CVE-2016-7420
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2016-09-16 00:00
Modified
2024-08-06 01:57
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Crypto++ (aka cryptopp) through 5.6.4 does not document the requirement for a compile-time NDEBUG definition disabling the many assert calls that are unintended in production use, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging access to process memory after an assertion failure, as demonstrated by reading a core dump.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:57:47.536Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/553049ba297d89d9e8fbf2204acb40a8a53f5cd6"
},
{
"name": "92988",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92988"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20160915 Re: Does a documentation bug elevate to CVE status? - Crypto++",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/16/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/277"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20160915 Re: Does a documentation bug elevate to CVE status? - Crypto++",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/15/12"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20230928 Re: CVE-2023-4863: libwebp: Heap buffer overflow in WebP Codec",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20230928 Re: CVE-2023-4863: libwebp: Heap buffer overflow in WebP Codec",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2016-09-15T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Crypto++ (aka cryptopp) through 5.6.4 does not document the requirement for a compile-time NDEBUG definition disabling the many assert calls that are unintended in production use, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging access to process memory after an assertion failure, as demonstrated by reading a core dump."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-09-28T17:06:25.705453",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/553049ba297d89d9e8fbf2204acb40a8a53f5cd6"
},
{
"name": "92988",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92988"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20160915 Re: Does a documentation bug elevate to CVE status? - Crypto++",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/16/1"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/277"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20160915 Re: Does a documentation bug elevate to CVE status? - Crypto++",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/15/12"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20230928 Re: CVE-2023-4863: libwebp: Heap buffer overflow in WebP Codec",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20230928 Re: CVE-2023-4863: libwebp: Heap buffer overflow in WebP Codec",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-7420",
"datePublished": "2016-09-16T00:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2016-09-09T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:57:47.536Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-7420\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2016-09-16T05:59:15.427\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:57:58.327\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Crypto++ (aka cryptopp) through 5.6.4 does not document the requirement for a compile-time NDEBUG definition disabling the many assert calls that are unintended in production use, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging access to process memory after an assertion failure, as demonstrated by reading a core dump.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Crypto++ (tambi\u00e9n conocido como cryptopp) hasta la versi\u00f3n 5.6.4 no documenta el requisito para una definici\u00f3n NDEBUG de tiempo de compilaci\u00f3n deshabilitando las m\u00faltiples llamadas assert que son no intencionadas en uso de producci\u00f3n, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes dependientes del contexto obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible aprovechando acceso a la memoria de procesamiento despu\u00e9s de un fallo de aserci\u00f3n, seg\u00fan lo demostrado mediante la lectura de un volcado de memoria.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cryptopp:crypto\\\\+\\\\+:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"5.6.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CCF65951-D574-4603-BA6E-EE43D70B6C1F\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/15/12\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/16/1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92988\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/553049ba297d89d9e8fbf2204acb40a8a53f5cd6\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/277\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/15/12\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/16/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92988\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/553049ba297d89d9e8fbf2204acb40a8a53f5cd6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/277\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.