CVE-2013-1752 (GCVE-0-2013-1752)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-06-03 19:04 – Updated: 2019-06-03 19:04Various versions of Python do not properly restrict readline calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long string, related to (1) httplib - fixed in 2.7.4, 2.6.9, and 3.3.3; (2) ftplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (3) imaplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (4) nntplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (5) poplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; and (6) smtplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, not yet fixed in 3.3.x. NOTE: this was REJECTed because it is incompatible with CNT1 "Independently Fixable" in the CVE Counting Decisions
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2019-06-03T19:04:24.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Various versions of Python do not properly restrict readline calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long string, related to (1) httplib - fixed in 2.7.4, 2.6.9, and 3.3.3; (2) ftplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (3) imaplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (4) nntplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (5) poplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; and (6) smtplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, not yet fixed in 3.3.x. NOTE: this was REJECTed because it is incompatible with CNT1 \"Independently Fixable\" in the CVE Counting Decisions"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2013-1752",
"datePublished": "2019-06-03T19:04:24.000Z",
"dateRejected": "2019-06-03T19:04:24.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2019-06-03T19:04:24.000Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: Various versions of Python do not properly restrict readline calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long string, related to (1) httplib - fixed in 2.7.4, 2.6.9, and 3.3.3; (2) ftplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (3) imaplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (4) nntplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (5) poplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; and (6) smtplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, not yet fixed in 3.3.x. NOTE: this was REJECTed because it is incompatible with CNT1 \\\"Independently Fixable\\\" in the CVE Counting Decisions\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2013-1752",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:14:48.750",
"published": "2019-06-03T20:15:09.487",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2013-1752\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2019-06-03T20:15:09.487\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:14:48.750\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: Various versions of Python do not properly restrict readline calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long string, related to (1) httplib - fixed in 2.7.4, 2.6.9, and 3.3.3; (2) ftplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (3) imaplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (4) nntplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (5) poplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; and (6) smtplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, not yet fixed in 3.3.x. NOTE: this was REJECTed because it is incompatible with CNT1 \\\"Independently Fixable\\\" in the CVE Counting Decisions\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T22:03:00+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2013-1752",
"id": "CVE-2013-1752",
"initial_release_date": "2013-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "305",
"product_status:known_affected": "27",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "9",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "python: multiple unbound readline() DoS flaws in python stdlib",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2013/cve-2013-1752.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-16T00:37:52Z",
"cve": "CVE-2013-1752",
"id": "CVE-2013-1752",
"initial_release_date": "2023-02-15T05:40:11Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "455",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "257",
"product_status:recommended": "1109",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2013-1752",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2013-1752.json",
"version": "68"
}
}
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.