CVE-2024-3596 (GCVE-0-2024-3596)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-07-09 12:02
Modified
2025-09-04 21:05
Severity ?
9.0 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE
Summary
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.
References
cret@cert.org http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4 Mailing List
cret@cert.org https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html
cret@cert.org https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html
cret@cert.org https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/ Technical Description
cret@cert.org https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865 Technical Description
cret@cert.org https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf Third Party Advisory
cret@cert.org https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014 Third Party Advisory
cret@cert.org https://www.blastradius.fail/ Technical Description
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4 Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/ Technical Description
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865 Technical Description
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014 Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/ Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 https://www.blastradius.fail/ Technical Description
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
IETF RFC Version: 2865
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:rfc:2865:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "rfc",
            "vendor": "ietf",
            "versions": [
              {
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "2865"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 9,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "CHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-3596",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-07-11T03:55:37.141738Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T14:32:14.851Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container",
        "x_generator": {
          "engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
        }
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RFC",
          "vendor": "IETF",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2865"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Thanks to Sharon Goldberg, Miro Haller, Nadia Heninger, Mike Milano, Dan Shumow, Marc Stevens, and Adam Suhl who researched and reported this vulnerability"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-09-03T17:29:16.788Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
        },
        {
          "name": "Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT for  SIPROTEC, SICAM and related product",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT to SCALANCE, RUGGEDCOM and related products.",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "VINCE 3.0.4",
        "env": "prod",
        "origin": "https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2024-3596"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-3596",
    "datePublished": "2024-07-09T12:02:53.001Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-04-10T15:09:45.391Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-3596\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"published\":\"2024-07-09T12:15:20.700\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-04T21:15:32.753\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El protocolo RADIUS seg\u00fan RFC 2865 es susceptible a ataques de falsificaci\u00f3n por parte de un atacante local que puede modificar cualquier respuesta v\u00e1lida (acceso-aceptaci\u00f3n, acceso-rechazo o acceso-desaf\u00edo) a cualquier otra respuesta utilizando un ataque de colisi\u00f3n de prefijo elegido contra la firma del autenticador de respuesta MD5. .\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":6.0},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":6.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-354\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-924\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.0.27\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1C73FF4C-13DE-4050-BD56-447F9382AA4D\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:brocade_sannav:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"75B1EDA5-F189-440D-AD0E-C70DD2C0FEE5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:broadcom:fabric_operating_system:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"046FB51E-B768-44D3-AEB5-D857145CA840\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:sonicwall:sonicos:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1CF61DAA-8295-4407-B125-1714E1565965\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.blastradius.fail/\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.blastradius.fail/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/\"}, {\"url\": \"https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol\"}, {\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.blastradius.fail/\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"ADPogram 0.0.1\"}, \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-29T14:32:14.851Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-3596\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-07-11T03:55:37.141738Z\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:ietf:rfc:2865:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"ietf\", \"product\": \"rfc\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2865\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-07-24T20:18:02.244Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Thanks to Sharon Goldberg, Miro Haller, Nadia Heninger, Mike Milano, Dan Shumow, Marc Stevens, and Adam Suhl who researched and reported this vulnerability\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"IETF\", \"product\": \"RFC\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2865\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865\"}, {\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/\"}, {\"url\": \"https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.blastradius.fail/\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4\"}, {\"url\": \"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014\"}, {\"url\": \"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html\", \"name\": \"Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT for  SIPROTEC, SICAM and related product\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html\", \"name\": \"Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT to SCALANCE, RUGGEDCOM and related products.\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"env\": \"prod\", \"engine\": \"VINCE 3.0.4\", \"origin\": \"https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2024-3596\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b\", \"shortName\": \"certcc\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-09-03T17:29:16.788Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-3596\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-04-10T15:09:45.391Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-07-09T12:02:53.001Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"certcc\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.