ghsa-hr3v-9w59-cq9c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:47
Modified
2022-05-14 02:47
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-0891"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-04-20T17:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr3v-9w59-cq9c",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:47:05Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:47:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.