CWE-693
DiscouragedProtection Mechanism Failure
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Draft
The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.
978 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-R767-8X6Q-RPFX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-17 03:30 – Updated: 2025-12-17 03:30Certain motherboard models developed by GIGABYTE has a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. Because IOMMU was not properly enabled, unauthenticated physical attackers can use a DMA-capable PCIe device to read and write arbitrary physical memory before the OS kernel and its security features are loaded.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-14302"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-17T03:15:57Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Certain motherboard models developed by GIGABYTE has a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. Because IOMMU was not properly enabled, unauthenticated physical attackers can use a DMA-capable PCIe device to read and write arbitrary physical memory before the OS kernel and its security features are loaded.",
"id": "GHSA-r767-8x6q-rpfx",
"modified": "2025-12-17T03:30:13Z",
"published": "2025-12-17T03:30:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14302"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.gigabyte.com/Support/Security?type=1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10575-e4f41-2.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10574-ddf09-1.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-R7GR-W5GQ-FJXX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 00:34 – Updated: 2026-07-01 18:31Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-14097"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-30T23:17:21Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)",
"id": "GHSA-r7gr-w5gq-fjxx",
"modified": "2026-07-01T18:31:40Z",
"published": "2026-07-01T00:34:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14097"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0175352312.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/513333529"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R7VV-6763-M739
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-06-18 20:15Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-68xw-r643-9p5w. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains a hook bypass vulnerability where skill commands routed through the affected dispatch path skip before-tool-call hook coverage. Attackers can exploit this by sending skill commands through the vulnerable dispatch path to bypass hook-based auditing and policy enforcement mechanisms.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.5.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T20:15:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-16T19:17:01Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of\u00a0GHSA-68xw-r643-9p5w. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains a hook bypass vulnerability where skill commands routed through the affected dispatch path skip before-tool-call hook coverage. Attackers can exploit this by sending skill commands through the vulnerable dispatch path to bypass hook-based auditing and policy enforcement mechanisms.",
"id": "GHSA-r7vv-6763-m739",
"modified": "2026-06-18T20:15:49Z",
"published": "2026-06-16T21:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-68xw-r643-9p5w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53845"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-skill-command-dispatch-hook-bypass-via-before-tool-call-hook-skipping"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Skill-command dispatch could skip before-tool-call hooks",
"withdrawn": "2026-06-18T20:15:49Z"
}
GHSA-R824-GQ56-GJGX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-03 21:39 – Updated: 2025-04-28 18:30Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1 allows memory corruption, and SAFER sandbox bypass, via format string injection with a uniprint device.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-29510"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-03T19:15:03Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1 allows memory corruption, and SAFER sandbox bypass, via format string injection with a uniprint device.",
"id": "GHSA-r824-gq56-gjgx",
"modified": "2025-04-28T18:30:41Z",
"published": "2024-07-03T21:39:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-29510"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/critical-vulnerability-in-ghostscript-cve-2024-29510"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R83H-CRWP-3VM7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 18:51 – Updated: 2026-04-14 18:51An heap use after free when reading an invalid XMP profile could result in a crash due to an heap use after free when printing the values.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-HDRI-AnyCPU"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-HDRI-OpenMP-arm64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-HDRI-arm64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-HDRI-x64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-HDRI-x86"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-OpenMP-arm64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-OpenMP-x64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-arm64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-x64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q16-x86"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q8-AnyCPU"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q8-OpenMP-arm64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q8-arm64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q8-x64"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Magick.NET-Q8-x86"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "14.12.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-40311"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416",
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T18:51:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-13T22:16:29Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An heap use after free when reading an invalid XMP profile could result in a crash due to an heap use after free when printing the values.",
"id": "GHSA-r83h-crwp-3vm7",
"modified": "2026-04-14T18:51:48Z",
"published": "2026-04-14T18:51:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/security/advisories/GHSA-r83h-crwp-3vm7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40311"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/5facfecf1abb3fed46a08f614dcc43d1e548e20d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/releases/tag/7.1.2-19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dlemstra/Magick.NET/releases/tag/14.12.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "ImageMagick has a heap-use-after-free via XMP profile could result in a crash when printing the values."
}
GHSA-R9PM-GXMW-WV6P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-29 18:08 – Updated: 2026-06-12 19:30Summary
NodeVM supports excluding public network builtins from the wildcard builtin option. With this configuration direct access to http, https, http2, net, dgram, tls, dns, and dns/promises is blocked.
However, Node.js also exposes underscored internal HTTP builtins such as _http_client and _http_server. These are not blocked when the public modules are excluded.
Sandboxed code can use these internal builtins to make outbound HTTP requests and open listening HTTP sockets even though the public network modules are denied.
Note: This is not host RCE. It is a network capability bypass that can lead to SSRF-style access to internal services.
Details
The wildcard builtin expansion is based on Node.js builtin module names:
const BUILTIN_MODULES = (nmod.builtinModules || Object.getOwnPropertyNames(process.binding('natives')))
.filter(s=>!s.startsWith('internal/') && !DANGEROUS_BUILTINS.has(s));
Public modules can be excluded with -name:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
But excluding http and net does not exclude internal siblings such as:
_http_client
_http_server
_tls_wrap
These internal modules expose network primitives.
Confirmed examples:
require('_http_client').ClientRequest(...)performs an outbound HTTP request to a host-local service whilehttpandnetare blocked.require('_http_server').Server(...).listen(...)opens a listening HTTP socket whilehttpandnetare blocked.
PoC
Tested on:
vm2: 3.11.2
Node.js: v25.9.0
Run from the vm2 repository root:
node poc/internal-http-builtin-network-bypass.js
internal-http-builtin-network-bypass.js
The PoC first confirms the intended restrictions work then bypasses them:
require("_http_client").ClientRequest(...)
This performs an HTTP request to a host-local service and reads the response.
It also confirms:
require("_http_server").Server(...).listen(0)
This opens a listening HTTP socket from inside the sandbox.
Impact
An attacker who can run untrusted JavaScript inside NodeVM with this affected builtin configuration can regain network access even when the application attempted to block network modules.
This can allow SSRF-style access to localhost services, metadata endpoints, internal admin panels, or other network resources reachable from the host process.
Suggested fix
Treat underscored internal network modules as dangerous or link their availability to the public module they wrap.
At minimum, exclude related internal modules such as:
_http_agent
_http_client
_http_common
_http_incoming
_http_outgoing
_http_server
_tls_common
_tls_wrap
Alternatively, deny underscored Node.js internals from wildcard builtin expansion by default.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.11.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "vm2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.11.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-47139"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-29T18:08:06Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T15:16:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`NodeVM` supports excluding public network builtins from the wildcard builtin option. With this configuration direct access to `http`, `https`, `http2`, `net`, `dgram`, `tls`, `dns`, and `dns/promises` is blocked.\n\nHowever, Node.js also exposes underscored internal HTTP builtins such as `_http_client` and `_http_server`. These are not blocked when the public modules are excluded.\n\nSandboxed code can use these internal builtins to make outbound HTTP requests and open listening HTTP sockets even though the public network modules are denied.\n\n**Note**: This is not host RCE. It is a network capability bypass that can lead to SSRF-style access to internal services.\n\n## Details\n\nThe wildcard builtin expansion is based on Node.js builtin module names:\n\n```js\nconst BUILTIN_MODULES = (nmod.builtinModules || Object.getOwnPropertyNames(process.binding(\u0027natives\u0027)))\n .filter(s=\u003e!s.startsWith(\u0027internal/\u0027) \u0026\u0026 !DANGEROUS_BUILTINS.has(s));\n```\n\nPublic modules can be excluded with `-name`:\n\n```js\nif (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {\n addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);\n}\n```\n\nBut excluding `http` and `net` does not exclude internal siblings such as:\n\n```text\n_http_client\n_http_server\n_tls_wrap\n```\n\nThese internal modules expose network primitives.\n\nConfirmed examples:\n\n1. `require(\u0027_http_client\u0027).ClientRequest(...)` performs an outbound HTTP request to a host-local service while `http` and `net` are blocked.\n2. `require(\u0027_http_server\u0027).Server(...).listen(...)` opens a listening HTTP socket while `http` and `net` are blocked.\n\n## PoC\n\nTested on:\n\n```text\nvm2: 3.11.2\nNode.js: v25.9.0\n```\n\nRun from the vm2 repository root:\n\n```bash\nnode poc/internal-http-builtin-network-bypass.js\n```\n[internal-http-builtin-network-bypass.js](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27571182/internal-http-builtin-network-bypass.js)\n\n\nThe PoC first confirms the intended restrictions work then bypasses them:\n\n```text\nrequire(\"_http_client\").ClientRequest(...)\n```\n\nThis performs an HTTP request to a host-local service and reads the response.\n\nIt also confirms:\n\n```text\nrequire(\"_http_server\").Server(...).listen(0)\n```\n\nThis opens a listening HTTP socket from inside the sandbox.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"951\" height=\"623\" alt=\"Screenshot 2026-05-10 at 1 07 39\u202fPM\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21bfb1ff-dd15-423a-92c4-0337cd07816c\" /\u003e\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can run untrusted JavaScript inside `NodeVM` with this affected builtin configuration can regain network access even when the application attempted to block network modules.\n\nThis can allow SSRF-style access to localhost services, metadata endpoints, internal admin panels, or other network resources reachable from the host process.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nTreat underscored internal network modules as dangerous or link their availability to the public module they wrap.\n\nAt minimum, exclude related internal modules such as:\n\n```text\n_http_agent\n_http_client\n_http_common\n_http_incoming\n_http_outgoing\n_http_server\n_tls_common\n_tls_wrap\n```\n\nAlternatively, deny underscored Node.js internals from wildcard builtin expansion by default.",
"id": "GHSA-r9pm-gxmw-wv6p",
"modified": "2026-06-12T19:30:09Z",
"published": "2026-05-29T18:08:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-r9pm-gxmw-wv6p"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47139"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/436053e30eecbabd487e2fd2959c137ac34e2bb1"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.11.4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "NodeVM network builtin exclusions bypass via internal _http_client and _http_server"
}
GHSA-RF2V-QJ9W-X393
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-10 18:30 – Updated: 2025-10-22 00:33Microsoft Publisher Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38226"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-10T17:15:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Publisher Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability",
"id": "GHSA-rf2v-qj9w-x393",
"modified": "2025-10-22T00:33:06Z",
"published": "2024-09-10T18:30:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2024-38226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-38226"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RF4J-9C72-QFW6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 00:34 – Updated: 2026-07-01 00:34picklescan before 0.0.29 fails to detect the built-in Python trace.Trace.runctx function when used in pickle file reduce methods, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle files with trace.Trace.runctx payloads that bypass picklescan detection and execute code upon pickle.load() invocation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71352"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-30T23:16:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "picklescan before 0.0.29 fails to detect the built-in Python trace.Trace.runctx function when used in pickle file reduce methods, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle files with trace.Trace.runctx payloads that bypass picklescan detection and execute code upon pickle.load() invocation.",
"id": "GHSA-rf4j-9c72-qfw6",
"modified": "2026-07-01T00:34:01Z",
"published": "2026-07-01T00:34:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-g344-hcph-8vgg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-remote-code-execution-via-undetected-trace-trace-runctx-in-pickle-files"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-RF7Q-C3FX-F2JJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-05 18:31Inappropriate implementation in Site Isolation in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11174"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-04T23:17:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in Site Isolation in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
"id": "GHSA-rf7q-c3fx-f2jj",
"modified": "2026-06-05T18:31:37Z",
"published": "2026-06-05T00:31:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/502348223"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RFGW-G9G4-685P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 15:37 – Updated: 2026-06-30 03:35Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 147, Firefox ESR < 115.32, and Firefox ESR < 140.7.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0877"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T14:16:38Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 147, Firefox ESR \u003c 115.32, and Firefox ESR \u003c 140.7.",
"id": "GHSA-rfgw-g9g4-685p",
"modified": "2026-06-30T03:35:24Z",
"published": "2026-01-13T15:37:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0877"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0667"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2073"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2074"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2220"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2231"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2286"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-0877"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999257"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2428969"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-0877.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-03"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-04"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-05"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0694"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0924"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1320"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1413"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1414"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1461"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1462"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1471"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1487"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2047"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2069"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2070"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
CAPEC-107: Cross Site Tracing
Cross Site Tracing (XST) enables an adversary to steal the victim's session cookie and possibly other authentication credentials transmitted in the header of the HTTP request when the victim's browser communicates to a destination system's web server.
CAPEC-127: Directory Indexing
An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
CAPEC-17: Using Malicious Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an adversary to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an adversary to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
CAPEC-20: Encryption Brute Forcing
An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client
An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
CAPEC-237: Escaping a Sandbox by Calling Code in Another Language
The attacker may submit malicious code of another language to obtain access to privileges that were not intentionally exposed by the sandbox, thus escaping the sandbox. For instance, Java code cannot perform unsafe operations, such as modifying arbitrary memory locations, due to restrictions placed on it by the Byte code Verifier and the JVM. If allowed, Java code can call directly into native C code, which may perform unsafe operations, such as call system calls and modify arbitrary memory locations on their behalf. To provide isolation, Java does not grant untrusted code with unmediated access to native C code. Instead, the sandboxed code is typically allowed to call some subset of the pre-existing native code that is part of standard libraries.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-477: Signature Spoofing by Mixing Signed and Unsigned Content
An attacker exploits the underlying complexity of a data structure that allows for both signed and unsigned content, to cause unsigned data to be processed as though it were signed data.
CAPEC-480: Escaping Virtualization
An adversary gains access to an application, service, or device with the privileges of an authorized or privileged user by escaping the confines of a virtualized environment. The adversary is then able to access resources or execute unauthorized code within the host environment, generally with the privileges of the user running the virtualized process. Successfully executing an attack of this type is often the first step in executing more complex attacks.
CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry
SOA and Web Services often use a registry to perform look up, get schema information, and metadata about services. A poisoned registry can redirect (think phishing for servers) the service requester to a malicious service provider, provide incorrect information in schema or metadata, and delete information about service provider interfaces.
CAPEC-57: Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data
This attack utilizes a REST(REpresentational State Transfer)-style applications' trust in the system resources and environment to obtain sensitive data once SSL is terminated.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-65: Sniff Application Code
An adversary passively sniffs network communications and captures application code bound for an authorized client. Once obtained, they can use it as-is, or through reverse-engineering glean sensitive information or exploit the trust relationship between the client and server. Such code may belong to a dynamic update to the client, a patch being applied to a client component or any such interaction where the client is authorized to communicate with the server.
CAPEC-668: Key Negotiation of Bluetooth Attack (KNOB)
An adversary can exploit a flaw in Bluetooth key negotiation allowing them to decrypt information sent between two devices communicating via Bluetooth. The adversary uses an Adversary in the Middle setup to modify packets sent between the two devices during the authentication process, specifically the entropy bits. Knowledge of the number of entropy bits will allow the attacker to easily decrypt information passing over the line of communication.
CAPEC-74: Manipulating State
The adversary modifies state information maintained by the target software or causes a state transition in hardware. If successful, the target will use this tainted state and execute in an unintended manner.
State management is an important function within a software application. User state maintained by the application can include usernames, payment information, browsing history as well as application-specific contents such as items in a shopping cart. Manipulating user state can be employed by an adversary to elevate privilege, conduct fraudulent transactions or otherwise modify the flow of the application to derive certain benefits.
If there is a hardware logic error in a finite state machine, the adversary can use this to put the system in an undefined state which could cause a denial of service or exposure of secure data.
CAPEC-87: Forceful Browsing
An attacker employs forceful browsing (direct URL entry) to access portions of a website that are otherwise unreachable. Usually, a front controller or similar design pattern is employed to protect access to portions of a web application. Forceful browsing enables an attacker to access information, perform privileged operations and otherwise reach sections of the web application that have been improperly protected.