CWE-693
DiscouragedProtection Mechanism Failure
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Draft
The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.
976 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XGC8-G7V4-9H8H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-16 00:30 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:34This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7, macOS Tahoe 26. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-43330"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T23:15:35Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7, macOS Tahoe 26. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox.",
"id": "GHSA-xgc8-g7v4-9h8h",
"modified": "2025-11-03T21:34:32Z",
"published": "2025-09-16T00:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-43330"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/125110"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/125111"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Sep/53"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Sep/54"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XGQ9-7GW6-JR5R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-16 15:32 – Updated: 2024-09-16 20:20Mattermost Desktop App versions <=5.8.0 fail to sufficiently configure Electron Fuses which allows an attacker to gather Chromium cookies or abuse other misconfigurations via remote/local access.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "mattermost-desktop"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.9.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45835"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-16T20:20:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-16T15:15:16Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Mattermost Desktop App versions \u003c=5.8.0 fail to sufficiently configure Electron Fuses which allows an attacker to gather Chromium cookies or abuse other misconfigurations via remote/local access.",
"id": "GHSA-xgq9-7gw6-jr5r",
"modified": "2024-09-16T20:20:59Z",
"published": "2024-09-16T15:32:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45835"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mattermost/desktop"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mattermost.com/security-updates"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Mattermost Desktop App fails to sufficiently configure Electron Fuses"
}
GHSA-XGQM-WP7W-MGG2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-14 09:31 – Updated: 2024-06-17 21:23Mattermost Desktop App versions <=5.7.0 fail to disable certain Electron debug flags which allows for bypassing TCC restrictions on macOS.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "mattermost-desktop"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.8.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-36287"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-06-17T21:23:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-14T09:15:09Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Mattermost Desktop App versions \u003c=5.7.0 fail to disable certain Electron debug flags which allows for bypassing\u00a0TCC restrictions on macOS.",
"id": "GHSA-xgqm-wp7w-mgg2",
"modified": "2024-06-17T21:23:49Z",
"published": "2024-06-14T09:31:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36287"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mattermost/desktop"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mattermost.com/security-updates"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Mattermost Desktop App allows for bypassing\u00a0TCC restrictions on macOS"
}
GHSA-XHXM-P3QV-QPRC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-11 15:31 – Updated: 2024-08-16 15:31By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 127 and Firefox ESR < 115.12.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-5691"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-11T13:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "By tricking the browser with a `X-Frame-Options` header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 127 and Firefox ESR \u003c 115.12.",
"id": "GHSA-xhxm-p3qv-qprc",
"modified": "2024-08-16T15:31:40Z",
"published": "2024-06-11T15:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5691"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1888695"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00010.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-25"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-28"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XJ37-QJG2-XWV2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-12 00:31 – Updated: 2026-03-12 17:34A security vulnerability has been detected in whyour qinglong up to 2.20.1. Affected is an unknown function of the file back/loaders/express.ts of the component API Interface. The manipulation of the argument command leads to protection mechanism failure. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.20.2 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 6bec52dca158481258315ba0fc2f11206df7b719. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The code maintainer was informed beforehand about the issues. He reacted very fast and highly professional.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@whyour/qinglong"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.20.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3965"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-12T17:34:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-12T00:16:11Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A security vulnerability has been detected in whyour qinglong up to 2.20.1. Affected is an unknown function of the file back/loaders/express.ts of the component API Interface. The manipulation of the argument command leads to protection mechanism failure. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.20.2 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 6bec52dca158481258315ba0fc2f11206df7b719. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The code maintainer was informed beforehand about the issues. He reacted very fast and highly professional.",
"id": "GHSA-xj37-qjg2-xwv2",
"modified": "2026-03-12T17:34:35Z",
"published": "2026-03-12T00:31:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3965"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/A7cc/cve/issues/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/A7cc/cve/issues/6#issue-3999235307"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/whyour/qinglong/pull/2941"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/whyour/qinglong/commit/6bec52dca158481258315ba0fc2f11206df7b719"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/whyour/qinglong"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/whyour/qinglong/releases/tag/v2.20.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.350394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.350394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.768861"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "@whyour/qinglong: manipulation of the argument command leads to protection mechanism failure"
}
GHSA-XJ5H-8PRX-GPX7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:31 – Updated: 2023-08-16 18:30Multiple vulnerabilities in the secure boot process of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software for the Firepower 1000 Series and Firepower 2100 Series Appliances could allow an authenticated, local attacker to bypass the secure boot mechanism. The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient protections of the secure boot process. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by injecting code into specific files that are then referenced during the device boot process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to break the chain of trust and inject code into the boot process of the device, which would be executed at each boot and maintain persistence across reboots.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-3458"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-10-21T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple vulnerabilities in the secure boot process of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software for the Firepower 1000 Series and Firepower 2100 Series Appliances could allow an authenticated, local attacker to bypass the secure boot mechanism. The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient protections of the secure boot process. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by injecting code into specific files that are then referenced during the device boot process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to break the chain of trust and inject code into the boot process of the device, which would be executed at each boot and maintain persistence across reboots.",
"id": "GHSA-xj5h-8prx-gpx7",
"modified": "2023-08-16T18:30:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:31:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-3458"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fxos-sbbyp-KqP6NgrE"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XJCR-R5HG-97FC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-03-11 18:30In U-Boot of append_uint32_le(), there is a possible fault injection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-36938"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-11T20:15:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In U-Boot of append_uint32_le(), there is a possible fault injection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
"id": "GHSA-xjcr-r5hg-97fc",
"modified": "2026-03-11T18:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-12-11T21:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-36938"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-03-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2025-12-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XP3R-9WX8-Q2MM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-19 19:00 – Updated: 2022-12-16 19:55Jenkins Compuware Topaz for Total Test Plugin 2.4.8 and earlier implements an agent/controller message that does not limit where it can be executed, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to obtain the values of Java system properties from the Jenkins controller process.
These vulnerabilities are only exploitable in Jenkins 2.318 and earlier, LTS 2.303.2 and earlier. See the LTS upgrade guide.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.4.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.compuware.jenkins:compuware-topaz-for-total-test"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.4.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-43428"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-610",
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-19T22:02:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-19T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Jenkins Compuware Topaz for Total Test Plugin 2.4.8 and earlier implements an agent/controller message that does not limit where it can be executed, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to obtain the values of Java system properties from the Jenkins controller process.\n\nThese vulnerabilities are only exploitable in Jenkins 2.318 and earlier, LTS 2.303.2 and earlier. See the [LTS upgrade guide](https://www.jenkins.io/doc/upgrade-guide/2.303/#upgrading-to-jenkins-lts-2-303-3).",
"id": "GHSA-xp3r-9wx8-q2mm",
"modified": "2022-12-16T19:55:09Z",
"published": "2022-10-19T19:00:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/compuware-topaz-for-total-test-plugin/commit/5fca6eb21599f8f27323dfa17a6e44f8176ca551"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/compuware-topaz-for-total-test-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-10-19/#SECURITY-2624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/19/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Agent-to-controller security bypass vulnerabilities in Jenkins Compuware Topaz for Total Test Plugin"
}
GHSA-XRMC-C5CG-RV7X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 19:34 – Updated: 2026-07-10 19:34Summary
SafeInstall CLI through 0.10.1 can fail to recognize some package-manager and registry-runner commands in its agent guard. Case-variant launcher names, leading file-descriptor redirections, and supported shell wrappers with options can cause a raw install command to receive no guard decision. Remote project scaffolding through package-manager create/init commands can also avoid the approval decision used for other registry runners.
Impact
When the SafeInstall guard is installed for a coding agent, a crafted shell command can bypass the intended deny or ask response. The coding agent may then run a package installation or registry-provided scaffolding command without SafeInstall policy evaluation and without SafeInstall enforcing disabled lifecycle scripts.
Exploitation requires a coding agent to act on attacker-influenced instructions and issue the crafted shell command. A successful malicious package or runner can execute with the permissions of the developer account, affecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of local source code, credentials, and development resources.
The vulnerability is limited to guard interception. Commands already routed through the SafeInstall CLI continue to receive normal policy evaluation.
Affected versions
- safeinstall-cli <= 0.10.1
Patched version
- safeinstall-cli 0.10.2
Fix
Version 0.10.2:
- normalizes package-manager and wrapper launcher names for detection and rewriting;
- parses leading redirections before classifying the command;
- handles supported wrapper option arity conservatively and fails closed on ambiguous embedded command syntax;
- routes remote create/init scaffolding through the registry-runner approval path;
- preserves SafeInstall routing for path-qualified package-manager invocations.
The patch includes a permanent regression corpus, table-driven parser characterization, an independent reference detector, and deterministic fuzz invariants. The integrated release candidate passed 626 tests, package smoke validation, and a one-million-command fuzz campaign with zero invariant violations.
Mitigation
Upgrade to safeinstall-cli 0.10.2 or later.
Until an upgrade is possible, manually review every coding-agent shell command and prevent the agent from invoking package managers or registry runners directly. Running an affected guard does not make raw package-manager execution safe.
Credits
Discovered, reproduced, and remediated by the SafeInstall maintainer during adversarial parser testing.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "safeinstall-cli"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.10.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-178",
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-10T19:34:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nSafeInstall CLI through 0.10.1 can fail to recognize some package-manager and registry-runner commands in its agent guard. Case-variant launcher names, leading file-descriptor redirections, and supported shell wrappers with options can cause a raw install command to receive no guard decision. Remote project scaffolding through package-manager create/init commands can also avoid the approval decision used for other registry runners.\n\n## Impact\n\nWhen the SafeInstall guard is installed for a coding agent, a crafted shell command can bypass the intended deny or ask response. The coding agent may then run a package installation or registry-provided scaffolding command without SafeInstall policy evaluation and without SafeInstall enforcing disabled lifecycle scripts.\n\nExploitation requires a coding agent to act on attacker-influenced instructions and issue the crafted shell command. A successful malicious package or runner can execute with the permissions of the developer account, affecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of local source code, credentials, and development resources.\n\nThe vulnerability is limited to guard interception. Commands already routed through the SafeInstall CLI continue to receive normal policy evaluation.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n- safeinstall-cli \u003c= 0.10.1\n\n## Patched version\n\n- safeinstall-cli 0.10.2\n\n## Fix\n\nVersion 0.10.2:\n\n- normalizes package-manager and wrapper launcher names for detection and rewriting;\n- parses leading redirections before classifying the command;\n- handles supported wrapper option arity conservatively and fails closed on ambiguous embedded command syntax;\n- routes remote create/init scaffolding through the registry-runner approval path;\n- preserves SafeInstall routing for path-qualified package-manager invocations.\n\nThe patch includes a permanent regression corpus, table-driven parser characterization, an independent reference detector, and deterministic fuzz invariants. The integrated release candidate passed 626 tests, package smoke validation, and a one-million-command fuzz campaign with zero invariant violations.\n\n## Mitigation\n\nUpgrade to safeinstall-cli 0.10.2 or later.\n\nUntil an upgrade is possible, manually review every coding-agent shell command and prevent the agent from invoking package managers or registry runners directly. Running an affected guard does not make raw package-manager execution safe.\n\n## Credits\n\nDiscovered, reproduced, and remediated by the SafeInstall maintainer during adversarial parser testing.",
"id": "GHSA-xrmc-c5cg-rv7x",
"modified": "2026-07-10T19:34:14Z",
"published": "2026-07-10T19:34:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Mickdownunder/SafeInstall/security/advisories/GHSA-xrmc-c5cg-rv7x"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Mickdownunder/SafeInstall"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "SafeInstall agent guard shell parsing can miss raw package execution"
}
GHSA-XVM9-36WR-8W6J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-11 18:30 – Updated: 2025-11-11 18:30Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an information disclosure. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-24834"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-11T17:15:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an information disclosure. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.",
"id": "GHSA-xvm9-36wr-8w6j",
"modified": "2025-11-11T18:30:18Z",
"published": "2025-11-11T18:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24834"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01328.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
CAPEC-107: Cross Site Tracing
Cross Site Tracing (XST) enables an adversary to steal the victim's session cookie and possibly other authentication credentials transmitted in the header of the HTTP request when the victim's browser communicates to a destination system's web server.
CAPEC-127: Directory Indexing
An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
CAPEC-17: Using Malicious Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an adversary to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an adversary to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
CAPEC-20: Encryption Brute Forcing
An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client
An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
CAPEC-237: Escaping a Sandbox by Calling Code in Another Language
The attacker may submit malicious code of another language to obtain access to privileges that were not intentionally exposed by the sandbox, thus escaping the sandbox. For instance, Java code cannot perform unsafe operations, such as modifying arbitrary memory locations, due to restrictions placed on it by the Byte code Verifier and the JVM. If allowed, Java code can call directly into native C code, which may perform unsafe operations, such as call system calls and modify arbitrary memory locations on their behalf. To provide isolation, Java does not grant untrusted code with unmediated access to native C code. Instead, the sandboxed code is typically allowed to call some subset of the pre-existing native code that is part of standard libraries.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-477: Signature Spoofing by Mixing Signed and Unsigned Content
An attacker exploits the underlying complexity of a data structure that allows for both signed and unsigned content, to cause unsigned data to be processed as though it were signed data.
CAPEC-480: Escaping Virtualization
An adversary gains access to an application, service, or device with the privileges of an authorized or privileged user by escaping the confines of a virtualized environment. The adversary is then able to access resources or execute unauthorized code within the host environment, generally with the privileges of the user running the virtualized process. Successfully executing an attack of this type is often the first step in executing more complex attacks.
CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry
SOA and Web Services often use a registry to perform look up, get schema information, and metadata about services. A poisoned registry can redirect (think phishing for servers) the service requester to a malicious service provider, provide incorrect information in schema or metadata, and delete information about service provider interfaces.
CAPEC-57: Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data
This attack utilizes a REST(REpresentational State Transfer)-style applications' trust in the system resources and environment to obtain sensitive data once SSL is terminated.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-65: Sniff Application Code
An adversary passively sniffs network communications and captures application code bound for an authorized client. Once obtained, they can use it as-is, or through reverse-engineering glean sensitive information or exploit the trust relationship between the client and server. Such code may belong to a dynamic update to the client, a patch being applied to a client component or any such interaction where the client is authorized to communicate with the server.
CAPEC-668: Key Negotiation of Bluetooth Attack (KNOB)
An adversary can exploit a flaw in Bluetooth key negotiation allowing them to decrypt information sent between two devices communicating via Bluetooth. The adversary uses an Adversary in the Middle setup to modify packets sent between the two devices during the authentication process, specifically the entropy bits. Knowledge of the number of entropy bits will allow the attacker to easily decrypt information passing over the line of communication.
CAPEC-74: Manipulating State
The adversary modifies state information maintained by the target software or causes a state transition in hardware. If successful, the target will use this tainted state and execute in an unintended manner.
State management is an important function within a software application. User state maintained by the application can include usernames, payment information, browsing history as well as application-specific contents such as items in a shopping cart. Manipulating user state can be employed by an adversary to elevate privilege, conduct fraudulent transactions or otherwise modify the flow of the application to derive certain benefits.
If there is a hardware logic error in a finite state machine, the adversary can use this to put the system in an undefined state which could cause a denial of service or exposure of secure data.
CAPEC-87: Forceful Browsing
An attacker employs forceful browsing (direct URL entry) to access portions of a website that are otherwise unreachable. Usually, a front controller or similar design pattern is employed to protect access to portions of a web application. Forceful browsing enables an attacker to access information, perform privileged operations and otherwise reach sections of the web application that have been improperly protected.