Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-863
Allowed-with-ReviewIncorrect Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
6551 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-VHHX-5XPF-622G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:16 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:16
VLAI
Details
Improper access control in the Helpdesk App of Odoo Enterprise 10.0 through 12.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to obtain elevated privileges via a crafted request.
Severity
8.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-15640"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-09T16:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper access control in the Helpdesk App of Odoo Enterprise 10.0 through 12.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to obtain elevated privileges via a crafted request.",
"id": "GHSA-vhhx-5xpf-622g",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:16:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:16:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-15640"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/32514"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHJV-4VF6-MC9X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-02 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:29
VLAI
Details
Permission prompts for opening external schemes were only shown for ContentPrincipals resulting in extensions being able to open them without user interaction via ExpandedPrincipals. This could lead to further malicious actions such as downloading files or interacting with software already installed on the system. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 110, Thunderbird < 102.8, and Firefox ESR < 102.8.
Severity
8.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25729"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-02T17:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Permission prompts for opening external schemes were only shown for \u003ccode\u003eContentPrincipals\u003c/code\u003e resulting in extensions being able to open them without user interaction via \u003ccode\u003eExpandedPrincipals\u003c/code\u003e. This could lead to further malicious actions such as downloading files or interacting with software already installed on the system. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 110, Thunderbird \u003c 102.8, and Firefox ESR \u003c 102.8.",
"id": "GHSA-vhjv-4vf6-mc9x",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:29:54Z",
"published": "2023-06-02T18:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25729"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792138"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2023-05"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2023-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2023-07"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHPF-RH57-X3V9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-18 00:01 – Updated: 2025-10-22 00:32
VLAI
Details
Veeam Backup & Replication 10.x and 11.x has Incorrect Access Control (issue 1 of 2).
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-26501"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-17T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Veeam Backup \u0026 Replication 10.x and 11.x has Incorrect Access Control (issue 1 of 2).",
"id": "GHSA-vhpf-rh57-x3v9",
"modified": "2025-10-22T00:32:30Z",
"published": "2022-03-18T00:01:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26501"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://veeam.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2022-26501"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.veeam.com/kb4288"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHPW-P338-RHP9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-29 18:31 – Updated: 2026-05-29 18:31
VLAI
Details
OpenClaw before 2026.4.29 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in QQBot admin commands that allows authenticated senders to skip DM-only and allowFrom policy checks. Attackers can route admin commands from unauthorized senders or contexts to execute restricted behavior that policy should have blocked.
Severity
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34507"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-29T16:16:25Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "OpenClaw before 2026.4.29 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in QQBot admin commands that allows authenticated senders to skip DM-only and allowFrom policy checks. Attackers can route admin commands from unauthorized senders or contexts to execute restricted behavior that policy should have blocked.",
"id": "GHSA-vhpw-p338-rhp9",
"modified": "2026-05-29T18:31:33Z",
"published": "2026-05-29T18:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-w4v6-g3wm-w36c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34507"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-policy-bypass-in-qqbot-admin-commands-via-dm-only-and-allowfrom-checks"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHQ7-FWWH-7HJF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-03 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-01 18:55
VLAI
Summary
Gitea pre-receive hook scanner errors allow branch-protection bypass
Details
Gitea versions before 1.26.0 do not fail closed on bufio.Scanner errors while processing pre-receive hook input, allowing oversized input to bypass branch-protection checks.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "code.gitea.io/gitea"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.26.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-27780"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-01T18:55:25Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-03T21:16:59Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Gitea versions before 1.26.0 do not fail closed on bufio.Scanner errors while processing pre-receive hook input, allowing oversized input to bypass branch-protection checks.",
"id": "GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf",
"modified": "2026-09-01T18:55:25Z",
"published": "2026-07-03T21:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27780"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/36963"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/c453d09c36fad094405314dba2f370434b200711"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.26.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Gitea pre-receive hook scanner errors allow branch-protection bypass"
}
GHSA-VHRF-GFCG-4676
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-15 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-28 00:00
VLAI
Details
Due to improper authorization check, business users who are using Israeli File from SHAAM program (/ATL/VQ23 transaction), are granted more than needed authorization to perform certain transaction, which may lead to users getting access to data that would otherwise be restricted.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-31589"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-14T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Due to improper authorization check, business users who are using Israeli File from SHAAM program (/ATL/VQ23 transaction), are granted more than needed authorization to perform certain transaction, which may lead to users getting access to data that would otherwise be restricted.",
"id": "GHSA-vhrf-gfcg-4676",
"modified": "2022-06-28T00:00:54Z",
"published": "2022-06-15T00:00:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-31589"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/3203065"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sap.com/documents/2022/02/fa865ea4-167e-0010-bca6-c68f7e60039b.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHWM-F68V-4VG9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-11 00:31 – Updated: 2026-08-11 00:31
VLAI
Details
In affected TP-Link Aginet devices, insufficient authorization validation allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute higher-privileged operations.
An attacker may perform administrative actions such as creating privileged accounts or modifying critical configuration settings.
Severity
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30238"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-10T23:16:49Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In affected TP-Link Aginet devices, insufficient\nauthorization validation allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute higher-privileged\noperations.\n\n\n\n\n\nAn attacker\nmay perform administrative actions such as creating privileged accounts or\nmodifying critical configuration settings.",
"id": "GHSA-vhwm-f68v-4vg9",
"modified": "2026-08-11T00:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-08-11T00:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-VJ4M-83M8-XPW5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-25 20:21 – Updated: 2023-06-27 21:55
VLAI
Summary
OpenFGA Authorization Bypass via tupleset wildcard
Details
Overview
During our internal security assessment, it was discovered that OpenFGA versions v0.2.3 and prior are vulnerable to authorization bypass under certain conditions.
Am I affected?
You are affected by this vulnerability if you are using openfga/openfga version v0.2.3 and you added a tuple with a wildcard (*) assigned to a tupleset relation (the right hand side of a ‘from’ statement).
How to fix that?
Upgrade to version v0.2.4.
Backward Compatibility
This update is not backward compatible with any authorization model that uses wildcard on a tupleset relation.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.2.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/openfga/openfga"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.2.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-39341"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-25T20:21:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-25T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Overview\nDuring our internal security assessment, it was discovered that OpenFGA versions `v0.2.3` and prior are vulnerable to authorization bypass under certain conditions.\n\n### Am I affected?\nYou are affected by this vulnerability if you are using `openfga/openfga` version `v0.2.3` and you added a tuple with a wildcard (*) assigned to a tupleset relation (the right hand side of a \u2018from\u2019 statement).\n\n### How to fix that?\nUpgrade to version `v0.2.4`.\n\n### Backward Compatibility\nThis update is not backward compatible with any authorization model that uses wildcard on a tupleset relation.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-vj4m-83m8-xpw5",
"modified": "2023-06-27T21:55:53Z",
"published": "2022-10-25T20:21:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-vj4m-83m8-xpw5"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39341"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/commit/b466769cc100b2065047786578718d313f52695b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/releases/tag/v0.2.4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenFGA Authorization Bypass via tupleset wildcard"
}
GHSA-VJ5C-CCV3-X6FH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-19 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:35
VLAI
Details
In AlarmManagerActivity of AlarmManagerActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass background activity launch restrictions via a pendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-195756028
Severity
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-20950"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-19T20:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In AlarmManagerActivity of AlarmManagerActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass background activity launch restrictions via a pendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-195756028",
"id": "GHSA-vj5c-ccv3-x6fh",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:35:45Z",
"published": "2023-04-19T21:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-20950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2023-04-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VJ99-793Q-7JP4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-06 00:01 – Updated: 2022-04-14 00:00
VLAI
Details
Seyeon Tech Co., Ltd FlexWATCH FW3170-PS-E Network Video System 4.23-3000_GY allows attackers to access sensitive information.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-25584"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-05T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Seyeon Tech Co., Ltd FlexWATCH FW3170-PS-E Network Video System 4.23-3000_GY allows attackers to access sensitive information.",
"id": "GHSA-vj99-793q-7jp4",
"modified": "2022-04-14T00:00:38Z",
"published": "2022-04-06T00:01:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25584"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/NSSCYCTFER/Flexwatch"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://115.142.194.178:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://115.142.194.178:10001/app/multi/single.asp.ad"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://118.176.196.247:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://121.133.21.35:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://121.133.21.35:10001/app/multi/single.asp.ac"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://183.100.61.196:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://210.223.145.159:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://211.174.227.102:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://211.174.227.102:10001/app/multi/single.asp.aa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://211.174.227.230:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://211.240.10.38:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://211.240.10.38:10001/app/multi/single.asp.ab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://211.36.62.253:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://27.1.124.18:10001/app/multi/single.asp"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration
Installation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.