CWE-770
AllowedAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
3904 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-66275 (GCVE-0-2026-66275)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 05:34 – Updated: 2026-08-06 15:30- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/jds59nxrgcxtlx7xl… | vendor-advisory |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/0… |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Qpid Proton-J |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 0.34.1
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T06:57:54.880Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/04/11"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66275",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-06T15:30:22.199548Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T15:30:56.492Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.qpid:proton-j",
"product": "Apache Qpid Proton-J",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.34.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T05:34:48.549Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/jds59nxrgcxtlx7xl0kvl5hqt07thxzt"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Qpid Proton-J: Incoming session flow control window can be exceeded",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66275",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T05:34:48.549Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-24T11:30:41.003Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T15:30:56.492Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66257 (GCVE-0-2026-66257)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 05:18 – Updated: 2026-08-06 13:13- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Qpid Proton-J |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 0.34.1
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T06:57:48.883Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/04/8"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66257",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-06T13:13:16.783067Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T13:13:32.455Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.qpid:proton-j",
"product": "Apache Qpid Proton-J",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.34.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA pre-authentication attacker could leverage unbounded symbol value caching to cause resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A pre-authentication attacker could leverage unbounded symbol value caching to cause resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T05:18:01.606Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/dnczt6bgfcq2x6q8ljco177h1qmv59fm"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Qpid Proton-J: Unbounded symbol value caching can lead to pre-authentication resource exhaustion",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66257",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T05:18:01.606Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-24T10:40:01.653Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T13:13:32.455Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66080 (GCVE-0-2026-66080)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-23 20:20 – Updated: 2026-09-24 15:05- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/secur… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/relea… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/relea… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server |
Affected:
>= 4.1.0, < 4.1.11
Affected: >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.6 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66080",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-24T13:58:57.486603Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T15:05:05.967Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rabbitmq-server",
"vendor": "rabbitmq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.1.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0, \u003c 4.2.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, validate_partitions only checks that the requested partition count is at least 1, with no upper bound. A large count such as lists:seq(0, 500000000) allocates roughly 8GB. Preconditions include The rabbitmq_stream_management plugin must be enabled. The caller needs the management tag and access to the target vhost.. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T20:20:34.845Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-wg79-5449-m728",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-wg79-5449-m728"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wg79-5449-m728",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RabbitMQ: Super-stream partitions unbounded allocation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66080",
"datePublished": "2026-09-23T20:20:34.845Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T23:25:28.898Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T15:05:05.967Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66079 (GCVE-0-2026-66079)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-23 20:01 – Updated: 2026-09-29 02:12- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/secur… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/relea… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server |
Affected:
>= 3.13.0, < 3.13.15
Affected: >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.20 Affected: >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.11 Affected: >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.6 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66079",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T02:12:28.546356Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T02:12:45.139Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rabbitmq-server",
"vendor": "rabbitmq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.13.0, \u003c 3.13.15"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.0.20"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.1.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0, \u003c 4.2.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, parse_array_primitive/2 for constructor 0x45 (list0) returns an element with byte-width B = 0. The enclosing array32 parser at line 148 reads a 4-byte Count from the wire and loops Count times consuming B bytes each , with B = 0, no input is consumed and the loop builds a list of Count empty elements bounded only by the 32-bit field. The SASL-mechanisms / SASL-init frame is parsed by amqp10_framing:decode_bin/1 from rabbit_amqp_reader.erl:412 before authentication completes. The pre-auth incoming_max_frame_size (default 8192 bytes) caps the frame, not the Count field, so a 19-byte payload with Count = 0xFFFFFFFF is accepted. No max_heap_size is set on the reader process. An unauthenticated network attacker can crash any RabbitMQ node that has the AMQP 1.0 listener enabled (default port 5672) by sending a single ~19-byte frame. The reader process attempts to build a list of ~4 billion empty elements, exhausting heap memory and terminating the Erlang VM. All tenants and protocols on the node lose service. Preconditions include Network reachability to the AMQP listener (port 5672, enabled by default) No authentication required. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T20:01:15.295Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-c66h-hf5j-8jf9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-c66h-hf5j-8jf9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c66h-hf5j-8jf9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RabbitMQ: Pre-auth AMQP 1.0 array32 zero-width element DoS"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66079",
"datePublished": "2026-09-23T20:01:15.295Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T23:25:28.898Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T02:12:45.139Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66067 (GCVE-0-2026-66067)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-23 20:12 – Updated: 2026-09-24 14:11- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/secur… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/relea… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/relea… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server |
Affected:
>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.7
Affected: >= 4.3.0, < 4.3.1 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66067",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-24T14:11:25.836720Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:11:44.566Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rabbitmq-server",
"vendor": "rabbitmq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0, \u003c 4.2.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.3.0, \u003c 4.3.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.2.7 and 4.3.1, The stream open handler calls only check_vhost_access; it omits the node/vhost/user connection-limit checks that rabbit_reader performs for AMQP. A developer %% FIXME comment at the cited line explicitly acknowledges the gap. No compensating enforcement exists in connection tracking or elsewhere in rabbitmq_stream. An authenticated tenant can fully bypass operator-configured per-user and per-vhost connection caps by connecting via port 5552 instead of 5672. Preconditions include rabbitmq_stream plugin enabled Authenticated stream-protocol credentials Operator relies on per-user/per-vhost connection limits for tenant isolation. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.7 and 4.3.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T20:12:00.076Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-hwqx-2gfg-89qf",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-hwqx-2gfg-89qf"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-hwqx-2gfg-89qf",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RabbitMQ: Stream protocol skips per vhost per user connection limits"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66067",
"datePublished": "2026-09-23T20:12:00.076Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T23:25:28.897Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:11:44.566Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66055 (GCVE-0-2026-66055)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-02 12:49 – Updated: 2026-10-03 15:52- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/33otcgbqd27wf6qq8… | vendor-advisory |
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/nxlmlhgsh7fwr4mo1… | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Thrift |
Affected:
0 , < 0.25.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66055",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-02T13:13:32.303995Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-03T15:52:56.729Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://conan.io/center",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "thrift",
"packageURL": "pkg:conan/thrift",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.thrift:libthrift",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.apache.thrift/libthrift",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://golang.org/pkg",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "github.com/apache/thrift",
"packageURL": "pkg:golang/github.com/apache/thrift",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://nuget.org/packages",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "ApacheThrift",
"packageURL": "pkg:nuget/ApacheThrift",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.python.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "thrift",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/thrift",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "delphi bindings",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Bin Luo, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC) (C++)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Apache Thrift Developers (Java/Go/netstd/Python/Delphi)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++, Java, Go, netstd, Python and Delphi bindings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++, Java, Go, netstd, Python and Delphi bindings.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T12:49:40.955Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/33otcgbqd27wf6qq810q56znzbomnhg1"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/nxlmlhgsh7fwr4mo1fkhtkw3v266qhcx"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift: TJSONProtocol accepts a single JSON string/number exceeding the configured size limit (multi-language)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66055",
"datePublished": "2026-10-02T12:49:40.955Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T21:41:15.712Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-03T15:52:56.729Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66054 (GCVE-0-2026-66054)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-02 12:58 – Updated: 2026-10-03 15:52| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/33otcgbqd27wf6qq8… | vendor-advisory |
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/7c23sgowkb3ssmolq… | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Thrift |
Affected:
0 , < 0.25.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66054",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-02T13:13:06.062323Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-03T15:52:56.354Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://conan.io/center",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "thrift",
"packageURL": "pkg:conan/thrift",
"product": "Apache Thrift",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.25.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Bin Luo, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling, Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ bindings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling, Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ bindings.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-409",
"description": "CWE-409 Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T12:58:05.610Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/33otcgbqd27wf6qq810q56znzbomnhg1"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/7c23sgowkb3ssmolqofqsn8wzsddvf33"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Thrift: C++ THeaderTransport does not enforce configured maxFrameSize",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66054",
"datePublished": "2026-10-02T12:58:05.610Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T21:34:04.862Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-03T15:52:56.354Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66037 (GCVE-0-2026-66037)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-24 19:36 – Updated: 2026-07-28 01:06 X_Open Source- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/23627 | issue-tracking |
| https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/8670… | patch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ffmpeg-iamf-… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66037",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-27T16:15:23.636110Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T16:18:48.697Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "FFmpeg",
"repo": "https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg",
"vendor": "FFmpeg",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "86708357d126af84c16f80d9c57335d1e8c845c5",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ffmpeg:ffmpeg:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "8.1.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Adrian Junge (vurlo)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FFmpeg through 8.1.2, fixed in commit 5d7112c, contains an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the IAMF demuxer that allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause multi-gigabyte memory allocation from a 17-byte input file by supplying a crafted count_label field. The mix_presentation_obu() function in libavformat/iamf_parse.c calls av_calloc(count_label, sizeof(*language_label)) with an attacker-controlled value before validating available OBU data, enabling an allocation amplification of approximately 126 million bytes per input byte that exhausts process memory or triggers an OOM-kill during format probing."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T01:06:28.161Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Pull Request",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/23627"
},
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/86708357d126af84c16f80d9c57335d1e8c845c5"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ffmpeg-iamf-demuxer-uncontrolled-resource-consumption-via-mix-presentation-obu"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"title": "FFmpeg IAMF Demuxer Uncontrolled Resource Consumption via mix_presentation_obu()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66037",
"datePublished": "2026-07-24T19:36:53.859Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T20:45:17.816Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T01:06:28.161Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-65827 (GCVE-0-2026-65827)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-24 18:28 – Updated: 2026-09-24 19:22| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/docmost/docmost/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/docmost/docmost/commit/0411088… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/docmost/docmost/releases/tag/v0.95.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-65827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-24T19:22:03.264160Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T19:22:12.940Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "docmost",
"vendor": "docmost",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.21.0, \u003c 0.95.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Docmost is open-source collaborative wiki and documentation software. From 0.21.0 until 0.95.0, any authenticated workspace member with edit rights to a space can upload an archive to the page-import feature whose ZIP extraction routine does not limit total uncompressed size, per-entry size, or entry count. The extractor writes entries to the server temp directory and automatically extracts one nested ZIP, allowing an outer upload within the default 200 MB limit to expand by multiple GB. The resulting disk exhaustion can crash the import worker and degrade or take down the instance for all tenants. This issue is fixed in version 0.95.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-409",
"description": "CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T18:28:36.809Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/docmost/docmost/security/advisories/GHSA-frjw-66gr-799m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/docmost/docmost/security/advisories/GHSA-frjw-66gr-799m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/docmost/docmost/commit/04110884b4e90a43cc5b337e063d0b7493be5da7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/docmost/docmost/commit/04110884b4e90a43cc5b337e063d0b7493be5da7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/docmost/docmost/releases/tag/v0.95.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/docmost/docmost/releases/tag/v0.95.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-frjw-66gr-799m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Docmost: Unbounded ZIP decompression (zip-bomb) in page import allows denial of service"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-65827",
"datePublished": "2026-09-24T18:28:36.809Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-22T23:16:47.752Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T19:22:12.940Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-65654 (GCVE-0-2026-65654)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-21 11:38 – Updated: 2026-09-21 15:26- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal Technologies, Inc. | temporalio/ringpop-go |
Affected:
0.0.0-20160824133849-d0de5fe13330 , < 0.0.0-20260724173031-c317effcdc8b
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-65654",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-21T15:26:15.984122Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T15:26:44.632Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Labels",
"SWIM membership"
],
"packageName": "github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go",
"product": "temporalio/ringpop-go",
"programFiles": [
"swim/labels.go",
"swim/member.go",
"swim/memberlist.go"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go",
"vendor": "Temporal Technologies, Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.0.0-20260724173031-c317effcdc8b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.0.0-20160824133849-d0de5fe13330",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe CVSS Base score reflects an application that exposes a Ringpop membership listener to untrusted network peers without authenticated transport. Ringpop does not authenticate peers at the application layer. An embedding application can restrict the listener to trusted cluster members or require verified client certificates before TChannel receives a request. Deployments using those controls should apply appropriate Environmental metrics.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The CVSS Base score reflects an application that exposes a Ringpop membership listener to untrusted network peers without authenticated transport. Ringpop does not authenticate peers at the application layer. An embedding application can restrict the listener to trusted cluster members or require verified client certificates before TChannel receives a request. Deployments using those controls should apply appropriate Environmental metrics."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "An external security researcher who reported this issue responsibly to Temporal Technologies"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003egithub.com/temporalio/ringpop-go enforces configured LabelOptions limits when an application changes the local node\u0027s labels, but affected versions do not apply those limits to label maps received in SWIM membership changes. A network peer that can reach a live Ringpop TChannel listener can repeatedly submit changes for distinct member addresses containing label keys, values, or counts that exceed the receiver\u0027s configured limits. Accepted labels are retained in the member list and disseminated to peers, allowing memory and gossip-bandwidth consumption to exceed configured bounds and potentially making the hosting process unavailable. The fix validates peer-supplied label maps before they are retained or disseminated. Availability only; no confidentiality or integrity impact was identified.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go enforces configured LabelOptions limits when an application changes the local node\u0027s labels, but affected versions do not apply those limits to label maps received in SWIM membership changes. A network peer that can reach a live Ringpop TChannel listener can repeatedly submit changes for distinct member addresses containing label keys, values, or counts that exceed the receiver\u0027s configured limits. Accepted labels are retained in the member list and disseminated to peers, allowing memory and gossip-bandwidth consumption to exceed configured bounds and potentially making the hosting process unavailable. The fix validates peer-supplied label maps before they are retained or disseminated. Availability only; no confidentiality or integrity impact was identified."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Denial of service through persistent memory and gossip-bandwidth consumption. No confidentiality or integrity impact was identified."
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "temporalio/ringpop-go reasonable worst-case network service embedding"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T11:38:23.307Z",
"orgId": "61241ed8-fa44-4f23-92db-b8c443751968",
"shortName": "Temporal"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "First affected source revision",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go/commit/d0de5fe1333074d5c41a88e9053592e39f495bb2"
},
{
"name": "Configured label limits and their resource-control purpose",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go/blob/b97329e994f792f70427a7533a3e7a98976eb262/swim/labels.go#L11-L61"
},
{
"name": "Vulnerable inbound membership-update path",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go/blob/b97329e994f792f70427a7533a3e7a98976eb262/swim/memberlist.go#L521-L612"
},
{
"name": "Inbound label-validation fix",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go/pull/22"
},
{
"name": "First fixed default-branch revision",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go/commit/c317effcdc8bc09ed1c11f00994782bda9685d4b"
},
{
"name": "Fixed release tag v0.1.0",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go/tree/v0.1.0"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go to v0.1.0 or later. The fix validates peer-supplied label maps against the configured LabelOptions before labels are retained or disseminated. Invalid incoming labels are discarded while the remaining membership change can still be processed.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade github.com/temporalio/ringpop-go to v0.1.0 or later. The fix validates peer-supplied label maps against the configured LabelOptions before labels are retained or disseminated. Invalid incoming labels are discarded while the remaining membership change can still be processed."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "temporalio/ringpop-go fails to enforce configured label limits on inbound membership gossip",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRestrict the Ringpop membership listener to trusted cluster members. Where supported by the embedding application, require mutual TLS with verified client certificates. These controls prevent untrusted clients from reaching the vulnerable receive path but do not correct the missing validation for an authenticated or compromised peer.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Restrict the Ringpop membership listener to trusted cluster members. Where supported by the embedding application, require mutual TLS with verified client certificates. These controls prevent untrusted clients from reaching the vulnerable receive path but do not correct the missing validation for an authenticated or compromised peer."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "61241ed8-fa44-4f23-92db-b8c443751968",
"assignerShortName": "Temporal",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-65654",
"datePublished": "2026-09-21T11:38:23.307Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-22T18:08:48.925Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T15:26:44.632Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Mitigation
Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Mitigation
Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation MIT-38.1
- If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
- Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Mitigation MIT-47
Strategy: Resource Limitation
- Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
- When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
- Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
CAPEC-125: Flooding
An adversary consumes the resources of a target by rapidly engaging in a large number of interactions with the target. This type of attack generally exposes a weakness in rate limiting or flow. When successful this attack prevents legitimate users from accessing the service and can cause the target to crash. This attack differs from resource depletion through leaks or allocations in that the latter attacks do not rely on the volume of requests made to the target but instead focus on manipulation of the target's operations. The key factor in a flooding attack is the number of requests the adversary can make in a given period of time. The greater this number, the more likely an attack is to succeed against a given target.
CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
An adversary causes the target to allocate excessive resources to servicing the attackers' request, thereby reducing the resources available for legitimate services and degrading or denying services. Usually, this attack focuses on memory allocation, but any finite resource on the target could be the attacked, including bandwidth, processing cycles, or other resources. This attack does not attempt to force this allocation through a large number of requests (that would be Resource Depletion through Flooding) but instead uses one or a small number of requests that are carefully formatted to force the target to allocate excessive resources to service this request(s). Often this attack takes advantage of a bug in the target to cause the target to allocate resources vastly beyond what would be needed for a normal request.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-197: Exponential Data Expansion
An adversary submits data to a target application which contains nested exponential data expansion to produce excessively large output. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. However, this capability can be abused to create excessive demands on a processor's CPU and memory. A small number of nested expansions can result in an exponential growth in demands on memory.
CAPEC-229: Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
This attack exploits certain serialized data parsers (e.g., XML, YAML, etc.) which manage data in an inefficient manner. The attacker crafts an serialized data file with multiple configuration parameters in the same dataset. In a vulnerable parser, this results in a denial of service condition where CPU resources are exhausted because of the parsing algorithm. The weakness being exploited is tied to parser implementation and not language specific.
CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.
CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.
CAPEC-469: HTTP DoS
An attacker performs flooding at the HTTP level to bring down only a particular web application rather than anything listening on a TCP/IP connection. This denial of service attack requires substantially fewer packets to be sent which makes DoS harder to detect. This is an equivalent of SYN flood in HTTP. The idea is to keep the HTTP session alive indefinitely and then repeat that hundreds of times. This attack targets resource depletion weaknesses in web server software. The web server will wait to attacker's responses on the initiated HTTP sessions while the connection threads are being exhausted.
CAPEC-482: TCP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the TCP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service. These attacks exploit the weakness within the TCP protocol where there is some state information for the connection the server needs to maintain. This often involves the use of TCP SYN messages.
CAPEC-486: UDP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the UDP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. Additionally, firewalls often open a port for each UDP connection destined for a service with an open UDP port, meaning the firewalls in essence save the connection state thus the high packet nature of a UDP flood can also overwhelm resources allocated to the firewall. UDP attacks can also target services like DNS or VoIP which utilize these protocols. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the UDP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-487: ICMP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the ICMP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. A typical attack involves a victim server receiving ICMP packets at a high rate from a wide range of source addresses. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the ICMP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-488: HTTP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the HTTP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming resources at the application layer such as web services and their infrastructure. These attacks use legitimate session-based HTTP GET requests designed to consume large amounts of a server's resources. Since these are legitimate sessions this attack is very difficult to detect.
CAPEC-489: SSL Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the SSL protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming all the available resources on the server side. These attacks take advantage of the asymmetric relationship between the processing power used by the client and the processing power used by the server to create a secure connection. In this manner the attacker can make a large number of HTTPS requests on a low provisioned machine to tie up a disproportionately large number of resources on the server. The clients then continue to keep renegotiating the SSL connection. When multiplied by a large number of attacking machines, this attack can result in a crash or loss of service to legitimate users.
CAPEC-490: Amplification
An adversary may execute an amplification where the size of a response is far greater than that of the request that generates it. The goal of this attack is to use a relatively few resources to create a large amount of traffic against a target server. To execute this attack, an adversary send a request to a 3rd party service, spoofing the source address to be that of the target server. The larger response that is generated by the 3rd party service is then sent to the target server. By sending a large number of initial requests, the adversary can generate a tremendous amount of traffic directed at the target. The greater the discrepancy in size between the initial request and the final payload delivered to the target increased the effectiveness of this attack.
CAPEC-491: Quadratic Data Expansion
An adversary exploits macro-like substitution to cause a denial of service situation due to excessive memory being allocated to fully expand the data. The result of this denial of service could cause the application to freeze or crash. This involves defining a very large entity and using it multiple times in a single entity substitution. CAPEC-197 is a similar attack pattern, but it is easier to discover and defend against. This attack pattern does not perform multi-level substitution and therefore does not obviously appear to consume extensive resources.
CAPEC-493: SOAP Array Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a web service that uses SOAP messages in communication. By sending a very large SOAP array declaration to the web service, the attacker forces the web service to allocate space for the array elements before they are parsed by the XML parser. The attacker message is typically small in size containing a large array declaration of say 1,000,000 elements and a couple of array elements. This attack targets exhaustion of the memory resources of the web service.
CAPEC-494: TCP Fragmentation
An adversary may execute a TCP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of avoiding filtering rules of network controls, by attempting to fragment the TCP packet such that the headers flag field is pushed into the second fragment which typically is not filtered.
CAPEC-495: UDP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a UDP Fragmentation attack against a target server in an attempt to consume resources such as bandwidth and CPU. IP fragmentation occurs when an IP datagram is larger than the MTU of the route the datagram has to traverse. Typically the attacker will use large UDP packets over 1500 bytes of data which forces fragmentation as ethernet MTU is 1500 bytes. This attack is a variation on a typical UDP flood but it enables more network bandwidth to be consumed with fewer packets. Additionally it has the potential to consume server CPU resources and fill memory buffers associated with the processing and reassembling of fragmented packets.
CAPEC-496: ICMP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a ICMP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of consuming resources or causing a crash. The attacker crafts a large number of identical fragmented IP packets containing a portion of a fragmented ICMP message. The attacker these sends these messages to a target host which causes the host to become non-responsive. Another vector may be sending a fragmented ICMP message to a target host with incorrect sizes in the header which causes the host to hang.
CAPEC-528: XML Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using XML messages with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a web service. These attacks are accomplished by sending a large number of XML based requests and letting the service attempt to parse each one. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a XML Denial of Service (XDoS) due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crashing.