CVE-2022-4265 (GCVE-0-2022-4265)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-03-06 13:33 – Updated: 2025-03-06 15:13
VLAI
Title
Replyable < 2.2.10 - Subscriber+ PHP Object Injection
Summary
The Replyable WordPress plugin before 2.2.10 does not validate the class name submitted by the request when instantiating an object in the prompt_dismiss_notice action and also lacks CSRF check in the related action. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform Object Injection attacks. The attack could also be done via a CSRF vector against any authenticated user
Severity
No CVSS data available.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41… exploitvdb-entrytechnical-description
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Unknown Replyable Affected: 0 , < 2.2.10 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Lana Codes WPScan
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:34:49.903Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit",
              "vdb-entry",
              "technical-description",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-4265",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-06T15:12:19.269840Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-352",
                "description": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-06T15:13:09.630Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Replyable",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.2.10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Lana Codes"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "WPScan"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Replyable WordPress plugin before 2.2.10 does not validate the class name submitted by the request when instantiating an object in the prompt_dismiss_notice action and also lacks CSRF check in the related action. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform Object Injection attacks. The attack could also be done via a CSRF vector against any authenticated user"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-03-06T13:33:59.581Z",
        "orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
        "shortName": "WPScan"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "exploit",
            "vdb-entry",
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Replyable \u003c 2.2.10 - Subscriber+ PHP Object Injection",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
    "assignerShortName": "WPScan",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-4265",
    "datePublished": "2023-03-06T13:33:59.581Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-12-02T09:10:21.912Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-03-06T15:13:09.630Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2022-4265",
      "date": "2026-07-15",
      "epss": "0.00511",
      "percentile": "0.40073"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:gopostmatic:replyable:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.2.10\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"650D2EF0-CF64-4585-B5B7-42A79D4711EE\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The Replyable WordPress plugin before 2.2.10 does not validate the class name submitted by the request when instantiating an object in the prompt_dismiss_notice action and also lacks CSRF check in the related action. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform Object Injection attacks. The attack could also be done via a CSRF vector against any authenticated user\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2022-4265",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:34:54.190",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 5.9}]}",
      "published": "2023-03-06T14:15:09.537",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd\", \"source\": \"contact@wpscan.com\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-4265\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"published\":\"2023-03-06T14:15:09.537\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T05:20:26.180\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The Replyable WordPress plugin before 2.2.10 does not validate the class name submitted by the request when instantiating an object in the prompt_dismiss_notice action and also lacks CSRF check in the related action. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform Object Injection attacks. The attack could also be done via a CSRF vector against any authenticated user\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Unknown\",\"product\":\"Replyable\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://wordpress.org/plugins\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"2.2.10\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2025-03-06T15:12:19.269840Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2022-4265\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"poc\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gopostmatic:replyable:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.2.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"650D2EF0-CF64-4585-B5B7-42A79D4711EE\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd\",\"source\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2025-05-29T01:39:55+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2022-4265",
      "id": "CVE-2022-4265",
      "initial_release_date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Replyable \u003c 2.2.10 - Subscriber+ PHP Object Injection",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2022/cve-2022-4265.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\", \"vdb-entry\", \"technical-description\", \"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T01:34:49.903Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-4265\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-03-06T15:12:19.269840Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-352\", \"description\": \"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-06T15:12:47.519Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Replyable \u003c 2.2.10 - Subscriber+ PHP Object Injection\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Lana Codes\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"coordinator\", \"value\": \"WPScan\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Unknown\", \"product\": \"Replyable\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"2.2.10\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"collectionURL\": \"https://wordpress.org/plugins\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/095cba08-7edd-41fb-9776-da151c0885dd\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\", \"vdb-entry\", \"technical-description\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"WPScan CVE Generator\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The Replyable WordPress plugin before 2.2.10 does not validate the class name submitted by the request when instantiating an object in the prompt_dismiss_notice action and also lacks CSRF check in the related action. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform Object Injection attacks. The attack could also be done via a CSRF vector against any authenticated user\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"description\": \"CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"description\": \"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81\", \"shortName\": \"WPScan\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2023-03-06T13:33:59.581Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-4265\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-06T15:13:09.630Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-12-02T09:10:21.912Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81\", \"datePublished\": \"2023-03-06T13:33:59.581Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"WPScan\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.