GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-863

Allowed-with-Review

Incorrect Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

6552 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-V59G-M57M-JWW7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:19 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:19
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in LinuxTV xawtv before 3.107. The function dev_open() in v4l-conf.c does not perform sufficient checks to prevent an unprivileged caller of the program from opening unintended filesystem paths. This allows a local attacker with access to the v4l-conf setuid-root program to test for the existence of arbitrary files and to trigger an open on arbitrary files with mode O_RDWR. To achieve this, relative path components need to be added to the device path, as demonstrated by a v4l-conf -c /dev/../root/.bash_history command.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-13696"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-732",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-06-08T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in LinuxTV xawtv before 3.107. The function dev_open() in v4l-conf.c does not perform sufficient checks to prevent an unprivileged caller of the program from opening unintended filesystem paths. This allows a local attacker with access to the v4l-conf setuid-root program to test for the existence of arbitrary files and to trigger an open on arbitrary files with mode O_RDWR. To achieve this, relative path components need to be added to the device path, as demonstrated by a v4l-conf -c /dev/../root/.bash_history command.",
  "id": "GHSA-v59g-m57m-jww7",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:19:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:19:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13696"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-13696"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.linuxtv.org/xawtv3.git/commit/?id=31f31f9cbaee7be806cba38e0ff5431bd44b20a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.linuxtv.org/xawtv3.git/commit/?id=36dc44e68e5886339b4a0fbe3f404fb1a4fd2292"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.linuxtv.org/xawtv3.git/commit/?id=8e3feea862db68d3ca0886f46cd99fab45d2db7c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/06/msg00018.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ELOXU5LXQSQOXX64D4BICZV3TQWOBXHC"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I7XWAO7W2DGA6M52JGK2TDWUGF62Q2KY"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4518-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00009.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00013.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/06/04/6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V5CR-HWCX-R95M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-21 09:30 – Updated: 2023-11-21 09:30
VLAI
Details

During internal Axis Security Development Model (ASDM) threat-modelling, a flaw was found in the protection for device tampering (commonly known as Secure Boot) in AXIS OS making it vulnerable to a sophisticated attack to bypass this protection. To Axis' knowledge, there are no known exploits of the vulnerability at this time. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-5553"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-21T07:15:11Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "During internal Axis Security Development Model (ASDM) threat-modelling, a flaw was found in the protection for device tampering (commonly known as Secure Boot) in AXIS OS making it vulnerable to a sophisticated attack to bypass this protection. To Axis\u0027 knowledge, there are no known exploits of the vulnerability at this time. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-v5cr-hwcx-r95m",
  "modified": "2023-11-21T09:30:23Z",
  "published": "2023-11-21T09:30:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5553"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.axis.com/dam/public/0a/66/25/cve-2023-5553-en-US-417789.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V5G2-X587-CC7C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-31 15:30 – Updated: 2023-11-08 18:30
VLAI
Details

TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Attackers are able to reset serveral critical passwords without authentication by visiting specific pages.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-46992"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-31T15:15:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Attackers are able to reset serveral critical passwords without authentication by visiting specific pages.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5g2-x587-cc7c",
  "modified": "2023-11-08T18:30:30Z",
  "published": "2023-10-31T15:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46992"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/AuroraHaaash/vul_report/blob/main/TOTOLINK%20A3300R/readme.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V5Q5-3VCQ-49R5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-05 06:30 – Updated: 2026-08-12 21:31
VLAI
Details

In OpenStack Neutron before 28.0.2, the subnetpool onboarding API does not verify ownership of the target subnets. An authenticated user can onboard subnets from another project's shared network into their own subnetpool, mutating the victim's subnet state and altering L3 routing and address scope behavior for victim routers.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55707"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-05T06:16:37Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In OpenStack Neutron before 28.0.2, the subnetpool onboarding API does not verify ownership of the target subnets. An authenticated user can onboard subnets from another project\u0027s shared network into their own subnetpool, mutating the victim\u0027s subnet state and altering L3 routing and address scope behavior for victim routers.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5q5-3vcq-49r5",
  "modified": "2026-08-12T21:31:16Z",
  "published": "2026-08-05T06:30:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55707"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://launchpad.net/bugs/2152113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/08/msg00024.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2026-032.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/29/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/29/5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V5VH-GQ27-CH94

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-10 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-10 00:00
VLAI
Details

Local privilege escalation via named pipe due to improper access control checks. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 28035, Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 27147, Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office (Windows) before build 39612, Acronis True Image 2021 (Windows) before build 39287

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-44204"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-04T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Local privilege escalation via named pipe due to improper access control checks. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 28035, Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 27147, Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office (Windows) before build 39612, Acronis True Image 2021 (Windows) before build 39287",
  "id": "GHSA-v5vh-gq27-ch94",
  "modified": "2022-08-10T00:00:32Z",
  "published": "2022-02-10T00:00:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44204"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security-advisory.acronis.com/advisories/SEC-2355"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V638-3J32-H7RM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:01
VLAI
Details

There is a permission verification vulnerability in the Bluetooth module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause unauthorized operations.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-40044"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-09T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "There is a permission verification vulnerability in the Bluetooth module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause unauthorized operations.",
  "id": "GHSA-v638-3j32-h7rm",
  "modified": "2022-07-13T00:01:39Z",
  "published": "2022-02-11T00:00:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40044"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2022/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V64G-GXM8-WHWJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 21:31 – Updated: 2025-03-28 18:33
VLAI
Details

HTCondor 23.0.x before 23.0.22, 23.10.x before 23.10.22, 24.0.x before 24.0.6, and 24.6.x before 24.6.1 allows authenticated attackers to bypass authorization restrictions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-30093"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T19:15:49Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "HTCondor 23.0.x before 23.0.22, 23.10.x before 23.10.22, 24.0.x before 24.0.6, and 24.6.x before 24.6.1 allows authenticated attackers to bypass authorization restrictions.",
  "id": "GHSA-v64g-gxm8-whwj",
  "modified": "2025-03-28T18:33:21Z",
  "published": "2025-03-27T21:31:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30093"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://htcondor.org/security/vulnerabilities/HTCONDOR-2025-0001.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V65X-57RF-CPG3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-05 12:31 – Updated: 2026-08-05 12:31
VLAI
Details

Documenso's sign-field-with-token.ts, used by the live document-signing UI, allows a recipient with the ASSISTANT role to fetch and complete fields belonging to any later-or-equal-order, not-yet-signed recipient in the same envelope, with no restriction on field type. The handler upserts a Signature record tied to the target field's recipientId with no check that field.type is SIGNATURE and the acting recipient owns it. A newer V2 signing path (sign-envelope-field.ts) explicitly blocks assistants from completing SIGNATURE fields, and the project's own test suite comments confirm this guard is absent from the V1 path used here. In a sequential-signing document, an assistant recipient can therefore forge another signer's signature field.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-71247"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-05T11:16:27Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Documenso\u0027s sign-field-with-token.ts, used by the live document-signing UI, allows a recipient with the ASSISTANT role to fetch and complete fields belonging to any later-or-equal-order, not-yet-signed recipient in the same envelope, with no restriction on field type. The handler upserts a Signature record tied to the target field\u0027s recipientId with no check that field.type is SIGNATURE and the acting recipient owns it. A newer V2 signing path (sign-envelope-field.ts) explicitly blocks assistants from completing SIGNATURE fields, and the project\u0027s own test suite comments confirm this guard is absent from the V1 path used here. In a sequential-signing document, an assistant recipient can therefore forge another signer\u0027s signature field.",
  "id": "GHSA-v65x-57rf-cpg3",
  "modified": "2026-08-05T12:31:32Z",
  "published": "2026-08-05T12:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71247"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/documenso/documenso"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V665-JF88-3M5X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:50 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:50
VLAI
Details

Inova Partner 5.0.5-RELEASE, Build 0510-0906 and earlier allows authenticated users authorization bypass via insecure direct object reference.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-15693"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-11-16T18:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Inova Partner 5.0.5-RELEASE, Build 0510-0906 and earlier allows authenticated users authorization bypass via insecure direct object reference.",
  "id": "GHSA-v665-jf88-3m5x",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:50:11Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:50:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-15693"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kpmg.de/noindex/advisories/KPMG-2018-001.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V66C-278H-3VJ4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-09 12:30
VLAI
Details

Inappropriate implementation in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.115 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-15123"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-122",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-08T23:16:53Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Inappropriate implementation in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.115 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)",
  "id": "GHSA-v66c-278h-3vj4",
  "modified": "2026-07-09T12:30:27Z",
  "published": "2026-07-09T00:31:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15123"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01162222768.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/523729553"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.