Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
CVE-2026-48096 (GCVE-0-2026-48096)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-10 15:09 – Updated: 2026-06-10 19:41
VLAI
Title
OpenFGA: Cache-key delimiter injection in openfga/openfga shared-iterator and v2 iterator caches enables intra-store authorization-decision poisoning
Summary
OpenFGA is an authorization/permission engine built for developers. Prior to version 1.16.0, when iterator caching is enabled, two distinct check requests can produce the same cache key, leading to OpenFGA reusing an earlier cached result for a subsequent request. This issue has been patched in version 1.16.0.
Severity
5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/openfga/openfga/releases/tag/v1.16.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48096",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-10T19:41:02.775660Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T19:41:18.553Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openfga",
"vendor": "openfga",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.16.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenFGA is an authorization/permission engine built for developers. Prior to version 1.16.0, when iterator caching is enabled, two distinct check requests can produce the same cache key, leading to OpenFGA reusing an earlier cached result for a subsequent request. This issue has been patched in version 1.16.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-668",
"description": "CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T15:09:59.042Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-8396-jffm-qx4w",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-8396-jffm-qx4w"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/releases/tag/v1.16.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/releases/tag/v1.16.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8396-jffm-qx4w",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenFGA: Cache-key delimiter injection in openfga/openfga shared-iterator and v2 iterator caches enables intra-store authorization-decision poisoning"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-48096",
"datePublished": "2026-06-10T15:09:59.042Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-20T18:40:45.834Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T19:41:18.553Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-48781 (GCVE-0-2026-48781)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-06-18 14:26
VLAI
Title
Postiz has cross-tenant SUPERADMIN takeover via Skool-provider JWT forgery
Summary
Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. In versions prior to 2.21.8, the Skool integration callback signed an attacker-controlled JSON blob into a session-shape JWT using the application's JWT_SECRET, and the auth middleware trusted every claim in that JWT without re-resolving the user from the database. Any authenticated Postiz user could forge a SUPERADMIN session and impersonate arbitrary organizations. This allowed Full Access to the following: all parts of Postiz, including users registered to the specific instance and the ability to post in the name of the victim's social media channels added to that Postiz instance. This issue has been fixed in version 2.21.8.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/23… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://gadvisory.org/advisories/PSA-2026-2CAQ96 | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gitroomhq | postiz-app |
Affected:
< 2.21.8
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48781",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-18T14:25:47.270443Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-18T14:26:17.633Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "postiz-app",
"vendor": "gitroomhq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.21.8"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. In versions prior to 2.21.8, the Skool integration callback signed an attacker-controlled JSON blob into a session-shape JWT using the application\u0027s JWT_SECRET, and the auth middleware trusted every claim in that JWT without re-resolving the user from the database. Any authenticated Postiz user could forge a SUPERADMIN session and impersonate arbitrary organizations. This allowed Full Access to the following: all parts of Postiz, including users registered to the specific instance and the ability to post in the name of the victim\u0027s social media channels added to that Postiz instance. This issue has been fixed in version 2.21.8."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-302",
"description": "CWE-302: Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T21:31:28.955Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-j77w-h625-56q2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-j77w-h625-56q2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/23696d2973510ae1f3f48bfa41a6bfbbf9827b05",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/23696d2973510ae1f3f48bfa41a6bfbbf9827b05"
},
{
"name": "https://gadvisory.org/advisories/PSA-2026-2CAQ96",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://gadvisory.org/advisories/PSA-2026-2CAQ96"
},
{
"name": "http://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/releases/tag/v2.21.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/releases/tag/v2.21.8"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-j77w-h625-56q2",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Postiz has cross-tenant SUPERADMIN takeover via Skool-provider JWT forgery"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-48781",
"datePublished": "2026-06-16T21:31:28.955Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-22T20:18:20.365Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-18T14:26:17.633Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-48783 (GCVE-0-2026-48783)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-16 21:38 – Updated: 2026-06-17 12:43
VLAI
Title
Postiz has an unauthenticated billing-enforcement bypass via /public/modify-subscription
Summary
Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Versions prior to 2.21.8 contained an unauthenticated endpoint that accepted a signed token and applied subscription-enforcement side effects to the organization referenced in that token's claims, without verifying the token's intended purpose. The endpoint, /public/modify-subscription, could not change the persisted subscription tier, but it did execute enforcement-related side effects on the caller's own organization, including adjusting team-member enablement state, disabling integrations exceeding the asserted plan's limits, and resetting the scheduled-post cron when the asserted plan was the free tier. Impact is limited to the attacker's own organization and cannot be redirected at other tenants through this endpoint. This issue has been fixed in version 2.21.8.
Severity
4.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/23… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://gadvisory.org/advisories/PSA-2026-WWFR8X | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/releases/… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gitroomhq | postiz-app |
Affected:
< 2.21.8
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48783",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-17T12:43:27.137971Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T12:43:39.751Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "postiz-app",
"vendor": "gitroomhq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.21.8"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Versions prior to 2.21.8 contained an unauthenticated endpoint that accepted a signed token and applied subscription-enforcement side effects to the organization referenced in that token\u0027s claims, without verifying the token\u0027s intended purpose. The endpoint, /public/modify-subscription, could not change the persisted subscription tier, but it did execute enforcement-related side effects on the caller\u0027s own organization, including adjusting team-member enablement state, disabling integrations exceeding the asserted plan\u0027s limits, and resetting the scheduled-post cron when the asserted plan was the free tier. Impact is limited to the attacker\u0027s own organization and cannot be redirected at other tenants through this endpoint. This issue has been fixed in version 2.21.8."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-749",
"description": "CWE-749: Exposed Dangerous Method or Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T21:38:00.674Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-v4wr-4j8g-4hfj",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-v4wr-4j8g-4hfj"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/23696d2973510ae1f3f48bfa41a6bfbbf9827b05",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/23696d2973510ae1f3f48bfa41a6bfbbf9827b05"
},
{
"name": "https://gadvisory.org/advisories/PSA-2026-WWFR8X",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://gadvisory.org/advisories/PSA-2026-WWFR8X"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/releases/tag/v2.21.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/releases/tag/v2.21.8"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v4wr-4j8g-4hfj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Postiz has an unauthenticated billing-enforcement bypass via /public/modify-subscription"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-48783",
"datePublished": "2026-06-16T21:38:00.674Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-22T20:18:20.365Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T12:43:39.751Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-50214 (GCVE-0-2026-50214)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-04 09:20 – Updated: 2026-06-04 13:07
VLAI
Title
Shared Secret Quota Inflation
Summary
The /v1/Plan service relies entirely on a shared global API token for full administrative management, allowing arbitrary creation of zero-cost network access plans.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acer | Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router |
Affected:
* , ≤ M6E_AI_1.00.000019
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50214",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T13:06:55.020712Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T13:07:09.202Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router",
"vendor": "Acer",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "M6E_AI_1.00.000019",
"status": "affected",
"version": "*",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ta-Lun Yen"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The\u0026nbsp;\u003ccode\u003e/v1/Plan\u003c/code\u003e\u0026nbsp;service relies entirely on a shared global API token for full administrative management, allowing arbitrary creation of zero-cost network access plans."
}
],
"value": "The\u00a0/v1/Plan\u00a0service relies entirely on a shared global API token for full administrative management, allowing arbitrary creation of zero-cost network access plans."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-233",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-233: Privilege Escalation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T09:20:37.959Z",
"orgId": "8fc372e3-d9c5-46e4-9410-38469745c639",
"shortName": "Acer"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://community.acer.com/en/kb/articles/19707"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Shared Secret Quota Inflation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8fc372e3-d9c5-46e4-9410-38469745c639",
"assignerShortName": "Acer",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50214",
"datePublished": "2026-06-04T09:20:37.959Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-04T01:29:10.112Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T13:07:09.202Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-50573 (GCVE-0-2026-50573)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-25 16:50 – Updated: 2026-06-26 03:56
VLAI
Title
pnpm: Unsafe default behavior breaks integrity check
Summary
pnpm is a package manager. Prior to 10.34.0 and 11.4.0, `pnpm install` in non-frozen mode can accept new remote package content after detecting that the downloaded tarball does not match the integrity recorded in pnpm-lock.yaml. When a package is already locked with an integrity value, and the registry later serves different metadata and tarball content for the same package name and version, pnpm initially reports an integrity mismatch. However, plain pnpm install then performs a resolution repair, accepts the registry's new integrity, updates the lockfile, installs the new content, and exits successfully. This means the lockfile integrity check does not act as a hard stop by default. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.34.0 and 11.4.0.
Severity
6.8 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/security/advisories/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50573",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-25T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T03:56:17.356Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/security/advisories/GHSA-54hh-g5mx-jqcp"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "pnpm",
"vendor": "pnpm",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 10.33.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 11.0.0, \u003c 11.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "pnpm is a package manager. Prior to 10.34.0 and 11.4.0, `pnpm install` in non-frozen mode can accept new remote package content after detecting that the downloaded tarball does not match the integrity recorded in pnpm-lock.yaml. When a package is already locked with an integrity value, and the registry later serves different metadata and tarball content for the same package name and version, pnpm initially reports an integrity mismatch. However, plain pnpm install then performs a resolution repair, accepts the registry\u0027s new integrity, updates the lockfile, installs the new content, and exits successfully. This means the lockfile integrity check does not act as a hard stop by default. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.34.0 and 11.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T16:50:21.093Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/security/advisories/GHSA-54hh-g5mx-jqcp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/security/advisories/GHSA-54hh-g5mx-jqcp"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-54hh-g5mx-jqcp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "pnpm: Unsafe default behavior breaks integrity check"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50573",
"datePublished": "2026-06-25T16:50:21.093Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-04T21:34:34.427Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T03:56:17.356Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-52812 (GCVE-0-2026-52812)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-24 20:32 – Updated: 2026-06-25 23:03
VLAI
Title
Gogs: LFS dedupe path leaks private repo content across tenants
Summary
Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, Git LFS storage is content-addressed by OID alone (<LFS-root>/<oid[0]>/<oid[1]>/<oid>) but per-repo authorization lives in the lfs_object table keyed (repo_id, oid). serveUpload skips re-uploading when the OID file already exists on disk and inserts a new (repo_id, oid) row pointing at it without verifying the request body hashes to the OID being claimed. Any user with write access to one repo can bind their repo to an OID owned by a private repo and download the original bytes via their own download endpoint. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.14.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8333 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/f35a767af74e0… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-52812",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-25T23:03:11.981996Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T23:03:37.203Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-6p9m-q3jp-47h4"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "gogs",
"vendor": "gogs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.14.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, Git LFS storage is content-addressed by OID alone (\u003cLFS-root\u003e/\u003coid[0]\u003e/\u003coid[1]\u003e/\u003coid\u003e) but per-repo authorization lives in the lfs_object table keyed (repo_id, oid). serveUpload skips re-uploading when the OID file already exists on disk and inserts a new (repo_id, oid) row pointing at it without verifying the request body hashes to the OID being claimed. Any user with write access to one repo can bind their repo to an OID owned by a private repo and download the original bytes via their own download endpoint. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.14.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T20:32:51.608Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-6p9m-q3jp-47h4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-6p9m-q3jp-47h4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8333",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8333"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/f35a767af74e05342bafc6fdda02c791816426f8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/f35a767af74e05342bafc6fdda02c791816426f8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-6p9m-q3jp-47h4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Gogs: LFS dedupe path leaks private repo content across tenants"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-52812",
"datePublished": "2026-06-24T20:32:51.608Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-08T18:11:06.660Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T23:03:37.203Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-53406 (GCVE-0-2026-53406)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-12 17:52 – Updated: 2026-06-12 18:01
VLAI
Summary
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Remote Control for Zoom Contact Center for Windows before version 7.0.0 may allow an authenticated user to enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
Severity
7.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom Communications | Remote Control for Zoom Contact Center |
Affected:
0 , < 7.0.0
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-06-10 12:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-53406",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-12T18:01:32.472839Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T18:01:48.839Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "Remote Control for Zoom Contact Center",
"vendor": "Zoom Communications",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-10T12:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eInsufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Remote Control for Zoom Contact Center for Windows before version 7.0.0 may allow an authenticated user to enable an escalation of privilege via local access.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Remote Control for Zoom Contact Center for Windows before version 7.0.0 may allow an authenticated user to enable an escalation of privilege via local access."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T17:52:45.190Z",
"orgId": "99b9af0d-a833-4a5d-9e2f-8b1324f35351",
"shortName": "Zoom"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-26009"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "99b9af0d-a833-4a5d-9e2f-8b1324f35351",
"assignerShortName": "Zoom",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-53406",
"datePublished": "2026-06-12T17:52:45.190Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-09T10:12:34.854Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T18:01:48.839Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-53862 (GCVE-0-2026-53862)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-16 18:05 – Updated: 2026-06-16 18:36 X_Open Source
VLAI
Title
OpenClaw < 2026.5.12 - Bootstrap Token Replay via Pending Pairing Scope Widening
Summary
OpenClaw before 2026.5.12 contains a bootstrap token replay vulnerability allowing callers with pending token access to reuse tokens with broader requested scopes. Attackers can replay bootstrap tokens before approval to escalate pairing authority beyond intended scope limits.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/adv… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-boo… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-05-28 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-53862",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T18:31:01.331574Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T18:36:00.802Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/openclaw",
"product": "OpenClaw",
"repo": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw",
"vendor": "OpenClaw",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2026.5.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "2026.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2026.5.12",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Edward-x (@YLChen-007)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenClaw before 2026.5.12 contains a bootstrap token replay vulnerability allowing callers with pending token access to reuse tokens with broader requested scopes. Attackers can replay bootstrap tokens before approval to escalate pairing authority beyond intended scope limits."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.3,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-266",
"description": "Incorrect Privilege Assignment",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T18:05:08.595Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-9v8j-9c9g-w66c)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-9v8j-9c9g-w66c"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw \u003c 2026.5.12 - Bootstrap Token Replay via Pending Pairing Scope Widening",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-bootstrap-token-replay-via-pending-pairing-scope-widening"
}
],
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"title": "OpenClaw \u003c 2026.5.12 - Bootstrap Token Replay via Pending Pairing Scope Widening",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-53862",
"datePublished": "2026-06-16T18:05:08.595Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-10T21:22:34.480Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T18:36:00.802Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-54266 (GCVE-0-2026-54266)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-22 15:28 – Updated: 2026-06-22 17:56
VLAI
Title
Angular: Weak 32-Bit Cache Key Hashing in `HttpTransferCache` Leading to Cross-Request Data Leakage and State Poisoning
Summary
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 22.0.1, 21.2.17, and 20.3.25, Angular's HttpTransferCache caches HTTP requests made during Server-Side Rendering (SSR) so that they can be reused during client-side hydration. This avoids repeating the same HTTP requests on the client. The cached responses are stored in TransferState using a cache key generated by hashing request properties (method, response type, mapped URL, serialized body, and sorted query parameters). The cache keys are generated using a weak 32-bit DJB2-like polynomial rolling hash. The 32-bit hash space is extremely small, allowing attackers to find hash collisions. An attacker can easily find a query parameter string (e.g., q=aaCAZMMM for a search request) that produces the exact same 32-bit hash as a sensitive endpoint (e.g., /api/user/profile). When a victim visits a crafted link containing the colliding parameter, the SSR process executes both the search request and the profile request. Due to the hash collision, the search response overwrites the profile response in the TransferState cache. This vulnerability is fixed in 22.0.1, 21.2.17, and 20.3.25.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/69153 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/5f36274… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-54266",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-22T17:55:58.476641Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T17:56:12.976Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "angular",
"vendor": "angular",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 22.0.0-next.0 \u003c 22.0.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 21.0.0-next.0 \u003c 21.2.17"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 20.0.0-next.0 \u003c 20.3.25"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 19.2.25"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 22.0.1, 21.2.17, and 20.3.25, Angular\u0027s HttpTransferCache caches HTTP requests made during Server-Side Rendering (SSR) so that they can be reused during client-side hydration. This avoids repeating the same HTTP requests on the client. The cached responses are stored in TransferState using a cache key generated by hashing request properties (method, response type, mapped URL, serialized body, and sorted query parameters). The cache keys are generated using a weak 32-bit DJB2-like polynomial rolling hash. The 32-bit hash space is extremely small, allowing attackers to find hash collisions. An attacker can easily find a query parameter string (e.g., q=aaCAZMMM for a search request) that produces the exact same 32-bit hash as a sensitive endpoint (e.g., /api/user/profile). When a victim visits a crafted link containing the colliding parameter, the SSR process executes both the search request and the profile request. Due to the hash collision, the search response overwrites the profile response in the TransferState cache. This vulnerability is fixed in 22.0.1, 21.2.17, and 20.3.25."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-328",
"description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T15:28:42.561Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-39pv-4j6c-2g6v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-39pv-4j6c-2g6v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/69153",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/69153"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/5f36274da3f961430ae72865159afa02a1dd9133",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/5f36274da3f961430ae72865159afa02a1dd9133"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-39pv-4j6c-2g6v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Angular: Weak 32-Bit Cache Key Hashing in `HttpTransferCache` Leading to Cross-Request Data Leakage and State Poisoning"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-54266",
"datePublished": "2026-06-22T15:28:42.561Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-12T17:13:32.279Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T17:56:12.976Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-54288 (GCVE-0-2026-54288)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-22 17:18 – Updated: 2026-06-23 16:11
VLAI
Title
Hono: Body Limit Middleware can be bypassed on AWS Lambda by understating `Content-Length`
Summary
Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.25, the Body Limit Middleware trusts the request's Content-Length header to decide whether a body is within the limit. On AWS Lambda (API Gateway v1/v2, ALB, VPC Lattice, and Lambda@Edge) the body is delivered fully buffered and the adapter builds the request with the client-declared Content-Length, which need not match the actual payload. A client can declare a tiny Content-Length while sending a much larger body, slipping past the limit. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.25.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-54288",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-23T14:16:43.807363Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T16:11:23.131Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.25"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.25, the Body Limit Middleware trusts the request\u0027s Content-Length header to decide whether a body is within the limit. On AWS Lambda (API Gateway v1/v2, ALB, VPC Lattice, and Lambda@Edge) the body is delivered fully buffered and the adapter builds the request with the client-declared Content-Length, which need not match the actual payload. A client can declare a tiny Content-Length while sending a much larger body, slipping past the limit. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.25."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T17:18:24.532Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-rv63-4mwf-qqc2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-rv63-4mwf-qqc2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rv63-4mwf-qqc2",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: Body Limit Middleware can be bypassed on AWS Lambda by understating `Content-Length`"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-54288",
"datePublished": "2026-06-22T17:18:24.532Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-12T17:46:37.293Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T16:11:23.131Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-148: Content Spoofing
An adversary modifies content to make it contain something other than what the original content producer intended while keeping the apparent source of the content unchanged. The term content spoofing is most often used to describe modification of web pages hosted by a target to display the adversary's content instead of the owner's content. However, any content can be spoofed, including the content of email messages, file transfers, or the content of other network communication protocols. Content can be modified at the source (e.g. modifying the source file for a web page) or in transit (e.g. intercepting and modifying a message between the sender and recipient). Usually, the adversary will attempt to hide the fact that the content has been modified, but in some cases, such as with web site defacement, this is not necessary. Content Spoofing can lead to malware exposure, financial fraud (if the content governs financial transactions), privacy violations, and other unwanted outcomes.
CAPEC-218: Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML Messages
An attacker spoofs a UDDI, ebXML, or similar message in order to impersonate a service provider in an e-business transaction. UDDI, ebXML, and similar standards are used to identify businesses in e-business transactions. Among other things, they identify a particular participant, WSDL information for SOAP transactions, and supported communication protocols, including security protocols. By spoofing one of these messages an attacker could impersonate a legitimate business in a transaction or could manipulate the protocols used between a client and business. This could result in disclosure of sensitive information, loss of message integrity, or even financial fraud.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.
CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)
An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.