Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2023-52502 (GCVE-0-2023-52502)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-03-02 21:52 – Updated: 2026-08-05 09:10| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a
(git)
Affected: 8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < 7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d (git) Affected: 8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < 6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9 (git) Affected: 8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8 (git) Affected: 8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc (git) Affected: 8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c (git) Affected: 8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502 , < 31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
3.6
Unaffected: 0 , < 3.6 (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.297 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.259 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.199 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.136 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.59 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.5.8 , ≤ 6.5.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-05T20:30:02.589366Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-05T14:59:47.087Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:03:20.409Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.297",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.199",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.59",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.297",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.199",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.136",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.59",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:A - The vulnerable lookups run in the NFC LLCP receive path (nfc_llcp_data_received \u2192 nfc_llcp_rx_skb \u2192 CONNECT/SNL/UI/I/DISC handlers) on frames from an NFC peer over a DEP link, requiring same-segment NFC proximity like Bluetooth adjacent attacks.\nAC:L - The attacker drives the lookup side by sending concurrent LLCP PDUs and can drive socket teardown via connect/disconnect and session churn; nfc_llcp_recv_snl also used the socket with no reference across a wide window, so the race is attacker-influenced and retryable.\nPR:N - Crafted LLCP frames are processed in-kernel from an unauthenticated NFC peer with no account or capabilities on the victim; AF_NFC STREAM/DGRAM sockets need no CAP_NET_RAW and phones commonly already have NFC/LLCP active.\nUI:N - Exploitation does not require a deliberate victim action beyond NFC already being enabled; a peer can bring up target/DEP mode and exchange LLCP PDUs without an interactive confirm step.\nS:U - This is a kernel heap UAF in the host NFC stack that escalates within the same OS security authority, with no VM/IOMMU or other cross-boundary escape.\nC:H - The race yields a use-after-free on struct sock/nfc_llcp_sock, which can be reclaimed and read to disclose arbitrary kernel memory.\nI:H - UAF on the socket object enables heap spray and corrupted sock state/function pointers, providing arbitrary write and control-flow hijack primitives in kernel context.\nA:H - The same UAF reliably causes kernel oops/panic or memory corruption crashes when the freed socket is accessed or when sock_hold runs on freed memory."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T09:10:16.026Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
}
],
"title": "net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52502",
"datePublished": "2024-03-02T21:52:17.218Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-20T12:30:33.313Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T09:10:16.026Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2023-52502",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00247",
"percentile": "0.16323"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: nfc: corrige ejecuci\u00f3ns en nfc_llcp_sock_get() y nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() Sili Luo inform\u00f3 una ejecuci\u00f3n en nfc_llcp_sock_get(), lo que llev\u00f3 a UAF. Obtener una referencia en el enchufe encontrado en una b\u00fasqueda mientras se mantiene un candado debe ocurrir antes de liberar el candado. nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() tiene un problema similar. Finalmente, nfc_llcp_recv_snl() necesita asegurarse de que el socket encontrado por nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() no desaparezca."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T08:39:54.847",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-03-02T22:15:47.203",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.297",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.199",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.59",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "11744FF9-EEDC-4705-B511-19A5DD432FB4",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.297",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9F46843-24C9-4AC7-B6BB-1EF101D05435",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8D886A8D-A6CD-44FA-ACF5-DD260ECA7A1B",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.199",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B1FA5161-3AC0-44DF-B1F7-93A070F2B1E7",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.136",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "96EA633C-1F3E-41C5-A13A-155C55A1F273",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.59",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AD4E15B4-2591-4A3A-B2A2-7FEAECD5027D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "84267A4F-DBC2-444F-B41D-69E15E1BEC97",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FB440208-241C-4246-9A83-C1715C0DAA6C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0DC421F1-3D5A-4BEF-BF76-4E468985D20B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "00AB783B-BE05-40E8-9A55-6AA457D95031",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E7C78D0A-C4A2-4D41-B726-8979E33AD0F9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: nfc: corrige ejecuci\u00f3ns en nfc_llcp_sock_get() y nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() Sili Luo inform\u00f3 una ejecuci\u00f3n en nfc_llcp_sock_get(), lo que llev\u00f3 a UAF. Obtener una referencia en el enchufe encontrado en una b\u00fasqueda mientras se mantiene un candado debe ocurrir antes de liberar el candado. nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() tiene un problema similar. Finalmente, nfc_llcp_recv_snl() necesita asegurarse de que el socket encontrado por nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() no desaparezca."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:18:30.607",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-05T20:30:02.589366Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-03-02T22:15:47.203",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-362"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T19:26:56+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52502",
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"initial_release_date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "198",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2023/cve-2023-52502.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "important",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-05T00:50:37Z",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52502",
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"initial_release_date": "2024-03-05T04:31:36Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "375",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "63",
"product_status:recommended": "1061",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2023-52502.json",
"version": "102"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:03:20.409Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-05T20:30:02.589366Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-05-23T19:01:15.910Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.297",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.199",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.59",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.297",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.199",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.136",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.59",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T07:38:07.231Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
}
],
"title": "net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52502",
"datePublished": "2024-03-02T21:52:17.218Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-20T12:30:33.313Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T07:38:07.231Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Confidential Computing Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Confidential Computing Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-34556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21662"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-01-31T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0268-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250268-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0244-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250244-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0248-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250248-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0260-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250260-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0250-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250250-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0252-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250252-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0238-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250238-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0261-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250261-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0269-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250269-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0230-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250230-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0243-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250243-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0246-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250246-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0242-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250242-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0240-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250240-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0255-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250255-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0241-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250241-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0239-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250239-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0289-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250289-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0229-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250229-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0264-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250264-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0245-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250245-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0266-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250266-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0265-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250265-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0251-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250251-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0231-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250231-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0262-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250262-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0236-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250236-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0253-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250253-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0249-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250249-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0254-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250254-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0263-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250263-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2023-52502
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-03-02 22:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 10:186.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a | Patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.6 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.6 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.6 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.6 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.6 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8f50020ed9b81ba909ce9573f9d05263cdebf502",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/nfc/llcp_core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.297",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.199",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.59",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "11744FF9-EEDC-4705-B511-19A5DD432FB4",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.297",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9F46843-24C9-4AC7-B6BB-1EF101D05435",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8D886A8D-A6CD-44FA-ACF5-DD260ECA7A1B",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.199",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B1FA5161-3AC0-44DF-B1F7-93A070F2B1E7",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.136",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "96EA633C-1F3E-41C5-A13A-155C55A1F273",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.59",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AD4E15B4-2591-4A3A-B2A2-7FEAECD5027D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "84267A4F-DBC2-444F-B41D-69E15E1BEC97",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FB440208-241C-4246-9A83-C1715C0DAA6C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0DC421F1-3D5A-4BEF-BF76-4E468985D20B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "00AB783B-BE05-40E8-9A55-6AA457D95031",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.6:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E7C78D0A-C4A2-4D41-B726-8979E33AD0F9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: nfc: corrige ejecuci\u00f3ns en nfc_llcp_sock_get() y nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() Sili Luo inform\u00f3 una ejecuci\u00f3n en nfc_llcp_sock_get(), lo que llev\u00f3 a UAF. Obtener una referencia en el enchufe encontrado en una b\u00fasqueda mientras se mantiene un candado debe ocurrir antes de liberar el candado. nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() tiene un problema similar. Finalmente, nfc_llcp_recv_snl() necesita asegurarse de que el socket encontrado por nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() no desaparezca."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:18:30.607",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-05T20:30:02.589366Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-03-02T22:15:47.203",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-362"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-G754-37WH-7WV7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-03 00:30 – Updated: 2024-11-05 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()
Sili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.
Getting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while holding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.
nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.
Finally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket found by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52502"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-362"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-02T22:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.",
"id": "GHSA-g754-37wh-7wv7",
"modified": "2024-11-05T18:31:58Z",
"published": "2024-03-03T00:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GSD-2023-52502
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2024-02-21 06:01{
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52502"
],
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.",
"id": "GSD-2023-52502",
"modified": "2024-02-21T06:01:53.352601Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
"ID": "CVE-2023-52502",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Linux",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "8f50020ed9b8",
"version_value": "e863f5720a56"
},
{
"version_value": "not down converted",
"x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.297",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.259",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.199",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.136",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.59",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.8",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Linux"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "bippy-4986f5686161"
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\n\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\n\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\n\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\n\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52502",
"lastModified": "2024-03-04T13:58:23.447",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2024-03-02T22:15:47.203",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7adcf014bda16cdbf804af5c164d94d5d025db2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1af8a39cf839d93c8967fdd858f6bbdc3e4a15c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d888d3f70b0de32b4f51534175f039ddab15eef8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4f2611f07c87b3ddb57c4b9e8efcd1e330fc3dc"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e863f5720a5680e50c4cecf12424d7cc31b3eb0a"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
}
}
}
ICSA-25-226-15
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00OESA-2024-1353 (CVE-2021-47094)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-04-03 11:06 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:06 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding
After dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during tdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator results in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is fatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.
When zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the iter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn has as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side() skipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.
Sprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are often used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with __must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.
Failing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid SPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), the shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm] __fput+0x82/0x240 task_work_run+0x5c/0x90 do_exit+0x364/0xa10 ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60 do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0 get_signal+0x155/0x850 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
If kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of marking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the free list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with page_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional errors in the kernel.
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171 RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm] kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm] mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm] __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0 task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0 do_exit+0x97b/0x2230 do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0 get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Note, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed") moved calls to tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still incorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level entry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced by yielding before processing the current gfn.
Alternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or callers could jump to their "retry" label. The downside of that approach is that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() must be called before anything else in the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.
Ideally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator macro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of bugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()
Sili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.
Getting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while holding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.
nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.
Finally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket found by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt
[Syz report] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2 index -878706688 is out of range for type 'struct iagctl[128]' CPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348 diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360 diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline] diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666 diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57 Code: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57 RDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140 RBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Analysis] When the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.
[Fix] After obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.
Modified the test from agno > MAXAG to agno >= MAXAG based on linux-next report by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode
When the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been released may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs when rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().
Therefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi->ipimap should not be initialized as ipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()
Since tomoyo_write_control() updates head->write_buf when write() of long lines is requested, we need to fetch head->write_buf after head->io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can cause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: call sock_orphan() at release time
syzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk->sk_wq pointer in a closed llc socket.
In commit ff7b11aa481f ("net: socket: set sock->sk to NULL after calling proto_ops::release()") Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols are missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.
In net-next, I plan to clear sock->sk from sock_orphan() and amend Eric patch to add a warning.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27
CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601 list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080 skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline] napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404 e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970 e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline] e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline] net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778 __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913 smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>
Allocated by task 5167: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline] sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005 sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634 __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535 sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline] __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Freed by task 0: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin ---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler
Inside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called & checked with host lock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.
This can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:
-
N hardware queues
-
queue depth is M for each hardware queue
-
each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests
If recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each scsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called for the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M - 1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.
If both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring host lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).
Fix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don't need the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never covers that.
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-source-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-194.0.0.107.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don\u0026apos;t advance iterator after restart due to yielding\r\n\r\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn\u0026apos;t visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nSprinkle WARNs on iter-\u0026gt;yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\r\n\r\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n __fput+0x82/0x240\n task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n get_signal+0x155/0x850\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\u0026quot;KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\u0026quot;) moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\r\n\r\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \u0026quot;retry\u0026quot; label. The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there\u0026apos;s no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\r\n\r\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\r\n\r\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\r\n\r\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\r\n\r\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\r\n\r\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt\r\n\r\n[Syz report]\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2\nindex -878706688 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct iagctl[128]\u0026apos;\nCPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348\n diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360\n diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline]\n diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666\n diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587\n ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56\n jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225\n vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106\n do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129\n __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline]\n __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline]\n __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\nRIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57\nCode: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57\nRDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140\nRBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\r\n\r\n[Analysis]\nWhen the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.\r\n\r\n[Fix]\nAfter obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.\r\n\r\n\nModified the test from agno \u0026gt; MAXAG to agno \u0026gt;= MAXAG based on linux-next\nreport by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode\r\n\r\nWhen the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been\nreleased may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs\nwhen rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().\r\n\r\nTherefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi-\u0026gt;ipimap should not be initialized as\nipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()\r\n\r\nSince tomoyo_write_control() updates head-\u0026gt;write_buf when write()\nof long lines is requested, we need to fetch head-\u0026gt;write_buf after\nhead-\u0026gt;io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can\ncause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: call sock_orphan() at release time\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk-\u0026gt;sk_wq\npointer in a closed llc socket.\r\n\r\nIn commit ff7b11aa481f (\u0026quot;net: socket: set sock-\u0026gt;sk to NULL after\ncalling proto_ops::release()\u0026quot;) Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols\nare missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.\r\n\r\nIn net-next, I plan to clear sock-\u0026gt;sk from sock_orphan() and\namend Eric patch to add a warning.\r\n\r\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\n skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080\n skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline]\n napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404\n e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970\n e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline]\n e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778\n __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553\n run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]\n run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 5167:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340\n kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline]\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879\n alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline]\n sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308\n alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260\n new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005\n sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634\n __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535\n sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline]\n __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline]\n __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706\n __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline]\n __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline]\n __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nFreed by task 0:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640\n poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257\n kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline]\n slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler\r\n\r\nInside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called \u0026amp; checked with host\nlock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.\r\n\r\nThis can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:\r\n\r\n - N hardware queues\r\n\r\n - queue depth is M for each hardware queue\r\n\r\n - each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests\r\n\r\nIf recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each\nscsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called\nfor the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M -\n1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.\r\n\r\nIf both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring\nhost lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).\r\n\r\nFix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don\u0026apos;t\nneed the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never\ncovers that.\r\n\r\n[mkp: Drop unnecessary \u0026apos;busy\u0026apos; variables pointed out by Bart](CVE-2024-26627)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1353",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:06:48Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T11:06:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1353"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26627"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47094",
"CVE-2023-52502",
"CVE-2023-52599",
"CVE-2023-52600",
"CVE-2024-26622",
"CVE-2024-26625",
"CVE-2024-26627"
]
}
OESA-2024-1355 (CVE-2021-47094)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-04-03 11:06 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:06 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding
After dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during tdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator results in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is fatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.
When zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the iter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn has as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side() skipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.
Sprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are often used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with __must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.
Failing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid SPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), the shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm] __fput+0x82/0x240 task_work_run+0x5c/0x90 do_exit+0x364/0xa10 ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60 do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0 get_signal+0x155/0x850 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
If kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of marking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the free list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with page_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional errors in the kernel.
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171 RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm] kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm] mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm] __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0 task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0 do_exit+0x97b/0x2230 do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0 get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Note, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed") moved calls to tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still incorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level entry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced by yielding before processing the current gfn.
Alternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or callers could jump to their "retry" label. The downside of that approach is that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() must be called before anything else in the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.
Ideally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator macro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of bugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()
Sili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.
Getting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while holding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.
nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.
Finally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket found by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt
[Syz report] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2 index -878706688 is out of range for type 'struct iagctl[128]' CPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348 diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360 diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline] diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666 diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57 Code: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57 RDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140 RBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Analysis] When the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.
[Fix] After obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.
Modified the test from agno > MAXAG to agno >= MAXAG based on linux-next report by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode
When the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been released may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs when rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().
Therefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi->ipimap should not be initialized as ipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Currently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while accessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl which is required to determine the size as suggest in the following commit. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/(CVE-2023-52601)
Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Linux Linux kernel kernel on Linux, x86, ARM (md, raid, raid5 modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow.(CVE-2024-23307)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()
Since tomoyo_write_control() updates head->write_buf when write() of long lines is requested, we need to fetch head->write_buf after head->io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can cause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: call sock_orphan() at release time
syzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk->sk_wq pointer in a closed llc socket.
In commit ff7b11aa481f ("net: socket: set sock->sk to NULL after calling proto_ops::release()") Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols are missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.
In net-next, I plan to clear sock->sk from sock_orphan() and amend Eric patch to add a warning.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27
CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601 list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080 skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline] napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404 e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970 e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline] e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline] net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778 __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913 smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>
Allocated by task 5167: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline] sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005 sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634 __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535 sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline] __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Freed by task 0: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin ---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler
Inside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called & checked with host lock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.
This can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:
-
N hardware queues
-
queue depth is M for each hardware queue
-
each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests
If recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each scsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called for the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M - 1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.
If both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring host lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).
Fix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don't need the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never covers that.
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-153.49.0.127.oe2203sp2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don\u0026apos;t advance iterator after restart due to yielding\r\n\r\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn\u0026apos;t visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nSprinkle WARNs on iter-\u0026gt;yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\r\n\r\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n __fput+0x82/0x240\n task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n get_signal+0x155/0x850\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\u0026quot;KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\u0026quot;) moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\r\n\r\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \u0026quot;retry\u0026quot; label. The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there\u0026apos;s no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\r\n\r\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\r\n\r\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\r\n\r\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\r\n\r\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\r\n\r\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt\r\n\r\n[Syz report]\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2\nindex -878706688 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct iagctl[128]\u0026apos;\nCPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348\n diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360\n diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline]\n diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666\n diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587\n ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56\n jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225\n vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106\n do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129\n __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline]\n __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline]\n __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\nRIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57\nCode: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57\nRDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140\nRBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\r\n\r\n[Analysis]\nWhen the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.\r\n\r\n[Fix]\nAfter obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.\r\n\r\n\nModified the test from agno \u0026gt; MAXAG to agno \u0026gt;= MAXAG based on linux-next\nreport by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode\r\n\r\nWhen the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been\nreleased may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs\nwhen rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().\r\n\r\nTherefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi-\u0026gt;ipimap should not be initialized as\nipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree\r\n\r\nCurrently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while\naccessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl\nwhich is required to determine the size as suggest in the following\ncommit.\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/(CVE-2023-52601)\r\n\r\nInteger Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Linux Linux kernel kernel on Linux, x86, ARM (md, raid, raid5 modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow.(CVE-2024-23307)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()\r\n\r\nSince tomoyo_write_control() updates head-\u0026gt;write_buf when write()\nof long lines is requested, we need to fetch head-\u0026gt;write_buf after\nhead-\u0026gt;io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can\ncause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: call sock_orphan() at release time\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk-\u0026gt;sk_wq\npointer in a closed llc socket.\r\n\r\nIn commit ff7b11aa481f (\u0026quot;net: socket: set sock-\u0026gt;sk to NULL after\ncalling proto_ops::release()\u0026quot;) Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols\nare missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.\r\n\r\nIn net-next, I plan to clear sock-\u0026gt;sk from sock_orphan() and\namend Eric patch to add a warning.\r\n\r\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\n skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080\n skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline]\n napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404\n e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970\n e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline]\n e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778\n __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553\n run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]\n run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 5167:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340\n kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline]\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879\n alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline]\n sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308\n alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260\n new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005\n sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634\n __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535\n sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline]\n __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline]\n __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706\n __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline]\n __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline]\n __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nFreed by task 0:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640\n poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257\n kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline]\n slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler\r\n\r\nInside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called \u0026amp; checked with host\nlock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.\r\n\r\nThis can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:\r\n\r\n - N hardware queues\r\n\r\n - queue depth is M for each hardware queue\r\n\r\n - each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests\r\n\r\nIf recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each\nscsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called\nfor the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M -\n1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.\r\n\r\nIf both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring\nhost lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).\r\n\r\nFix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don\u0026apos;t\nneed the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never\ncovers that.\r\n\r\n[mkp: Drop unnecessary \u0026apos;busy\u0026apos; variables pointed out by Bart](CVE-2024-26627)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1355",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:06:48Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T11:06:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1355"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26627"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47094",
"CVE-2023-52502",
"CVE-2023-52599",
"CVE-2023-52600",
"CVE-2023-52601",
"CVE-2024-23307",
"CVE-2024-26622",
"CVE-2024-26625",
"CVE-2024-26627"
]
}
OESA-2024-1356 (CVE-2021-47094)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-04-03 11:06 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:06 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding
After dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during tdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator results in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is fatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.
When zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the iter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn has as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side() skipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.
Sprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are often used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with __must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.
Failing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid SPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), the shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm] __fput+0x82/0x240 task_work_run+0x5c/0x90 do_exit+0x364/0xa10 ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60 do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0 get_signal+0x155/0x850 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
If kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of marking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the free list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with page_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional errors in the kernel.
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171 RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm] kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm] mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm] __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0 task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0 do_exit+0x97b/0x2230 do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0 get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Note, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed") moved calls to tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still incorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level entry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced by yielding before processing the current gfn.
Alternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or callers could jump to their "retry" label. The downside of that approach is that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() must be called before anything else in the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.
Ideally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator macro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of bugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()
Sili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.
Getting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while holding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.
nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.
Finally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket found by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt
[Syz report] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2 index -878706688 is out of range for type 'struct iagctl[128]' CPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348 diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360 diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline] diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666 diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57 Code: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57 RDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140 RBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Analysis] When the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.
[Fix] After obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.
Modified the test from agno > MAXAG to agno >= MAXAG based on linux-next report by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode
When the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been released may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs when rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().
Therefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi->ipimap should not be initialized as ipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Currently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while accessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl which is required to determine the size as suggest in the following commit. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/(CVE-2023-52601)
Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Linux Linux kernel kernel on Linux, x86, ARM (md, raid, raid5 modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow.(CVE-2024-23307)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()
Since tomoyo_write_control() updates head->write_buf when write() of long lines is requested, we need to fetch head->write_buf after head->io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can cause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: call sock_orphan() at release time
syzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk->sk_wq pointer in a closed llc socket.
In commit ff7b11aa481f ("net: socket: set sock->sk to NULL after calling proto_ops::release()") Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols are missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.
In net-next, I plan to clear sock->sk from sock_orphan() and amend Eric patch to add a warning.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27
CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601 list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080 skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline] napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404 e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970 e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline] e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline] net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778 __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913 smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>
Allocated by task 5167: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline] sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005 sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634 __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535 sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline] __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Freed by task 0: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin ---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler
Inside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called & checked with host lock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.
This can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:
-
N hardware queues
-
queue depth is M for each hardware queue
-
each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests
If recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each scsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called for the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M - 1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.
If both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring host lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).
Fix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don't need the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never covers that.
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-60.132.0.159.oe2203"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don\u0026apos;t advance iterator after restart due to yielding\r\n\r\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn\u0026apos;t visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nSprinkle WARNs on iter-\u0026gt;yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\r\n\r\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n __fput+0x82/0x240\n task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n get_signal+0x155/0x850\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\u0026quot;KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\u0026quot;) moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\r\n\r\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \u0026quot;retry\u0026quot; label. The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there\u0026apos;s no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\r\n\r\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\r\n\r\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\r\n\r\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\r\n\r\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\r\n\r\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt\r\n\r\n[Syz report]\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2\nindex -878706688 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct iagctl[128]\u0026apos;\nCPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348\n diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360\n diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline]\n diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666\n diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587\n ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56\n jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225\n vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106\n do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129\n __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline]\n __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline]\n __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\nRIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57\nCode: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57\nRDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140\nRBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\r\n\r\n[Analysis]\nWhen the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.\r\n\r\n[Fix]\nAfter obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.\r\n\r\n\nModified the test from agno \u0026gt; MAXAG to agno \u0026gt;= MAXAG based on linux-next\nreport by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode\r\n\r\nWhen the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been\nreleased may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs\nwhen rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().\r\n\r\nTherefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi-\u0026gt;ipimap should not be initialized as\nipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree\r\n\r\nCurrently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while\naccessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl\nwhich is required to determine the size as suggest in the following\ncommit.\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/(CVE-2023-52601)\r\n\r\nInteger Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Linux Linux kernel kernel on Linux, x86, ARM (md, raid, raid5 modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow.(CVE-2024-23307)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()\r\n\r\nSince tomoyo_write_control() updates head-\u0026gt;write_buf when write()\nof long lines is requested, we need to fetch head-\u0026gt;write_buf after\nhead-\u0026gt;io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can\ncause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: call sock_orphan() at release time\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk-\u0026gt;sk_wq\npointer in a closed llc socket.\r\n\r\nIn commit ff7b11aa481f (\u0026quot;net: socket: set sock-\u0026gt;sk to NULL after\ncalling proto_ops::release()\u0026quot;) Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols\nare missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.\r\n\r\nIn net-next, I plan to clear sock-\u0026gt;sk from sock_orphan() and\namend Eric patch to add a warning.\r\n\r\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\n skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080\n skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline]\n napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404\n e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970\n e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline]\n e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778\n __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553\n run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]\n run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 5167:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340\n kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline]\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879\n alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline]\n sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308\n alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260\n new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005\n sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634\n __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535\n sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline]\n __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline]\n __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706\n __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline]\n __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline]\n __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nFreed by task 0:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640\n poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257\n kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline]\n slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler\r\n\r\nInside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called \u0026amp; checked with host\nlock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.\r\n\r\nThis can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:\r\n\r\n - N hardware queues\r\n\r\n - queue depth is M for each hardware queue\r\n\r\n - each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests\r\n\r\nIf recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each\nscsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called\nfor the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M -\n1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.\r\n\r\nIf both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring\nhost lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).\r\n\r\nFix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don\u0026apos;t\nneed the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never\ncovers that.\r\n\r\n[mkp: Drop unnecessary \u0026apos;busy\u0026apos; variables pointed out by Bart](CVE-2024-26627)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1356",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:06:48Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T11:06:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26627"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47094",
"CVE-2023-52502",
"CVE-2023-52599",
"CVE-2023-52600",
"CVE-2023-52601",
"CVE-2024-23307",
"CVE-2024-26622",
"CVE-2024-26625",
"CVE-2024-26627"
]
}
OESA-2024-1357 (CVE-2021-47094)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-04-03 11:06 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:06 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding
After dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during tdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator results in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is fatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.
When zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the iter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn has as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side() skipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.
Sprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are often used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with __must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.
Failing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid SPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), the shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm] __fput+0x82/0x240 task_work_run+0x5c/0x90 do_exit+0x364/0xa10 ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60 do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0 get_signal+0x155/0x850 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
If kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of marking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the free list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with page_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional errors in the kernel.
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171 RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm] zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm] kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm] mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm] __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0 task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0 do_exit+0x97b/0x2230 do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0 get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Note, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed") moved calls to tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still incorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level entry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced by yielding before processing the current gfn.
Alternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or callers could jump to their "retry" label. The downside of that approach is that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() must be called before anything else in the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.
Ideally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator macro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of bugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()
Sili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.
Getting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while holding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.
nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.
Finally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket found by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt
[Syz report] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2 index -878706688 is out of range for type 'struct iagctl[128]' CPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348 diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360 diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline] diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666 diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57 Code: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57 RDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140 RBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Analysis] When the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.
[Fix] After obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.
Modified the test from agno > MAXAG to agno >= MAXAG based on linux-next report by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode
When the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been released may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs when rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().
Therefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi->ipimap should not be initialized as ipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Currently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while accessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl which is required to determine the size as suggest in the following commit. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/(CVE-2023-52601)
Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Linux Linux kernel kernel on Linux, x86, ARM (md, raid, raid5 modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow.(CVE-2024-23307)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()
Since tomoyo_write_control() updates head->write_buf when write() of long lines is requested, we need to fetch head->write_buf after head->io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can cause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: call sock_orphan() at release time
syzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk->sk_wq pointer in a closed llc socket.
In commit ff7b11aa481f ("net: socket: set sock->sk to NULL after calling proto_ops::release()") Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols are missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.
In net-next, I plan to clear sock->sk from sock_orphan() and amend Eric patch to add a warning.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27
CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601 list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline] waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline] sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline] sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468 skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080 skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline] napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404 e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970 e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline] e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline] net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778 __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913 smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>
Allocated by task 5167: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline] sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308 alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005 sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634 __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535 sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline] __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Freed by task 0: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin ---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler
Inside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called & checked with host lock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.
This can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:
-
N hardware queues
-
queue depth is M for each hardware queue
-
each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests
If recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each scsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called for the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M - 1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.
If both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring host lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).
Fix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don't need the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never covers that.
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"perf-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.70.0.150.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don\u0026apos;t advance iterator after restart due to yielding\r\n\r\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator. Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn\u0026apos;t visited before yielding.\r\n\r\nSprinkle WARNs on iter-\u0026gt;yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\r\n\r\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways. If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n __fput+0x82/0x240\n task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n get_signal+0x155/0x850\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list. This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\u0026quot;KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\u0026quot;) moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry. But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\r\n\r\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \u0026quot;retry\u0026quot; label. The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there\u0026apos;s no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\r\n\r\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47094)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()\r\n\r\nSili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF.\r\n\r\nGetting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while\nholding a lock should happen before releasing the lock.\r\n\r\nnfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem.\r\n\r\nFinally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket\nfound by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear.(CVE-2023-52502)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt\r\n\r\n[Syz report]\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2\nindex -878706688 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct iagctl[128]\u0026apos;\nCPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348\n diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360\n diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline]\n diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666\n diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587\n ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56\n jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225\n vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106\n do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129\n __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline]\n __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline]\n __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\nRIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57\nCode: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57\nRDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140\nRBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\r\n\r\n[Analysis]\nWhen the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.\r\n\r\n[Fix]\nAfter obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.\r\n\r\n\nModified the test from agno \u0026gt; MAXAG to agno \u0026gt;= MAXAG based on linux-next\nreport by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).(CVE-2023-52599)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix uaf in jfs_evict_inode\r\n\r\nWhen the execution of diMount(ipimap) fails, the object ipimap that has been\nreleased may be accessed in diFreeSpecial(). Asynchronous ipimap release occurs\nwhen rcu_core() calls jfs_free_node().\r\n\r\nTherefore, when diMount(ipimap) fails, sbi-\u0026gt;ipimap should not be initialized as\nipimap.(CVE-2023-52600)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree\r\n\r\nCurrently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while\naccessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl\nwhich is required to determine the size as suggest in the following\ncommit.\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/(CVE-2023-52601)\r\n\r\nInteger Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Linux Linux kernel kernel on Linux, x86, ARM (md, raid, raid5 modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow.(CVE-2024-23307)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntomoyo: fix UAF write bug in tomoyo_write_control()\r\n\r\nSince tomoyo_write_control() updates head-\u0026gt;write_buf when write()\nof long lines is requested, we need to fetch head-\u0026gt;write_buf after\nhead-\u0026gt;io_sem is held. Otherwise, concurrent write() requests can\ncause use-after-free-write and double-free problems.(CVE-2024-26622)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: call sock_orphan() at release time\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported an interesting trace [1] caused by a stale sk-\u0026gt;sk_wq\npointer in a closed llc socket.\r\n\r\nIn commit ff7b11aa481f (\u0026quot;net: socket: set sock-\u0026gt;sk to NULL after\ncalling proto_ops::release()\u0026quot;) Eric Biggers hinted that some protocols\nare missing a sock_orphan(), we need to perform a full audit.\r\n\r\nIn net-next, I plan to clear sock-\u0026gt;sk from sock_orphan() and\namend Eric patch to add a warning.\r\n\r\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88802f4fc880 by task ksoftirqd/1/27\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00049-g6098d87eaf31 #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n list_empty include/linux/list.h:373 [inline]\n waitqueue_active include/linux/wait.h:127 [inline]\n sock_def_write_space_wfree net/core/sock.c:3384 [inline]\n sock_wfree+0x9a8/0x9d0 net/core/sock.c:2468\n skb_release_head_state+0xa3/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1080\n skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1092 [inline]\n napi_consume_skb+0x119/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1404\n e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource+0x144/0x200 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:1970\n e1000_clean_tx_irq drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3860 [inline]\n e1000_clean+0x4a1/0x26e0 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3801\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb4/0x540 net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6645 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x956/0xe90 net/core/dev.c:6778\n __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553\n run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]\n run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x660/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 5167:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_alloc+0x81/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:340\n kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline]\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x142/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:3879\n alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3019 [inline]\n sock_alloc_inode+0x25/0x1c0 net/socket.c:308\n alloc_inode+0x5d/0x220 fs/inode.c:260\n new_inode_pseudo+0x16/0x80 fs/inode.c:1005\n sock_alloc+0x40/0x270 net/socket.c:634\n __sock_create+0xbc/0x800 net/socket.c:1535\n sock_create net/socket.c:1622 [inline]\n __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1659 [inline]\n __sys_socket+0x14c/0x260 net/socket.c:1706\n __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1720 [inline]\n __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1718 [inline]\n __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1718\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nFreed by task 0:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:47\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640\n poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:241 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_free+0x121/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:257\n kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline]\n slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2121 [inlin\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26625)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler\r\n\r\nInside scsi_eh_wakeup(), scsi_host_busy() is called \u0026amp; checked with host\nlock every time for deciding if error handler kthread needs to be waken up.\r\n\r\nThis can be too heavy in case of recovery, such as:\r\n\r\n - N hardware queues\r\n\r\n - queue depth is M for each hardware queue\r\n\r\n - each scsi_host_busy() iterates over (N * M) tag/requests\r\n\r\nIf recovery is triggered in case that all requests are in-flight, each\nscsi_eh_wakeup() is strictly serialized, when scsi_eh_wakeup() is called\nfor the last in-flight request, scsi_host_busy() has been run for (N * M -\n1) times, and request has been iterated for (N*M - 1) * (N * M) times.\r\n\r\nIf both N and M are big enough, hard lockup can be triggered on acquiring\nhost lock, and it is observed on mpi3mr(128 hw queues, queue depth 8169).\r\n\r\nFix the issue by calling scsi_host_busy() outside the host lock. We don\u0026apos;t\nneed the host lock for getting busy count because host the lock never\ncovers that.\r\n\r\n[mkp: Drop unnecessary \u0026apos;busy\u0026apos; variables pointed out by Bart](CVE-2024-26627)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1357",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:06:48Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T11:06:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1357"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26627"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47094",
"CVE-2023-52502",
"CVE-2023-52599",
"CVE-2023-52600",
"CVE-2023-52601",
"CVE-2024-23307",
"CVE-2024-26622",
"CVE-2024-26625",
"CVE-2024-26627"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.