CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-P6M5-M496-HFM6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-16 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alok Tiwari Amazon Product Price allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Amazon Product Price: from n/a through 1.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-54439"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-16T15:15:22Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alok Tiwari Amazon Product Price allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Amazon Product Price: from n/a through 1.1.",
"id": "GHSA-p6m5-m496-hfm6",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:51Z",
"published": "2024-12-16T15:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-54439"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/amazon-product-price/vulnerability/wordpress-amazon-product-price-plugin-1-1-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6MR-XF3R-GHQ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 21:36 – Updated: 2026-04-01 21:36Impact
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability existed in the authentication flow. Under certain conditions, the configured CSRF protection could be bypassed, allowing cross-site requests to be made.
Consumers are affected if ALL of these are true:
- Payload version < v3.79.1
serverURLis configured
Patches
This vulnerability has been patched in v3.79.1. Additional validation has been added to the authentication flow.
Consumers should upgrade to v3.79.1 or later.
Workarounds
There is no complete workaround without upgrading.
If consumers cannot upgrade immediately, setting cookies.sameSite to 'Strict' will prevent the session cookie from being sent cross-site. However, this will also require users to re-authenticate when navigating to the application from external links (e.g. email, other sites).
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "payload"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.79.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34749"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-01T21:36:06Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-01T20:16:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability existed in the authentication flow. Under certain conditions, the configured CSRF protection could be bypassed, allowing cross-site requests to be made.\n\nConsumers are affected if ALL of these are true:\n\n- Payload version **\u003c v3.79.1**\n- `serverURL` is configured\n\n### Patches\n\nThis vulnerability has been patched in **v3.79.1**. Additional validation has been added to the authentication flow.\n\nConsumers should upgrade to **v3.79.1** or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere is no complete workaround without upgrading. \n\nIf consumers cannot upgrade immediately, setting `cookies.sameSite` to `\u0027Strict\u0027` will prevent the session cookie from being sent cross-site. However, this will also require users to re-authenticate when navigating to the application from external links (e.g. email, other sites).",
"id": "GHSA-p6mr-xf3r-ghq4",
"modified": "2026-04-01T21:36:06Z",
"published": "2026-04-01T21:36:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/security/advisories/GHSA-p6mr-xf3r-ghq4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34749"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/payloadcms/payload"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/releases/tag/v3.79.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Payload has a CSRF Protection Bypass in Authentication Flow"
}
GHSA-P6P3-CHV5-MWRQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 00:01 – Updated: 2022-05-31 00:00Lumidek Associates Simple Food Website 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows anyone to takeover admin/moderater account.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-30014"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-23T16:16:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Lumidek Associates Simple Food Website 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows anyone to takeover admin/moderater account.",
"id": "GHSA-p6p3-chv5-mwrq",
"modified": "2022-05-31T00:00:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T00:01:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30014"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/offsecin/bugsdisclose/blob/main/csrf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lumidek.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://simple.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6PR-26JX-RXMW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-10 18:30 – Updated: 2025-09-10 18:30A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) Software and Cisco Unified CM Session Management Edition (SME) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-20326"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-03T18:15:33Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) Software and Cisco Unified CM Session Management Edition (SME) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device.\n\nThis vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.",
"id": "GHSA-p6pr-26jx-rxmw",
"modified": "2025-09-10T18:30:14Z",
"published": "2025-09-10T18:30:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-20326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-cucm-csrf-w762pRYd"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6QV-FRQJ-63R6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-02 06:30 – Updated: 2024-11-20 21:30The Button Generator WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete buttons via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-3471"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-02T06:15:50Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The Button Generator WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete buttons via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-p6qv-frqj-63r6",
"modified": "2024-11-20T21:30:43Z",
"published": "2024-05-02T06:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3471"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/a3c282fb-81b8-48bf-8c18-8366ea8ad9af"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6VG-HCCP-MXHQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-14 06:34 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:33The Schema App Structured Data plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the MarkUpdate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update and delete post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0892"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-14T04:15:17Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Schema App Structured Data plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the MarkUpdate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update and delete post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-p6vg-hccp-mxhq",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:33:25Z",
"published": "2024-06-14T06:34:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/schema-app-structured-data-for-schemaorg/trunk/lib/SchemaEditor.php#L327"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3108928%40schema-app-structured-data-for-schemaorg\u0026new=3108928%40schema-app-structured-data-for-schemaorg\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/254291b3-a30d-44ff-9df4-6ba700a9efc9?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6W5-QF2C-M57M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-02 09:30 – Updated: 2026-06-02 09:36Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Proticaret E-Commerce: before v6.0
NOTE: According to the vendor, fixing process is still ongoing for v4.05.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-11142"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-02T08:15:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Proticaret E-Commerce: before v6.0\n\nNOTE: According to the vendor, fixing process is still ongoing for v4.05.",
"id": "GHSA-p6w5-qf2c-m57m",
"modified": "2026-06-02T09:36:14Z",
"published": "2025-05-02T09:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-11142"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-25-0098"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-25-0098"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P726-6587-94PH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-08 06:30 – Updated: 2024-09-09 21:31The WP MultiTasking WordPress plugin through 0.1.12 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6856"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-08T06:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP MultiTasking WordPress plugin through 0.1.12 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-p726-6587-94ph",
"modified": "2024-09-09T21:31:22Z",
"published": "2024-09-08T06:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6856"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9700845e-89ca-4f9b-95f0-4b46a975b662"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P732-PXQ3-8XMQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-03 12:33 – Updated: 2025-10-03 12:33The PayPal Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the form creation and management functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new PayPal forms and modify PayPal payment settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-10309"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-03T12:15:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The PayPal Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the form creation and management functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new PayPal forms and modify PayPal payment settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-p732-pxq3-8xmq",
"modified": "2025-10-03T12:33:15Z",
"published": "2025-10-03T12:33:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-10309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/paypal-forms/trunk/paypal-forms.php#L533"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/8cc25fe1-82f0-493b-a9d3-1a4892e35613?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P738-HFMQ-65WM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-13 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-17 00:00An issue was discovered in the webmail component in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. When using preauth, CSRF tokens are not checked on some POST endpoints. Thus, when an authenticated user views an attacker-controlled page, a request will be sent to the application that appears to be intended. The CSRF token is omitted from the request, but the request still succeeds.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-37043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-12T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in the webmail component in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. When using preauth, CSRF tokens are not checked on some POST endpoints. Thus, when an authenticated user views an attacker-controlled page, a request will be sent to the application that appears to be intended. The CSRF token is omitted from the request, but the request still succeeds.",
"id": "GHSA-p738-hfmq-65wm",
"modified": "2022-08-17T00:00:24Z",
"published": "2022-08-13T00:00:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.