CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-P694-PGRR-CMPQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-15 21:31 – Updated: 2025-05-16 21:32The EKC Tournament Manager WordPress plugin before 2.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9711"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-15T20:16:01Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The EKC Tournament Manager WordPress plugin before 2.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-p694-pgrr-cmpq",
"modified": "2025-05-16T21:32:11Z",
"published": "2025-05-15T21:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9711"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/daee95c5-006e-4a83-b92a-7faa3e89d985"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P69G-F978-XXV9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2018-12-20 22:01 – Updated: 2024-09-30 16:56Luigi version prior to version 2.8.0; after commit 53b52e12745075a8acc016d33945d9d6a7a6aaeb; after GitHub PR spotify/luigi/pull/1870 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in API endpoint: /api/ that can result in Task metadata such as task name, id, parameter, etc. will be leaked to unauthorized users. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim must visit a specially crafted webpage from the network where their Luigi server is accessible.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.8.0 and later.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "luigi"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.8.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-1000843"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:48:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Luigi version prior to version 2.8.0; after commit 53b52e12745075a8acc016d33945d9d6a7a6aaeb; after GitHub PR spotify/luigi/pull/1870 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in API endpoint: /api/\u003cmethod\u003e that can result in Task metadata such as task name, id, parameter, etc. will be leaked to unauthorized users. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim must visit a specially crafted webpage from the network where their Luigi server is accessible.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.8.0 and later.",
"id": "GHSA-p69g-f978-xxv9",
"modified": "2024-09-30T16:56:51Z",
"published": "2018-12-20T22:01:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1000843"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/spotify/luigi/pull/1870"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p69g-f978-xxv9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/luigi/PYSEC-2018-11.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/spotify/luigi"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/spotify/luigi/blob/2.7.9/luigi/server.py#L67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/luigi-user/ZgfRTpBsVUY"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Luigi"
}
GHSA-P6CC-GMFF-5Q9X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:59 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:59index.php?r=admini/admin/create in BageCMS V3.1.3 allows CSRF to add a background administrator account.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-14582"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-24T16:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "index.php?r=admini/admin/create in BageCMS V3.1.3 allows CSRF to add a background administrator account.",
"id": "GHSA-p6cc-gmff-5q9x",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:59:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:59:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14582"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/bagesoft/bagecms/issues/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6F3-WW46-8PRR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-12 15:37 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Catch Plugins Generate Child Theme.This issue affects Generate Child Theme: from n/a through 2.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31279"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-12T13:15:18Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Catch Plugins Generate Child Theme.This issue affects Generate Child Theme: from n/a through 2.0.",
"id": "GHSA-p6f3-ww46-8prr",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:38Z",
"published": "2024-04-12T15:37:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31279"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/generate-child-theme/wordpress-generate-child-theme-plugin-2-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6F6-RX68-R56M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-14 15:30Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Portfolio grandportfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Portfolio: from n/a through <= 3.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39634"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T09:16:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Portfolio grandportfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Portfolio: from n/a through \u003c= 3.3.",
"id": "GHSA-p6f6-rx68-r56m",
"modified": "2026-04-14T15:30:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T09:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39634"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/grandportfolio/vulnerability/wordpress-grand-portfolio-theme-3-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6FC-FHQ6-XPXQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:10 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:10An issue was discovered in Moxa ioLogik E1210, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1211, firmware Version V2.3 and prior, ioLogik E1212, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1213, firmware Version V2.5 and prior, ioLogik E1214, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1240, firmware Version V2.3 and prior, ioLogik E1241, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1242, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1260, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1262, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E2210, firmware versions prior to V3.13, ioLogik E2212, firmware versions prior to V3.14, ioLogik E2214, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2240, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2242, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2260, firmware versions prior to V3.13, and ioLogik E2262, firmware versions prior to V3.12. The web application may not sufficiently verify whether a request was provided by a valid user (CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-8350"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-13T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Moxa ioLogik E1210, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1211, firmware Version V2.3 and prior, ioLogik E1212, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1213, firmware Version V2.5 and prior, ioLogik E1214, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1240, firmware Version V2.3 and prior, ioLogik E1241, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1242, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1260, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1262, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E2210, firmware versions prior to V3.13, ioLogik E2212, firmware versions prior to V3.14, ioLogik E2214, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2240, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2242, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2260, firmware versions prior to V3.13, and ioLogik E2262, firmware versions prior to V3.12. The web application may not sufficiently verify whether a request was provided by a valid user (CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY).",
"id": "GHSA-p6fc-fhq6-xpxq",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:10:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:10:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8350"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-16-287-05"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93550"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6G2-26XX-9595
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-19 18:32 – Updated: 2025-02-20 18:31Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-10095"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-19T18:15:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device.",
"id": "GHSA-p6g2-26xx-9595",
"modified": "2025-02-20T18:31:21Z",
"published": "2025-02-19T18:32:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10095"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.lexmark.com/en_us/solutions/security//lexmark-security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://support.lexmark.com/alerts"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6H2-GW2P-3837
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in smackcoders Google SEO Pressor Snippet allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Google SEO Pressor Snippet: from n/a through 2.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31775"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T15:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in smackcoders Google SEO Pressor Snippet allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Google SEO Pressor Snippet: from n/a through 2.0.",
"id": "GHSA-p6h2-gw2p-3837",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:20Z",
"published": "2025-04-01T15:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31775"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/google-seo-author-snippets/vulnerability/wordpress-google-seo-pressor-for-rich-snippets-plugin-2-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P6H6-F78V-7WJ8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:39 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:39Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Commerce Extra Panes module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.1 in Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that enable or disable a Commerce extra panes pane via unspecified vectors related to "the link to reorder items."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-5542"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-12-03T21:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Commerce Extra Panes module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.1 in Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that enable or disable a Commerce extra panes pane via unspecified vectors related to \"the link to reorder items.\"",
"id": "GHSA-p6h6-f78v-7wj8",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:39:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:39:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79025"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://drupal.org/node/1802192"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://drupal.org/node/1802258"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/85892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50802"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/20/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55776"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-P6HC-W7H4-Q55X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2022-11-11 12:00A CWE-942: Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability exists that could cause a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the product when conducting cross-domain attacks based on same-origin policy or cross-site request forgery protections bypass. Affected Product: EcoStruxure EV Charging Expert (formerly known as EVlink Load Management System): (HMIBSCEA53D1EDB, HMIBSCEA53D1EDS, HMIBSCEA53D1EDM, HMIBSCEA53D1EDL, HMIBSCEA53D1ESS, HMIBSCEA53D1ESM, HMIBSCEA53D1EML) (All Versions prior to SP8 (Version 01) V4.0.0.13)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-22808"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-942"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-09T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A CWE-942: Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability exists that could cause a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the product when conducting cross-domain attacks based on same-origin policy or cross-site request forgery protections bypass. Affected Product: EcoStruxure EV Charging Expert (formerly known as EVlink Load Management System): (HMIBSCEA53D1EDB, HMIBSCEA53D1EDS, HMIBSCEA53D1EDM, HMIBSCEA53D1EDL, HMIBSCEA53D1ESS, HMIBSCEA53D1ESM, HMIBSCEA53D1EML) (All Versions prior to SP8 (Version 01) V4.0.0.13)",
"id": "GHSA-p6hc-w7h4-q55x",
"modified": "2022-11-11T12:00:31Z",
"published": "2022-02-11T00:00:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22808"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2022-039-02"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.