt context, locks taken during a map_delete_elem\noperation must be hardirq-safe. Otherwise a deadlock due to lock inversion\nis possible, as reported by lockdep:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock(\u0026amp;htab-\u0026gt;buckets[i].lock);\n local_irq_disable();\n lock(\u0026amp;host-\u0026gt;lock);\n lock(\u0026amp;htab-\u0026gt;buckets[i].lock);\n \u0026lt;Interrupt\u0026gt;\n lock(\u0026amp;host-\u0026gt;lock);\r\n\r\nLocks in sockmap are hardirq-unsafe by design. We expects elements to be\ndeleted from sockmap/sockhash only in task (normal) context with interrupts\nenabled, or in softirq context.\r\n\r\nDetect when map_delete_elem operation is invoked from a context which is\n_not_ hardirq-unsafe, that is interrupts are disabled, and bail out with an\nerror.\r\n\r\nNote that map updates are not affected by this issue. BPF verifier does not\nallow updating sockmap/sockhash from a BPF tracing program today.(CVE-2024-35895)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: validate user input for expected length\r\n\r\nI got multiple syzbot reports showing old bugs exposed\nby BPF after commit 20f2505fb436 (\u0026quot;bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc\nin cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nsetsockopt() @optlen argument should be taken into account\nbefore copying data.\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627\nRead of size 96 at addr ffff88802cd73da0 by task syz-executor.4/7238\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 7238 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-next-20240403-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n __asan_memcpy+0x29/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:105\n copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline]\n do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627\n nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\nRIP: 0033:0x7fd22067dde9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fd21f9ff0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd2207abf80 RCX: 00007fd22067dde9\nRDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007fd2206ca47a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000020000880 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd2207abf80 R15: 00007ffd2d0170d8\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 7238:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline]\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387\n kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline]\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4069 [inline]\n __kmalloc_noprof+0x200/0x410 mm/slub.c:4082\n kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline]\n __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd47/0x1050 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802cd73da0\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\nThe buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of\n allocated 1-byte region [ffff88802cd73da0, ffff88802cd73da1)\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88802cd73020 pfn:0x2cd73\nflags: 0xfff80000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0xfff)\npage_type: 0xffffefff(slab)\nraw: 00fff80000000000 ffff888015041280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122\nraw: ffff88802cd73020 000000008080007f 00000001ffffefff 00\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35896)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size\r\n\r\nThis patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack\nmemory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result\nof overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually\nhappen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should\nprotect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections\n(fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array\naccesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the\nverification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.\r\n\r\nThis check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly\nremoved in a833a17aeac7.(CVE-2024-35905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1][2]:\r\n\r\nnci_rx_work() parses and processes received packet. When the payload\nlength is zero, each message type handler reads uninitialized payload\nand KMSAN detects this issue. The receipt of a packet with a zero-size\npayload is considered unexpected, and therefore, such packets should be\nsilently discarded.\r\n\r\nThis patch resolved this issue by checking payload size before calling\neach message type handler codes.(CVE-2024-35915)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: ucsi: Limit read size on v1.2\r\n\r\nBetween UCSI 1.2 and UCSI 2.0, the size of the MESSAGE_IN region was\nincreased from 16 to 256. In order to avoid overflowing reads for older\nsystems, add a mechanism to use the read UCSI version to truncate read\nsizes on UCSI v1.2.(CVE-2024-35924)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: prevent division by zero in blk_rq_stat_sum()\r\n\r\nThe expression dst-\u0026gt;nr_samples + src-\u0026gt;nr_samples may\nhave zero value on overflow. It is necessary to add\na check to avoid division by zero.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35925)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported sco_sock_setsockopt() is copying data without\nchecking user input length.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset\ninclude/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr\ninclude/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sco_sock_setsockopt+0xc0b/0xf90\nnet/bluetooth/sco.c:893\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88805f7b15a3 by task syz-executor.5/12578(CVE-2024-35967)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngeneve: fix header validation in geneve[6]_xmit_skb\r\n\r\nsyzbot is able to trigger an uninit-value in geneve_xmit() [1]\r\n\r\nProblem : While most ip tunnel helpers (like ip_tunnel_get_dsfield())\nuses skb_protocol(skb, true), pskb_inet_may_pull() is only using\nskb-\u0026gt;protocol.\r\n\r\nIf anything else than ETH_P_IPV6 or ETH_P_IP is found in skb-\u0026gt;protocol,\npskb_inet_may_pull() does nothing at all.\r\n\r\nIf a vlan tag was provided by the caller (af_packet in the syzbot case),\nthe network header might not point to the correct location, and skb\nlinear part could be smaller than expected.\r\n\r\nAdd skb_vlan_inet_prepare() to perform a complete mac validation.\r\n\r\nUse this in geneve for the moment, I suspect we need to adopt this\nmore broadly.\r\n\r\nv4 - Jakub reported v3 broke l2_tos_ttl_inherit.sh selftest\n - Only call __vlan_get_protocol() for vlan types.\r\n\r\nv2,v3 - Addressed Sabrina comments on v1 and v2\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030\n geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline]\n geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x348d/0x52c0 net/core/dev.c:4335\n dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline]\n packet_xmit+0x9c/0x6c0 net/packet/af_packet.c:276\n packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3081 [inline]\n packet_sendmsg+0x8bb0/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n packet_alloc_skb net/packet/af_packet.c:2930 [inline]\n packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3024 [inline]\n packet_sendmsg+0x722d/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 5033 Comm: syz-executor346 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00005-g928a87efa423 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024(CVE-2024-35973)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv4: check for NULL idev in ip_route_use_hint()\r\n\r\nsyzbot was able to trigger a NULL deref in fib_validate_source()\nin an old tree [1].\r\n\r\nIt appears the bug exists in latest trees.\r\n\r\nAll calls to __in_dev_get_rcu() must be checked for a NULL result.\r\n\r\n[1]\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 2 PID: 3257 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:fib_validate_source+0xbf/0x15a0 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:425\nCode: 18 f2 f2 f2 f2 42 c7 44 20 23 f3 f3 f3 f3 48 89 44 24 78 42 c6 44 20 27 f3 e8 5d 88 48 fc 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 48 89 44 24 18 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 80 3c 20 00 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 d2 15 98 fc 48 89 5c 24 10 41 bf\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900015fee40 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88800f7a4000 RCX: ffff88800f4f90c0\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000004001eac RDI: ffff8880160c64c0\nRBP: ffffc900015ff060 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88800f7a4000\nR10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88800f4f90c0 R12: dffffc0000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88800f7a4000\nFS: 00007f938acfe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888058c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f938acddd58 CR3: 000000001248e000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n ip_route_use_hint+0x410/0x9b0 net/ipv4/route.c:2231\n ip_rcv_finish_core+0x2c4/0x1a30 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:327\n ip_list_rcv_finish net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612 [inline]\n ip_sublist_rcv+0x3ed/0xe50 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:638\n ip_list_rcv+0x422/0x470 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:673\n __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:5572 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x6b1/0x890 net/core/dev.c:5620\n __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:5672 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x9f9/0xdc0 net/core/dev.c:5764\n netif_receive_skb_list+0x55/0x3e0 net/core/dev.c:5816\n xdp_recv_frames net/bpf/test_run.c:257 [inline]\n xdp_test_run_batch net/bpf/test_run.c:335 [inline]\n bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x1818/0x1d00 net/bpf/test_run.c:363\n bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x81f/0x1170 net/bpf/test_run.c:1376\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x349/0x3c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3736\n __sys_bpf+0x45c/0x710 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5115\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5201 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199(CVE-2024-36008)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation\r\n\r\nEach attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least\nof sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes.\nThe current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes)\nwhich is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation\nis not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands\nread access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: hns3: fix kernel crash when devlink reload during pf initialization\r\n\r\nThe devlink reload process will access the hardware resources,\nbut the register operation is done before the hardware is initialized.\nSo, processing the devlink reload during initialization may lead to kernel\ncrash. This patch fixes this by taking devl_lock during initialization.(CVE-2024-36021)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller\r\n\r\nGeneric sdhci code registers LED device and uses host-\u0026gt;runtime_suspended\nflag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn\u0026apos;t set this flag,\nwhich causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime\nsuspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.(CVE-2024-36029)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init\r\n\r\nnet_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is called without any\nlocking. It reads max_gen_ptrs, which is changed under pernet_ops_rwsem. It\nis read twice, first to allocate an array, then to set s.len, which is\nlater used to limit the bounds of the array access.\r\n\r\nIt is possible that the array is allocated and another thread is\nregistering a new pernet ops, increments max_gen_ptrs, which is then used\nto set s.len with a larger than allocated length for the variable array.\r\n\r\nFix it by reading max_gen_ptrs only once in net_alloc_generic. If\nmax_gen_ptrs is later incremented, it will be caught in net_assign_generic.(CVE-2024-36883)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix UAF in error path\r\n\r\nSam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported\na UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0\nlinux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\n skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026\n skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094\n __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108\n kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144\n kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244\n tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186\n tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324\n tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824\n tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159\n tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390\n udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108\n udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186\n udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346\n __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254\n dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461\n ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648\n process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645\n net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781\n __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553\n do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454\n do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381\n local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33\n rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378\n dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169\n neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526\n neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540\n ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235\n __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313\n __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295\n ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323\n NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303\n ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433\n dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451\n ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129\n ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492\n udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963\n udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250\n inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850\n sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730\n __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203\n __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n do_syscall_\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect\r\n\r\nChristoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events mptcp_worker\n RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8\n \t8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe\n \t\u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9\n RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4\n RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001\n RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000\n R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline]\n mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline]\n __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615\n mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767\n process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416\n kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nWhen fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt\nis not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value\ninto snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level\nre-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send\nbuffer cleanup using \u0026apos;bad\u0026apos; snd_una values.\r\n\r\nWe could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such\ndumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very\nlow to zero impact in practice.\r\n\r\nInstead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq,\nfor consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpiolib: cdev: fix uninitialised kfifo\r\n\r\nIf a line is requested with debounce, and that results in debouncing\nin software, and the line is subsequently reconfigured to enable edge\ndetection then the allocation of the kfifo to contain edge events is\noverlooked. This results in events being written to and read from an\nuninitialised kfifo. Read events are returned to userspace.\r\n\r\nInitialise the kfifo in the case where the software debounce is\nalready active.(CVE-2024-36898)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpiolib: cdev: Fix use after free in lineinfo_changed_notify\r\n\r\nThe use-after-free issue occurs as follows: when the GPIO chip device file\nis being closed by invoking gpio_chrdev_release(), watched_lines is freed\nby bitmap_free(), but the unregistration of lineinfo_changed_nb notifier\nchain failed due to waiting write rwsem. Additionally, one of the GPIO\nchip\u0026apos;s lines is also in the release process and holds the notifier chain\u0026apos;s\nread rwsem. Consequently, a race condition leads to the use-after-free of\nwatched_lines.\r\n\r\nHere is the typical stack when issue happened:\r\n\r\n[free]\ngpio_chrdev_release()\n --\u0026gt; bitmap_free(cdev-\u0026gt;watched_lines) \u0026lt;-- freed\n --\u0026gt; blocking_notifier_chain_unregister()\n --\u0026gt; down_write(\u0026amp;nh-\u0026gt;rwsem) \u0026lt;-- waiting rwsem\n --\u0026gt; __down_write_common()\n --\u0026gt; rwsem_down_write_slowpath()\n --\u0026gt; schedule_preempt_disabled()\n --\u0026gt; schedule()\r\n\r\n[use]\nst54spi_gpio_dev_release()\n --\u0026gt; gpio_free()\n --\u0026gt; gpiod_free()\n --\u0026gt; gpiod_free_commit()\n --\u0026gt; gpiod_line_state_notify()\n --\u0026gt; blocking_notifier_call_chain()\n --\u0026gt; down_read(\u0026amp;nh-\u0026gt;rwsem); \u0026lt;-- held rwsem\n --\u0026gt; notifier_call_chain()\n --\u0026gt; lineinfo_changed_notify()\n --\u0026gt; test_bit(xxxx, cdev-\u0026gt;watched_lines) \u0026lt;-- use after free\r\n\r\nThe side effect of the use-after-free issue is that a GPIO line event is\nbeing generated for userspace where it shouldn\u0026apos;t. However, since the chrdev\nis being closed, userspace won\u0026apos;t have the chance to read that event anyway.\r\n\r\nTo fix the issue, call the bitmap_free() function after the unregistration\nof lineinfo_changed_nb notifier chain.(CVE-2024-36899)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()\r\n\r\nAccording to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev()\nreturns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack\ndeal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]\nCPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237\nCode: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000\nRDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0\nR13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000\nFS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358\n sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248\n sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653\n sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783\n sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline]\n sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212\n sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline]\n sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169\n sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73\n __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fib6_rules: avoid possible NULL dereference in fib6_rule_action()\r\n\r\nsyzbot is able to trigger the following crash [1],\ncaused by unsafe ip6_dst_idev() use.\r\n\r\nIndeed ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, and must always be checked.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 0 PID: 31648 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240417-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:__fib6_rule_action net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:237 [inline]\n RIP: 0010:fib6_rule_action+0x241/0x7b0 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:267\nCode: 02 00 00 49 8d 9f d8 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f9 32 bf f7 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 e0 32 bf f7 4c 8b 03 48 89 ef 4c\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000fc1f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1a772f98c8186700\nRDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8bcac4e0 RDI: ffffffff8c1f9760\nRBP: ffff8880673fb980 R08: ffffffff8fac15ef R09: 1ffffffff1f582bd\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f582be R12: dffffc0000000000\nR13: 0000000000000080 R14: ffff888076509000 R15: ffff88807a029a00\nFS: 00007f55e82ca6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b31d23000 CR3: 0000000022b66000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n fib_rules_lookup+0x62c/0xdb0 net/core/fib_rules.c:317\n fib6_rule_lookup+0x1fd/0x790 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:108\n ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2637 [inline]\n ip6_route_output_flags+0x38e/0x610 net/ipv6/route.c:2649\n ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:93 [inline]\n ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x189/0x11a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1120\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0xb9/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250\n sctp_v6_get_dst+0x792/0x1e20 net/sctp/ipv6.c:326\n sctp_transport_route+0x12c/0x2e0 net/sctp/transport.c:455\n sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x614/0x15c0 net/sctp/associola.c:662\n sctp_connect_new_asoc+0x31d/0x6c0 net/sctp/socket.c:1099\n __sctp_connect+0x66d/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1197\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36902)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets\r\n\r\nTCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by\ncross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers.\r\n\r\nIn the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide\nby zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()\r\n\r\nA socket makes the following state transitions,\nwithout ever calling tcp_init_transfer(),\nmeaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called.\r\n\r\n TCP_CLOSE\nconnect()\n TCP_SYN_SENT\n TCP_SYN_RECV\nshutdown() -\u0026gt; tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN)\n TCP_FIN_WAIT1\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not\nperform a TCP_SYN_RECV -\u0026gt; TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition,\nwhich makes no sense anyway.\r\n\r\nWhen tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state\nfrom TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state,\nand send a FIN packet from a sane socket state.\r\n\r\nThis means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH\ncontext, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations.\r\n\r\n[1]\ndivide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\nCPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767\nCode: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da\nFS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513\n tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578\n inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068\n ____sys_recvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803\n ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline]\n do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939\n __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline]\n __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c\nR10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001(CVE-2024-36905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nARM: 9381/1: kasan: clear stale stack poison\r\n\r\nWe found below OOB crash:\r\n\r\n[ 33.452494] ==================================================================\n[ 33.453513] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec\n[ 33.454660] Write of size 164 at addr c1d03d30 by task swapper/0/0\n[ 33.455515]\n[ 33.455767] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.1.25-mainline #1\n[ 33.456880] Hardware name: Generic DT based system\n[ 33.457555] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c\n[ 33.458326] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c\n[ 33.459072] dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x158/0x4a4\n[ 33.459863] print_report from kasan_report+0x9c/0x148\n[ 33.460616] kasan_report from kasan_check_range+0x94/0x1a0\n[ 33.461424] kasan_check_range from memset+0x20/0x3c\n[ 33.462157] memset from refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec\n[ 33.463064] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0 from tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick+0x180/0x53c\n[ 33.464181] tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick from do_idle+0x264/0x354\n[ 33.465029] do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x24\n[ 33.465769] cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xf0/0xf4\n[ 33.466528] rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18\n[ 33.467397]\n[ 33.467644] The buggy address belongs to stack of task swapper/0/0\n[ 33.468493] and is located at offset 112 in frame:\n[ 33.469172] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0x0/0x2ec\n[ 33.469917]\n[ 33.470165] This frame has 2 objects:\n[ 33.470696] [32, 76) \u0026apos;global_zone_diff\u0026apos;\n[ 33.470729] [112, 276) \u0026apos;global_node_diff\u0026apos;\n[ 33.471294]\n[ 33.472095] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n[ 33.472862] page:3cd72da8 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x41d03\n[ 33.473944] flags: 0x1000(reserved|zone=0)\n[ 33.474565] raw: 00001000 ed741470 ed741470 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001\n[ 33.475656] raw: 00000000\n[ 33.476050] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\n[ 33.476816]\n[ 33.477061] Memory state around the buggy address:\n[ 33.477732] c1d03c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 33.478630] c1d03c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00\n[ 33.479526] \u0026gt;c1d03d00: 00 04 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1\n[ 33.480415] ^\n[ 33.481195] c1d03d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3\n[ 33.482088] c1d03e00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 33.482978] ==================================================================\r\n\r\nWe find the root cause of this OOB is that arm does not clear stale stack\npoison in the case of cpuidle.\r\n\r\nThis patch refer to arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S to resolve this issue.\r\n\r\nFrom cited commit [1] that explain the problem\r\n\r\nFunctions which the compiler has instrumented for KASAN place poison on\nthe stack shadow upon entry and remove this poison prior to returning.\r\n\r\nIn the case of cpuidle, CPUs exit the kernel a number of levels deep in\nC code. Any instrumented functions on this critical path will leave\nportions of the stack shadow poisoned.\r\n\r\nIf CPUs lose context and return to the kernel via a cold path, we\nrestore a prior context saved in __cpu_suspend_enter are forgotten, and\nwe never remove the poison they placed in the stack shadow area by\nfunctions calls between this and the actual exit of the kernel.\r\n\r\nThus, (depending on stackframe layout) subsequent calls to instrumented\nfunctions may hit this stale poison, resulting in (spurious) KASAN\nsplats to the console.\r\n\r\nTo avoid this, clear any stale poison from the idle thread for a CPU\nprior to bringing a CPU online.\r\n\r\nFrom cited commit [2]\r\n\r\nExtend to check for CONFIG_KASAN_STACK\r\n\r\n[1] commit 0d97e6d8024c (\u0026quot;arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison\u0026quot;)\n[2] commit d56a9ef84bd0 (\u0026quot;kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36906)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined\r\n\r\nIn iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if \u0026apos;active_list\u0026apos; is empty, which\nis intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn\ncan be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn()\nis run at that time:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190\n Call trace:\n iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190\n iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0\n iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130\n __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c\n __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244\n hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0\r\n\r\nThe warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being\nremoved, the state of the \u0026apos;active_list\u0026apos; is irrelevant, and \u0026apos;waitq_timer\u0026apos;\nis canceled after removing \u0026apos;active_list\u0026apos; in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures\niocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns.\r\n\r\nTherefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn\nwhen removing a blkcg or disk.(CVE-2024-36908)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\r\n\r\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs\r\n\r\nSKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be linearized, otherwise they become\ninvalid. Return NULL if such an skb is passed to skb_copy or\nskb_copy_expand, in order to prevent a crash on a potential later\ncall to skb_gso_segment.(CVE-2024-36929)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\namd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted\r\n\r\nIf there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first\ndevice will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes\non all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will\nstart reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been\nevicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page\nfault.(CVE-2024-36949)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: avoid off-by-one read from userspace\r\n\r\nWe try to access count + 1 byte from userspace with memdup_user(buffer,\ncount + 1). However, the userspace only provides buffer of count bytes and\nonly these count bytes are verified to be okay to access. To ensure the\ncopied buffer is NUL terminated, we use memdup_user_nul instead.(CVE-2024-36957)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/9p: only translate RWX permissions for plain 9P2000\r\n\r\nGarbage in plain 9P2000\u0026apos;s perm bits is allowed through, which causes it\nto be able to set (among others) the suid bit. This was presumably not\nthe intent since the unix extended bits are handled explicitly and\nconditionally on .u.(CVE-2024-36964)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1706",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:10Z",
"published": "2024-06-14T11:07:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1706"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47247"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47558"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52677"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52705"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52745"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52746"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27415"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36964"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47247",
"CVE-2021-47265",
"CVE-2021-47356",
"CVE-2021-47558",
"CVE-2022-48652",
"CVE-2023-52646",
"CVE-2023-52677",
"CVE-2023-52680",
"CVE-2023-52686",
"CVE-2023-52702",
"CVE-2023-52705",
"CVE-2023-52745",
"CVE-2023-52746",
"CVE-2023-52753",
"CVE-2023-52775",
"CVE-2023-52796",
"CVE-2023-52798",
"CVE-2023-52799",
"CVE-2023-52800",
"CVE-2023-52803",
"CVE-2023-52807",
"CVE-2023-52865",
"CVE-2023-52875",
"CVE-2024-27393",
"CVE-2024-27399",
"CVE-2024-27402",
"CVE-2024-27415",
"CVE-2024-35790",
"CVE-2024-35809",
"CVE-2024-35853",
"CVE-2024-35854",
"CVE-2024-35855",
"CVE-2024-35886",
"CVE-2024-35888",
"CVE-2024-35895",
"CVE-2024-35896",
"CVE-2024-35905",
"CVE-2024-35915",
"CVE-2024-35924",
"CVE-2024-35925",
"CVE-2024-35967",
"CVE-2024-35973",
"CVE-2024-36008",
"CVE-2024-36017",
"CVE-2024-36021",
"CVE-2024-36029",
"CVE-2024-36883",
"CVE-2024-36886",
"CVE-2024-36889",
"CVE-2024-36898",
"CVE-2024-36899",
"CVE-2024-36901",
"CVE-2024-36902",
"CVE-2024-36905",
"CVE-2024-36906",
"CVE-2024-36908",
"CVE-2024-36924",
"CVE-2024-36929",
"CVE-2024-36949",
"CVE-2024-36957",
"CVE-2024-36964"
]
}
OESA-2024-1707 (CVE-2021-47247)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-14 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix use-after-free of encap entry in neigh update handler
Function mlx5e_rep_neigh_update() wasn't updated to accommodate rtnl lock removal from TC filter update path and properly handle concurrent encap entry insertion/deletion which can lead to following use-after-free:
[23827.464923] ================================================================== [23827.469446] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.470971] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881d132228c by task kworker/u20:6/21635 [23827.472251] [23827.472615] CPU: 9 PID: 21635 Comm: kworker/u20:6 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #5 [23827.473788] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [23827.475639] Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_rep_neigh_update [mlx5_core] [23827.476731] Call Trace: [23827.477260] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107 [23827.477906] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x140 [23827.478896] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.479879] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.480905] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [23827.481701] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.482744] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 [23827.493112] mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.494054] ? mlx5e_tc_tun_encap_info_equal_generic+0x140/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.495296] mlx5e_rep_neigh_update+0x41e/0x5e0 [mlx5_core] [23827.496338] ? mlx5e_rep_neigh_entry_release+0xb80/0xb80 [mlx5_core] [23827.497486] ? read_word_at_a_time+0xe/0x20 [23827.498250] ? strscpy+0xa0/0x2a0 [23827.498889] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [23827.499638] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 [23827.500537] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2c0/0x2c0 [23827.501359] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [23827.502116] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220 [23827.502831] ? process_one_work+0x14e0/0x14e0 [23827.503627] kthread+0x328/0x3f0 [23827.504254] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [23827.505065] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x90/0x90 [23827.505912] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [23827.506621] [23827.506987] Allocated by task 28248: [23827.507694] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.508476] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7c/0x90 [23827.509197] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xde1/0x1d40 [mlx5_core] [23827.510194] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x397/0xc40 [mlx5_core] [23827.511218] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x519/0xb30 [mlx5_core] [23827.512234] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x191c/0x4870 [mlx5_core] [23827.513298] tc_setup_cb_add+0x1d5/0x420 [23827.514023] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x382/0x6a0 [cls_flower] [23827.514975] fl_change+0x2ceb/0x4a51 [cls_flower] [23827.515821] tc_new_tfilter+0x89a/0x2070 [23827.516548] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x644/0x8c0 [23827.517300] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 [23827.518021] netlink_unicast+0x42b/0x700 [23827.518742] netlink_sendmsg+0x743/0xc20 [23827.519467] sock_sendmsg+0xb2/0xe0 [23827.520131] _syssendmsg+0x590/0x770 [23827.520851] _sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x160 [23827.521552] __sys_sendmsg+0xb7/0x140 [23827.522238] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70 [23827.522907] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [23827.523797] [23827.524163] Freed by task 25948: [23827.524780] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.525488] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 [23827.526187] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 [23827.526968] __kasan_slab_free+0xed/0x130 [23827.527709] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xcf/0x1d0 [23827.528528] kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x33a/0x6e0 [23827.529317] kfree_rcu_work+0x55f/0xb70 [23827.530024] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [23827.530770] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220 [23827.531480] kthread+0x328/0x3f0 [23827.532114] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [23827.532785] [23827.533147] Last potentially related work creation: [23827.534007] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.534710] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0 [23827.535492] kvfree_call_rcu+0x31/0x7b0 [23827.536206] mlx5e_tc_del ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47247)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: Fix possible null pointer dereference.
This patch fixes possible null pointer dereference in files "rvu_debugfs.c" and "rvu_nix.c"(CVE-2021-47484)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: stmmac: Disable Tx queues when reconfiguring the interface
The Tx queues were not disabled in situations where the driver needed to stop the interface to apply a new configuration. This could result in a kernel panic when doing any of the 3 following actions: * reconfiguring the number of queues (ethtool -L) * reconfiguring the size of the ring buffers (ethtool -G) * installing/removing an XDP program (ip l set dev ethX xdp)
Prevent the panic by making sure netif_tx_disable is called when stopping an interface.
Without this patch, the following kernel panic can be observed when doing any of the actions above:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001238d040 [....] Call trace: dwmac4_set_addr+0x8/0x10 dev_hard_start_xmit+0xe4/0x1ac sch_direct_xmit+0xe8/0x39c __dev_queue_xmit+0x3ec/0xaf0 dev_queue_xmit+0x14/0x20 [...] [ end trace 0000000000000002 ]---(CVE-2021-47558)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more than queues
There are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.
Commit a632b2a4c920 ("ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config for DCB") already disallow setting less queues than TCs.
Another case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs config due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty num_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid pointer access.
[ 95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated. [ 95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)! [ 95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0 [ 95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G U W O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1 [ 95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021 [ 95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60 [ 95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 <8b> 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c [ 95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0 [ 95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200 [ 95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000 [ 95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100 [ 95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460 [ 95.970981] FS: 00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 95.971108] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [ 95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 95.971530] PKRU: 55555554 [ 95.971573] Call Trace: [ 95.971622] ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice] [ 95.971695] ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice] [ 95.971774] ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice] [ 95.971843] ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice] [ 95.971919] ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice] [ 95.971987] ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice] [ 95.972082] ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice] [ 95.972154] ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice] [ 95.972220] dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230 [ 95.972279] ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150 [ 95.972341] dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0 [ 95.972392] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0 [ 95.972457] ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0 [ 95.972510] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280 [ 95.972591] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100 [ 95.972661] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0 [ 95.972720] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220 [ 95.972781] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0 [ 95.975891] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50 [ 95.979032] syssendmsg+0x2e4/0x300 [ 95.982147] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190 [ 95.985242] ? wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90 [ 95.988338] ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0 [ 95.991440] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30 [ 95.994539] ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0 [ 95.997619] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80 [ 96.000664] __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80 [ 96.003747] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0 [ 96.006862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
Only update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup queue map failed.(CVE-2022-48652)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage
Commit c73be61cede5 ("pipe: Add general notification queue support") a regression was introduced that would lock up resized pipes under certain conditions. See the reproducer in [1].
The commit resizing the pipe ring size was moved to a different function, doing that moved the wakeup for pipe->wr_wait before actually raising pipe->max_usage. If a pipe was full before the resize occured it would result in the wakeup never actually triggering pipe_write.
Set @max_usage and @nr_accounted before waking writers if this isn't a watch queue.
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>: rewrite to account for watch queues
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: scarlett2: Add missing error checks to *_ctl_get()
The ctl_get() functions which call scarlett2_update() were not checking the return value. Fix to check the return value and pass to the caller.(CVE-2023-52680)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_event_init()
kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory which can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52686)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent
If acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight() fails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside acpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized) acpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting the parent pci device.
Check acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52693)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace
When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue IOs and metadatas access to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents.
This patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests immediately and then evict the kclient itself.
The reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after blocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps faster.(CVE-2023-52732)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
virtio-blk: fix implicit overflow on virtio_max_dma_size
The following codes have an implicit conversion from size_t to u32: (u32)max_size = (size_t)virtio_max_dma_size(vdev);
This may lead overflow, Ex (size_t)4G -> (u32)0. Once virtio_max_dma_size() has a larger size than U32_MAX, use U32_MAX instead.(CVE-2023-52762)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline
We found a data corruption issue during testing of SMC-R on Redis applications.
The benchmark has a low probability of reporting a strange error as shown below.
"Error: Protocol error, got "\xe2" as reply type byte"
Finally, we found that the retrieved error data was as follows:
0xE2 0xD4 0xC3 0xD9 0x04 0x00 0x2C 0x20 0xA6 0x56 0x00 0x16 0x3E 0x0C 0xCB 0x04 0x02 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x20 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xE2
It is quite obvious that this is a SMC DECLINE message, which means that the applications received SMC protocol message. We found that this was caused by the following situations:
client server ¦ clc proposal -------------> ¦ clc accept <------------- ¦ clc confirm -------------> wait llc confirm send llc confirm ¦failed llc confirm ¦ x------ (after 2s)timeout wait llc confirm rsp
wait decline
(after 1s) timeout (after 2s) timeout ¦ decline --------------> ¦ decline <--------------
As a result, a decline message was sent in the implementation, and this message was read from TCP by the already-fallback connection.
This patch double the client timeout as 2x of the server value, With this simple change, the Decline messages should never cross or collide (during Confirm link timeout).
This issue requires an immediate solution, since the protocol updates involve a more long-term solution.(CVE-2023-52775)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: Fix RPC client cleaned up the freed pipefs dentries
RPC client pipefs dentries cleanup is in separated rpc_remove_pipedir() workqueue,which takes care about pipefs superblock locking. In some special scenarios, when kernel frees the pipefs sb of the current client and immediately alloctes a new pipefs sb, rpc_remove_pipedir function would misjudge the existence of pipefs sb which is not the one it used to hold. As a result, the rpc_remove_pipedir would clean the released freed pipefs dentries.
To fix this issue, rpc_remove_pipedir should check whether the current pipefs sb is consistent with the original pipefs sb.
This error can be catched by KASAN:
[ 250.497700] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.498315] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a2ab804 by task kworker/0:18/106503 [ 250.500549] Workqueue: events rpc_free_client_work [ 250.501001] Call Trace: [ 250.502880] kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 [ 250.503209] ? dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.503561] dget_parent+0x195/0x200 [ 250.503897] ? __pfx_rpc_clntdir_depopulate+0x10/0x10 [ 250.504384] rpc_rmdir_depopulate+0x1b/0x90 [ 250.504781] rpc_remove_client_dir+0xf5/0x150 [ 250.505195] rpc_free_client_work+0xe4/0x230 [ 250.505598] process_one_work+0x8ee/0x13b0 ... [ 22.039056] Allocated by task 244: [ 22.039390] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.039758] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [ 22.040109] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x59/0x70 [ 22.040487] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0xf0/0x240 [ 22.040889] __d_alloc+0x31/0x8e0 [ 22.041207] d_alloc+0x44/0x1f0 [ 22.041514] __rpc_lookup_create_exclusive+0x11c/0x140 [ 22.041987] rpc_mkdir_populate.constprop.0+0x5f/0x110 [ 22.042459] rpc_create_client_dir+0x34/0x150 [ 22.042874] rpc_setup_pipedir_sb+0x102/0x1c0 [ 22.043284] rpc_client_register+0x136/0x4e0 [ 22.043689] rpc_new_client+0x911/0x1020 [ 22.044057] rpc_create_xprt+0xcb/0x370 [ 22.044417] rpc_create+0x36b/0x6c0 ... [ 22.049524] Freed by task 0: [ 22.049803] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.050165] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [ 22.050520] kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50 [ 22.050921] __kasan_slab_free+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 22.051306] kmem_cache_free+0xa5/0x390 [ 22.051667] rcu_core+0x62c/0x1930 [ 22.051995] __do_softirq+0x165/0x52a [ 22.052347] [ 22.052503] Last potentially related work creation: [ 22.052952] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50 [ 22.053313] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8e/0xa0 [ 22.053739] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x6b/0x8b0 [ 22.054209] dentry_free+0xb2/0x140 [ 22.054540] __dentry_kill+0x3be/0x540 [ 22.054900] shrink_dentry_list+0x199/0x510 [ 22.055293] shrink_dcache_parent+0x190/0x240 [ 22.055703] do_one_tree+0x11/0x40 [ 22.056028] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x61/0x140 [ 22.056461] generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0x590 [ 22.056879] kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 [ 22.057234] rpc_kill_sb+0x121/0x200(CVE-2023-52803)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage
l2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal value should be 0, not negative.
In the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur when subsequently used as shift exponent.
Syzbot reported this bug:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12 shift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: n_gsm: require CAP_NET_ADMIN to attach N_GSM0710 ldisc
Any unprivileged user can attach N_GSM0710 ldisc, but it requires CAP_NET_ADMIN to create a GSM network anyway.
Require initial namespace CAP_NET_ADMIN to do that.(CVE-2023-52880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent
This patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan and Christian Rossow.
ACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines:
The ACK value is considered acceptable only if it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn't satisfy the above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: "If the ACK is a duplicate (SEG.ACK < SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK > SND.NXT) then send an ACK, drop the segment, and return". The "ignored" above implies that the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the ACK check more stringent since any ACK < SND.UNA wouldn't be accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT) get through.
This can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows, by not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent.
This greatly improves TCP security at a little cost.
I added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees, even if the 'blamed' patch was adhering to the RFC.
tp->bytes_acked was added in linux-4.2
Following packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows the issue at hand:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3 +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0 +0 listen(3, 1024) = 0
// ---------------- Handshake ------------------- //
// when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to // 65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet // with ack number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1) // ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never // sent by the server.
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 65535 <mss 1400,nop,wscale 14> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <...> +0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535 +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
// For the established connection, we send an ACK packet, // the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32, // where 2^32 is used to wrap around. // Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible // edge cases. // 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997
// Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet. +0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535
// After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK, // and prior malicious frame would be dropped. +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001(CVE-2023-52881)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: set dormant flag on hook register failure
We need to set the dormant flag again if we fail to register the hooks.
During memory pressure hook registration can fail and we end up with a table marked as active but no registered hooks.
On table/base chain deletion, nf_tables will attempt to unregister the hook again which yields a warn splat from the nftables core.(CVE-2024-26835)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_core: Fix possible buffer overflow
struct hci_dev_info has a fixed size name[8] field so in the event that hdev->name is bigger than that strcpy would attempt to write past its size, so this fixes this problem by switching to use strscpy.(CVE-2024-26889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xen-netfront: Add missing skb_mark_for_recycle
Notice that skb_mark_for_recycle() is introduced later than fixes tag in commit 6a5bcd84e886 ("page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB recycling").
It is believed that fixes tag were missing a call to page_pool_release_page() between v5.9 to v5.14, after which is should have used skb_mark_for_recycle(). Since v6.6 the call page_pool_release_page() were removed (in commit 535b9c61bdef ("net: page_pool: hide page_pool_release_page()") and remaining callers converted (in commit 6bfef2ec0172 ("Merge branch 'net-page_pool-remove-page_pool_release_page'")).
This leak became visible in v6.8 via commit dba1b8a7ab68 ("mm/page_pool: catch page_pool memory leaks").(CVE-2024-27393)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use
The receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not the socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly returning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: dw-edma: eDMA: Add sync read before starting the DMA transfer in remote setup
The Linked list element and pointer are not stored in the same memory as the eDMA controller register. If the doorbell register is toggled before the full write of the linked list a race condition error will occur. In remote setup we can only use a readl to the memory to assure the full write has occurred.(CVE-2024-27408)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: altmodes/displayport: create sysfs nodes as driver's default device attribute group
The DisplayPort driver's sysfs nodes may be present to the userspace before typec_altmode_set_drvdata() completes in dp_altmode_probe. This means that a sysfs read can trigger a NULL pointer error by deferencing dp->hpd in hpd_show or dp->lock in pin_assignment_show, as dev_get_drvdata() returns NULL in those cases.
Remove manual sysfs node creation in favor of adding attribute group as default for devices bound to the driver. The ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro is not used here otherwise the path to the sysfs nodes is no longer compliant with the ABI.(CVE-2024-35790)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal
A race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove() callback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an unhandled page fault [1].
The problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running after pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn't really guarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks will not be running when it returns.
However, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when pm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM status of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without waiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for .runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it arguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly prohibited).
Thus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs to protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after pm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after pm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it has started earlier.]
One way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier() after pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the runtime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from being invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should it be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in pci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the driver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which will prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr driver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks.(CVE-2024-35809)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: brcmfmac: Fix use-after-free bug in brcmf_cfg80211_detach
This is the candidate patch of CVE-2023-47233 : https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47233
In brcm80211 driver,it starts with the following invoking chain to start init a timeout worker:
->brcmf_usb_probe ->brcmf_usb_probe_cb ->brcmf_attach ->brcmf_bus_started ->brcmf_cfg80211_attach ->wl_init_priv ->brcmf_init_escan ->INIT_WORK(&cfg->escan_timeout_work, brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker);
If we disconnect the USB by hotplug, it will call brcmf_usb_disconnect to make cleanup. The invoking chain is :
brcmf_usb_disconnect ->brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb ->brcmf_detach ->brcmf_cfg80211_detach ->kfree(cfg);
While the timeout woker may still be running. This will cause a use-after-free bug on cfg in brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker.
Fix it by deleting the timer and canceling the worker in brcmf_cfg80211_detach.
arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com: keep timer delete as is and cancel work just before free
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix memory leak during rehash
The rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another. This is done by iterating over all chunks (all the filters with the same priority) in the region and in each chunk iterating over all the filters.
If the migration fails, the code tries to migrate the filters back to the old region. However, the rollback itself can also fail in which case another migration will be erroneously performed. Besides the fact that this ping pong is not a very good idea, it also creates a problem.
Each virtual chunk references two chunks: The currently used one ('vchunk->chunk') and a backup ('vchunk->chunk2'). During migration the first holds the chunk we want to migrate filters to and the second holds the chunk we are migrating filters from.
The code currently assumes - but does not verify - that the backup chunk does not exist (NULL) if the currently used chunk does not reference the target region. This assumption breaks when we are trying to rollback a rollback, resulting in the backup chunk being overwritten and leaked [1].
Fix by not rolling back a failed rollback and add a warning to avoid future cases.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1063 at lib/parman.c:291 parman_destroy+0x17/0x20 Modules linked in: CPU: 5 PID: 1063 Comm: kworker/5:11 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00784-gc6a05c468a0b #14 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:parman_destroy+0x17/0x20 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_region_fini+0x19/0x60 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x49/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x1f1/0x470 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-35853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during rehash
The rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another according to the number of available credits.
The migrated from region is destroyed at the end of the work if the number of credits is non-negative as the assumption is that this is indicative of migration being complete. This assumption is incorrect as a non-negative number of credits can also be the result of a failed migration.
The destruction of a region that still has filters referencing it can result in a use-after-free [1].
Fix by not destroying the region if migration failed.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881735319e8 by task kworker/0:31/3858
CPU: 0 PID: 3858 Comm: kworker/0:31 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00782-gf2275c2157d8 #5 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120 print_report+0xce/0x670 kasan_report+0xd7/0x110 mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230 mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_entry_del+0x2e/0x70 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_del+0x81/0x210 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3cd/0xb50 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
Allocated by task 174: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_create+0xdf/0x9c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x954/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Freed by task 7: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170 __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30 kfree+0xc1/0x290 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x272/0x310 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x731/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35854)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage
childregs represents the registers which are active for the new thread in user context. For a kernel thread, childregs->gp is never used since the kernel gp is not touched by switch_to. For a user mode helper, the gp value can be observed in user space after execve or possibly by other means.
[From the email thread]
The / Kernel thread / comment is somewhat inaccurate in that it is also used for user_mode_helper threads, which exec a user process, e.g. /sbin/init or when /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a pipe. Such threads do not have PF_KTHREAD set and are valid targets for ptrace etc. even before they exec.
childregs is the user context during syscall execution and it is observable from userspace in at least five ways:
- kernel_execve does not currently clear integer registers, so the starting register state for PID 1 and other user processes started by the kernel has sp = user stack, gp = kernel __global_pointer$, all other integer registers zeroed by the memset in the patch comment.
This is a bug in its own right, but I'm unwilling to bet that it is the only way to exploit the issue addressed by this patch.
-
ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET): you can PTRACE_ATTACH to a user_mode_helper thread before it execs, but ptrace requires SIGSTOP to be delivered which can only happen at user/kernel boundaries.
-
/proc//task//syscall: this is perfectly happy to read pt_regs for user_mode_helpers before the exec completes, but gp is not one of the registers it returns.
-
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER: LOCKDOWN_PERF normally prevents access to kernel addresses via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR, but due to this bug kernel addresses are also exposed via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER which is permitted under LOCKDOWN_PERF. I have not attempted to write exploit code.
-
Much of the tracing infrastructure allows access to user registers. I have not attempted to determine which forms of tracing allow access to user registers without already allowing access to kernel registers.(CVE-2024-35871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
erspan: make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb->head
syzbot reported a problem in ip6erspan_rcv() [1]
Issue is that ip6erspan_rcv() (and erspan_rcv()) no longer make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb linear part (skb->head) before getting @ver field from it.
Add the missing pskb_may_pull() calls.
v2: Reload iph pointer in erspan_rcv() after pskb_may_pull() because skb->head might have changed.
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610 pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline] pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline] ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline] gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1d4c/0x2ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438 ip6_input_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_input+0x15d/0x430 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492 ip6_mc_input+0xa7e/0xc80 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:586 dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline] ip6_rcv_finish+0x955/0x970 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xde/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5538 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5652 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5738 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5798 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1549 tun_get_user+0x5566/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 tun_alloc_skb drivers/net/tun.c:1525 [inline] tun_get_user+0x209a/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:1846 tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 5045 Comm: syz-executor114 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00021-g962490525cff #0(CVE-2024-35888)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem
syzkaller started using corpuses where a BPF tracing program deletes elements from a sockmap/sockhash map. Because BPF tracing programs can be invoked from any interrupt context, locks taken during a map_delete_elem operation must be hardirq-safe. Otherwise a deadlock due to lock inversion is possible, as reported by lockdep:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&host->lock); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); <Interrupt> lock(&host->lock);
Locks in sockmap are hardirq-unsafe by design. We expects elements to be deleted from sockmap/sockhash only in task (normal) context with interrupts enabled, or in softirq context.
Detect when map_delete_elem operation is invoked from a context which is not hardirq-unsafe, that is interrupts are disabled, and bail out with an error.
Note that map updates are not affected by this issue. BPF verifier does not allow updating sockmap/sockhash from a BPF tracing program today.(CVE-2024-35895)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: validate user input for expected length
I got multiple syzbot reports showing old bugs exposed by BPF after commit 20f2505fb436 ("bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc in cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt")
setsockopt() @optlen argument should be taken into account before copying data.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627 Read of size 96 at addr ffff88802cd73da0 by task syz-executor.4/7238
CPU: 1 PID: 7238 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-next-20240403-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x29/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:105 copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627 nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a RIP: 0033:0x7fd22067dde9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fd21f9ff0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd2207abf80 RCX: 00007fd22067dde9 RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fd2206ca47a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000020000880 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd2207abf80 R15: 00007ffd2d0170d8 </TASK>
Allocated by task 7238: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4069 [inline] __kmalloc_noprof+0x200/0x410 mm/slub.c:4082 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd47/0x1050 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869 do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802cd73da0 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 1-byte region [ffff88802cd73da0, ffff88802cd73da1)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88802cd73020 pfn:0x2cd73 flags: 0xfff80000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0xfff) page_type: 0xffffefff(slab) raw: 00fff80000000000 ffff888015041280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 raw: ffff88802cd73020 000000008080007f 00000001ffffefff 00 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35896)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size
This patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack memory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result of overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually happen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should protect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections (fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array accesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the verification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.
This check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly removed in a833a17aeac7.(CVE-2024-35905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: ucsi: Limit read size on v1.2
Between UCSI 1.2 and UCSI 2.0, the size of the MESSAGE_IN region was increased from 16 to 256. In order to avoid overflowing reads for older systems, add a mechanism to use the read UCSI version to truncate read sizes on UCSI v1.2.(CVE-2024-35924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
syzbot reported sco_sock_setsockopt() is copying data without checking user input length.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sco_sock_setsockopt+0xc0b/0xf90 net/bluetooth/sco.c:893 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88805f7b15a3 by task syz-executor.5/12578(CVE-2024-35967)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
geneve: fix header validation in geneve[6]_xmit_skb
syzbot is able to trigger an uninit-value in geneve_xmit() [1]
Problem : While most ip tunnel helpers (like ip_tunnel_get_dsfield()) uses skb_protocol(skb, true), pskb_inet_may_pull() is only using skb->protocol.
If anything else than ETH_P_IPV6 or ETH_P_IP is found in skb->protocol, pskb_inet_may_pull() does nothing at all.
If a vlan tag was provided by the caller (af_packet in the syzbot case), the network header might not point to the correct location, and skb linear part could be smaller than expected.
Add skb_vlan_inet_prepare() to perform a complete mac validation.
Use this in geneve for the moment, I suspect we need to adopt this more broadly.
v4 - Jakub reported v3 broke l2_tos_ttl_inherit.sh selftest - Only call __vlan_get_protocol() for vlan types.
v2,v3 - Addressed Sabrina comments on v1 and v2
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030 geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline] geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547 __dev_queue_xmit+0x348d/0x52c0 net/core/dev.c:4335 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline] packet_xmit+0x9c/0x6c0 net/packet/af_packet.c:276 packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3081 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x8bb0/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 packet_alloc_skb net/packet/af_packet.c:2930 [inline] packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3024 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x722d/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 0 PID: 5033 Comm: syz-executor346 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00005-g928a87efa423 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024(CVE-2024-35973)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT
If the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit the local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all fragments (when enabled) or a single packet.
But if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN specific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This can for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are on top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed. There will just be an endless spam of
batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)
in the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the timeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and therefore never be able to reduce the table even more.
There are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too high to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with only a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120 bytes.
While this should be handled proactively when:
- interface with too low MTU is added
- VLAN is added
- non-purgeable local mac is added
- MTU of an attached interface is reduced
- fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping attached interfaces)
not all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only consuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions (non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced). It is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle also the situations when there were already incompatible system configuration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: smbus: fix NULL function pointer dereference
Baruch reported an OOPS when using the designware controller as target only. Target-only modes break the assumption of one transfer function always being available. Fix this by always checking the pointer in __i2c_transfer.
wsa: dropped the simplification in core-smbus to avoid theoretical regressions
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation
Each attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least of sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes. The current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes) which is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation is not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands read access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller
Generic sdhci code registers LED device and uses host->runtime_suspended flag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn't set this flag, which causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime suspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.(CVE-2024-36029)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init
net_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is called without any locking. It reads max_gen_ptrs, which is changed under pernet_ops_rwsem. It is read twice, first to allocate an array, then to set s.len, which is later used to limit the bounds of the array access.
It is possible that the array is allocated and another thread is registering a new pernet ops, increments max_gen_ptrs, which is then used to set s.len with a larger than allocated length for the variable array.
Fix it by reading max_gen_ptrs only once in net_alloc_generic. If max_gen_ptrs is later incremented, it will be caught in net_assign_generic.(CVE-2024-36883)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix UAF in error path
Sam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported a UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034
CPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88 dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377 print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601 kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026 skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094 __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108 kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144 kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244 tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186 tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324 tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824 tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159 tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346 __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254 dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461 ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534 __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648 process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645 net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781 __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553 do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454 do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381 local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851 __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378 dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169 neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526 neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540 ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235 __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313 __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295 ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323 NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303 ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451 ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492 udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963 udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250 inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850 sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730 __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203 __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 do_syscall_ ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect
Christoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8 8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe <0f> 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4 RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000 R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline] mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline] __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615 mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767 process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline] worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 </TASK>
When fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt is not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value into snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level re-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send buffer cleanup using 'bad' snd_una values.
We could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such dumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very low to zero impact in practice.
Instead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq, for consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpiolib: cdev: fix uninitialised kfifo
If a line is requested with debounce, and that results in debouncing in software, and the line is subsequently reconfigured to enable edge detection then the allocation of the kfifo to contain edge events is overlooked. This results in events being written to and read from an uninitialised kfifo. Read events are returned to userspace.
Initialise the kfifo in the case where the software debounce is already active.(CVE-2024-36898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpiolib: cdev: Fix use after free in lineinfo_changed_notify
The use-after-free issue occurs as follows: when the GPIO chip device file is being closed by invoking gpio_chrdev_release(), watched_lines is freed by bitmap_free(), but the unregistration of lineinfo_changed_nb notifier chain failed due to waiting write rwsem. Additionally, one of the GPIO chip's lines is also in the release process and holds the notifier chain's read rwsem. Consequently, a race condition leads to the use-after-free of watched_lines.
Here is the typical stack when issue happened:
[free] gpio_chrdev_release() --> bitmap_free(cdev->watched_lines) <-- freed --> blocking_notifier_chain_unregister() --> down_write(&nh->rwsem) <-- waiting rwsem --> __down_write_common() --> rwsem_down_write_slowpath() --> schedule_preempt_disabled() --> schedule()
[use] st54spi_gpio_dev_release() --> gpio_free() --> gpiod_free() --> gpiod_free_commit() --> gpiod_line_state_notify() --> blocking_notifier_call_chain() --> down_read(&nh->rwsem); <-- held rwsem --> notifier_call_chain() --> lineinfo_changed_notify() --> test_bit(xxxx, cdev->watched_lines) <-- use after free
The side effect of the use-after-free issue is that a GPIO line event is being generated for userspace where it shouldn't. However, since the chrdev is being closed, userspace won't have the chance to read that event anyway.
To fix the issue, call the bitmap_free() function after the unregistration of lineinfo_changed_nb notifier chain.(CVE-2024-36899)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()
According to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev() returns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack deal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.
syzbot reported:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7] CPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237 Code: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0 R13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358 sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248 sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653 sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783 sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline] sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212 sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline] sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169 sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73 __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fib6_rules: avoid possible NULL dereference in fib6_rule_action()
syzbot is able to trigger the following crash [1], caused by unsafe ip6_dst_idev() use.
Indeed ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, and must always be checked.
[1]
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 PID: 31648 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240417-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:__fib6_rule_action net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:237 [inline] RIP: 0010:fib6_rule_action+0x241/0x7b0 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:267 Code: 02 00 00 49 8d 9f d8 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f9 32 bf f7 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 e0 32 bf f7 4c 8b 03 48 89 ef 4c RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fc1f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1a772f98c8186700 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8bcac4e0 RDI: ffffffff8c1f9760 RBP: ffff8880673fb980 R08: ffffffff8fac15ef R09: 1ffffffff1f582bd R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f582be R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: 0000000000000080 R14: ffff888076509000 R15: ffff88807a029a00 FS: 00007f55e82ca6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b31d23000 CR3: 0000000022b66000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> fib_rules_lookup+0x62c/0xdb0 net/core/fib_rules.c:317 fib6_rule_lookup+0x1fd/0x790 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:108 ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2637 [inline] ip6_route_output_flags+0x38e/0x610 net/ipv6/route.c:2649 ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:93 [inline] ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x189/0x11a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1120 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0xb9/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250 sctp_v6_get_dst+0x792/0x1e20 net/sctp/ipv6.c:326 sctp_transport_route+0x12c/0x2e0 net/sctp/transport.c:455 sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x614/0x15c0 net/sctp/associola.c:662 sctp_connect_new_asoc+0x31d/0x6c0 net/sctp/socket.c:1099 __sctp_connect+0x66d/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1197 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36902)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: Fix potential uninit-value access in __ip6_make_skb()
As it was done in commit fc1092f51567 ("ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()") for IPv4, check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl6->flowi6_flags instead of testing HDRINCL on the socket to avoid a race condition which causes uninit-value access.(CVE-2024-36903)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ARM: 9381/1: kasan: clear stale stack poison
We found below OOB crash:
[ 33.452494] ================================================================== [ 33.453513] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec [ 33.454660] Write of size 164 at addr c1d03d30 by task swapper/0/0 [ 33.455515] [ 33.455767] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.1.25-mainline #1 [ 33.456880] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 33.457555] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c [ 33.458326] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c [ 33.459072] dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x158/0x4a4 [ 33.459863] print_report from kasan_report+0x9c/0x148 [ 33.460616] kasan_report from kasan_check_range+0x94/0x1a0 [ 33.461424] kasan_check_range from memset+0x20/0x3c [ 33.462157] memset from refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec [ 33.463064] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0 from tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick+0x180/0x53c [ 33.464181] tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick from do_idle+0x264/0x354 [ 33.465029] do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x24 [ 33.465769] cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xf0/0xf4 [ 33.466528] rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18 [ 33.467397] [ 33.467644] The buggy address belongs to stack of task swapper/0/0 [ 33.468493] and is located at offset 112 in frame: [ 33.469172] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0x0/0x2ec [ 33.469917] [ 33.470165] This frame has 2 objects: [ 33.470696] [32, 76) 'global_zone_diff' [ 33.470729] [112, 276) 'global_node_diff' [ 33.471294] [ 33.472095] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 33.472862] page:3cd72da8 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x41d03 [ 33.473944] flags: 0x1000(reserved|zone=0) [ 33.474565] raw: 00001000 ed741470 ed741470 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001 [ 33.475656] raw: 00000000 [ 33.476050] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 33.476816] [ 33.477061] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 33.477732] c1d03c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 33.478630] c1d03c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 [ 33.479526] >c1d03d00: 00 04 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 [ 33.480415] ^ [ 33.481195] c1d03d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3 [ 33.482088] c1d03e00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 33.482978] ==================================================================
We find the root cause of this OOB is that arm does not clear stale stack poison in the case of cpuidle.
This patch refer to arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S to resolve this issue.
From cited commit [1] that explain the problem
Functions which the compiler has instrumented for KASAN place poison on the stack shadow upon entry and remove this poison prior to returning.
In the case of cpuidle, CPUs exit the kernel a number of levels deep in C code. Any instrumented functions on this critical path will leave portions of the stack shadow poisoned.
If CPUs lose context and return to the kernel via a cold path, we restore a prior context saved in __cpu_suspend_enter are forgotten, and we never remove the poison they placed in the stack shadow area by functions calls between this and the actual exit of the kernel.
Thus, (depending on stackframe layout) subsequent calls to instrumented functions may hit this stale poison, resulting in (spurious) KASAN splats to the console.
To avoid this, clear any stale poison from the idle thread for a CPU prior to bringing a CPU online.
From cited commit [2]
Extend to check for CONFIG_KASAN_STACK
[1] commit 0d97e6d8024c ("arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison") [2] commit d56a9ef84bd0 ("kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK")(CVE-2024-36906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0
The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns.
Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk.(CVE-2024-36908)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()
There is no check for overflow of 'start + len' in blk_ioctl_discard(). Hung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param: start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000; Add the overflow validation now.(CVE-2024-36917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()
lpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the hbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the hbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/qeth: Fix kernel panic after setting hsuid
Symptom: When the hsuid attribute is set for the first time on an IQD Layer3 device while the corresponding network interface is already UP, the kernel will try to execute a napi function pointer that is NULL.
Example:
[ 2057.572696] illegal operation: 0001 ilc:1 [#1] SMP [ 2057.572702] Modules linked in: af_iucv qeth_l3 zfcp scsi_transport_fc sunrpc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nf_tables_set nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink ghash_s390 prng xts aes_s390 des_s390 de s_generic sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 vfio_ccw vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 eadm_sch vfio ext4 mbcache jbd2 qeth_l2 bridge stp llc dasd_eckd_mod qeth dasd_mod qdio ccwgroup pkey zcrypt [ 2057.572739] CPU: 6 PID: 60182 Comm: stress_client Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-541.el8.s390x #1 [ 2057.572742] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (LPAR) [ 2057.572744] Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 0000000000000002 (0x2) [ 2057.572748] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 [ 2057.572751] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 0000000000000000 [ 2057.572754] 00000000a3b008d8 cb923a29c779abc5 0000000000000000 00000000814cfd80 [ 2057.572756] 000000000000012c 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 00000000a3b008d8 [ 2057.572758] 00000000bab6d500 00000000814cfd80 0000000091317e46 00000000814cfc68 [ 2057.572762] Krnl Code:#0000000000000000: 0000 illegal >0000000000000002: 0000 illegal 0000000000000004: 0000 illegal 0000000000000006: 0000 illegal 0000000000000008: 0000 illegal 000000000000000a: 0000 illegal 000000000000000c: 0000 illegal 000000000000000e: 0000 illegal [ 2057.572800] Call Trace: [ 2057.572801] ([<00000000ec639700>] 0xec639700) [ 2057.572803] [<00000000913183e2>] net_rx_action+0x2ba/0x398 [ 2057.572809] [<0000000091515f76>] __do_softirq+0x11e/0x3a0 [ 2057.572813] [<0000000090ce160c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x3c/0x58 [ 2057.572817] ([<0000000090d2cbd6>] do_softirq.part.1+0x56/0x60) [ 2057.572822] [<0000000090d2cc60>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x80/0x98 [ 2057.572825] [<0000000091314706>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2be/0xd70 [ 2057.572827] [<000003ff803dd6d6>] afiucv_hs_send+0x24e/0x300 [af_iucv] [ 2057.572830] [<000003ff803dd88a>] iucv_send_ctrl+0x102/0x138 [af_iucv] [ 2057.572833] [<000003ff803de72a>] iucv_sock_connect+0x37a/0x468 [af_iucv] [ 2057.572835] [<00000000912e7e90>] __sys_connect+0xa0/0xd8 [ 2057.572839] [<00000000912e9580>] sys_socketcall+0x228/0x348 [ 2057.572841] [<0000000091514e1a>] system_call+0x2a6/0x2c8 [ 2057.572843] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 2057.572844] [<0000000091317e44>] __napi_poll+0x4c/0x1d8 [ 2057.572846] [ 2057.572847] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Analysis: There is one napi structure per out_q: card->qdio.out_qs[i].napi The napi.poll functions are set during qeth_open().
Since commit 1cfef80d4c2b ("s390/qeth: Don't call dev_close/dev_open (DOWN/UP)") qeth_set_offline()/qeth_set_online() no longer call dev_close()/ dev_open(). So if qeth_free_qdio_queues() cleared card->qdio.out_qs[i].napi.poll while the network interface was UP and the card was offline, they are not set again.
Reproduction: chzdev -e $devno layer2=0 ip link set dev $network_interface up echo 0 > /sys/bus/ccw ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36928)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs
SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be linearized, otherwise they become invalid. Return NULL if such an skb is passed to skb_copy or skb_copy_expand, in order to prevent a crash on a potential later call to skb_gso_segment.(CVE-2024-36929)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
amd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted
If there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first device will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes on all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will start reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been evicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page fault.(CVE-2024-36949)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix a possible memleak in tipc_buf_append
__skb_linearize() doesn't free the skb when it fails, so move '*buf = NULL' after __skb_linearize(), so that the skb can be freed on the err path.(CVE-2024-36954)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: avoid off-by-one read from userspace
We try to access count + 1 byte from userspace with memdup_user(buffer, count + 1). However, the userspace only provides buffer of count bytes and only these count bytes are verified to be okay to access. To ensure the copied buffer is NUL terminated, we use memdup_user_nul instead.(CVE-2024-36957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/9p: only translate RWX permissions for plain 9P2000
Garbage in plain 9P2000's perm bits is allowed through, which causes it to be able to set (among others) the suid bit. This was presumably not the intent since the unix extended bits are handled explicitly and conditionally on .u.(CVE-2024-36964)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-207.0.0.116.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix use-after-free of encap entry in neigh update handler\r\n\r\nFunction mlx5e_rep_neigh_update() wasn\u0026apos;t updated to accommodate rtnl lock\nremoval from TC filter update path and properly handle concurrent encap\nentry insertion/deletion which can lead to following use-after-free:\r\n\r\n [23827.464923] ==================================================================\n [23827.469446] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.470971] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881d132228c by task kworker/u20:6/21635\n [23827.472251]\n [23827.472615] CPU: 9 PID: 21635 Comm: kworker/u20:6 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #5\n [23827.473788] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\n [23827.475639] Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_rep_neigh_update [mlx5_core]\n [23827.476731] Call Trace:\n [23827.477260] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107\n [23827.477906] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x140\n [23827.478896] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.479879] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.480905] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8\n [23827.481701] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.482744] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0\n [23827.493112] mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.494054] ? mlx5e_tc_tun_encap_info_equal_generic+0x140/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.495296] mlx5e_rep_neigh_update+0x41e/0x5e0 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.496338] ? mlx5e_rep_neigh_entry_release+0xb80/0xb80 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.497486] ? read_word_at_a_time+0xe/0x20\n [23827.498250] ? strscpy+0xa0/0x2a0\n [23827.498889] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0\n [23827.499638] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400\n [23827.500537] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2c0/0x2c0\n [23827.501359] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90\n [23827.502116] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220\n [23827.502831] ? process_one_work+0x14e0/0x14e0\n [23827.503627] kthread+0x328/0x3f0\n [23827.504254] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40\n [23827.505065] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x90/0x90\n [23827.505912] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\n [23827.506621]\n [23827.506987] Allocated by task 28248:\n [23827.507694] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40\n [23827.508476] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7c/0x90\n [23827.509197] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xde1/0x1d40 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.510194] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x397/0xc40 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.511218] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x519/0xb30 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.512234] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x191c/0x4870 [mlx5_core]\n [23827.513298] tc_setup_cb_add+0x1d5/0x420\n [23827.514023] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x382/0x6a0 [cls_flower]\n [23827.514975] fl_change+0x2ceb/0x4a51 [cls_flower]\n [23827.515821] tc_new_tfilter+0x89a/0x2070\n [23827.516548] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x644/0x8c0\n [23827.517300] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340\n [23827.518021] netlink_unicast+0x42b/0x700\n [23827.518742] netlink_sendmsg+0x743/0xc20\n [23827.519467] sock_sendmsg+0xb2/0xe0\n [23827.520131] ____sys_sendmsg+0x590/0x770\n [23827.520851] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x160\n [23827.521552] __sys_sendmsg+0xb7/0x140\n [23827.522238] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70\n [23827.522907] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n [23827.523797]\n [23827.524163] Freed by task 25948:\n [23827.524780] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40\n [23827.525488] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30\n [23827.526187] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30\n [23827.526968] __kasan_slab_free+0xed/0x130\n [23827.527709] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xcf/0x1d0\n [23827.528528] kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x33a/0x6e0\n [23827.529317] kfree_rcu_work+0x55f/0xb70\n [23827.530024] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0\n [23827.530770] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220\n [23827.531480] kthread+0x328/0x3f0\n [23827.532114] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\n [23827.532785]\n [23827.533147] Last potentially related work creation:\n [23827.534007] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40\n [23827.534710] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0\n [23827.535492] kvfree_call_rcu+0x31/0x7b0\n [23827.536206] mlx5e_tc_del\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47247)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: Fix possible null pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes possible null pointer dereference in files\n\u0026quot;rvu_debugfs.c\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;rvu_nix.c\u0026quot;(CVE-2021-47484)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: stmmac: Disable Tx queues when reconfiguring the interface\r\n\r\nThe Tx queues were not disabled in situations where the driver needed to\nstop the interface to apply a new configuration. This could result in a\nkernel panic when doing any of the 3 following actions:\n* reconfiguring the number of queues (ethtool -L)\n* reconfiguring the size of the ring buffers (ethtool -G)\n* installing/removing an XDP program (ip l set dev ethX xdp)\r\n\r\nPrevent the panic by making sure netif_tx_disable is called when stopping\nan interface.\r\n\r\nWithout this patch, the following kernel panic can be observed when doing\nany of the actions above:\r\n\r\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001238d040\n[....]\n Call trace:\n dwmac4_set_addr+0x8/0x10\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0xe4/0x1ac\n sch_direct_xmit+0xe8/0x39c\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x3ec/0xaf0\n dev_queue_xmit+0x14/0x20\n[...]\n[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]---(CVE-2021-47558)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more than queues\r\n\r\nThere are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.\r\n\r\nCommit a632b2a4c920 (\u0026quot;ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config\nfor DCB\u0026quot;) already disallow setting less queues than TCs.\r\n\r\nAnother case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs\nconfig due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty\nnum_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid pointer access.\r\n\r\n[ 95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated.\n[ 95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)!\n[ 95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0\n[ 95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n[ 95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G U W O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1\n[ 95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021\n[ 95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60\n[ 95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 \u0026lt;8b\u0026gt; 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c\n[ 95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[ 95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0\n[ 95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200\n[ 95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000\n[ 95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100\n[ 95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460\n[ 95.970981] FS: 00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 95.971108] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0\n[ 95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 95.971530] PKRU: 55555554\n[ 95.971573] Call Trace:\n[ 95.971622] ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice]\n[ 95.971695] ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice]\n[ 95.971774] ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice]\n[ 95.971843] ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice]\n[ 95.971919] ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice]\n[ 95.971987] ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice]\n[ 95.972082] ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice]\n[ 95.972154] ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice]\n[ 95.972220] dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230\n[ 95.972279] ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150\n[ 95.972341] dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0\n[ 95.972392] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0\n[ 95.972457] ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0\n[ 95.972510] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280\n[ 95.972591] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100\n[ 95.972661] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0\n[ 95.972720] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220\n[ 95.972781] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0\n[ 95.975891] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50\n[ 95.979032] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2e4/0x300\n[ 95.982147] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190\n[ 95.985242] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90\n[ 95.988338] ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0\n[ 95.991440] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30\n[ 95.994539] ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0\n[ 95.997619] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80\n[ 96.000664] __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80\n[ 96.003747] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0\n[ 96.006862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca\r\n\r\nOnly update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup\nqueue map failed.(CVE-2022-48652)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage\r\n\r\nCommit c73be61cede5 (\u0026quot;pipe: Add general notification queue support\u0026quot;) a\nregression was introduced that would lock up resized pipes under certain\nconditions. See the reproducer in [1].\r\n\r\nThe commit resizing the pipe ring size was moved to a different\nfunction, doing that moved the wakeup for pipe-\u0026gt;wr_wait before actually\nraising pipe-\u0026gt;max_usage. If a pipe was full before the resize occured it\nwould result in the wakeup never actually triggering pipe_write.\r\n\r\nSet @max_usage and @nr_accounted before waking writers if this isn\u0026apos;t a\nwatch queue.\r\n\r\n[Christian Brauner \u0026lt;brauner@kernel.org\u0026gt;: rewrite to account for watch queues](CVE-2023-52672)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: scarlett2: Add missing error checks to *_ctl_get()\r\n\r\nThe *_ctl_get() functions which call scarlett2_update_*() were not\nchecking the return value. Fix to check the return value and pass to\nthe caller.(CVE-2023-52680)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_event_init()\r\n\r\nkasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory\nwhich can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52686)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent\r\n\r\nIf acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight()\nfails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside\nacpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized)\nacpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting\nthe parent pci device.\r\n\r\nCheck acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52693)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace\r\n\r\nWhen received corrupted snap trace we don\u0026apos;t know what exactly has\nhappened in MDS side. And we shouldn\u0026apos;t continue IOs and metadatas\naccess to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents.\r\n\r\nThis patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests\nimmediately and then evict the kclient itself.\r\n\r\nThe reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after\nblocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps\nfaster.(CVE-2023-52732)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvirtio-blk: fix implicit overflow on virtio_max_dma_size\r\n\r\nThe following codes have an implicit conversion from size_t to u32:\n(u32)max_size = (size_t)virtio_max_dma_size(vdev);\r\n\r\nThis may lead overflow, Ex (size_t)4G -\u0026gt; (u32)0. Once\nvirtio_max_dma_size() has a larger size than U32_MAX, use U32_MAX\ninstead.(CVE-2023-52762)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline\r\n\r\nWe found a data corruption issue during testing of SMC-R on Redis\napplications.\r\n\r\nThe benchmark has a low probability of reporting a strange error as\nshown below.\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;Error: Protocol error, got \u0026quot;\\xe2\u0026quot; as reply type byte\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nFinally, we found that the retrieved error data was as follows:\r\n\r\n0xE2 0xD4 0xC3 0xD9 0x04 0x00 0x2C 0x20 0xA6 0x56 0x00 0x16 0x3E 0x0C\n0xCB 0x04 0x02 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x20 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00\n0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xE2\r\n\r\nIt is quite obvious that this is a SMC DECLINE message, which means that\nthe applications received SMC protocol message.\nWe found that this was caused by the following situations:\r\n\r\nclient server\n \u00a6 clc proposal\n -------------\u0026gt;\n \u00a6 clc accept\n \u0026lt;-------------\n \u00a6 clc confirm\n -------------\u0026gt;\nwait llc confirm\n\t\t\tsend llc confirm\n \u00a6failed llc confirm\n \u00a6 x------\n(after 2s)timeout\n wait llc confirm rsp\r\n\r\nwait decline\r\n\r\n(after 1s) timeout\n (after 2s) timeout\n \u00a6 decline\n --------------\u0026gt;\n \u00a6 decline\n \u0026lt;--------------\r\n\r\nAs a result, a decline message was sent in the implementation, and this\nmessage was read from TCP by the already-fallback connection.\r\n\r\nThis patch double the client timeout as 2x of the server value,\nWith this simple change, the Decline messages should never cross or\ncollide (during Confirm link timeout).\r\n\r\nThis issue requires an immediate solution, since the protocol updates\ninvolve a more long-term solution.(CVE-2023-52775)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: Fix RPC client cleaned up the freed pipefs dentries\r\n\r\nRPC client pipefs dentries cleanup is in separated rpc_remove_pipedir()\nworkqueue,which takes care about pipefs superblock locking.\nIn some special scenarios, when kernel frees the pipefs sb of the\ncurrent client and immediately alloctes a new pipefs sb,\nrpc_remove_pipedir function would misjudge the existence of pipefs\nsb which is not the one it used to hold. As a result,\nthe rpc_remove_pipedir would clean the released freed pipefs dentries.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, rpc_remove_pipedir should check whether the\ncurrent pipefs sb is consistent with the original pipefs sb.\r\n\r\nThis error can be catched by KASAN:\n=========================================================\n[ 250.497700] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.498315] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a2ab804 by task kworker/0:18/106503\n[ 250.500549] Workqueue: events rpc_free_client_work\n[ 250.501001] Call Trace:\n[ 250.502880] kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0\n[ 250.503209] ? dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.503561] dget_parent+0x195/0x200\n[ 250.503897] ? __pfx_rpc_clntdir_depopulate+0x10/0x10\n[ 250.504384] rpc_rmdir_depopulate+0x1b/0x90\n[ 250.504781] rpc_remove_client_dir+0xf5/0x150\n[ 250.505195] rpc_free_client_work+0xe4/0x230\n[ 250.505598] process_one_work+0x8ee/0x13b0\n...\n[ 22.039056] Allocated by task 244:\n[ 22.039390] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.039758] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30\n[ 22.040109] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x59/0x70\n[ 22.040487] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0xf0/0x240\n[ 22.040889] __d_alloc+0x31/0x8e0\n[ 22.041207] d_alloc+0x44/0x1f0\n[ 22.041514] __rpc_lookup_create_exclusive+0x11c/0x140\n[ 22.041987] rpc_mkdir_populate.constprop.0+0x5f/0x110\n[ 22.042459] rpc_create_client_dir+0x34/0x150\n[ 22.042874] rpc_setup_pipedir_sb+0x102/0x1c0\n[ 22.043284] rpc_client_register+0x136/0x4e0\n[ 22.043689] rpc_new_client+0x911/0x1020\n[ 22.044057] rpc_create_xprt+0xcb/0x370\n[ 22.044417] rpc_create+0x36b/0x6c0\n...\n[ 22.049524] Freed by task 0:\n[ 22.049803] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.050165] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30\n[ 22.050520] kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50\n[ 22.050921] __kasan_slab_free+0x10e/0x1a0\n[ 22.051306] kmem_cache_free+0xa5/0x390\n[ 22.051667] rcu_core+0x62c/0x1930\n[ 22.051995] __do_softirq+0x165/0x52a\n[ 22.052347]\n[ 22.052503] Last potentially related work creation:\n[ 22.052952] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x50\n[ 22.053313] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8e/0xa0\n[ 22.053739] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x6b/0x8b0\n[ 22.054209] dentry_free+0xb2/0x140\n[ 22.054540] __dentry_kill+0x3be/0x540\n[ 22.054900] shrink_dentry_list+0x199/0x510\n[ 22.055293] shrink_dcache_parent+0x190/0x240\n[ 22.055703] do_one_tree+0x11/0x40\n[ 22.056028] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x61/0x140\n[ 22.056461] generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0x590\n[ 22.056879] kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60\n[ 22.057234] rpc_kill_sb+0x121/0x200(CVE-2023-52803)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage\r\n\r\nl2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal\nvalue should be 0, not negative.\r\n\r\nIn the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur\nwhen subsequently used as shift exponent.\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported this bug:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12\nshift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: n_gsm: require CAP_NET_ADMIN to attach N_GSM0710 ldisc\r\n\r\nAny unprivileged user can attach N_GSM0710 ldisc, but it requires\nCAP_NET_ADMIN to create a GSM network anyway.\r\n\r\nRequire initial namespace CAP_NET_ADMIN to do that.(CVE-2023-52880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent\r\n\r\nThis patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan\nand Christian Rossow.\r\n\r\nACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines:\r\n\r\n The ACK value is considered acceptable only if\n it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) \u0026lt;= SEG.ACK \u0026lt;=\n SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn\u0026apos;t satisfy the\n above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to\n be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: \u0026quot;If the ACK is a\n duplicate (SEG.ACK \u0026lt; SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK\n acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK \u0026gt; SND.NXT) then send an\n ACK, drop the segment, and return\u0026quot;. The \u0026quot;ignored\u0026quot; above implies that\n the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means\n the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the\n ACK check more stringent since any ACK \u0026lt; SND.UNA wouldn\u0026apos;t be\n accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA -\n MAX.SND.WND) \u0026lt;= SEG.ACK \u0026lt;= SND.NXT) get through.\r\n\r\nThis can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows,\nby not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent.\r\n\r\nThis greatly improves TCP security at a little cost.\r\n\r\nI added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees,\neven if the \u0026apos;blamed\u0026apos; patch was adhering to the RFC.\r\n\r\ntp-\u0026gt;bytes_acked was added in linux-4.2\r\n\r\nFollowing packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows\nthe issue at hand:\r\n\r\n0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3\n+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0\n+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0\n+0 listen(3, 1024) = 0\r\n\r\n// ---------------- Handshake ------------------- //\r\n\r\n// when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to\n// 65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet\n// with ack number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1)\n// ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never\n// sent by the server.\r\n\r\n+0 \u0026lt; S 0:0(0) win 65535 \u0026lt;mss 1400,nop,wscale 14\u0026gt;\n+0 \u0026gt; S. 0:0(0) ack 1 \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n+0 \u0026lt; . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535\n+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4\r\n\r\n// For the established connection, we send an ACK packet,\n// the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32,\n// where 2^32 is used to wrap around.\n// Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible\n// edge cases.\n// 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997\r\n\r\n// Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet.\n+0 \u0026lt; . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535\r\n\r\n// After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK,\n// and prior malicious frame would be dropped.\n+0 \u0026gt; . 1:1(0) ack 1001(CVE-2023-52881)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: set dormant flag on hook register failure\r\n\r\nWe need to set the dormant flag again if we fail to register\nthe hooks.\r\n\r\nDuring memory pressure hook registration can fail and we end up\nwith a table marked as active but no registered hooks.\r\n\r\nOn table/base chain deletion, nf_tables will attempt to unregister\nthe hook again which yields a warn splat from the nftables core.(CVE-2024-26835)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: hci_core: Fix possible buffer overflow\r\n\r\nstruct hci_dev_info has a fixed size name[8] field so in the event that\nhdev-\u0026gt;name is bigger than that strcpy would attempt to write past its\nsize, so this fixes this problem by switching to use strscpy.(CVE-2024-26889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxen-netfront: Add missing skb_mark_for_recycle\r\n\r\nNotice that skb_mark_for_recycle() is introduced later than fixes tag in\ncommit 6a5bcd84e886 (\u0026quot;page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB recycling\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nIt is believed that fixes tag were missing a call to page_pool_release_page()\nbetween v5.9 to v5.14, after which is should have used skb_mark_for_recycle().\nSince v6.6 the call page_pool_release_page() were removed (in\ncommit 535b9c61bdef (\u0026quot;net: page_pool: hide page_pool_release_page()\u0026quot;)\nand remaining callers converted (in commit 6bfef2ec0172 (\u0026quot;Merge branch\n\u0026apos;net-page_pool-remove-page_pool_release_page\u0026apos;\u0026quot;)).\r\n\r\nThis leak became visible in v6.8 via commit dba1b8a7ab68 (\u0026quot;mm/page_pool: catch\npage_pool memory leaks\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-27393)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use\r\n\r\nThe receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not\nthe socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly\nreturning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: dw-edma: eDMA: Add sync read before starting the DMA transfer in remote setup\r\n\r\nThe Linked list element and pointer are not stored in the same memory as\nthe eDMA controller register. If the doorbell register is toggled before\nthe full write of the linked list a race condition error will occur.\nIn remote setup we can only use a readl to the memory to assure the full\nwrite has occurred.(CVE-2024-27408)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: altmodes/displayport: create sysfs nodes as driver\u0026apos;s default device attribute group\r\n\r\nThe DisplayPort driver\u0026apos;s sysfs nodes may be present to the userspace before\ntypec_altmode_set_drvdata() completes in dp_altmode_probe. This means that\na sysfs read can trigger a NULL pointer error by deferencing dp-\u0026gt;hpd in\nhpd_show or dp-\u0026gt;lock in pin_assignment_show, as dev_get_drvdata() returns\nNULL in those cases.\r\n\r\nRemove manual sysfs node creation in favor of adding attribute group as\ndefault for devices bound to the driver. The ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro is\nnot used here otherwise the path to the sysfs nodes is no longer compliant\nwith the ABI.(CVE-2024-35790)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal\r\n\r\nA race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove()\ncallback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an\nunhandled page fault [1].\r\n\r\nThe problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running\nafter pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn\u0026apos;t really\nguarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks\nwill not be running when it returns.\r\n\r\nHowever, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when\npm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM\nstatus of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without\nwaiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for\n.runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it\narguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly\nprohibited).\r\n\r\nThus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs\nto protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after\npm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after\npm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it\nhas started earlier.]\r\n\r\nOne way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier()\nafter pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the\nruntime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from\nbeing invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should\nit be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in\npci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the\ndriver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which\nwill prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr\ndriver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks.(CVE-2024-35809)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: brcmfmac: Fix use-after-free bug in brcmf_cfg80211_detach\r\n\r\nThis is the candidate patch of CVE-2023-47233 :\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47233\r\n\r\nIn brcm80211 driver,it starts with the following invoking chain\nto start init a timeout worker:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_probe\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_probe_cb\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_attach\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_bus_started\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_cfg80211_attach\n -\u0026gt;wl_init_priv\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_init_escan\n -\u0026gt;INIT_WORK(\u0026amp;cfg-\u0026gt;escan_timeout_work,\n\t\t brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker);\r\n\r\nIf we disconnect the USB by hotplug, it will call\nbrcmf_usb_disconnect to make cleanup. The invoking chain is :\r\n\r\nbrcmf_usb_disconnect\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_detach\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_cfg80211_detach\n -\u0026gt;kfree(cfg);\r\n\r\nWhile the timeout woker may still be running. This will cause\na use-after-free bug on cfg in brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker.\r\n\r\nFix it by deleting the timer and canceling the worker in\nbrcmf_cfg80211_detach.\r\n\r\n[arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com: keep timer delete as is and cancel work just before free](CVE-2024-35811)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix memory leak during rehash\r\n\r\nThe rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another.\nThis is done by iterating over all chunks (all the filters with the same\npriority) in the region and in each chunk iterating over all the\nfilters.\r\n\r\nIf the migration fails, the code tries to migrate the filters back to\nthe old region. However, the rollback itself can also fail in which case\nanother migration will be erroneously performed. Besides the fact that\nthis ping pong is not a very good idea, it also creates a problem.\r\n\r\nEach virtual chunk references two chunks: The currently used one\n(\u0026apos;vchunk-\u0026gt;chunk\u0026apos;) and a backup (\u0026apos;vchunk-\u0026gt;chunk2\u0026apos;). During migration the\nfirst holds the chunk we want to migrate filters to and the second holds\nthe chunk we are migrating filters from.\r\n\r\nThe code currently assumes - but does not verify - that the backup chunk\ndoes not exist (NULL) if the currently used chunk does not reference the\ntarget region. This assumption breaks when we are trying to rollback a\nrollback, resulting in the backup chunk being overwritten and leaked\n[1].\r\n\r\nFix by not rolling back a failed rollback and add a warning to avoid\nfuture cases.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1063 at lib/parman.c:291 parman_destroy+0x17/0x20\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 5 PID: 1063 Comm: kworker/5:11 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00784-gc6a05c468a0b #14\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:parman_destroy+0x17/0x20\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_region_fini+0x19/0x60\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x49/0xf0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x1f1/0x470\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370\n worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0\n kthread+0xd0/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-35853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during rehash\r\n\r\nThe rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another\naccording to the number of available credits.\r\n\r\nThe migrated from region is destroyed at the end of the work if the\nnumber of credits is non-negative as the assumption is that this is\nindicative of migration being complete. This assumption is incorrect as\na non-negative number of credits can also be the result of a failed\nmigration.\r\n\r\nThe destruction of a region that still has filters referencing it can\nresult in a use-after-free [1].\r\n\r\nFix by not destroying the region if migration failed.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff8881735319e8 by task kworker/0:31/3858\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 3858 Comm: kworker/0:31 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00782-gf2275c2157d8 #5\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120\n print_report+0xce/0x670\n kasan_report+0xd7/0x110\n mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_region_entry_remove+0x21d/0x230\n mlxsw_sp_acl_ctcam_entry_del+0x2e/0x70\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_del+0x81/0x210\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3cd/0xb50\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 174:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0\n __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_create+0xdf/0x9c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x954/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\r\n\r\nFreed by task 7:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170\n __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30\n kfree+0xc1/0x290\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_destroy+0x272/0x310\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x731/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35854)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage\r\n\r\nchildregs represents the registers which are active for the new thread\nin user context. For a kernel thread, childregs-\u0026gt;gp is never used since\nthe kernel gp is not touched by switch_to. For a user mode helper, the\ngp value can be observed in user space after execve or possibly by other\nmeans.\r\n\r\n[From the email thread]\r\n\r\nThe /* Kernel thread */ comment is somewhat inaccurate in that it is also used\nfor user_mode_helper threads, which exec a user process, e.g. /sbin/init or\nwhen /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a pipe. Such threads do not have\nPF_KTHREAD set and are valid targets for ptrace etc. even before they exec.\r\n\r\nchildregs is the *user* context during syscall execution and it is observable\nfrom userspace in at least five ways:\r\n\r\n1. kernel_execve does not currently clear integer registers, so the starting\n register state for PID 1 and other user processes started by the kernel has\n sp = user stack, gp = kernel __global_pointer$, all other integer registers\n zeroed by the memset in the patch comment.\r\n\r\n This is a bug in its own right, but I\u0026apos;m unwilling to bet that it is the only\n way to exploit the issue addressed by this patch.\r\n\r\n2. ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET): you can PTRACE_ATTACH to a user_mode_helper thread\n before it execs, but ptrace requires SIGSTOP to be delivered which can only\n happen at user/kernel boundaries.\r\n\r\n3. /proc/*/task/*/syscall: this is perfectly happy to read pt_regs for\n user_mode_helpers before the exec completes, but gp is not one of the\n registers it returns.\r\n\r\n4. PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER: LOCKDOWN_PERF normally prevents access to kernel\n addresses via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR, but due to this bug kernel addresses\n are also exposed via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER which is permitted under\n LOCKDOWN_PERF. I have not attempted to write exploit code.\r\n\r\n5. Much of the tracing infrastructure allows access to user registers. I have\n not attempted to determine which forms of tracing allow access to user\n registers without already allowing access to kernel registers.(CVE-2024-35871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nerspan: make sure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb-\u0026gt;head\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported a problem in ip6erspan_rcv() [1]\r\n\r\nIssue is that ip6erspan_rcv() (and erspan_rcv()) no longer make\nsure erspan_base_hdr is present in skb linear part (skb-\u0026gt;head)\nbefore getting @ver field from it.\r\n\r\nAdd the missing pskb_may_pull() calls.\r\n\r\nv2: Reload iph pointer in erspan_rcv() after pskb_may_pull()\n because skb-\u0026gt;head might have changed.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610\n pskb_may_pull_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:2742 [inline]\n pskb_may_pull include/linux/skbuff.h:2756 [inline]\n ip6erspan_rcv net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:541 [inline]\n gre_rcv+0x11f8/0x1930 net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:610\n ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1d4c/0x2ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438\n ip6_input_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_input+0x15d/0x430 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492\n ip6_mc_input+0xa7e/0xc80 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:586\n dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline]\n ip6_rcv_finish+0x955/0x970 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xde/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5538 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5652\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5738 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5798\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1549\n tun_get_user+0x5566/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n tun_alloc_skb drivers/net/tun.c:1525 [inline]\n tun_get_user+0x209a/0x69e0 drivers/net/tun.c:1846\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x3af/0x5d0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xb63/0x1520 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x20f/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x93/0xe0 fs/read_write.c:652\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5045 Comm: syz-executor114 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00021-g962490525cff #0(CVE-2024-35888)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem\r\n\r\nsyzkaller started using corpuses where a BPF tracing program deletes\nelements from a sockmap/sockhash map. Because BPF tracing programs can be\ninvoked from any interrupt context, locks taken during a map_delete_elem\noperation must be hardirq-safe. Otherwise a deadlock due to lock inversion\nis possible, as reported by lockdep:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock(\u0026amp;htab-\u0026gt;buckets[i].lock);\n local_irq_disable();\n lock(\u0026amp;host-\u0026gt;lock);\n lock(\u0026amp;htab-\u0026gt;buckets[i].lock);\n \u0026lt;Interrupt\u0026gt;\n lock(\u0026amp;host-\u0026gt;lock);\r\n\r\nLocks in sockmap are hardirq-unsafe by design. We expects elements to be\ndeleted from sockmap/sockhash only in task (normal) context with interrupts\nenabled, or in softirq context.\r\n\r\nDetect when map_delete_elem operation is invoked from a context which is\n_not_ hardirq-unsafe, that is interrupts are disabled, and bail out with an\nerror.\r\n\r\nNote that map updates are not affected by this issue. BPF verifier does not\nallow updating sockmap/sockhash from a BPF tracing program today.(CVE-2024-35895)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: validate user input for expected length\r\n\r\nI got multiple syzbot reports showing old bugs exposed\nby BPF after commit 20f2505fb436 (\u0026quot;bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc\nin cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nsetsockopt() @optlen argument should be taken into account\nbefore copying data.\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627\nRead of size 96 at addr ffff88802cd73da0 by task syz-executor.4/7238\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 7238 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-next-20240403-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n __asan_memcpy+0x29/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:105\n copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1111 [inline]\n do_ipt_set_ctl+0x902/0x3dd0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1627\n nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\nRIP: 0033:0x7fd22067dde9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fd21f9ff0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd2207abf80 RCX: 00007fd22067dde9\nRDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007fd2206ca47a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000020000880 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd2207abf80 R15: 00007ffd2d0170d8\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 7238:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline]\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387\n kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline]\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4069 [inline]\n __kmalloc_noprof+0x200/0x410 mm/slub.c:4082\n kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline]\n __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd47/0x1050 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802cd73da0\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\nThe buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of\n allocated 1-byte region [ffff88802cd73da0, ffff88802cd73da1)\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88802cd73020 pfn:0x2cd73\nflags: 0xfff80000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0xfff)\npage_type: 0xffffefff(slab)\nraw: 00fff80000000000 ffff888015041280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122\nraw: ffff88802cd73020 000000008080007f 00000001ffffefff 00\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35896)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size\r\n\r\nThis patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack\nmemory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result\nof overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually\nhappen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should\nprotect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections\n(fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array\naccesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the\nverification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.\r\n\r\nThis check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly\nremoved in a833a17aeac7.(CVE-2024-35905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: ucsi: Limit read size on v1.2\r\n\r\nBetween UCSI 1.2 and UCSI 2.0, the size of the MESSAGE_IN region was\nincreased from 16 to 256. In order to avoid overflowing reads for older\nsystems, add a mechanism to use the read UCSI version to truncate read\nsizes on UCSI v1.2.(CVE-2024-35924)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported sco_sock_setsockopt() is copying data without\nchecking user input length.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset\ninclude/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr\ninclude/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sco_sock_setsockopt+0xc0b/0xf90\nnet/bluetooth/sco.c:893\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88805f7b15a3 by task syz-executor.5/12578(CVE-2024-35967)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngeneve: fix header validation in geneve[6]_xmit_skb\r\n\r\nsyzbot is able to trigger an uninit-value in geneve_xmit() [1]\r\n\r\nProblem : While most ip tunnel helpers (like ip_tunnel_get_dsfield())\nuses skb_protocol(skb, true), pskb_inet_may_pull() is only using\nskb-\u0026gt;protocol.\r\n\r\nIf anything else than ETH_P_IPV6 or ETH_P_IP is found in skb-\u0026gt;protocol,\npskb_inet_may_pull() does nothing at all.\r\n\r\nIf a vlan tag was provided by the caller (af_packet in the syzbot case),\nthe network header might not point to the correct location, and skb\nlinear part could be smaller than expected.\r\n\r\nAdd skb_vlan_inet_prepare() to perform a complete mac validation.\r\n\r\nUse this in geneve for the moment, I suspect we need to adopt this\nmore broadly.\r\n\r\nv4 - Jakub reported v3 broke l2_tos_ttl_inherit.sh selftest\n - Only call __vlan_get_protocol() for vlan types.\r\n\r\nv2,v3 - Addressed Sabrina comments on v1 and v2\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030\n geneve_xmit_skb drivers/net/geneve.c:910 [inline]\n geneve_xmit+0x302d/0x5420 drivers/net/geneve.c:1030\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x348d/0x52c0 net/core/dev.c:4335\n dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline]\n packet_xmit+0x9c/0x6c0 net/packet/af_packet.c:276\n packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3081 [inline]\n packet_sendmsg+0x8bb0/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n packet_alloc_skb net/packet/af_packet.c:2930 [inline]\n packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3024 [inline]\n packet_sendmsg+0x722d/0x9ef0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3113\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x685/0x830 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x125/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 5033 Comm: syz-executor346 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-syzkaller-00005-g928a87efa423 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024(CVE-2024-35973)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbatman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT\r\n\r\nIf the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit\nthe local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all\nfragments (when enabled) or a single packet.\r\n\r\nBut if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN\nspecific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This\ncan for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are\non top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed.\nThere will just be an endless spam of\r\n\r\n batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)\r\n\r\nin the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the\ntimeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and\ntherefore never be able to reduce the table even more.\r\n\r\nThere are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of\nBATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too\nhigh to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with\nonly a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120\nbytes.\r\n\r\nWhile this should be handled proactively when:\r\n\r\n* interface with too low MTU is added\n* VLAN is added\n* non-purgeable local mac is added\n* MTU of an attached interface is reduced\n* fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping\n attached interfaces)\r\n\r\nnot all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only\nconsuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions\n(non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced).\nIt is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle\nalso the situations when there were already incompatible system\nconfiguration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni2c: smbus: fix NULL function pointer dereference\r\n\r\nBaruch reported an OOPS when using the designware controller as target\nonly. Target-only modes break the assumption of one transfer function\nalways being available. Fix this by always checking the pointer in\n__i2c_transfer.\r\n\r\n[wsa: dropped the simplification in core-smbus to avoid theoretical regressions](CVE-2024-35984)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation\r\n\r\nEach attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least\nof sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes.\nThe current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes)\nwhich is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation\nis not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands\nread access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller\r\n\r\nGeneric sdhci code registers LED device and uses host-\u0026gt;runtime_suspended\nflag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn\u0026apos;t set this flag,\nwhich causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime\nsuspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.(CVE-2024-36029)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init\r\n\r\nnet_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is called without any\nlocking. It reads max_gen_ptrs, which is changed under pernet_ops_rwsem. It\nis read twice, first to allocate an array, then to set s.len, which is\nlater used to limit the bounds of the array access.\r\n\r\nIt is possible that the array is allocated and another thread is\nregistering a new pernet ops, increments max_gen_ptrs, which is then used\nto set s.len with a larger than allocated length for the variable array.\r\n\r\nFix it by reading max_gen_ptrs only once in net_alloc_generic. If\nmax_gen_ptrs is later incremented, it will be caught in net_assign_generic.(CVE-2024-36883)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix UAF in error path\r\n\r\nSam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported\na UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0\nlinux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\n skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026\n skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094\n __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108\n kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144\n kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244\n tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186\n tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324\n tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824\n tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159\n tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390\n udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108\n udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186\n udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346\n __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254\n dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461\n ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648\n process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645\n net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781\n __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553\n do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454\n do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381\n local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33\n rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378\n dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169\n neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526\n neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540\n ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235\n __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313\n __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295\n ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323\n NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303\n ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433\n dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451\n ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129\n ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492\n udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963\n udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250\n inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850\n sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730\n __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203\n __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n do_syscall_\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect\r\n\r\nChristoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events mptcp_worker\n RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8\n \t8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe\n \t\u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9\n RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4\n RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001\n RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000\n R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline]\n mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline]\n __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615\n mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767\n process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416\n kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nWhen fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt\nis not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value\ninto snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level\nre-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send\nbuffer cleanup using \u0026apos;bad\u0026apos; snd_una values.\r\n\r\nWe could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such\ndumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very\nlow to zero impact in practice.\r\n\r\nInstead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq,\nfor consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpiolib: cdev: fix uninitialised kfifo\r\n\r\nIf a line is requested with debounce, and that results in debouncing\nin software, and the line is subsequently reconfigured to enable edge\ndetection then the allocation of the kfifo to contain edge events is\noverlooked. This results in events being written to and read from an\nuninitialised kfifo. Read events are returned to userspace.\r\n\r\nInitialise the kfifo in the case where the software debounce is\nalready active.(CVE-2024-36898)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpiolib: cdev: Fix use after free in lineinfo_changed_notify\r\n\r\nThe use-after-free issue occurs as follows: when the GPIO chip device file\nis being closed by invoking gpio_chrdev_release(), watched_lines is freed\nby bitmap_free(), but the unregistration of lineinfo_changed_nb notifier\nchain failed due to waiting write rwsem. Additionally, one of the GPIO\nchip\u0026apos;s lines is also in the release process and holds the notifier chain\u0026apos;s\nread rwsem. Consequently, a race condition leads to the use-after-free of\nwatched_lines.\r\n\r\nHere is the typical stack when issue happened:\r\n\r\n[free]\ngpio_chrdev_release()\n --\u0026gt; bitmap_free(cdev-\u0026gt;watched_lines) \u0026lt;-- freed\n --\u0026gt; blocking_notifier_chain_unregister()\n --\u0026gt; down_write(\u0026amp;nh-\u0026gt;rwsem) \u0026lt;-- waiting rwsem\n --\u0026gt; __down_write_common()\n --\u0026gt; rwsem_down_write_slowpath()\n --\u0026gt; schedule_preempt_disabled()\n --\u0026gt; schedule()\r\n\r\n[use]\nst54spi_gpio_dev_release()\n --\u0026gt; gpio_free()\n --\u0026gt; gpiod_free()\n --\u0026gt; gpiod_free_commit()\n --\u0026gt; gpiod_line_state_notify()\n --\u0026gt; blocking_notifier_call_chain()\n --\u0026gt; down_read(\u0026amp;nh-\u0026gt;rwsem); \u0026lt;-- held rwsem\n --\u0026gt; notifier_call_chain()\n --\u0026gt; lineinfo_changed_notify()\n --\u0026gt; test_bit(xxxx, cdev-\u0026gt;watched_lines) \u0026lt;-- use after free\r\n\r\nThe side effect of the use-after-free issue is that a GPIO line event is\nbeing generated for userspace where it shouldn\u0026apos;t. However, since the chrdev\nis being closed, userspace won\u0026apos;t have the chance to read that event anyway.\r\n\r\nTo fix the issue, call the bitmap_free() function after the unregistration\nof lineinfo_changed_nb notifier chain.(CVE-2024-36899)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()\r\n\r\nAccording to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev()\nreturns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack\ndeal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]\nCPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237\nCode: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000\nRDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0\nR13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000\nFS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358\n sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248\n sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653\n sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783\n sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline]\n sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212\n sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline]\n sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169\n sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73\n __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fib6_rules: avoid possible NULL dereference in fib6_rule_action()\r\n\r\nsyzbot is able to trigger the following crash [1],\ncaused by unsafe ip6_dst_idev() use.\r\n\r\nIndeed ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, and must always be checked.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 0 PID: 31648 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240417-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:__fib6_rule_action net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:237 [inline]\n RIP: 0010:fib6_rule_action+0x241/0x7b0 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:267\nCode: 02 00 00 49 8d 9f d8 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f9 32 bf f7 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 e0 32 bf f7 4c 8b 03 48 89 ef 4c\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000fc1f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1a772f98c8186700\nRDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff8bcac4e0 RDI: ffffffff8c1f9760\nRBP: ffff8880673fb980 R08: ffffffff8fac15ef R09: 1ffffffff1f582bd\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f582be R12: dffffc0000000000\nR13: 0000000000000080 R14: ffff888076509000 R15: ffff88807a029a00\nFS: 00007f55e82ca6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b31d23000 CR3: 0000000022b66000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n fib_rules_lookup+0x62c/0xdb0 net/core/fib_rules.c:317\n fib6_rule_lookup+0x1fd/0x790 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:108\n ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2637 [inline]\n ip6_route_output_flags+0x38e/0x610 net/ipv6/route.c:2649\n ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:93 [inline]\n ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x189/0x11a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1120\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0xb9/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250\n sctp_v6_get_dst+0x792/0x1e20 net/sctp/ipv6.c:326\n sctp_transport_route+0x12c/0x2e0 net/sctp/transport.c:455\n sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x614/0x15c0 net/sctp/associola.c:662\n sctp_connect_new_asoc+0x31d/0x6c0 net/sctp/socket.c:1099\n __sctp_connect+0x66d/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1197\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36902)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: Fix potential uninit-value access in __ip6_make_skb()\r\n\r\nAs it was done in commit fc1092f51567 (\u0026quot;ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in\n__ip_make_skb()\u0026quot;) for IPv4, check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl6-\u0026gt;flowi6_flags\ninstead of testing HDRINCL on the socket to avoid a race condition which\ncauses uninit-value access.(CVE-2024-36903)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nARM: 9381/1: kasan: clear stale stack poison\r\n\r\nWe found below OOB crash:\r\n\r\n[ 33.452494] ==================================================================\n[ 33.453513] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec\n[ 33.454660] Write of size 164 at addr c1d03d30 by task swapper/0/0\n[ 33.455515]\n[ 33.455767] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.1.25-mainline #1\n[ 33.456880] Hardware name: Generic DT based system\n[ 33.457555] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c\n[ 33.458326] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c\n[ 33.459072] dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x158/0x4a4\n[ 33.459863] print_report from kasan_report+0x9c/0x148\n[ 33.460616] kasan_report from kasan_check_range+0x94/0x1a0\n[ 33.461424] kasan_check_range from memset+0x20/0x3c\n[ 33.462157] memset from refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec\n[ 33.463064] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0 from tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick+0x180/0x53c\n[ 33.464181] tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick from do_idle+0x264/0x354\n[ 33.465029] do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x24\n[ 33.465769] cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xf0/0xf4\n[ 33.466528] rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18\n[ 33.467397]\n[ 33.467644] The buggy address belongs to stack of task swapper/0/0\n[ 33.468493] and is located at offset 112 in frame:\n[ 33.469172] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0x0/0x2ec\n[ 33.469917]\n[ 33.470165] This frame has 2 objects:\n[ 33.470696] [32, 76) \u0026apos;global_zone_diff\u0026apos;\n[ 33.470729] [112, 276) \u0026apos;global_node_diff\u0026apos;\n[ 33.471294]\n[ 33.472095] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n[ 33.472862] page:3cd72da8 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x41d03\n[ 33.473944] flags: 0x1000(reserved|zone=0)\n[ 33.474565] raw: 00001000 ed741470 ed741470 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001\n[ 33.475656] raw: 00000000\n[ 33.476050] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\n[ 33.476816]\n[ 33.477061] Memory state around the buggy address:\n[ 33.477732] c1d03c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 33.478630] c1d03c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00\n[ 33.479526] \u0026gt;c1d03d00: 00 04 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1\n[ 33.480415] ^\n[ 33.481195] c1d03d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3\n[ 33.482088] c1d03e00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 33.482978] ==================================================================\r\n\r\nWe find the root cause of this OOB is that arm does not clear stale stack\npoison in the case of cpuidle.\r\n\r\nThis patch refer to arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S to resolve this issue.\r\n\r\nFrom cited commit [1] that explain the problem\r\n\r\nFunctions which the compiler has instrumented for KASAN place poison on\nthe stack shadow upon entry and remove this poison prior to returning.\r\n\r\nIn the case of cpuidle, CPUs exit the kernel a number of levels deep in\nC code. Any instrumented functions on this critical path will leave\nportions of the stack shadow poisoned.\r\n\r\nIf CPUs lose context and return to the kernel via a cold path, we\nrestore a prior context saved in __cpu_suspend_enter are forgotten, and\nwe never remove the poison they placed in the stack shadow area by\nfunctions calls between this and the actual exit of the kernel.\r\n\r\nThus, (depending on stackframe layout) subsequent calls to instrumented\nfunctions may hit this stale poison, resulting in (spurious) KASAN\nsplats to the console.\r\n\r\nTo avoid this, clear any stale poison from the idle thread for a CPU\nprior to bringing a CPU online.\r\n\r\nFrom cited commit [2]\r\n\r\nExtend to check for CONFIG_KASAN_STACK\r\n\r\n[1] commit 0d97e6d8024c (\u0026quot;arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison\u0026quot;)\n[2] commit d56a9ef84bd0 (\u0026quot;kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36906)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined\r\n\r\nIn iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if \u0026apos;active_list\u0026apos; is empty, which\nis intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn\ncan be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn()\nis run at that time:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190\n Call trace:\n iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190\n iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0\n iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130\n __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c\n __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244\n hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0\r\n\r\nThe warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being\nremoved, the state of the \u0026apos;active_list\u0026apos; is irrelevant, and \u0026apos;waitq_timer\u0026apos;\nis canceled after removing \u0026apos;active_list\u0026apos; in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures\niocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns.\r\n\r\nTherefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn\nwhen removing a blkcg or disk.(CVE-2024-36908)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()\r\n\r\nThere is no check for overflow of \u0026apos;start + len\u0026apos; in blk_ioctl_discard().\nHung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param:\n start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000;\nAdd the overflow validation now.(CVE-2024-36917)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\r\n\r\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/qeth: Fix kernel panic after setting hsuid\r\n\r\nSymptom:\nWhen the hsuid attribute is set for the first time on an IQD Layer3\ndevice while the corresponding network interface is already UP,\nthe kernel will try to execute a napi function pointer that is NULL.\r\n\r\nExample:\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n[ 2057.572696] illegal operation: 0001 ilc:1 [#1] SMP\n[ 2057.572702] Modules linked in: af_iucv qeth_l3 zfcp scsi_transport_fc sunrpc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6\nnft_reject nft_ct nf_tables_set nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink ghash_s390 prng xts aes_s390 des_s390 de\ns_generic sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 vfio_ccw vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 eadm_sch vfio ext4 mbcache jbd2 qeth_l2 bridge stp llc dasd_eckd_mod qeth dasd_mod\n qdio ccwgroup pkey zcrypt\n[ 2057.572739] CPU: 6 PID: 60182 Comm: stress_client Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-541.el8.s390x #1\n[ 2057.572742] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (LPAR)\n[ 2057.572744] Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 0000000000000002 (0x2)\n[ 2057.572748] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3\n[ 2057.572751] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 0000000000000000\n[ 2057.572754] 00000000a3b008d8 cb923a29c779abc5 0000000000000000 00000000814cfd80\n[ 2057.572756] 000000000000012c 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 00000000a3b008d8\n[ 2057.572758] 00000000bab6d500 00000000814cfd80 0000000091317e46 00000000814cfc68\n[ 2057.572762] Krnl Code:#0000000000000000: 0000 illegal\n \u0026gt;0000000000000002: 0000 illegal\n 0000000000000004: 0000 illegal\n 0000000000000006: 0000 illegal\n 0000000000000008: 0000 illegal\n 000000000000000a: 0000 illegal\n 000000000000000c: 0000 illegal\n 000000000000000e: 0000 illegal\n[ 2057.572800] Call Trace:\n[ 2057.572801] ([\u0026lt;00000000ec639700\u0026gt;] 0xec639700)\n[ 2057.572803] [\u0026lt;00000000913183e2\u0026gt;] net_rx_action+0x2ba/0x398\n[ 2057.572809] [\u0026lt;0000000091515f76\u0026gt;] __do_softirq+0x11e/0x3a0\n[ 2057.572813] [\u0026lt;0000000090ce160c\u0026gt;] do_softirq_own_stack+0x3c/0x58\n[ 2057.572817] ([\u0026lt;0000000090d2cbd6\u0026gt;] do_softirq.part.1+0x56/0x60)\n[ 2057.572822] [\u0026lt;0000000090d2cc60\u0026gt;] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x80/0x98\n[ 2057.572825] [\u0026lt;0000000091314706\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2be/0xd70\n[ 2057.572827] [\u0026lt;000003ff803dd6d6\u0026gt;] afiucv_hs_send+0x24e/0x300 [af_iucv]\n[ 2057.572830] [\u0026lt;000003ff803dd88a\u0026gt;] iucv_send_ctrl+0x102/0x138 [af_iucv]\n[ 2057.572833] [\u0026lt;000003ff803de72a\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_connect+0x37a/0x468 [af_iucv]\n[ 2057.572835] [\u0026lt;00000000912e7e90\u0026gt;] __sys_connect+0xa0/0xd8\n[ 2057.572839] [\u0026lt;00000000912e9580\u0026gt;] sys_socketcall+0x228/0x348\n[ 2057.572841] [\u0026lt;0000000091514e1a\u0026gt;] system_call+0x2a6/0x2c8\n[ 2057.572843] Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n[ 2057.572844] [\u0026lt;0000000091317e44\u0026gt;] __napi_poll+0x4c/0x1d8\n[ 2057.572846]\n[ 2057.572847] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt\n-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\nAnalysis:\nThere is one napi structure per out_q: card-\u0026gt;qdio.out_qs[i].napi\nThe napi.poll functions are set during qeth_open().\r\n\r\nSince\ncommit 1cfef80d4c2b (\u0026quot;s390/qeth: Don\u0026apos;t call dev_close/dev_open (DOWN/UP)\u0026quot;)\nqeth_set_offline()/qeth_set_online() no longer call dev_close()/\ndev_open(). So if qeth_free_qdio_queues() cleared\ncard-\u0026gt;qdio.out_qs[i].napi.poll while the network interface was UP and the\ncard was offline, they are not set again.\r\n\r\nReproduction:\nchzdev -e $devno layer2=0\nip link set dev $network_interface up\necho 0 \u0026gt; /sys/bus/ccw\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36928)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs\r\n\r\nSKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be linearized, otherwise they become\ninvalid. Return NULL if such an skb is passed to skb_copy or\nskb_copy_expand, in order to prevent a crash on a potential later\ncall to skb_gso_segment.(CVE-2024-36929)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\namd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted\r\n\r\nIf there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first\ndevice will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes\non all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will\nstart reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been\nevicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page\nfault.(CVE-2024-36949)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix a possible memleak in tipc_buf_append\r\n\r\n__skb_linearize() doesn\u0026apos;t free the skb when it fails, so move\n\u0026apos;*buf = NULL\u0026apos; after __skb_linearize(), so that the skb can be\nfreed on the err path.(CVE-2024-36954)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: avoid off-by-one read from userspace\r\n\r\nWe try to access count + 1 byte from userspace with memdup_user(buffer,\ncount + 1). However, the userspace only provides buffer of count bytes and\nonly these count bytes are verified to be okay to access. To ensure the\ncopied buffer is NUL terminated, we use memdup_user_nul instead.(CVE-2024-36957)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/9p: only translate RWX permissions for plain 9P2000\r\n\r\nGarbage in plain 9P2000\u0026apos;s perm bits is allowed through, which causes it\nto be able to set (among others) the suid bit. This was presumably not\nthe intent since the unix extended bits are handled explicitly and\nconditionally on .u.(CVE-2024-36964)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1707",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:10Z",
"published": "2024-06-14T11:07:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1707"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47247"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47484"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47558"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36964"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47247",
"CVE-2021-47484",
"CVE-2021-47558",
"CVE-2022-48652",
"CVE-2023-52672",
"CVE-2023-52680",
"CVE-2023-52686",
"CVE-2023-52693",
"CVE-2023-52732",
"CVE-2023-52762",
"CVE-2023-52775",
"CVE-2023-52803",
"CVE-2023-52810",
"CVE-2023-52880",
"CVE-2023-52881",
"CVE-2024-26835",
"CVE-2024-26889",
"CVE-2024-27393",
"CVE-2024-27402",
"CVE-2024-27408",
"CVE-2024-35790",
"CVE-2024-35809",
"CVE-2024-35811",
"CVE-2024-35853",
"CVE-2024-35854",
"CVE-2024-35871",
"CVE-2024-35888",
"CVE-2024-35895",
"CVE-2024-35896",
"CVE-2024-35905",
"CVE-2024-35924",
"CVE-2024-35967",
"CVE-2024-35973",
"CVE-2024-35982",
"CVE-2024-35984",
"CVE-2024-36017",
"CVE-2024-36029",
"CVE-2024-36883",
"CVE-2024-36886",
"CVE-2024-36889",
"CVE-2024-36898",
"CVE-2024-36899",
"CVE-2024-36901",
"CVE-2024-36902",
"CVE-2024-36903",
"CVE-2024-36906",
"CVE-2024-36908",
"CVE-2024-36917",
"CVE-2024-36924",
"CVE-2024-36928",
"CVE-2024-36929",
"CVE-2024-36949",
"CVE-2024-36954",
"CVE-2024-36957",
"CVE-2024-36964"
]
}
OESA-2024-1863 (CVE-2024-36017)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-07-19 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation
Each attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least of sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes. The current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes) which is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation is not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a struct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands read access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
null_blk: fix null-ptr-dereference while configuring 'power' and 'submit_queues'
Writing 'power' and 'submit_queues' concurrently will trigger kernel panic:
Test script:
modprobe null_blk nr_devices=0 mkdir -p /sys/kernel/config/nullb/nullb0 while true; do echo 1 > submit_queues; echo 4 > submit_queues; done & while true; do echo 1 > power; echo 0 > power; done
Test result:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000148 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x41d/0x28f0 Call Trace: <TASK> lock_acquire+0x121/0x450 down_write+0x5f/0x1d0 simple_recursive_removal+0x12f/0x5c0 blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctxs+0x7c/0x100 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x4a3/0x720 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_submit_queues_store+0x79/0xf0 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x119/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x326/0x730 ksys_write+0x74/0x150
This is because del_gendisk() can concurrent with blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues():
nullb_device_power_store nullb_apply_submit_queues null_del_dev del_gendisk nullb_update_nr_hw_queues if (!dev->nullb) // still set while gendisk is deleted return 0 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues dev->nullb = NULL
Fix this problem by resuing the global mutex to protect nullb_device_power_store() and nullb_update_nr_hw_queues() from configfs.(CVE-2024-36478)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing/probes: fix error check in parse_btf_field()
btf_find_struct_member() might return NULL or an error via the ERR_PTR() macro. However, its caller in parse_btf_field() only checks for the NULL condition. Fix this by using IS_ERR() and returning the error up the stack.(CVE-2024-36481)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()
lpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the hbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the hbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs
SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be linearized, otherwise they become invalid. Return NULL if such an skb is passed to skb_copy or skb_copy_expand, in order to prevent a crash on a potential later call to skb_gso_segment.(CVE-2024-36929)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/cio: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a lbuf-sized kernel buffer and copy lbuf from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use scanf on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using scanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead.(CVE-2024-36931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: range check cp bad op exception interrupts
Due to a CP interrupt bug, bad packet garbage exception codes are raised. Do a range check so that the debugger and runtime do not receive garbage codes. Update the user api to guard exception code type checking as well.(CVE-2024-36951)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
blk-cgroup: fix list corruption from reorder of WRITE ->lqueued
__blkcg_rstat_flush() can be run anytime, especially when blk_cgroup_bio_start is being executed.
If WRITE of ->lqueued is re-ordered with READ of 'bisc->lnode.next' in
the loop of __blkcg_rstat_flush(), next_bisc can be assigned with one
stat instance being added in blk_cgroup_bio_start(), then the local
list in __blkcg_rstat_flush() could be corrupted.
Fix the issue by adding one barrier.(CVE-2024-38384)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: openvswitch: fix overwriting ct original tuple for ICMPv6
OVS_PACKET_CMD_EXECUTE has 3 main attributes: - OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY - Packet metadata in a netlink format. - OVS_PACKET_ATTR_PACKET - Binary packet content. - OVS_PACKET_ATTR_ACTIONS - Actions to execute on the packet.
OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY is parsed first to populate sw_flow_key structure with the metadata like conntrack state, input port, recirculation id, etc. Then the packet itself gets parsed to populate the rest of the keys from the packet headers.
Whenever the packet parsing code starts parsing the ICMPv6 header, it first zeroes out fields in the key corresponding to Neighbor Discovery information even if it is not an ND packet.
It is an 'ipv6.nd' field. However, the 'ipv6' is a union that shares the space between 'nd' and 'ct_orig' that holds the original tuple conntrack metadata parsed from the OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY.
ND packets should not normally have conntrack state, so it's fine to share the space, but normal ICMPv6 Echo packets or maybe other types of ICMPv6 can have the state attached and it should not be overwritten.
The issue results in all but the last 4 bytes of the destination address being wiped from the original conntrack tuple leading to incorrect packet matching and potentially executing wrong actions in case this packet recirculates within the datapath or goes back to userspace.
ND fields should not be accessed in non-ND packets, so not clearing them should be fine. Executing memset() only for actual ND packets to avoid the issue.
Initializing the whole thing before parsing is needed because ND packet may not contain all the options.
The issue only affects the OVS_PACKET_CMD_EXECUTE path and doesn't affect packets entering OVS datapath from network interfaces, because in this case CT metadata is populated from skb after the packet is already parsed.(CVE-2024-38558)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: Fix potential glock use-after-free on unmount
When a DLM lockspace is released and there ares still locks in that lockspace, DLM will unlock those locks automatically. Commit fb6791d100d1b started exploiting this behavior to speed up filesystem unmount: gfs2 would simply free glocks it didn't want to unlock and then release the lockspace. This didn't take the bast callbacks for asynchronous lock contention notifications into account, which remain active until until a lock is unlocked or its lockspace is released.
To prevent those callbacks from accessing deallocated objects, put the glocks that should not be unlocked on the sd_dead_glocks list, release the lockspace, and only then free those glocks.
As an additional measure, ignore unexpected ast and bast callbacks if the receiving glock is dead.(CVE-2024-38570)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/mes: fix use-after-free issue
Delete fence fallback timer to fix the ramdom use-after-free issue.
v2: move to amdgpu_mes.c(CVE-2024-38581)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread
Patch series "nilfs2: fix log writer related issues".
This bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues, including a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on unmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found during their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.
This patch (of 3):
A use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on the nilfs_sc_info structure.
The problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log writer thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure is about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread's lifetime.
Fix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer thread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
r8169: Fix possible ring buffer corruption on fragmented Tx packets.
An issue was found on the RTL8125b when transmitting small fragmented packets, whereby invalid entries were inserted into the transmit ring buffer, subsequently leading to calls to dma_unmap_single() with a null address.
This was caused by rtl8169_start_xmit() not noticing changes to nr_frags which may occur when small packets are padded (to work around hardware quirks) in rtl8169_tso_csum_v2().
To fix this, postpone inspecting nr_frags until after any padding has been applied.(CVE-2024-38586)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
openrisc: traps: Don't send signals to kernel mode threads
OpenRISC exception handling sends signals to user processes on floating point exceptions and trap instructions (for debugging) among others. There is a bug where the trap handling logic may send signals to kernel threads, we should not send these signals to kernel threads, if that happens we treat it as an error.
This patch adds conditions to die if the kernel receives these exceptions in kernel mode code.(CVE-2024-38614)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: HCI: Remove HCI_AMP support
Since BT_HS has been remove HCI_AMP controllers no longer has any use so remove it along with the capability of creating AMP controllers.
Since we no longer need to differentiate between AMP and Primary controllers, as only HCI_PRIMARY is left, this also remove hdev->dev_type altogether.(CVE-2024-38620)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vfio/pci: fix potential memory leak in vfio_intx_enable()
If vfio_irq_ctx_alloc() failed will lead to 'name' memory leak.(CVE-2024-38632)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/ap: Fix crash in AP internal function modify_bitmap()
A system crash like this
Failing address: 200000cb7df6f000 TEID: 200000cb7df6f403 Fault in home space mode while using kernel ASCE. AS:00000002d71bc007 R3:00000003fe5b8007 S:000000011a446000 P:000000015660c13d Oops: 0038 ilc:3 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: mlx5_ib ... CPU: 8 PID: 7556 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7 #8 Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (LPAR) Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 0000014b75e7b606 (ap_parse_bitmap_str+0x10e/0x1f8) R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000001 ffffffffffffffc0 0000000000000001 00000048f96b75d3 000000cb00000100 ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff 000000cb7df6fce0 000000cb7df6fce0 00000000ffffffff 000000000000002b 00000048ffffffff 000003ff9b2dbc80 200000cb7df6fcd8 0000014bffffffc0 000000cb7df6fbc8 Krnl Code: 0000014b75e7b5fc: a7840047 brc 8,0000014b75e7b68a 0000014b75e7b600: 18b2 lr %r11,%r2 #0000014b75e7b602: a7f4000a brc 15,0000014b75e7b616 >0000014b75e7b606: eb22d00000e6 laog %r2,%r2,0(%r13) 0000014b75e7b60c: a7680001 lhi %r6,1 0000014b75e7b610: 187b lr %r7,%r11 0000014b75e7b612: 84960021 brxh %r9,%r6,0000014b75e7b654 0000014b75e7b616: 18e9 lr %r14,%r9 Call Trace: [<0000014b75e7b606>] ap_parse_bitmap_str+0x10e/0x1f8 ([<0000014b75e7b5dc>] ap_parse_bitmap_str+0xe4/0x1f8) [<0000014b75e7b758>] apmask_store+0x68/0x140 [<0000014b75679196>] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x14e/0x1e8 [<0000014b75598524>] vfs_write+0x1b4/0x448 [<0000014b7559894c>] ksys_write+0x74/0x100 [<0000014b7618a440>] __do_syscall+0x268/0x328 [<0000014b761a3558>] system_call+0x70/0x98 INFO: lockdep is turned off. Last Breaking-Event-Address: [<0000014b75e7b636>] ap_parse_bitmap_str+0x13e/0x1f8 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
occured when /sys/bus/ap/a[pq]mask was updated with a relative mask value (like +0x10-0x12,+60,-90) with one of the numeric values exceeding INT_MAX.
The fix is simple: use unsigned long values for the internal variables. The correct checks are already in place in the function but a simple int for the internal variables was used with the possibility to overflow.(CVE-2024-38661)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: bcm: dvp: Assign ->num before accessing ->hws
Commit f316cdff8d67 ("clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with __counted_by") annotated the hws member of 'struct clk_hw_onecell_data' with __counted_by, which informs the bounds sanitizer about the number of elements in hws, so that it can warn when hws is accessed out of bounds. As noted in that change, the __counted_by member must be initialized with the number of elements before the first array access happens, otherwise there will be a warning from each access prior to the initialization because the number of elements is zero. This occurs in clk_dvp_probe() due to ->num being assigned after ->hws has been accessed:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2711-dvp.c:59:2 index 0 is out of range for type 'struct clk_hw [] __counted_by(num)' (aka 'struct clk_hw []')
Move the ->num initialization to before the first access of ->hws, which clears up the warning.(CVE-2024-39462)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: v4l: async: Fix notifier list entry init
struct v4l2_async_notifier has several list_head members, but only waiting_list and done_list are initialized. notifier_entry was kept 'zeroed' leading to an uninitialized list_head. This results in a NULL-pointer dereference if csi2_async_register() fails, e.g. node for remote endpoint is disabled, and returns -ENOTCONN. The following calls to v4l2_async_nf_unregister() results in a NULL pointer dereference. Add the missing list head initializer.(CVE-2024-39464)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: starfive - Do not free stack buffer
RSA text data uses variable length buffer allocated in software stack. Calling kfree on it causes undefined behaviour in subsequent operations.(CVE-2024-39478)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/hwmon: Get rid of devm
When both hwmon and hwmon drvdata (on which hwmon depends) are device managed resources, the expectation, on device unbind, is that hwmon will be released before drvdata. However, in i915 there are two separate code paths, which both release either drvdata or hwmon and either can be released before the other. These code paths (for device unbind) are as follows (see also the bug referenced below):
Call Trace: release_nodes+0x11/0x70 devres_release_group+0xb2/0x110 component_unbind_all+0x8d/0xa0 component_del+0xa5/0x140 intel_pxp_tee_component_fini+0x29/0x40 [i915] intel_pxp_fini+0x33/0x80 [i915] i915_driver_remove+0x4c/0x120 [i915] i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915] pci_device_remove+0x32/0xa0 device_release_driver_internal+0x19c/0x200 unbind_store+0x9c/0xb0
and
Call Trace: release_nodes+0x11/0x70 devres_release_all+0x8a/0xc0 device_unbind_cleanup+0x9/0x70 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c1/0x200 unbind_store+0x9c/0xb0
This means that in i915, if use devm, we cannot gurantee that hwmon will always be released before drvdata. Which means that we have a uaf if hwmon sysfs is accessed when drvdata has been released but hwmon hasn't.
The only way out of this seems to be do get rid of devm_ and release/free everything explicitly during device unbind.
v2: Change commit message and other minor code changes v3: Cleanup from i915_hwmon_register on error (Armin Wolf) v4: Eliminate potential static analyzer warning (Rodrigo) Eliminate fetch_and_zero (Jani) v5: Restore previous logic for ddat_gt->hwmon_dev error return (Andi)(CVE-2024-39479)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kdb: Fix buffer overflow during tab-complete
Currently, when the user attempts symbol completion with the Tab key, kdb will use strncpy() to insert the completed symbol into the command buffer. Unfortunately it passes the size of the source buffer rather than the destination to strncpy() with predictably horrible results. Most obviously if the command buffer is already full but cp, the cursor position, is in the middle of the buffer, then we will write past the end of the supplied buffer.
Fix this by replacing the dubious strncpy() calls with memmove()/memcpy() calls plus explicit boundary checks to make sure we have enough space before we start moving characters around.(CVE-2024-39480)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: Fix out-of-bounds read in bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set()
In function bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set(), if newval->string is an empty string, newval->string+1 will point to the byte after the string, causing an out-of-bound read.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in strlen+0x7d/0xa0 lib/string.c:418 Read of size 1 at addr ffff8881119c4781 by task syz-executor665/8107 CPU: 1 PID: 8107 Comm: syz-executor665 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc7 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:364 [inline] print_report+0xc1/0x5e0 mm/kasan/report.c:475 kasan_report+0xbe/0xf0 mm/kasan/report.c:588 strlen+0x7d/0xa0 lib/string.c:418 __fortify_strlen include/linux/fortify-string.h:210 [inline] in4_pton+0xa3/0x3f0 net/core/utils.c:130 bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set+0xc2/0x910 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:1201 __bond_opt_set+0x2a4/0x1030 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:767 __bond_opt_set_notify+0x48/0x150 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:792 bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0xda/0x160 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:817 bonding_sysfs_store_option+0xa1/0x120 drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c:156 dev_attr_store+0x54/0x80 drivers/base/core.c:2366 sysfs_kf_write+0x114/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:136 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x337/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2020 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x96a/0xd80 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x122/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b ---[ end trace ]---
Fix it by adding a check of string length before using it.(CVE-2024-39487)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: asm-bug: Add .align 2 to the end of __BUG_ENTRY
When CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=n, we fail to add necessary padding bytes to bug_table entries, and as a result the last entry in a bug table will be ignored, potentially leading to an unexpected panic(). All prior entries in the table will be handled correctly.
The arm64 ABI requires that struct fields of up to 8 bytes are naturally-aligned, with padding added within a struct such that struct are suitably aligned within arrays.
When CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERPOSE=y, the layout of a bug_entry is:
struct bug_entry {
signed int bug_addr_disp; // 4 bytes
signed int file_disp; // 4 bytes
unsigned short line; // 2 bytes
unsigned short flags; // 2 bytes
}
... with 12 bytes total, requiring 4-byte alignment.
When CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=n, the layout of a bug_entry is:
struct bug_entry {
signed int bug_addr_disp; // 4 bytes
unsigned short flags; // 2 bytes
< implicit padding > // 2 bytes
}
... with 8 bytes total, with 6 bytes of data and 2 bytes of trailing padding, requiring 4-byte alginment.
When we create a bug_entry in assembly, we align the start of the entry to 4 bytes, which implicitly handles padding for any prior entries. However, we do not align the end of the entry, and so when CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=n, the final entry lacks the trailing padding bytes.
For the main kernel image this is not a problem as find_bug() doesn't depend on the trailing padding bytes when searching for entries:
for (bug = __start___bug_table; bug < __stop___bug_table; ++bug)
if (bugaddr == bug_addr(bug))
return bug;
However for modules, module_bug_finalize() depends on the trailing bytes when calculating the number of entries:
mod->num_bugs = sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(struct bug_entry);
... and as the last bug_entry lacks the necessary padding bytes, this entry will not be counted, e.g. in the case of a single entry:
sechdrs[i].sh_size == 6
sizeof(struct bug_entry) == 8;
sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(struct bug_entry) == 0;
Consequently module_find_bug() will miss the last bug_entry when it does:
for (i = 0; i < mod->num_bugs; ++i, ++bug)
if (bugaddr == bug_addr(bug))
goto out;
... which can lead to a kenrel panic due to an unhandled bug.
This can be demonstrated with the following module:
static int __init buginit(void)
{
WARN(1, "hello\n");
return 0;
}
static void __exit bugexit(void)
{
}
module_init(buginit);
module_exit(bugexit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
... which will trigger a kernel panic when loaded:
------------[ cut here ]------------
hello
Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
Internal error: BRK handler: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: hello(O+)
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 6.9.1 #8
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello]
lr : buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello]
sp : ffff800080533ae0
x29: ffff800080533ae0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: ffffaba8c4e70510 x25: ffff800080533c30 x24: ffffaba8c4a28a58
x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff3947c0eab3c0
x20: ffffaba8c4e3f000 x19: ffffaba846464000 x18: 0000000000000006
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffaba8c2492834 x15: 0720072007200720
x14: 0720072007200720 x13: ffffaba8c49b27c8 x12: 0000000000000312
x11: 0000000000000106 x10: ffffaba8c4a0a7c8 x9 : ffffaba8c49b27c8
x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffffaba8c4a0a7c8 x6 : 80000000fffff000
x5 : 0000000000000107 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff3947c0eab3c0
Call trace:
buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello]
do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1c8
do_init_module+0x60/0x218
load_module+0x1ba4/0x1d70
__do_sys_init_module+0x198/0x1d0
__arm64_sys_init_module+0x1c/0x28
invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
el0_svc
---truncated---(CVE-2024-39488)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix memleak in seg6_hmac_init_algo
seg6_hmac_init_algo returns without cleaning up the previous allocations if one fails, so it's going to leak all that memory and the crypto tfms.
Update seg6_hmac_exit to only free the memory when allocated, so we can reuse the code directly.(CVE-2024-39489)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sock_map: avoid race between sock_map_close and sk_psock_put
sk_psock_get will return NULL if the refcount of psock has gone to 0, which will happen when the last call of sk_psock_put is done. However, sk_psock_drop may not have finished yet, so the close callback will still point to sock_map_close despite psock being NULL.
This can be reproduced with a thread deleting an element from the sock map, while the second one creates a socket, adds it to the map and closes it.
That will trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE:
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7220 at net/core/sock_map.c:1701 sock_map_close+0x2a2/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1701 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 7220 Comm: syz-executor380 Not tainted 6.9.0-syzkaller-07726-g3c999d1ae3c7 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 RIP: 0010:sock_map_close+0x2a2/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1701 Code: df e8 92 29 88 f8 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 79 29 88 f8 4c 8b 23 eb 89 e8 4f 15 23 f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 48 83 c4 08 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 13 26 3d 02 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000441fda8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff89731ae1 RBX: ffffffff94b87540 RCX: ffff888029470000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8bcab5c0 RDI: ffffffff8c1faba0 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff92f9b61f R09: 1ffffffff25f36c3 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff25f36c4 R12: ffffffff89731840 R13: ffff88804b587000 R14: ffff88804b587000 R15: ffffffff89731870 FS: 000055555e080380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000207d4000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> unix_release+0x87/0xc0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1048 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbe/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x42b/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 __do_sys_close fs/open.c:1556 [inline] __se_sys_close fs/open.c:1541 [inline] __x64_sys_close+0x7f/0x110 fs/open.c:1541 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fb37d618070 Code: 00 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb d4 e8 10 2c 00 00 80 3d 31 f0 07 00 00 74 17 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 48 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 18 89 7c RSP: 002b:00007ffcd4a525d8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fb37d618070 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 00000000200001c0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000100000000 R09: 0000000100000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK>
Use sk_psock, which will only check that the pointer is not been set to NULL yet, which should only happen after the callbacks are restored. If, then, a reference can still be gotten, we may call sk_psock_stop and cancel psock->work.
As suggested by Paolo Abeni, reorder the condition so the control flow is less convoluted.
After that change, the reproducer does not trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore.(CVE-2024-39500)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ionic: fix use after netif_napi_del()
When queues are started, netif_napi_add() and napi_enable() are called. If there are 4 queues and only 3 queues are used for the current configuration, only 3 queues' napi should be registered and enabled. The ionic_qcq_enable() checks whether the .poll pointer is not NULL for enabling only the using queue' napi. Unused queues' napi will not be registered by netif_napi_add(), so the .poll pointer indicates NULL. But it couldn't distinguish whether the napi was unregistered or not because netif_napi_del() doesn't reset the .poll pointer to NULL. So, ionic_qcq_enable() calls napi_enable() for the queue, which was unregistered by netif_napi_del().
Reproducer: ethtool -L <interface name> rx 1 tx 1 combined 0 ethtool -L <interface name> rx 0 tx 0 combined 1 ethtool -L <interface name> rx 0 tx 0 combined 4
Splat looks like: kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6666! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 3 PID: 1057 Comm: kworker/3:3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2+ #16 Workqueue: events ionic_lif_deferred_work [ionic] RIP: 0010:napi_enable+0x3b/0x40 Code: 48 89 c2 48 83 e2 f6 80 b9 61 09 00 00 00 74 0d 48 83 bf 60 01 00 00 00 74 03 80 ce 01 f0 4f RSP: 0018:ffffb6ed83227d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff97560cda0828 RCX: 0000000000000029 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff97560cda0a28 RBP: ffffb6ed83227d50 R08: 0000000000000400 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff97560ce3c1a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff975613ba0a20 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff975d5f780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f8f734ee200 CR3: 0000000103e50000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die+0x33/0x90 ? do_trap+0xd9/0x100 ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40 ? do_error_trap+0x83/0xb0 ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40 ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40 ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70 ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40 ionic_qcq_enable+0xb7/0x180 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8] ionic_start_queues+0xc4/0x290 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8] ionic_link_status_check+0x11c/0x170 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8] ionic_lif_deferred_work+0x129/0x280 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8] process_one_work+0x145/0x360 worker_thread+0x2bb/0x3d0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcc/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-39502)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fix possible race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from()
syzbot found a race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from() [1]
If compiler reads more than once (*ppcpu_rt), second read could read NULL, if another cpu clears the value in rt6_get_pcpu_route().
Add a READ_ONCE() to prevent this race.
Also add rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() because we rely on RCU protection while dereferencing pcpu_rt.
[1]
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000012: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097] CPU: 0 PID: 7543 Comm: kworker/u8:17 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-00013-g2bfcfd584ff5 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net RIP: 0010:__fib6_drop_pcpu_from.part.0+0x10a/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:984 Code: f8 48 c1 e8 03 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 16 02 00 00 4d 8b 3f 4d 85 ff 74 31 e8 74 a7 fa f7 49 8d bf 90 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <80> 3c 28 00 0f 85 1e 02 00 00 49 8b 87 90 00 00 00 48 8b 0c 24 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900040df070 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff89932e16 RDX: ffff888049dd1e00 RSI: ffffffff89932d7c RDI: 0000000000000091 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000007 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88807fa080b8 R13: fffffbfff1a9a07d R14: ffffed100ff41022 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b32c26000 CR3: 000000005d56e000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:966 [inline] fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1027 [inline] fib6_purge_rt+0x7f2/0x9f0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1038 fib6_del_route net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1998 [inline] fib6_del+0xa70/0x17b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2043 fib6_clean_node+0x426/0x5b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2205 fib6_walk_continue+0x44f/0x8d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2127 fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2175 fib6_clean_tree+0xd7/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2255 __fib6_clean_all+0x100/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2271 rt6_sync_down_dev net/ipv6/route.c:4906 [inline] rt6_disable_ip+0x7ed/0xa00 net/ipv6/route.c:4911 addrconf_ifdown.isra.0+0x117/0x1b40 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3855 addrconf_notify+0x223/0x19e0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3778 notifier_call_chain+0xb9/0x410 kernel/notifier.c:93 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xbe/0x140 net/core/dev.c:1992 call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2030 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2044 [inline] dev_close_many+0x333/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:1585 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x46d/0x19f0 net/core/dev.c:11193 unregister_netdevice_many net/core/dev.c:11276 [inline] default_device_exit_batch+0x85b/0xae0 net/core/dev.c:11759 ops_exit_list+0x128/0x180 net/core/net_namespace.c:178 cleanup_net+0x5b7/0xbf0 net/core/net_namespace.c:640 process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline] worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: ensure snd_una is properly initialized on connect
This is strictly related to commit fb7a0d334894 ("mptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect"). It turns out that syzkaller can trigger the retransmit after fallback and before processing any other incoming packet - so that snd_una is still left uninitialized.
Address the issue explicitly initializing snd_una together with snd_nxt and write_seq.(CVE-2024-40931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: logitech-dj: Fix memory leak in logi_dj_recv_switch_to_dj_mode()
Fix a memory leak on logi_dj_recv_send_report() error path.(CVE-2024-40934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Possible null pointer dereference in cs35l41_hda_unbind()
The cs35l41_hda_unbind() function clears the hda_component entry matching it's index and then dereferences the codec pointer held in the first element of the hda_component array, this is an issue when the device index was 0.
Instead use the codec pointer stashed in the cs35l41_hda structure as it will still be valid.(CVE-2024-40964)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: remove clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag in default_options
In f2fs_remount, SB_INLINECRYPT flag will be clear and re-set. If create new file or open file during this gap, these files will not use inlinecrypt. Worse case, it may lead to data corruption if wrappedkey_v0 is enable.
Thread A: Thread B:
-f2fs_remount -f2fs_file_open or f2fs_new_inode -default_options <- clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag
-fscrypt_select_encryption_impl
-parse_options <- set SB_INLINECRYPT again(CVE-2024-40971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix memory leak on CPU EPP exit
The cpudata memory from kzalloc() in amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init() is not freed in the analogous exit function, so fix that.
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-34.0.0.41.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrtnetlink: Correct nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST attribute validation\r\n\r\nEach attribute inside a nested IFLA_VF_VLAN_LIST is assumed to be a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info so the size of such attribute needs to be at least\nof sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) which is 14 bytes.\nThe current size validation in do_setvfinfo is against NLA_HDRLEN (4 bytes)\nwhich is less than sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan_info) so this validation\nis not enough and a too small attribute might be cast to a\nstruct ifla_vf_vlan_info, this might result in an out of bands\nread access when accessing the saved (casted) entry in ivvl.(CVE-2024-36017)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnull_blk: fix null-ptr-dereference while configuring \u0026apos;power\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;submit_queues\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nWriting \u0026apos;power\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;submit_queues\u0026apos; concurrently will trigger kernel\npanic:\r\n\r\nTest script:\r\n\r\nmodprobe null_blk nr_devices=0\nmkdir -p /sys/kernel/config/nullb/nullb0\nwhile true; do echo 1 \u0026gt; submit_queues; echo 4 \u0026gt; submit_queues; done \u0026amp;\nwhile true; do echo 1 \u0026gt; power; echo 0 \u0026gt; power; done\r\n\r\nTest result:\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000148\nOops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\nRIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x41d/0x28f0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n lock_acquire+0x121/0x450\n down_write+0x5f/0x1d0\n simple_recursive_removal+0x12f/0x5c0\n blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctxs+0x7c/0x100\n blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x4a3/0x720\n nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk]\n nullb_device_submit_queues_store+0x79/0xf0 [null_blk]\n configfs_write_iter+0x119/0x1e0\n vfs_write+0x326/0x730\n ksys_write+0x74/0x150\r\n\r\nThis is because del_gendisk() can concurrent with\nblk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues():\r\n\r\nnullb_device_power_store\tnullb_apply_submit_queues\n null_del_dev\n del_gendisk\n\t\t\t\t nullb_update_nr_hw_queues\n\t\t\t\t if (!dev-\u0026gt;nullb)\n\t\t\t\t // still set while gendisk is deleted\n\t\t\t\t return 0\n\t\t\t\t blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues\n dev-\u0026gt;nullb = NULL\r\n\r\nFix this problem by resuing the global mutex to protect\nnullb_device_power_store() and nullb_update_nr_hw_queues() from configfs.(CVE-2024-36478)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracing/probes: fix error check in parse_btf_field()\r\n\r\nbtf_find_struct_member() might return NULL or an error via the\nERR_PTR() macro. However, its caller in parse_btf_field() only checks\nfor the NULL condition. Fix this by using IS_ERR() and returning the\nerror up the stack.(CVE-2024-36481)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Release hbalock before calling lpfc_worker_wake_up()\r\n\r\nlpfc_worker_wake_up() calls the lpfc_work_done() routine, which takes the\nhbalock. Thus, lpfc_worker_wake_up() should not be called while holding the\nhbalock to avoid potential deadlock.(CVE-2024-36924)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs\r\n\r\nSKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be linearized, otherwise they become\ninvalid. Return NULL if such an skb is passed to skb_copy or\nskb_copy_expand, in order to prevent a crash on a potential later\ncall to skb_gso_segment.(CVE-2024-36929)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/cio: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a lbuf-sized kernel buffer and copy lbuf from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use scanf on this buffer but we don\u0026apos;t\nensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to\nOOB read when using scanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead.(CVE-2024-36931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdkfd: range check cp bad op exception interrupts\r\n\r\nDue to a CP interrupt bug, bad packet garbage exception codes are raised.\nDo a range check so that the debugger and runtime do not receive garbage\ncodes.\nUpdate the user api to guard exception code type checking as well.(CVE-2024-36951)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblk-cgroup: fix list corruption from reorder of WRITE -\u0026gt;lqueued\r\n\r\n__blkcg_rstat_flush() can be run anytime, especially when blk_cgroup_bio_start\nis being executed.\r\n\r\nIf WRITE of `-\u0026gt;lqueued` is re-ordered with READ of \u0026apos;bisc-\u0026gt;lnode.next\u0026apos; in\nthe loop of __blkcg_rstat_flush(), `next_bisc` can be assigned with one\nstat instance being added in blk_cgroup_bio_start(), then the local\nlist in __blkcg_rstat_flush() could be corrupted.\r\n\r\nFix the issue by adding one barrier.(CVE-2024-38384)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: openvswitch: fix overwriting ct original tuple for ICMPv6\r\n\r\nOVS_PACKET_CMD_EXECUTE has 3 main attributes:\n - OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY - Packet metadata in a netlink format.\n - OVS_PACKET_ATTR_PACKET - Binary packet content.\n - OVS_PACKET_ATTR_ACTIONS - Actions to execute on the packet.\r\n\r\nOVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY is parsed first to populate sw_flow_key structure\nwith the metadata like conntrack state, input port, recirculation id,\netc. Then the packet itself gets parsed to populate the rest of the\nkeys from the packet headers.\r\n\r\nWhenever the packet parsing code starts parsing the ICMPv6 header, it\nfirst zeroes out fields in the key corresponding to Neighbor Discovery\ninformation even if it is not an ND packet.\r\n\r\nIt is an \u0026apos;ipv6.nd\u0026apos; field. However, the \u0026apos;ipv6\u0026apos; is a union that shares\nthe space between \u0026apos;nd\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;ct_orig\u0026apos; that holds the original tuple\nconntrack metadata parsed from the OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY.\r\n\r\nND packets should not normally have conntrack state, so it\u0026apos;s fine to\nshare the space, but normal ICMPv6 Echo packets or maybe other types of\nICMPv6 can have the state attached and it should not be overwritten.\r\n\r\nThe issue results in all but the last 4 bytes of the destination\naddress being wiped from the original conntrack tuple leading to\nincorrect packet matching and potentially executing wrong actions\nin case this packet recirculates within the datapath or goes back\nto userspace.\r\n\r\nND fields should not be accessed in non-ND packets, so not clearing\nthem should be fine. Executing memset() only for actual ND packets to\navoid the issue.\r\n\r\nInitializing the whole thing before parsing is needed because ND packet\nmay not contain all the options.\r\n\r\nThe issue only affects the OVS_PACKET_CMD_EXECUTE path and doesn\u0026apos;t\naffect packets entering OVS datapath from network interfaces, because\nin this case CT metadata is populated from skb after the packet is\nalready parsed.(CVE-2024-38558)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngfs2: Fix potential glock use-after-free on unmount\r\n\r\nWhen a DLM lockspace is released and there ares still locks in that\nlockspace, DLM will unlock those locks automatically. Commit\nfb6791d100d1b started exploiting this behavior to speed up filesystem\nunmount: gfs2 would simply free glocks it didn\u0026apos;t want to unlock and then\nrelease the lockspace. This didn\u0026apos;t take the bast callbacks for\nasynchronous lock contention notifications into account, which remain\nactive until until a lock is unlocked or its lockspace is released.\r\n\r\nTo prevent those callbacks from accessing deallocated objects, put the\nglocks that should not be unlocked on the sd_dead_glocks list, release\nthe lockspace, and only then free those glocks.\r\n\r\nAs an additional measure, ignore unexpected ast and bast callbacks if\nthe receiving glock is dead.(CVE-2024-38570)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu/mes: fix use-after-free issue\r\n\r\nDelete fence fallback timer to fix the ramdom\nuse-after-free issue.\r\n\r\nv2: move to amdgpu_mes.c(CVE-2024-38581)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;nilfs2: fix log writer related issues\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nThis bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues,\nincluding a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on\nunmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found\nduring their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.\r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 3):\r\n\r\nA use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on\nthe nilfs_sc_info structure.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log\nwriter thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure\nis about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread\u0026apos;s lifetime.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer\nthread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nr8169: Fix possible ring buffer corruption on fragmented Tx packets.\r\n\r\nAn issue was found on the RTL8125b when transmitting small fragmented\npackets, whereby invalid entries were inserted into the transmit ring\nbuffer, subsequently leading to calls to dma_unmap_single() with a null\naddress.\r\n\r\nThis was caused by rtl8169_start_xmit() not noticing changes to nr_frags\nwhich may occur when small packets are padded (to work around hardware\nquirks) in rtl8169_tso_csum_v2().\r\n\r\nTo fix this, postpone inspecting nr_frags until after any padding has been\napplied.(CVE-2024-38586)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nopenrisc: traps: Don\u0026apos;t send signals to kernel mode threads\r\n\r\nOpenRISC exception handling sends signals to user processes on floating\npoint exceptions and trap instructions (for debugging) among others.\nThere is a bug where the trap handling logic may send signals to kernel\nthreads, we should not send these signals to kernel threads, if that\nhappens we treat it as an error.\r\n\r\nThis patch adds conditions to die if the kernel receives these\nexceptions in kernel mode code.(CVE-2024-38614)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: HCI: Remove HCI_AMP support\r\n\r\nSince BT_HS has been remove HCI_AMP controllers no longer has any use so\nremove it along with the capability of creating AMP controllers.\r\n\r\nSince we no longer need to differentiate between AMP and Primary\ncontrollers, as only HCI_PRIMARY is left, this also remove\nhdev-\u0026gt;dev_type altogether.(CVE-2024-38620)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvfio/pci: fix potential memory leak in vfio_intx_enable()\r\n\r\nIf vfio_irq_ctx_alloc() failed will lead to \u0026apos;name\u0026apos; memory leak.(CVE-2024-38632)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/ap: Fix crash in AP internal function modify_bitmap()\r\n\r\nA system crash like this\r\n\r\n Failing address: 200000cb7df6f000 TEID: 200000cb7df6f403\n Fault in home space mode while using kernel ASCE.\n AS:00000002d71bc007 R3:00000003fe5b8007 S:000000011a446000 P:000000015660c13d\n Oops: 0038 ilc:3 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n Modules linked in: mlx5_ib ...\n CPU: 8 PID: 7556 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7 #8\n Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (LPAR)\n Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 0000014b75e7b606 (ap_parse_bitmap_str+0x10e/0x1f8)\n R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3\n Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000001 ffffffffffffffc0 0000000000000001 00000048f96b75d3\n 000000cb00000100 ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff 000000cb7df6fce0\n 000000cb7df6fce0 00000000ffffffff 000000000000002b 00000048ffffffff\n 000003ff9b2dbc80 200000cb7df6fcd8 0000014bffffffc0 000000cb7df6fbc8\n Krnl Code: 0000014b75e7b5fc: a7840047 brc 8,0000014b75e7b68a\n 0000014b75e7b600: 18b2 lr %r11,%r2\n #0000014b75e7b602: a7f4000a brc 15,0000014b75e7b616\n \u0026gt;0000014b75e7b606: eb22d00000e6 laog %r2,%r2,0(%r13)\n 0000014b75e7b60c: a7680001 lhi %r6,1\n 0000014b75e7b610: 187b lr %r7,%r11\n 0000014b75e7b612: 84960021 brxh %r9,%r6,0000014b75e7b654\n 0000014b75e7b616: 18e9 lr %r14,%r9\n Call Trace:\n [\u0026lt;0000014b75e7b606\u0026gt;] ap_parse_bitmap_str+0x10e/0x1f8\n ([\u0026lt;0000014b75e7b5dc\u0026gt;] ap_parse_bitmap_str+0xe4/0x1f8)\n [\u0026lt;0000014b75e7b758\u0026gt;] apmask_store+0x68/0x140\n [\u0026lt;0000014b75679196\u0026gt;] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x14e/0x1e8\n [\u0026lt;0000014b75598524\u0026gt;] vfs_write+0x1b4/0x448\n [\u0026lt;0000014b7559894c\u0026gt;] ksys_write+0x74/0x100\n [\u0026lt;0000014b7618a440\u0026gt;] __do_syscall+0x268/0x328\n [\u0026lt;0000014b761a3558\u0026gt;] system_call+0x70/0x98\n INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n [\u0026lt;0000014b75e7b636\u0026gt;] ap_parse_bitmap_str+0x13e/0x1f8\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops\r\n\r\noccured when /sys/bus/ap/a[pq]mask was updated with a relative mask value\n(like +0x10-0x12,+60,-90) with one of the numeric values exceeding INT_MAX.\r\n\r\nThe fix is simple: use unsigned long values for the internal variables. The\ncorrect checks are already in place in the function but a simple int for\nthe internal variables was used with the possibility to overflow.(CVE-2024-38661)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: bcm: dvp: Assign -\u0026gt;num before accessing -\u0026gt;hws\r\n\r\nCommit f316cdff8d67 (\u0026quot;clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with\n__counted_by\u0026quot;) annotated the hws member of \u0026apos;struct clk_hw_onecell_data\u0026apos;\nwith __counted_by, which informs the bounds sanitizer about the number\nof elements in hws, so that it can warn when hws is accessed out of\nbounds. As noted in that change, the __counted_by member must be\ninitialized with the number of elements before the first array access\nhappens, otherwise there will be a warning from each access prior to the\ninitialization because the number of elements is zero. This occurs in\nclk_dvp_probe() due to -\u0026gt;num being assigned after -\u0026gt;hws has been\naccessed:\r\n\r\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2711-dvp.c:59:2\n index 0 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct clk_hw *[] __counted_by(num)\u0026apos; (aka \u0026apos;struct clk_hw *[]\u0026apos;)\r\n\r\nMove the -\u0026gt;num initialization to before the first access of -\u0026gt;hws, which\nclears up the warning.(CVE-2024-39462)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: v4l: async: Fix notifier list entry init\r\n\r\nstruct v4l2_async_notifier has several list_head members, but only\nwaiting_list and done_list are initialized. notifier_entry was kept\n\u0026apos;zeroed\u0026apos; leading to an uninitialized list_head.\nThis results in a NULL-pointer dereference if csi2_async_register() fails,\ne.g. node for remote endpoint is disabled, and returns -ENOTCONN.\nThe following calls to v4l2_async_nf_unregister() results in a NULL\npointer dereference.\nAdd the missing list head initializer.(CVE-2024-39464)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: starfive - Do not free stack buffer\r\n\r\nRSA text data uses variable length buffer allocated in software stack.\nCalling kfree on it causes undefined behaviour in subsequent operations.(CVE-2024-39478)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/i915/hwmon: Get rid of devm\r\n\r\nWhen both hwmon and hwmon drvdata (on which hwmon depends) are device\nmanaged resources, the expectation, on device unbind, is that hwmon will be\nreleased before drvdata. However, in i915 there are two separate code\npaths, which both release either drvdata or hwmon and either can be\nreleased before the other. These code paths (for device unbind) are as\nfollows (see also the bug referenced below):\r\n\r\nCall Trace:\nrelease_nodes+0x11/0x70\ndevres_release_group+0xb2/0x110\ncomponent_unbind_all+0x8d/0xa0\ncomponent_del+0xa5/0x140\nintel_pxp_tee_component_fini+0x29/0x40 [i915]\nintel_pxp_fini+0x33/0x80 [i915]\ni915_driver_remove+0x4c/0x120 [i915]\ni915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915]\npci_device_remove+0x32/0xa0\ndevice_release_driver_internal+0x19c/0x200\nunbind_store+0x9c/0xb0\r\n\r\nand\r\n\r\nCall Trace:\nrelease_nodes+0x11/0x70\ndevres_release_all+0x8a/0xc0\ndevice_unbind_cleanup+0x9/0x70\ndevice_release_driver_internal+0x1c1/0x200\nunbind_store+0x9c/0xb0\r\n\r\nThis means that in i915, if use devm, we cannot gurantee that hwmon will\nalways be released before drvdata. Which means that we have a uaf if hwmon\nsysfs is accessed when drvdata has been released but hwmon hasn\u0026apos;t.\r\n\r\nThe only way out of this seems to be do get rid of devm_ and release/free\neverything explicitly during device unbind.\r\n\r\nv2: Change commit message and other minor code changes\nv3: Cleanup from i915_hwmon_register on error (Armin Wolf)\nv4: Eliminate potential static analyzer warning (Rodrigo)\n Eliminate fetch_and_zero (Jani)\nv5: Restore previous logic for ddat_gt-\u0026gt;hwmon_dev error return (Andi)(CVE-2024-39479)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkdb: Fix buffer overflow during tab-complete\r\n\r\nCurrently, when the user attempts symbol completion with the Tab key, kdb\nwill use strncpy() to insert the completed symbol into the command buffer.\nUnfortunately it passes the size of the source buffer rather than the\ndestination to strncpy() with predictably horrible results. Most obviously\nif the command buffer is already full but cp, the cursor position, is in\nthe middle of the buffer, then we will write past the end of the supplied\nbuffer.\r\n\r\nFix this by replacing the dubious strncpy() calls with memmove()/memcpy()\ncalls plus explicit boundary checks to make sure we have enough space\nbefore we start moving characters around.(CVE-2024-39480)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: Fix out-of-bounds read in bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set()\r\n\r\nIn function bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set(), if newval-\u0026gt;string is an\nempty string, newval-\u0026gt;string+1 will point to the byte after the\nstring, causing an out-of-bound read.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in strlen+0x7d/0xa0 lib/string.c:418\nRead of size 1 at addr ffff8881119c4781 by task syz-executor665/8107\nCPU: 1 PID: 8107 Comm: syz-executor665 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc7 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:364 [inline]\n print_report+0xc1/0x5e0 mm/kasan/report.c:475\n kasan_report+0xbe/0xf0 mm/kasan/report.c:588\n strlen+0x7d/0xa0 lib/string.c:418\n __fortify_strlen include/linux/fortify-string.h:210 [inline]\n in4_pton+0xa3/0x3f0 net/core/utils.c:130\n bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set+0xc2/0x910\ndrivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:1201\n __bond_opt_set+0x2a4/0x1030 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:767\n __bond_opt_set_notify+0x48/0x150 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:792\n bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0xda/0x160 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:817\n bonding_sysfs_store_option+0xa1/0x120 drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c:156\n dev_attr_store+0x54/0x80 drivers/base/core.c:2366\n sysfs_kf_write+0x114/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:136\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x337/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2020 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]\n vfs_write+0x96a/0xd80 fs/read_write.c:584\n ksys_write+0x122/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\n---[ end trace ]---\r\n\r\nFix it by adding a check of string length before using it.(CVE-2024-39487)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: asm-bug: Add .align 2 to the end of __BUG_ENTRY\r\n\r\nWhen CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=n, we fail to add necessary padding bytes\nto bug_table entries, and as a result the last entry in a bug table will\nbe ignored, potentially leading to an unexpected panic(). All prior\nentries in the table will be handled correctly.\r\n\r\nThe arm64 ABI requires that struct fields of up to 8 bytes are\nnaturally-aligned, with padding added within a struct such that struct\nare suitably aligned within arrays.\r\n\r\nWhen CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERPOSE=y, the layout of a bug_entry is:\r\n\r\n\tstruct bug_entry {\n\t\tsigned int bug_addr_disp;\t// 4 bytes\n\t\tsigned int file_disp;\t// 4 bytes\n\t\tunsigned short line;\t\t// 2 bytes\n\t\tunsigned short flags;\t\t// 2 bytes\n\t}\r\n\r\n... with 12 bytes total, requiring 4-byte alignment.\r\n\r\nWhen CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=n, the layout of a bug_entry is:\r\n\r\n\tstruct bug_entry {\n\t\tsigned int bug_addr_disp;\t// 4 bytes\n\t\tunsigned short flags;\t\t// 2 bytes\n\t\t\u0026lt; implicit padding \u0026gt;\t\t// 2 bytes\n\t}\r\n\r\n... with 8 bytes total, with 6 bytes of data and 2 bytes of trailing\npadding, requiring 4-byte alginment.\r\n\r\nWhen we create a bug_entry in assembly, we align the start of the entry\nto 4 bytes, which implicitly handles padding for any prior entries.\nHowever, we do not align the end of the entry, and so when\nCONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=n, the final entry lacks the trailing padding\nbytes.\r\n\r\nFor the main kernel image this is not a problem as find_bug() doesn\u0026apos;t\ndepend on the trailing padding bytes when searching for entries:\r\n\r\n\tfor (bug = __start___bug_table; bug \u0026lt; __stop___bug_table; ++bug)\n\t\tif (bugaddr == bug_addr(bug))\n\t\t\treturn bug;\r\n\r\nHowever for modules, module_bug_finalize() depends on the trailing\nbytes when calculating the number of entries:\r\n\r\n\tmod-\u0026gt;num_bugs = sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(struct bug_entry);\r\n\r\n... and as the last bug_entry lacks the necessary padding bytes, this entry\nwill not be counted, e.g. in the case of a single entry:\r\n\r\n\tsechdrs[i].sh_size == 6\n\tsizeof(struct bug_entry) == 8;\r\n\r\n\tsechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(struct bug_entry) == 0;\r\n\r\nConsequently module_find_bug() will miss the last bug_entry when it does:\r\n\r\n\tfor (i = 0; i \u0026lt; mod-\u0026gt;num_bugs; ++i, ++bug)\n\t\tif (bugaddr == bug_addr(bug))\n\t\t\tgoto out;\r\n\r\n... which can lead to a kenrel panic due to an unhandled bug.\r\n\r\nThis can be demonstrated with the following module:\r\n\r\n\tstatic int __init buginit(void)\n\t{\n\t\tWARN(1, \u0026quot;hello\\n\u0026quot;);\n\t\treturn 0;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tstatic void __exit bugexit(void)\n\t{\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tmodule_init(buginit);\n\tmodule_exit(bugexit);\n\tMODULE_LICENSE(\u0026quot;GPL\u0026quot;);\r\n\r\n... which will trigger a kernel panic when loaded:\r\n\r\n\t------------[ cut here ]------------\n\thello\n\tUnexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n\tInternal error: BRK handler: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n\tModules linked in: hello(O+)\n\tCPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 6.9.1 #8\n\tHardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n\tpstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n\tpc : buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello]\n\tlr : buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello]\n\tsp : ffff800080533ae0\n\tx29: ffff800080533ae0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000\n\tx26: ffffaba8c4e70510 x25: ffff800080533c30 x24: ffffaba8c4a28a58\n\tx23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff3947c0eab3c0\n\tx20: ffffaba8c4e3f000 x19: ffffaba846464000 x18: 0000000000000006\n\tx17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffaba8c2492834 x15: 0720072007200720\n\tx14: 0720072007200720 x13: ffffaba8c49b27c8 x12: 0000000000000312\n\tx11: 0000000000000106 x10: ffffaba8c4a0a7c8 x9 : ffffaba8c49b27c8\n\tx8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffffaba8c4a0a7c8 x6 : 80000000fffff000\n\tx5 : 0000000000000107 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000\n\tx2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff3947c0eab3c0\n\tCall trace:\n\t buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello]\n\t do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1c8\n\t do_init_module+0x60/0x218\n\t load_module+0x1ba4/0x1d70\n\t __do_sys_init_module+0x198/0x1d0\n\t __arm64_sys_init_module+0x1c/0x28\n\t invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114\n\t el0_svc\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-39488)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix memleak in seg6_hmac_init_algo\r\n\r\nseg6_hmac_init_algo returns without cleaning up the previous allocations\nif one fails, so it\u0026apos;s going to leak all that memory and the crypto tfms.\r\n\r\nUpdate seg6_hmac_exit to only free the memory when allocated, so we can\nreuse the code directly.(CVE-2024-39489)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsock_map: avoid race between sock_map_close and sk_psock_put\r\n\r\nsk_psock_get will return NULL if the refcount of psock has gone to 0, which\nwill happen when the last call of sk_psock_put is done. However,\nsk_psock_drop may not have finished yet, so the close callback will still\npoint to sock_map_close despite psock being NULL.\r\n\r\nThis can be reproduced with a thread deleting an element from the sock map,\nwhile the second one creates a socket, adds it to the map and closes it.\r\n\r\nThat will trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE:\r\n\r\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7220 at net/core/sock_map.c:1701 sock_map_close+0x2a2/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1701\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 7220 Comm: syz-executor380 Not tainted 6.9.0-syzkaller-07726-g3c999d1ae3c7 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nRIP: 0010:sock_map_close+0x2a2/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1701\nCode: df e8 92 29 88 f8 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 79 29 88 f8 4c 8b 23 eb 89 e8 4f 15 23 f8 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 48 83 c4 08 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 13 26 3d 02\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000441fda8 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: ffffffff89731ae1 RBX: ffffffff94b87540 RCX: ffff888029470000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8bcab5c0 RDI: ffffffff8c1faba0\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff92f9b61f R09: 1ffffffff25f36c3\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff25f36c4 R12: ffffffff89731840\nR13: ffff88804b587000 R14: ffff88804b587000 R15: ffffffff89731870\nFS: 000055555e080380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000207d4000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n unix_release+0x87/0xc0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1048\n __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]\n sock_close+0xbe/0x240 net/socket.c:1421\n __fput+0x42b/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422\n __do_sys_close fs/open.c:1556 [inline]\n __se_sys_close fs/open.c:1541 [inline]\n __x64_sys_close+0x7f/0x110 fs/open.c:1541\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7fb37d618070\nCode: 00 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb d4 e8 10 2c 00 00 80 3d 31 f0 07 00 00 74 17 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 48 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 18 89 7c\nRSP: 002b:00007ffcd4a525d8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fb37d618070\nRDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 00000000200001c0 RDI: 0000000000000004\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000100000000 R09: 0000000100000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nUse sk_psock, which will only check that the pointer is not been set to\nNULL yet, which should only happen after the callbacks are restored. If,\nthen, a reference can still be gotten, we may call sk_psock_stop and cancel\npsock-\u0026gt;work.\r\n\r\nAs suggested by Paolo Abeni, reorder the condition so the control flow is\nless convoluted.\r\n\r\nAfter that change, the reproducer does not trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE\nanymore.(CVE-2024-39500)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nionic: fix use after netif_napi_del()\r\n\r\nWhen queues are started, netif_napi_add() and napi_enable() are called.\nIf there are 4 queues and only 3 queues are used for the current\nconfiguration, only 3 queues\u0026apos; napi should be registered and enabled.\nThe ionic_qcq_enable() checks whether the .poll pointer is not NULL for\nenabling only the using queue\u0026apos; napi. Unused queues\u0026apos; napi will not be\nregistered by netif_napi_add(), so the .poll pointer indicates NULL.\nBut it couldn\u0026apos;t distinguish whether the napi was unregistered or not\nbecause netif_napi_del() doesn\u0026apos;t reset the .poll pointer to NULL.\nSo, ionic_qcq_enable() calls napi_enable() for the queue, which was\nunregistered by netif_napi_del().\r\n\r\nReproducer:\n ethtool -L \u0026lt;interface name\u0026gt; rx 1 tx 1 combined 0\n ethtool -L \u0026lt;interface name\u0026gt; rx 0 tx 0 combined 1\n ethtool -L \u0026lt;interface name\u0026gt; rx 0 tx 0 combined 4\r\n\r\nSplat looks like:\nkernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6666!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 3 PID: 1057 Comm: kworker/3:3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2+ #16\nWorkqueue: events ionic_lif_deferred_work [ionic]\nRIP: 0010:napi_enable+0x3b/0x40\nCode: 48 89 c2 48 83 e2 f6 80 b9 61 09 00 00 00 74 0d 48 83 bf 60 01 00 00 00 74 03 80 ce 01 f0 4f\nRSP: 0018:ffffb6ed83227d48 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff97560cda0828 RCX: 0000000000000029\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff97560cda0a28\nRBP: ffffb6ed83227d50 R08: 0000000000000400 R09: 0000000000000001\nR10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: ffff97560ce3c1a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff975613ba0a20\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff975d5f780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f8f734ee200 CR3: 0000000103e50000 CR4: 00000000007506f0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? die+0x33/0x90\n ? do_trap+0xd9/0x100\n ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40\n ? do_error_trap+0x83/0xb0\n ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40\n ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70\n ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n ? napi_enable+0x3b/0x40\n ionic_qcq_enable+0xb7/0x180 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8]\n ionic_start_queues+0xc4/0x290 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8]\n ionic_link_status_check+0x11c/0x170 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8]\n ionic_lif_deferred_work+0x129/0x280 [ionic 59bdfc8a035436e1c4224ff7d10789e3f14643f8]\n process_one_work+0x145/0x360\n worker_thread+0x2bb/0x3d0\n ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0xcc/0x100\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-39502)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fix possible race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from()\r\n\r\nsyzbot found a race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from() [1]\r\n\r\nIf compiler reads more than once (*ppcpu_rt),\nsecond read could read NULL, if another cpu clears\nthe value in rt6_get_pcpu_route().\r\n\r\nAdd a READ_ONCE() to prevent this race.\r\n\r\nAlso add rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() because\nwe rely on RCU protection while dereferencing pcpu_rt.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000012: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097]\nCPU: 0 PID: 7543 Comm: kworker/u8:17 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-00013-g2bfcfd584ff5 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nWorkqueue: netns cleanup_net\n RIP: 0010:__fib6_drop_pcpu_from.part.0+0x10a/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:984\nCode: f8 48 c1 e8 03 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 16 02 00 00 4d 8b 3f 4d 85 ff 74 31 e8 74 a7 fa f7 49 8d bf 90 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 28 00 0f 85 1e 02 00 00 49 8b 87 90 00 00 00 48 8b 0c 24 48\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900040df070 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff89932e16\nRDX: ffff888049dd1e00 RSI: ffffffff89932d7c RDI: 0000000000000091\nRBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000007\nR10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88807fa080b8\nR13: fffffbfff1a9a07d R14: ffffed100ff41022 R15: 0000000000000001\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b32c26000 CR3: 000000005d56e000 CR4: 00000000003526f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:966 [inline]\n fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1027 [inline]\n fib6_purge_rt+0x7f2/0x9f0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1038\n fib6_del_route net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1998 [inline]\n fib6_del+0xa70/0x17b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2043\n fib6_clean_node+0x426/0x5b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2205\n fib6_walk_continue+0x44f/0x8d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2127\n fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2175\n fib6_clean_tree+0xd7/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2255\n __fib6_clean_all+0x100/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2271\n rt6_sync_down_dev net/ipv6/route.c:4906 [inline]\n rt6_disable_ip+0x7ed/0xa00 net/ipv6/route.c:4911\n addrconf_ifdown.isra.0+0x117/0x1b40 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3855\n addrconf_notify+0x223/0x19e0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3778\n notifier_call_chain+0xb9/0x410 kernel/notifier.c:93\n call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xbe/0x140 net/core/dev.c:1992\n call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2030 [inline]\n call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2044 [inline]\n dev_close_many+0x333/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:1585\n unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x46d/0x19f0 net/core/dev.c:11193\n unregister_netdevice_many net/core/dev.c:11276 [inline]\n default_device_exit_batch+0x85b/0xae0 net/core/dev.c:11759\n ops_exit_list+0x128/0x180 net/core/net_namespace.c:178\n cleanup_net+0x5b7/0xbf0 net/core/net_namespace.c:640\n process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393\n kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: ensure snd_una is properly initialized on connect\r\n\r\nThis is strictly related to commit fb7a0d334894 (\u0026quot;mptcp: ensure snd_nxt\nis properly initialized on connect\u0026quot;). It turns out that syzkaller can\ntrigger the retransmit after fallback and before processing any other\nincoming packet - so that snd_una is still left uninitialized.\r\n\r\nAddress the issue explicitly initializing snd_una together with snd_nxt\nand write_seq.(CVE-2024-40931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nHID: logitech-dj: Fix memory leak in logi_dj_recv_switch_to_dj_mode()\r\n\r\nFix a memory leak on logi_dj_recv_send_report() error path.(CVE-2024-40934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: hda: cs35l41: Possible null pointer dereference in cs35l41_hda_unbind()\r\n\r\nThe cs35l41_hda_unbind() function clears the hda_component entry\nmatching it\u0026apos;s index and then dereferences the codec pointer held in the\nfirst element of the hda_component array, this is an issue when the\ndevice index was 0.\r\n\r\nInstead use the codec pointer stashed in the cs35l41_hda structure as it\nwill still be valid.(CVE-2024-40964)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: remove clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag in default_options\r\n\r\nIn f2fs_remount, SB_INLINECRYPT flag will be clear and re-set.\nIf create new file or open file during this gap, these files\nwill not use inlinecrypt. Worse case, it may lead to data\ncorruption if wrappedkey_v0 is enable.\r\n\r\nThread A: Thread B:\r\n\r\n-f2fs_remount\t\t\t\t-f2fs_file_open or f2fs_new_inode\n -default_options\n\t\u0026lt;- clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag\r\n\r\n -fscrypt_select_encryption_impl\r\n\r\n -parse_options\n\t\u0026lt;- set SB_INLINECRYPT again(CVE-2024-40971)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncpufreq: amd-pstate: fix memory leak on CPU EPP exit\r\n\r\nThe cpudata memory from kzalloc() in amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init() is\nnot freed in the analogous exit function, so fix that.\r\n\r\n[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ](CVE-2024-40997)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1863",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:19Z",
"published": "2024-07-19T11:07:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1863"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38614"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38620"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40997"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-36017",
"CVE-2024-36478",
"CVE-2024-36481",
"CVE-2024-36924",
"CVE-2024-36929",
"CVE-2024-36931",
"CVE-2024-36951",
"CVE-2024-38384",
"CVE-2024-38558",
"CVE-2024-38570",
"CVE-2024-38581",
"CVE-2024-38583",
"CVE-2024-38586",
"CVE-2024-38614",
"CVE-2024-38620",
"CVE-2024-38632",
"CVE-2024-38661",
"CVE-2024-39462",
"CVE-2024-39464",
"CVE-2024-39478",
"CVE-2024-39479",
"CVE-2024-39480",
"CVE-2024-39487",
"CVE-2024-39488",
"CVE-2024-39489",
"CVE-2024-39500",
"CVE-2024-39502",
"CVE-2024-40905",
"CVE-2024-40931",
"CVE-2024-40934",
"CVE-2024-40964",
"CVE-2024-40971",
"CVE-2024-40997"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.