Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-521

Allowed

Weak Password Requirements

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product does not require that users should have strong passwords.

351 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-3MMP-V5FP-4VCM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-27 06:30 – Updated: 2025-08-27 06:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been found in macrozheng mall up to 1.0.3. This impacts an unknown function of the component Registration. Such manipulation leads to weak password requirements. The attack can be executed remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The vendor deleted the GitHub issue for this vulnerability without and explanation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-9514"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-27T06:15:32Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been found in macrozheng mall up to 1.0.3. This impacts an unknown function of the component Registration. Such manipulation leads to weak password requirements. The attack can be executed remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The vendor deleted the GitHub issue for this vulnerability without and explanation.",
  "id": "GHSA-3mmp-v5fp-4vcm",
  "modified": "2025-08-27T06:30:27Z",
  "published": "2025-08-27T06:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9514"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/macrozheng/mall/issues/923"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321507"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321507"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.635503"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3PR4-C94W-58X7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:46 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:46
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. macOS before 10.13 Supplemental Update is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component. It allows attackers to bypass the keychain access prompt, and consequently extract passwords, via a synthetic click.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-7150"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-23T01:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. macOS before 10.13 Supplemental Update is affected. The issue involves the \"Security\" component. It allows attackers to bypass the keychain access prompt, and consequently extract passwords, via a synthetic click.",
  "id": "GHSA-3pr4-c94w-58x7",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:46:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:46:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-7150"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/HT208165"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039430"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3Q22-68GW-X3MQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-01 18:30 – Updated: 2025-10-01 18:30
VLAI
Details

IBM Transformation Extender Advanced 10.0.1

does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-49883"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-01T17:15:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Transformation Extender Advanced 10.0.1 \n\n\n\n\n\ndoes not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.",
  "id": "GHSA-3q22-68gw-x3mq",
  "modified": "2025-10-01T18:30:39Z",
  "published": "2025-10-01T18:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49883"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7246885"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3V2G-M6QM-PVJ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-07 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-14 00:03
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Kaseya Unitrends Backup Appliance before 10.5.5. The password for the PostgreSQL wguest account is weak.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-43036"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-06T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Kaseya Unitrends Backup Appliance before 10.5.5. The password for the PostgreSQL wguest account is weak.",
  "id": "GHSA-3v2g-m6qm-pvj3",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T00:03:45Z",
  "published": "2021-12-07T00:00:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43036"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://helpdesk.kaseya.com/hc/en-gb/articles/4412762258961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cyberonesecurity.com/blog/exploiting-kaseya-unitrends-backup-appliance-part-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cyberonesecurity.com/blog/exploiting-kaseya-unitrends-backup-appliance-part-2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-43X5-W66J-7JFW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-21 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-05 00:00
VLAI
Details

The weak password on the web user interface can be exploited via HTTP or HTTPS. Once such access has been obtained, the other passwords can be changed. The weak password on Linux accounts can be accessed via SSH or Telnet, the former of which is by default enabled on trusted interfaces. While the SSH service does not support root login, a user logging in using either of the other Linux accounts may elevate to root access using the su command if they have access to the associated password.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-1039"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-04-20T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The weak password on the web user interface can be exploited via HTTP or HTTPS. Once such access has been obtained, the other passwords can be changed. The weak password on Linux accounts can be accessed via SSH or Telnet, the former of which is by default enabled on trusted interfaces. While the SSH service does not support root login, a user logging in using either of the other Linux accounts may elevate to root access using the su command if they have access to the associated password.",
  "id": "GHSA-43x5-w66j-7jfw",
  "modified": "2022-05-05T00:00:47Z",
  "published": "2022-04-21T00:00:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1039"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-104-03"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-45CF-5RXQ-XPQR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 22:00 – Updated: 2022-12-03 00:30
VLAI
Details

IBM Intelligent Operations Center V5.1.0 - V5.2.0, IBM Intelligent Operations Center for Emergency Management V5.1.0 - V5.1.0.6, and IBM Water Operations for Waternamics V5.1.0 - V5.2.1.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 161201.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-4321"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-09-05T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "IBM Intelligent Operations Center V5.1.0 - V5.2.0, IBM Intelligent Operations Center for Emergency Management V5.1.0 - V5.1.0.6, and IBM Water Operations for Waternamics V5.1.0 - V5.2.1.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 161201.",
  "id": "GHSA-45cf-5rxq-xpqr",
  "modified": "2022-12-03T00:30:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T22:00:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-4321"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/161201"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm10885901"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-4766-3XQH-RP5X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-09 03:30 – Updated: 2024-02-16 15:30
VLAI
Details

In Gradle Enterprise before 2023.1, a remote attacker may be able to gain access to a new installation (in certain installation scenarios) because of a non-unique initial system user password. Although this password must be changed upon the first login, it is possible that an attacker logs in before the legitimate administrator logs in.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-49238"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-09T02:15:44Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In Gradle Enterprise before 2023.1, a remote attacker may be able to gain access to a new installation (in certain installation scenarios) because of a non-unique initial system user password. Although this password must be changed upon the first login, it is possible that an attacker logs in before the legitimate administrator logs in.",
  "id": "GHSA-4766-3xqh-rp5x",
  "modified": "2024-02-16T15:30:26Z",
  "published": "2024-01-09T03:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49238"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gradle.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gradle.com/advisory/2023-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240216-0003"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-4993-M7G5-R9HH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-06 23:14 – Updated: 2022-10-06 23:14
VLAI
Summary
etcd has no minimum password length
Details

Vulnerability type

Access Control

Workarounds

The etcdctl and etcd API do not enforce a specific password length during user creation or user password update operations. It is the responsibility of the administrator to enforce these requirements.

Detail

etcd does not perform any password length validation, which allows for very short passwords, such as those with a length of one. This may allow an attacker to guess or brute-force users’ passwords with little computational effort.

References

Find out more on this vulnerability in the security audit report

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Contact the etcd security committee

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.4.10"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.23"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-15115"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-06T23:14:23Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-08-06T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Vulnerability type\nAccess Control\n\n### Workarounds\nThe etcdctl and etcd API do not enforce a specific password length during user creation or user password update operations. [It is the responsibility of the administrator to enforce these requirements](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/Documentation/op-guide/authentication.md#notes-on-password-strength).\n\n### Detail\netcd does not perform any password length validation, which allows for very short passwords, such as those with a length of one. This may allow an attacker to guess or brute-force users\u2019 passwords with little computational effort.\n\n### References\nFind out more on this vulnerability in the [security audit report](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Contact the [etcd security committee](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/security-release-process.md#product-security-committee-psc)",
  "id": "GHSA-4993-m7g5-r9hh",
  "modified": "2022-10-06T23:14:23Z",
  "published": "2022-10-06T23:14:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-4993-m7g5-r9hh"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15115"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "etcd has no minimum password length"
}

GHSA-4CFR-XP32-H9C9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-29 18:31 – Updated: 2025-01-29 18:31
VLAI
Details

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.10 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-35907"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-29T17:15:26Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.10 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.",
  "id": "GHSA-4cfr-xp32-h9c9",
  "modified": "2025-01-29T18:31:22Z",
  "published": "2025-01-29T18:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-35907"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7181814"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-4FG7-XXFH-8QC3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:23 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:23
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered on D-Link DIR-825 Rev.B 2.10 devices. The "user" account has a blank password.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-9123"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-521"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-02-25T05:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered on D-Link DIR-825 Rev.B 2.10 devices. The \"user\" account has a blank password.",
  "id": "GHSA-4fg7-xxfh-8qc3",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:23:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:23:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9123"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/WhooAmii/whooamii.github.io/blob/master/2018/DIR-825/Permission%20access%20control.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • A product's design should require adherance to an appropriate password policy. Specific password requirements depend strongly on contextual factors, but it is recommended to contain the following attributes:
  • Depending on the threat model, the password policy may include several additional attributes.
  • See NIST 800-63B [REF-1053] for further information on password requirements.
  • {'xhtml:li': ['Enforcement of a minimum and maximum length', 'Restrictions against password reuse', 'Restrictions against using common passwords', 'Restrictions against using contextual string in the password (e.g., user id, app name)']}
  • {'xhtml:li': [{'xhtml:ul': {'xhtml:li': ['Increasing the range of characters makes the password harder to crack and may be appropriate for systems relying on single factor authentication.', 'Unfortunately, a complex password may be difficult to memorize, encouraging a user to select a short password or to incorrectly manage the password (write it down).', "Another disadvantage of this approach is that it often does not result in a significant increases in overal password complexity due to people's predictable usage of various symbols."]}, '#text': 'Complex passwords requiring mixed character sets (alpha, numeric, special, mixed case)'}, {'xhtml:ul': {'xhtml:li': ['Increasing the number of characters makes the password harder to crack and may be appropriate for systems relying on single factor authentication.', 'A disadvantage of this approach is that selecting a good passphrase is not easy and poor passwords can still be generated. Some prompting may be needed to encourage long un-predictable passwords.']}, '#text': 'Large Minimum Length (encouraging passphrases instead of passwords)'}, {'xhtml:ul': {'xhtml:li': ['Generating a password for the user can help make sure that length and complexity requirements are met, and can result in secure passwords being used.', 'A disadvantage of this approach is that the resulting password or passpharse may be too difficult to memorize, encouraging them to be written down.']}, '#text': 'Randomly Chosen Secrets'}]}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Consider a second authentication factor beyond the password, which prevents the password from being a single point of failure. See CWE-308 for further information.

Mitigation
Implementation

Consider implementing a password complexity meter to inform users when a chosen password meets the required attributes.

Mitigation
Implementation

Previously, "password expiration" was widely advocated as a defense-in-depth approach to minimize the risk of weak passwords, and it has become a common practice. Password expiration requires a password to be changed within a fixed time window (such as every 90 days). However, this approach has significant limitations in the current threat landscape, and its utility has been reduced in light of the adoption of related protection mechanisms (such as password complexity and computational effort), along with the recognition that regular password changes often caused users to generate more predictable passwords. As a result, this is now a Discouraged Common Practice [REF-1488] [REF-1489], especially as the sole factor in protecting passwords. It is still strongly encouraged to force password changes in case of evidence of compromise, but this is not the same as a forced "expiration" on an arbitrary time frame.

CAPEC-112: Brute Force

In this attack, some asset (information, functionality, identity, etc.) is protected by a finite secret value. The attacker attempts to gain access to this asset by using trial-and-error to exhaustively explore all the possible secret values in the hope of finding the secret (or a value that is functionally equivalent) that will unlock the asset.

CAPEC-16: Dictionary-based Password Attack

An attacker tries each of the words in a dictionary as passwords to gain access to the system via some user's account. If the password chosen by the user was a word within the dictionary, this attack will be successful (in the absence of other mitigations). This is a specific instance of the password brute forcing attack pattern.

Dictionary Attacks differ from similar attacks such as Password Spraying (CAPEC-565) and Credential Stuffing (CAPEC-600), since they leverage unknown username/password combinations and don't care about inducing account lockouts.

CAPEC-49: Password Brute Forcing

An adversary tries every possible value for a password until they succeed. A brute force attack, if feasible computationally, will always be successful because it will essentially go through all possible passwords given the alphabet used (lower case letters, upper case letters, numbers, symbols, etc.) and the maximum length of the password.

CAPEC-509: Kerberoasting

Through the exploitation of how service accounts leverage Kerberos authentication with Service Principal Names (SPNs), the adversary obtains and subsequently cracks the hashed credentials of a service account target to exploit its privileges. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. As an authenticated user, the adversary may request Active Directory and obtain a service ticket with portions encrypted via RC4 with the private key of the authenticated account. By extracting the local ticket and saving it disk, the adversary can brute force the hashed value to reveal the target account credentials.

CAPEC-55: Rainbow Table Password Cracking

An attacker gets access to the database table where hashes of passwords are stored. They then use a rainbow table of pre-computed hash chains to attempt to look up the original password. Once the original password corresponding to the hash is obtained, the attacker uses the original password to gain access to the system.

CAPEC-555: Remote Services with Stolen Credentials

This pattern of attack involves an adversary that uses stolen credentials to leverage remote services such as RDP, telnet, SSH, and VNC to log into a system. Once access is gained, any number of malicious activities could be performed.

CAPEC-561: Windows Admin Shares with Stolen Credentials

An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows administrator credentials (e.g. userID/password) to access Windows Admin Shares on a local machine or within a Windows domain.

CAPEC-565: Password Spraying

In a Password Spraying attack, an adversary tries a small list (e.g. 3-5) of common or expected passwords, often matching the target's complexity policy, against a known list of user accounts to gain valid credentials. The adversary tries a particular password for each user account, before moving onto the next password in the list. This approach assists the adversary in remaining undetected by avoiding rapid or frequent account lockouts. The adversary may then reattempt the process with additional passwords, once enough time has passed to prevent inducing a lockout.

CAPEC-70: Try Common or Default Usernames and Passwords

An adversary may try certain common or default usernames and passwords to gain access into the system and perform unauthorized actions. An adversary may try an intelligent brute force using empty passwords, known vendor default credentials, as well as a dictionary of common usernames and passwords. Many vendor products come preconfigured with default (and thus well-known) usernames and passwords that should be deleted prior to usage in a production environment. It is a common mistake to forget to remove these default login credentials. Another problem is that users would pick very simple (common) passwords (e.g. "secret" or "password") that make it easier for the attacker to gain access to the system compared to using a brute force attack or even a dictionary attack using a full dictionary.