CWE-863
Allowed-with-ReviewIncorrect Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
7135 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-3C4P-4MFX-W9R8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-09 03:30 – Updated: 2026-09-09 21:31Incorrect authorization in Isolated in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-87540"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-09T01:17:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Incorrect authorization in Isolated in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
"id": "GHSA-3c4p-4mfx-w9r8",
"modified": "2026-09-09T21:31:35Z",
"published": "2026-09-09T03:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-87540"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0808145027.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/517721914"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3C6H-G97W-FG78
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 21:41 – Updated: 2026-03-11 20:38Summary
In OpenClaw, tools.exec.safeBins validation for sort could be bypassed via GNU long-option abbreviations in allowlist mode, allowing approval-free execution paths that should require approval.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Ecosystem: npm
- Package:
openclaw - Latest published version checked:
2026.2.22-2 - Affected range:
<= 2026.2.22-2 - Fixed version:
2026.2.23
Impact
When all of the following are true:
- tools.exec.security=allowlist
- tools.exec.ask=on-miss
- tools.exec.safeBins includes sort
abbreviated GNU long options (for example --compress-prog) could bypass denied-flag checks and be treated as allowlist-satisfied safe-bin usage, skipping approval.
Root Cause
Long-option handling matched denied flags by exact string and accepted unknown long options with inline values instead of failing closed.
Fix Commit(s)
3b8e33037ae2e12af7beb56fcf0346f1f8cbde6f
Release Process Note
patched_versions is pre-set to the released version (2026.2.23). This advisory now reflects released fix version 2026.2.23.
OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.23"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32059"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T21:41:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-11T14:16:27Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nIn OpenClaw, `tools.exec.safeBins` validation for `sort` could be bypassed via GNU long-option abbreviations in allowlist mode, allowing approval-free execution paths that should require approval.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Ecosystem: npm\n- Package: `openclaw`\n- Latest published version checked: `2026.2.22-2`\n- Affected range: `\u003c= 2026.2.22-2`\n- Fixed version: `2026.2.23`\n\n### Impact\nWhen all of the following are true:\n- `tools.exec.security=allowlist`\n- `tools.exec.ask=on-miss`\n- `tools.exec.safeBins` includes `sort`\n\nabbreviated GNU long options (for example `--compress-prog`) could bypass denied-flag checks and be treated as allowlist-satisfied safe-bin usage, skipping approval.\n\n### Root Cause\nLong-option handling matched denied flags by exact string and accepted unknown long options with inline values instead of failing closed.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `3b8e33037ae2e12af7beb56fcf0346f1f8cbde6f`\n\n### Release Process Note\n`patched_versions` is pre-set to the released version (`2026.2.23`). This advisory now reflects released fix version `2026.2.23`.\n\nOpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-3c6h-g97w-fg78",
"modified": "2026-03-11T20:38:42Z",
"published": "2026-03-03T21:41:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-3c6h-g97w-fg78"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32059"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/3b8e33037ae2e12af7beb56fcf0346f1f8cbde6f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-allowlist-bypass-via-sort-long-option-abbreviation-in-toolsexecsafebins"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw\u0027s tools.exec.safeBins sort long-option abbreviation bypass can skip exec approval in allowlist mode"
}
GHSA-3C6J-HQ33-3JV4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-02 17:12 – Updated: 2026-07-02 17:12Summary
OpenClaw nodes send lifecycle events back to the gateway. In affected releases, a paired node could send an exec lifecycle event that was accepted without enough provenance tying it to an authorized system.run request.
This issue affects the node event boundary. It does not allow an unauthenticated caller to reach the gateway; the attacker must already control a paired node connection.
Affected configurations
This affects deployments with a paired node where that node can send crafted node.event messages to the gateway and the target agent/session can process exec lifecycle events.
Impact
A malicious or compromised paired node could make the gateway treat attacker-supplied event data as an exec lifecycle result. In the vulnerable flow, that could steer the target session into an exec-event path that exposed capabilities the reduced node surface should not have provided.
The issue is a missing provenance check for node-originated lifecycle events.
Patched Versions
The first stable patched version is 2026.5.18.
Mitigations
Upgrade to openclaw@2026.5.18 or later. Pair nodes only from trusted environments, and remove/re-pair nodes that may have been compromised.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.5.18"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53816"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-862",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-02T17:12:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-11T21:16:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nOpenClaw nodes send lifecycle events back to the gateway. In affected releases, a paired node could send an exec lifecycle event that was accepted without enough provenance tying it to an authorized `system.run` request.\n\nThis issue affects the node event boundary. It does not allow an unauthenticated caller to reach the gateway; the attacker must already control a paired node connection.\n\n### Affected configurations\n\nThis affects deployments with a paired node where that node can send crafted `node.event` messages to the gateway and the target agent/session can process exec lifecycle events.\n\n### Impact\n\nA malicious or compromised paired node could make the gateway treat attacker-supplied event data as an exec lifecycle result. In the vulnerable flow, that could steer the target session into an exec-event path that exposed capabilities the reduced node surface should not have provided.\n\nThe issue is a missing provenance check for node-originated lifecycle events.\n\n### Patched Versions\n\nThe first stable patched version is `2026.5.18`.\n\n### Mitigations\n\nUpgrade to `openclaw@2026.5.18` or later. Pair nodes only from trusted environments, and remove/re-pair nodes that may have been compromised.",
"id": "GHSA-3c6j-hq33-3jv4",
"modified": "2026-07-02T17:12:03Z",
"published": "2026-07-02T17:12:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-3c6j-hq33-3jv4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53816"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-exec-lifecycle-event-forgery-via-paired-node"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Paired nodes could forge exec lifecycle events without system.run provenance"
}
GHSA-3C7P-VV5R-CMR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-10 00:31 – Updated: 2025-03-17 21:39Apache Solr versions 6.6.0 to 6.6.6, 7.0.0 to 7.7.3 and 8.0.0 to 8.6.2 prevents some features considered dangerous (which could be used for remote code execution) to be configured in a ConfigSet that's uploaded via API without authentication/authorization. The checks in place to prevent such features can be circumvented by using a combination of UPLOAD/CREATE actions. This issue is patched in 8.6.3.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.solr:solr-parent"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.6.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.solr:solr-solrj"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.6.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.solr:solr-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.6.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-13957"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-04-14T17:55:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-10-13T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Apache Solr versions 6.6.0 to 6.6.6, 7.0.0 to 7.7.3 and 8.0.0 to 8.6.2 prevents some features considered dangerous (which could be used for remote code execution) to be configured in a ConfigSet that\u0027s uploaded via API without authentication/authorization. The checks in place to prevent such features can be circumvented by using a combination of UPLOAD/CREATE actions. This issue is patched in 8.6.3.",
"id": "GHSA-3c7p-vv5r-cmr5",
"modified": "2025-03-17T21:39:03Z",
"published": "2022-02-10T00:31:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13957"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/solr/commit/e001c2221812a0ba9e9378855040ce72f93eced4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20201023-0002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mail-archives.us.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/202010.mbox/%3CCAECwjAWCVLoVaZy%3DTNRQ6Wk9KWVxdPRiGS8NT%2BPHMJCxbbsEVg%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf1a32f00017e83ff29a74be2de02e28e4302dddb5f14c624e297a8c0@%3Cdev.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb2f1c7fd3d3ea719dfac4706a80e6affddecae8663dda04e1335347f@%3Ccommits.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb1de6ba50a468e9baff32a249edaa08f6bcec7dd7cc208e25e6b48c8@%3Cissues.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9d7356f209ee30d702b6a921c866564eb2e291b126640c7ab70feea7@%3Ccommits.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r999f828e6e37d9e825e207471cbfd2681c3befcd7f3abd59ed87c0d5@%3Cissues.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8b1782d42d0a4ce573495d5d9345ad328d652c68c411ccdb245c57e3@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r853fdc6d0b91d5e01a26c7bd5becb044ad775a231703d634ca5d55c9@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7512ae552cd9d14ab8b1bc0a7e95f2ec52ae85364f068d4034398ede@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r622a043c2890327f8a4aea16b131e8a7137a282a004614369fceb224@%3Cdev.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5557641fcf5cfd99260a7037cfbc8788fb546b72c98a900570edaa2e@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4ca8ba5980d9049cf3707798aa3116ee76c1582f171ff452ad2ca75e@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3da9895cea476bcee2557531bebd4e8f6f367dc3ea900a65e2f51cd8@%3Cissues.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3d1e24a73e6bffa1d6534e1f34c8f5cbd9999495e7d933640f4fa0ed@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2f8d33a4de07db9459fb2a98a1cd39747066137636b53f84a13e5628@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2a6600fe9afd502c04d26fd112823ec3f3c3ad1b4a289d10567a78a0@%3Cdev.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r226c1112bb41e7cd427862d875eff9877a20a40242c2542f4dd39e4a@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2236fdf99ac3efbfc36c2df96d3a88f822baa6f45e13fec7ff558e34@%3Cdev.bigtop.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d4a247329a8478073163567bbc8c8cb6b49c6bfc2bf58153a857af1@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1c783d3d81ba62f3381a17a4d6c826f7dead3a132ba42349c90df075@%3Ccommits.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a728994c60be5b5a7049282b5c926dac1fc6a9a0b2362f6adfa573@%3Cissues.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Incorrect Authorization in Apache Solr"
}
GHSA-3C8C-VCMC-G2H3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-12 03:31 – Updated: 2022-12-14 15:30SENS v1.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-45760"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-12T03:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SENS v1.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-3c8c-vcmc-g2h3",
"modified": "2022-12-14T15:30:18Z",
"published": "2022-12-12T03:31:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45760"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/saysky/SENS/issues/21"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3C9G-JQWF-QRR8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-30 18:33 – Updated: 2026-09-30 18:33In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19197 authorisation bypass in the scripts debugger allowed arbitrary code execution
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-100273"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-30T16:16:58Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19197 authorisation bypass in the scripts debugger allowed arbitrary code execution",
"id": "GHSA-3c9g-jqwf-qrr8",
"modified": "2026-09-30T18:33:31Z",
"published": "2026-09-30T18:33:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100273"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3CFW-2RV8-9RX3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-07-18 00:00 – Updated: 2022-07-23 00:00An issue was discovered in Poly EagleEye Director II before 2.2.2.1. Existence of a certain file (which can be created via an rsync backdoor) causes all API calls to execute as admin without authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-26479"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-07-17T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Poly EagleEye Director II before 2.2.2.1. Existence of a certain file (which can be created via an rsync backdoor) causes all API calls to execute as admin without authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-3cfw-2rv8-9rx3",
"modified": "2022-07-23T00:00:23Z",
"published": "2022-07-18T00:00:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec-consult.com/de/vulnerability-lab/advisory/poly-eagleeye-director-ii-kritische-schwachstellen"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec-consult.com/vulnerability-lab/advisory/critical-vulnerabilities-poly-eagleeye-director-ii"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.poly.com/us/en/support/security-center"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3CG5-48J3-V4GV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 20:58 – Updated: 2026-08-04 20:58Summary
A user granted write access to a shared chat folder could permanently delete chats and messages belonging to the folder's owner. Deleting a folder cascades into the owner's chats and the entire subfolder subtree, and the deletion handler required only write access on subfolders instead of ownership. Root folders were restricted to the owner or an admin, subfolders were not.
Preconditions
The Folders Sharing permission (user.permissions.sharing.folders) must be enabled; it is off by default. The victim must have shared a folder with the attacker at write access. features.folders and the chat.delete permission are enabled by default and are both required. Deployments that leave folder sharing disabled are not affected, and neither are single-user instances.
Impact
Permanent, irreversible destruction of another user's chat history within and beneath a shared folder. With delete_contents=false the same request instead force-moved the owner's chats out of the folder, an unauthorized relocation rather than a deletion. The write grant on the shared root folder is inherited by every descendant, so the attacker could destroy subfolders that were never explicitly shared with them. Nothing outside the shared folder's subtree is reachable, and no data is disclosed that write access did not already expose.
Fix
Fixed in 0.11.0 by https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/27003. Folder deletion is now restricted to the folder owner or an admin for root folders and subfolders alike, replacing the previous root/subfolder split with a single check. Upgrading fully resolves the issue; no configuration change is required. Owners and admins are unaffected, and a write-collaborator can still create, rename and add to shared folders and delete subfolders they own.
Root cause
Affected component: backend/open_webui/routers/folders.py, the DELETE /api/v1/folders/{id} handler. Affected setup: any release from 0.10.0 onward that has folder sharing enabled.
The cascade that follows the authorization check is bound to the folder owner's id, not the caller's, so whoever passes the check deletes the owner's data. The check itself branched on whether the folder had a parent: root folders demanded ownership or admin, while subfolders accepted any write grant. Because write grants propagate down the folder tree, that branch handed every collaborator deletion rights over the owner's subtree, which is broader than what the sharing model grants write access.
Credits
@legobattman, who reported the issue and its remediation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.10.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.11.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-70494"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-04T20:58:12Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\nA user granted write access to a shared chat folder could permanently delete chats and messages belonging to the folder\u0027s owner. Deleting a folder cascades into the owner\u0027s chats and the entire subfolder subtree, and the deletion handler required only write access on subfolders instead of ownership. Root folders were restricted to the owner or an admin, subfolders were not.\n\n## Preconditions\nThe Folders Sharing permission (`user.permissions.sharing.folders`) must be enabled; it is off by default. The victim must have shared a folder with the attacker at write access. `features.folders` and the `chat.delete` permission are enabled by default and are both required. Deployments that leave folder sharing disabled are not affected, and neither are single-user instances.\n\n## Impact\nPermanent, irreversible destruction of another user\u0027s chat history within and beneath a shared folder. With `delete_contents=false` the same request instead force-moved the owner\u0027s chats out of the folder, an unauthorized relocation rather than a deletion. The write grant on the shared root folder is inherited by every descendant, so the attacker could destroy subfolders that were never explicitly shared with them. Nothing outside the shared folder\u0027s subtree is reachable, and no data is disclosed that write access did not already expose.\n\n## Fix\nFixed in 0.11.0 by https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/27003. Folder deletion is now restricted to the folder owner or an admin for root folders and subfolders alike, replacing the previous root/subfolder split with a single check. Upgrading fully resolves the issue; no configuration change is required. Owners and admins are unaffected, and a write-collaborator can still create, rename and add to shared folders and delete subfolders they own.\n\n## Root cause\nAffected component: `backend/open_webui/routers/folders.py`, the `DELETE /api/v1/folders/{id}` handler. Affected setup: any release from 0.10.0 onward that has folder sharing enabled.\n\nThe cascade that follows the authorization check is bound to the folder owner\u0027s id, not the caller\u0027s, so whoever passes the check deletes the owner\u0027s data. The check itself branched on whether the folder had a parent: root folders demanded ownership or admin, while subfolders accepted any write grant. Because write grants propagate down the folder tree, that branch handed every collaborator deletion rights over the owner\u0027s subtree, which is broader than what the sharing model grants write access.\n\n## Credits\n@legobattman, who reported the issue and its remediation.",
"id": "GHSA-3cg5-48j3-v4gv",
"modified": "2026-08-04T20:58:12Z",
"published": "2026-08-04T20:58:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3cg5-48j3-v4gv"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/27003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/915ef7d0798d3175819cedbb2f62d7bf0db78c98"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI: A folder write-collaborator can permanently delete the owner\u0027s chats by deleting a shared subfolder"
}
GHSA-3CG7-X7VX-225C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-13 06:30 – Updated: 2025-03-13 06:30An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE/CE affecting all versions starting from 16.9 before 17.7.7, all versions starting from 17.8 before 17.8.5, all versions starting from 17.9 before 17.9.2 could allow unauthorized users to access confidential information intended for internal use only.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-0652"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-13T06:15:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE/CE affecting all versions starting from 16.9 before 17.7.7, all versions starting from 17.8 before 17.8.5, all versions starting from 17.9 before 17.9.2 could allow unauthorized users to access confidential information intended for internal use only.",
"id": "GHSA-3cg7-x7vx-225c",
"modified": "2025-03-13T06:30:35Z",
"published": "2025-03-13T06:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0652"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2947863"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/514532"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3CJF-FWCQ-XH22
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-04 12:30 – Updated: 2025-02-18 22:31Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Cassandra allowing users to access a datacenter or IP/CIDR groups they should not be able to when using CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer.
Users with restricted data center access can update their own permissions via data control language (DCL) statements on affected versions.
This issue affects Apache Cassandra: from 4.0.0 through 4.0.15 and from 4.1.0 through 4.1.7 for CassandraNetworkAuthorizer, and from 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 for both CassandraNetworkAuthorizer and CassandraCIDRAuthorizer.
Operators using CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer on affected versions should review data access rules for potential breaches. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.16, 4.1.8, 5.0.3, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.cassandra:cassandra-all"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0-alpha1"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.cassandra:cassandra-all"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.1-alpha1"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.cassandra:cassandra-all"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.0-alpha1"
},
{
"fixed": "5.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-24860"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-02-04T18:39:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-04T11:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Cassandra allowing users to access a datacenter or IP/CIDR groups they should not be able to when using CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer. \n\nUsers with restricted data center access can update their own permissions via data control language (DCL) statements on affected versions.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Cassandra: from 4.0.0 through 4.0.15 and from 4.1.0 through 4.1.7 for CassandraNetworkAuthorizer, and from 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 for both CassandraNetworkAuthorizer and CassandraCIDRAuthorizer.\n\nOperators using\u00a0CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or\u00a0CassandraCIDRAuthorizer on affected versions should review data access rules for potential breaches. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.16, 4.1.8, 5.0.3, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-3cjf-fwcq-xh22",
"modified": "2025-02-18T22:31:50Z",
"published": "2025-02-04T12:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24860"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/cassandra"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/yjo5on4tf7s1r9qklc4byrz30b8vkm2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250214-0005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/03/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Cassandra: CassandraNetworkAuthorizer and CassandraCIDRAuthorizer can be bypassed allowing access to different network regions"
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.