CVE-2011-2910 (GCVE-0-2011-2910)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-11-15 16:37 – Updated: 2024-08-06 23:15
VLAI
Summary
The AX.25 daemon (ax25d) in ax25-tools before 0.0.8-13 does not check the return value of a setuid call. The setuid call is responsible for dropping privileges but if the call fails the daemon would continue to run with root privileges which can allow possible privilege escalation.
CWE
  • possible privilege escalation due to failure to check for s*id return values
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ax25-tools ax25-tools Affected: before 0.0.8-13
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T23:15:31.523Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2910"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2910"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-2910"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "ax25-tools",
          "vendor": "ax25-tools",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "before 0.0.8-13"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The AX.25 daemon (ax25d) in ax25-tools before 0.0.8-13 does not check the return value of a setuid call. The setuid call is responsible for dropping privileges but if the call fails the daemon would continue to run with root privileges which can allow possible privilege escalation."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "possible privilege escalation due to failure to check for s*id return values",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2019-11-15T16:37:29.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2910"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2910"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-2910"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2011-2910",
    "datePublished": "2019-11-15T16:37:29.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2011-07-27T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T23:15:31.523Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2011-2910",
      "date": "2026-07-15",
      "epss": "0.00375",
      "percentile": "0.29657"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:linux-ax25:ax25-tools:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"0.0.8-13\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"CB5D2FC4-86E3-4AF6-9E3E-5FF459D59358\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"07B237A9-69A3-4A9C-9DA0-4E06BD37AE73\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The AX.25 daemon (ax25d) in ax25-tools before 0.0.8-13 does not check the return value of a setuid call. The setuid call is responsible for dropping privileges but if the call fails the daemon would continue to run with root privileges which can allow possible privilege escalation.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"El demonio AX.25 (ax25d) en ax25-tools versiones anteriores a la versi\\u00f3n  0.0.8-13 no comprueba el valor de retorno de una llamada setuid. La llamada setuid es responsable de eliminar los privilegios, pero si la llamada no funciona, el demonio continuar\\u00e1 ejecut\\u00e1ndose con privilegios de root que pueden permitir una posible escalada de privilegios.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2011-2910",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:29:15.430",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 6.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 0.8, \"impactScore\": 5.9}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\", \"baseScore\": 7.2, \"accessVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 10.0, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2019-11-15T17:15:12.617",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-2910\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2910\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2910\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-2910\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2910\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2910\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-269\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2011-2910\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2019-11-15T17:15:12.617\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:29:15.430\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The AX.25 daemon (ax25d) in ax25-tools before 0.0.8-13 does not check the return value of a setuid call. The setuid call is responsible for dropping privileges but if the call fails the daemon would continue to run with root privileges which can allow possible privilege escalation.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El demonio AX.25 (ax25d) en ax25-tools versiones anteriores a la versi\u00f3n  0.0.8-13 no comprueba el valor de retorno de una llamada setuid. La llamada setuid es responsable de eliminar los privilegios, pero si la llamada no funciona, el demonio continuar\u00e1 ejecut\u00e1ndose con privilegios de root que pueden permitir una posible escalada de privilegios.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":6.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.2,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-269\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:linux-ax25:ax25-tools:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.0.8-13\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CB5D2FC4-86E3-4AF6-9E3E-5FF459D59358\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07B237A9-69A3-4A9C-9DA0-4E06BD37AE73\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-2910\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2910\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2910\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-2910\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2910\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2910\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2025-11-21T17:20:36+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2011-2910",
      "id": "CVE-2011-2910",
      "initial_release_date": "2011-08-09T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "ax25-tools: possible privilege escalation due to failure to check for s*id return values",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2011/cve-2011-2910.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…