CVE-2016-0891 (GCVE-0-2016-0891)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2016-04-20 17:00
Modified
2024-08-05 22:38
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T22:38:39.956Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "39738",
"tags": [
"exploit",
"x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89"
},
{
"name": "20160419 ESA-2016-039: EMC ViPR SRM Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2016-04-19T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-09T18:57:01",
"orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"shortName": "dell"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "39738",
"tags": [
"exploit",
"x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89"
},
{
"name": "20160419 ESA-2016-039: EMC ViPR SRM Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security_alert@emc.com",
"ID": "CVE-2016-0891",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "39738",
"refsource": "EXPLOIT-DB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/"
},
{
"name": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"name": "20160427 EMC M\u0026R (Watch4net) lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery protection",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89"
},
{
"name": "20160419 ESA-2016-039: EMC ViPR SRM Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"assignerShortName": "dell",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-0891",
"datePublished": "2016-04-20T17:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2015-12-17T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T22:38:39.956Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-0891\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"published\":\"2016-04-20T17:59:00.150\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-12T10:46:40.837\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"M\u00faltiples vulnerabilidades de CSRF en p\u00e1ginas administrativas en EMC ViPR SRM en versiones anteriores a 3.7 permiten a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticaci\u00f3n de administradores.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:emc:vipr_srm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.6.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5BA1447F-A2BA-41CD-93D7-A22776318347\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…