CVE-2016-7074 (GCVE-0-2016-7074)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-09-11 13:00
Modified
2024-08-06 01:50
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Xchange | pdns |
Version: 3.4.11 Version: 4.0.2 Version: 4.0.4 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:50:47.469Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3764",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "pdns",
"vendor": "Open-Xchange",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.4"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2016-12-15T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-09-12T09:57:01",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3764",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2016-7074",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "pdns",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "3.4.11"
},
{
"version_value": "4.0.2"
},
{
"version_value": "4.0.4"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Open-Xchange"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": [
[
{
"vectorString": "5.3/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
]
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3764",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764"
},
{
"name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-7074",
"datePublished": "2018-09-11T13:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2016-08-23T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:50:47.469Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-7074\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2018-09-11T13:29:01.167\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:57:24.437\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue has been found in PowerDNS before 3.4.11 and 4.0.2, and PowerDNS recursor before 4.0.4, allowing an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of an AXFR because of insufficient validation of TSIG signatures. A missing check that the TSIG record is the last one, leading to the possibility of parsing records that are not covered by the TSIG signature.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha descubierto un problema en PowerDNS en versiones anteriores a la 3.4.11 y 4.0.2, y PowerDNS recursor en versiones anteriores a la 4.0.4, lo que permite que un atacante en posici\u00f3n Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) altere el contenido de un AXFR debido a una validaci\u00f3n insuficiente de firmas TSIG. Falta una comprobaci\u00f3n de que el registro TSIG es el \u00faltimo, lo que conduce a la posibilidad de que se analicen registros que no est\u00e1n cubiertos por la firma TSIG.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:authoritative:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.4.11\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"45749DBA-3089-4FD6-8999-9A6F0C3B4904\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:authoritative:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.0.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1DDAEFF5-B01E-4765-98F8-F00F80806118\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:recursor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.0.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0DBCA6C5-AC57-401A-8B44-A9AAEFB92B60\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7074\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://doc.powerdns.com/md/security/powerdns-advisory-2016-04/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3764\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…