CWE-88
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string.
628 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-Q9JX-PP2V-V8XH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:17 – Updated: 2025-10-22 00:31rcube_image.php in Roundcube Webmail before 1.4.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in a configuration setting for im_convert_path or im_identify_path.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-12641"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-05-04T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "rcube_image.php in Roundcube Webmail before 1.4.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in a configuration setting for im_convert_path or im_identify_path.",
"id": "GHSA-q9jx-pp2v-v8xh",
"modified": "2025-10-22T00:31:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:17:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12641"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/fcfb099477f353373c34c8a65c9035b06b364db3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/DrunkenShells/Disclosures/tree/master/CVE-2020-12641-Command%20Injection-Roundcube"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/compare/1.4.3...1.4.4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.4.4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://roundcube.net/news/2020/04/29/security-updates-1.4.4-1.3.11-and-1.2.10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-41"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-12641"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00083.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QC6X-G3H2-596Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:55 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:55Argument injection vulnerability in Avant Browser 10.1 Build 17 allows user-assisted remote attackers to modify command line arguments to an invoked mail client via " (double quote) characters in a mailto: scheme handler, as demonstrated by launching Microsoft Outlook with an arbitrary filename as an attachment. NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue is implementation-specific or a problem in the Microsoft API.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-2058"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-04-26T20:06:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Argument injection vulnerability in Avant Browser 10.1 Build 17 allows user-assisted remote attackers to modify command line arguments to an invoked mail client via \" (double quote) characters in a mailto: scheme handler, as demonstrated by launching Microsoft Outlook with an arbitrary filename as an attachment. NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue is implementation-specific or a problem in the Microsoft API.",
"id": "GHSA-qc6x-g3h2-596q",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:55:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:55:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26118"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ingehenriksen.blogspot.com/2006/04/office-2003-file-attachment-exploit.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/785"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/432009/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1538"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-QFFW-8WG7-H665
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-23 00:03 – Updated: 2022-04-29 17:22A command injection vulnerability exists in git-interface in the GitHub repository yarkeev/git-interface prior to 2.1.2. If both the git remote and destination directory are provided by user input, then the use of an --upload-pack command-line argument feature of git is also supported for git clone, which would then allow for any operating system command to be spawned by the attacker.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "git-interface"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1440"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-04-26T13:06:52Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-22T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A command injection vulnerability exists in git-interface in the GitHub repository yarkeev/git-interface prior to 2.1.2. If both the git remote and destination directory are provided by user input, then the use of an `--upload-pack` command-line argument feature of git is also supported for `git clone`, which would then allow for any operating system command to be spawned by the attacker.",
"id": "GHSA-qffw-8wg7-h665",
"modified": "2022-04-29T17:22:43Z",
"published": "2022-04-23T00:03:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1440"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yarkeev/git-interface/commit/f828aa790016fee3aa667f7b44cf94bf0aa8c60d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/yarkeev/git-interface"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/cdc25408-d3c1-4a9d-bb45-33b12a715ca1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Command injection in git-interface"
}
GHSA-QGFH-PXFJ-79W2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-06 09:31 – Updated: 2025-02-06 09:31Improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('Argument Injection') issue exists in Defense Platform Home Edition Ver.3.9.51.x and earlier. If an attacker provides specially crafted data to the specific process of the Windows system where the product is running, the system may cause a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD), and as a result, cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-24845"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-06T08:15:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command (\u0027Argument Injection\u0027) issue exists in Defense Platform Home Edition Ver.3.9.51.x and earlier. If an attacker provides specially crafted data to the specific process of the Windows system where the product is running, the system may cause a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD), and as a result, cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.",
"id": "GHSA-qgfh-pxfj-79w2",
"modified": "2025-02-06T09:31:47Z",
"published": "2025-02-06T09:31:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24845"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN66673020"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.hummingheads.co.jp/dep/storelist"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QHG9-FCXX-72FV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:49 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:13In MobaXterm 11.1, the mobaxterm: URI handler has an argument injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands when the user visits a specially crafted URL. Based on the available command-line arguments of the software, one can simply inject -exec to execute arbitrary commands. The additional arguments -hideterm and -exitwhendone in the payload make the attack less visible.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-13475"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-09T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In MobaXterm 11.1, the mobaxterm: URI handler has an argument injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands when the user visits a specially crafted URL. Based on the available command-line arguments of the software, one can simply inject -exec to execute arbitrary commands. The additional arguments -hideterm and -exitwhendone in the payload make the attack less visible.",
"id": "GHSA-qhg9-fcxx-72fv",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:13:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:49:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13475"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2186"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QHW8-CJ7P-3GXH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:19 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:19There was an argument injection vulnerability in Sourcetree for Windows via filenames in Mercurial repositories. An attacker with permission to commit to a Mercurial repository linked in Sourcetree for Windows is able to exploit this issue to gain code execution on the system. Versions of Sourcetree for Windows before version 2.6.9 are affected by this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13386"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-24T13:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There was an argument injection vulnerability in Sourcetree for Windows via filenames in Mercurial repositories. An attacker with permission to commit to a Mercurial repository linked in Sourcetree for Windows is able to exploit this issue to gain code execution on the system. Versions of Sourcetree for Windows before version 2.6.9 are affected by this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-qhw8-cj7p-3gxh",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:19:06Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:19:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13386"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/SRCTREEWIN-8884"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QM57-VHQ3-3FWF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-06-09 17:14 – Updated: 2024-09-20 15:28In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.22"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.2"
},
{
"fixed": "3.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-32052"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79",
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-19T18:12:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-06T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers.",
"id": "GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf",
"modified": "2024-09-20T15:28:25Z",
"published": "2021-06-09T17:14:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32052"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/e1e81aa1c4427411e3c68facdd761229ffea6f6f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944801"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/releases/security"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/django/django"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django/PYSEC-2021-8.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/django-announce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZVKYPHR3TKR2ESWXBPOJEKRO2OSJRZUE"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210611-0002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/may/06/security-releases"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/06/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Header injection possible in Django"
}
GHSA-QMCQ-XW74-W667
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-17 17:46 – Updated: 2026-08-17 17:46Summary
The uniget CLI has a command injection vulnerability in hooks.go line 199 where strings.Split(editor, " ") naively parses the EDITOR environment variable without respecting shell syntax. An attacker can set EDITOR="/path/to/wrapper && id && echo" which gets split into separate arguments, allowing the wrapper script to execute arbitrary commands like id. This was successfully exploited to execute uid=1000(w4nn4d13), confirming code execution is possible. The vulnerability affects hook editing and breaks configurations with modern editors like VSCode.
Vulnerable Code:
editorWithArgs := strings.Split(editor, " ")
Location Context:
editor := os.Getenv("UNIGET_EDITOR")
if len(editor) == 0 {
editor = os.Getenv("EDITOR")
}
editorWithArgs := strings.Split(editor, " ") // ← VULNERABLE
command := exec.Command(editorWithArgs[0], editorWithArgs[1:]...)
Issue: Naive space-splitting allows injection. EDITOR="script && id && echo" splits into ["script", "&&", "id", "&&", "echo"] enabling command execution.
Step to Reproduce
Step 1: Create malicious editor wrapper
mkdir -p /tmp/poc-editor
cat > /tmp/poc-editor/editor_wrapper.sh << 'EOF'
#!/bin/bash
echo "[EDITOR] Received args: $@"
id
EOF
chmod +x /tmp/poc-editor/editor_wrapper.sh
Step 2: Create test hook
mkdir -p ~/.config/uniget/hooks/pre-install
cat > ~/.config/uniget/hooks/pre-install/test.sh << 'EOF'
#!/bin/bash
echo "Test hook"
EOF
chmod 700 ~/.config/uniget/hooks/pre-install/test.sh
Step 3: Set injection payload
export EDITOR="/tmp/poc-editor/editor_wrapper.sh && id && echo"
Step 4: Run vulnerable code
cd /home/w4nn4d13/Downloads/cli
go build -o uniget ./cmd/uniget
./uniget hooks edit --type=pre-install test.sh
Step 5: Observe output
[EDITOR] Received args: && id && echo /path/to/hook
uid=1000(w4nn4d13) gid=1000(w4nn4d13) groups=1000(w4nn4d13),65534(nfsnobody)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "gitlab.com/uniget-org/cli"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.27.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-55061"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-17T17:46:05Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe uniget CLI has a command injection vulnerability in [hooks.go](vscode-file://vscode-app/app/extra/vscode/resources/app/out/vs/code/electron-browser/workbench/workbench.html) line 199 where [strings.Split(editor, \" \")](vscode-file://vscode-app/app/extra/vscode/resources/app/out/vs/code/electron-browser/workbench/workbench.html) naively parses the EDITOR environment variable without respecting shell syntax. An attacker can set EDITOR=\"/path/to/wrapper \u0026\u0026 id \u0026\u0026 echo\" which gets split into separate arguments, allowing the wrapper script to execute arbitrary commands like id. This was successfully exploited to execute uid=1000(w4nn4d13), confirming code execution is possible. The vulnerability affects hook editing and breaks configurations with modern editors like VSCode.\n\n**Vulnerable Code:**\n```\neditorWithArgs := strings.Split(editor, \" \")\n```\n\n**Location Context:**\n```\neditor := os.Getenv(\"UNIGET_EDITOR\")\nif len(editor) == 0 {\n editor = os.Getenv(\"EDITOR\")\n}\neditorWithArgs := strings.Split(editor, \" \") // \u2190 VULNERABLE\ncommand := exec.Command(editorWithArgs[0], editorWithArgs[1:]...)\n```\n**Issue:** Naive space-splitting allows injection. EDITOR=\"script \u0026\u0026 id \u0026\u0026 echo\" splits into [\"script\", \"\u0026\u0026\", \"id\", \"\u0026\u0026\", \"echo\"] enabling command execution.\n\n## **Step to Reproduce**\n\n**Step 1: **Create malicious editor wrapper\n```\nmkdir -p /tmp/poc-editor\ncat \u003e /tmp/poc-editor/editor_wrapper.sh \u003c\u003c \u0027EOF\u0027\n#!/bin/bash\necho \"[EDITOR] Received args: $@\"\nid\nEOF\nchmod +x /tmp/poc-editor/editor_wrapper.sh\n```\n\n**Step 2: **Create test hook\n```\nmkdir -p ~/.config/uniget/hooks/pre-install\ncat \u003e ~/.config/uniget/hooks/pre-install/test.sh \u003c\u003c \u0027EOF\u0027\n#!/bin/bash\necho \"Test hook\"\nEOF\nchmod 700 ~/.config/uniget/hooks/pre-install/test.sh\n```\n**Step 3:** Set injection payload\n```\nexport EDITOR=\"/tmp/poc-editor/editor_wrapper.sh \u0026\u0026 id \u0026\u0026 echo\"\n```\n\n**Step 4:** Run vulnerable code\n```\ncd /home/w4nn4d13/Downloads/cli\ngo build -o uniget ./cmd/uniget\n./uniget hooks edit --type=pre-install test.sh\n```\n**Step 5:** Observe output\n```\n[EDITOR] Received args: \u0026\u0026 id \u0026\u0026 echo /path/to/hook\nuid=1000(w4nn4d13) gid=1000(w4nn4d13) groups=1000(w4nn4d13),65534(nfsnobody)\n```\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1017\" height=\"449\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c72ea0c-fa08-46cd-a9cb-098942a488ce\" /\u003e",
"id": "GHSA-qmcq-xw74-w667",
"modified": "2026-08-17T17:46:05Z",
"published": "2026-08-17T17:46:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/uniget-org/cli/security/advisories/GHSA-qmcq-xw74-w667"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/uniget-org/cli/commit/7b4f18a9f00f0955f830c7ccf266ed0de5f9fd91"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/uniget-org/cli"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/uniget-org/cli/releases/tag/v0.27.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "uniget CLI has an EDITOR Command Injection"
}
GHSA-QMHP-32VC-R662
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:29 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:29Argument injection vulnerability in TellMe 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify command line arguments for the Whois program and obtain sensitive information via "--" style options in the q_Host parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-4699"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Argument injection vulnerability in TellMe 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify command line arguments for the Whois program and obtain sensitive information via \"--\" style options in the q_Host parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-qmhp-32vc-r662",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:29:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:29:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4699"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22522"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2005-10/0107.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://exploitlabs.com/files/advisories/EXPL-A-2005-015-tellme.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://kimihia.org.nz/projects/tellme/files/tellme-1.2-1.3.diff"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17078"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/19871"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-QMX8-JJXC-9JWH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:26 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:26There was an argument injection vulnerability in Sourcetree for macOS via filenames in Mercurial repositories. An attacker with permission to commit to a Mercurial repository linked in Sourcetree for macOS is able to exploit this issue to gain code execution on the system. Versions of Sourcetree for macOS from 1.0b2 before 2.7.6 are affected by this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13385"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-24T13:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "There was an argument injection vulnerability in Sourcetree for macOS via filenames in Mercurial repositories. An attacker with permission to commit to a Mercurial repository linked in Sourcetree for macOS is able to exploit this issue to gain code execution on the system. Versions of Sourcetree for macOS from 1.0b2 before 2.7.6 are affected by this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-qmx8-jjxc-9jwh",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:26:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:26:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13385"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/SRCTREE-5846"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Parameterization
Where possible, avoid building a single string that contains the command and its arguments. Some languages or frameworks have functions that support specifying independent arguments, e.g. as an array, which is used to automatically perform the appropriate quoting or escaping while building the command. For example, in PHP, escapeshellarg() can be used to escape a single argument to system(), or exec() can be called with an array of arguments. In C, code can often be refactored from using system() - which accepts a single string - to using exec(), which requires separate function arguments for each parameter.
Mitigation
Strategy: Input Validation
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your product: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, request headers as well as content, URL components, e-mail, files, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Perform input validation at well-defined interfaces.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation
Directly convert your input type into the expected data type, such as using a conversion function that translates a string into a number. After converting to the expected data type, ensure that the input's values fall within the expected range of allowable values and that multi-field consistencies are maintained.
Mitigation
- Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180, CWE-181). Make sure that your application does not inadvertently decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use libraries such as the OWASP ESAPI Canonicalization control.
- Consider performing repeated canonicalization until your input does not change any more. This will avoid double-decoding and similar scenarios, but it might inadvertently modify inputs that are allowed to contain properly-encoded dangerous content.
Mitigation
When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.
Mitigation
When your application combines data from multiple sources, perform the validation after the sources have been combined. The individual data elements may pass the validation step but violate the intended restrictions after they have been combined.
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
CAPEC-137: Parameter Injection
An adversary manipulates the content of request parameters for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some parameter encodings use text characters as separators. For example, parameters in a HTTP GET message are encoded as name-value pairs separated by an ampersand (&). If an attacker can supply text strings that are used to fill in these parameters, then they can inject special characters used in the encoding scheme to add or modify parameters. For example, if user input is fed directly into an HTTP GET request and the user provides the value "myInput&new_param=myValue", then the input parameter is set to myInput, but a new parameter (new_param) is also added with a value of myValue. This can significantly change the meaning of the query that is processed by the server. Any encoding scheme where parameters are identified and separated by text characters is potentially vulnerable to this attack - the HTTP GET encoding used above is just one example.
CAPEC-174: Flash Parameter Injection
An adversary takes advantage of improper data validation to inject malicious global parameters into a Flash file embedded within an HTML document. Flash files can leverage user-submitted data to configure the Flash document and access the embedding HTML document.
CAPEC-41: Using Meta-characters in E-mail Headers to Inject Malicious Payloads
This type of attack involves an attacker leveraging meta-characters in email headers to inject improper behavior into email programs. Email software has become increasingly sophisticated and feature-rich. In addition, email applications are ubiquitous and connected directly to the Web making them ideal targets to launch and propagate attacks. As the user demand for new functionality in email applications grows, they become more like browsers with complex rendering and plug in routines. As more email functionality is included and abstracted from the user, this creates opportunities for attackers. Virtually all email applications do not list email header information by default, however the email header contains valuable attacker vectors for the attacker to exploit particularly if the behavior of the email client application is known. Meta-characters are hidden from the user, but can contain scripts, enumerations, probes, and other attacks against the user's system.
CAPEC-460: HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP)
An adversary adds duplicate HTTP GET/POST parameters by injecting query string delimiters. Via HPP it may be possible to override existing hardcoded HTTP parameters, modify the application behaviors, access and, potentially exploit, uncontrollable variables, and bypass input validation checkpoints and WAF rules.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.