CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-MVFP-RFGJ-3V6V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-12 15:37 – Updated: 2025-02-07 03:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeisle Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG.This issue affects Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG: from n/a through 3.4.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31301"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-12T13:15:18Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeisle Multiple Page Generator Plugin \u2013 MPG.This issue affects Multiple Page Generator Plugin \u2013 MPG: from n/a through 3.4.0.",
"id": "GHSA-mvfp-rfgj-3v6v",
"modified": "2025-02-07T03:31:57Z",
"published": "2024-04-12T15:37:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31301"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/multiple-pages-generator-by-porthas/wordpress-multiple-page-generator-plugin-mpg-plugin-3-4-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVFR-RHH2-R262
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-02 12:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartsupp Smartsupp – live chat, chatbots, AI and lead generation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Smartsupp – live chat, chatbots, AI and lead generation: from n/a through 3.6.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38790"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-02T12:15:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartsupp Smartsupp \u2013 live chat, chatbots, AI and lead generation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Smartsupp \u2013 live chat, chatbots, AI and lead generation: from n/a through 3.6.",
"id": "GHSA-mvfr-rhh2-r262",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:58Z",
"published": "2025-01-02T12:32:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/smartsupp-live-chat/vulnerability/wordpress-smartsupp-plugin-3-6-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVG8-4W53-3C5G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-10 09:31The GoodMeet – Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting & Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user's capability (manage_options), it does not validate a nonce, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link that will reset (delete) the plugin's stored Google Meet API credentials (goodmeet_google_credentials) and OAuth tokens (goodmeet_google_token), effectively disabling the Google Meet integration on the site.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6440"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-10T09:16:53Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The GoodMeet \u2013 Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting \u0026 Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user\u0027s capability (manage_options), it does not validate a nonce, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link that will reset (delete) the plugin\u0027s stored Google Meet API credentials (goodmeet_google_credentials) and OAuth tokens (goodmeet_google_token), effectively disabling the Google Meet integration on the site.",
"id": "GHSA-mvg8-4w53-3c5g",
"modified": "2026-07-10T09:31:38Z",
"published": "2026-07-10T09:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6440"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/tags/1.1.6/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L140"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/tags/1.1.6/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L38"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/tags/1.1.6/includes/Googlemeet/Goodmeet_Meet.php#L544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/trunk/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L140"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/trunk/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L38"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/trunk/includes/Googlemeet/Goodmeet_Meet.php#L544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=\u0026old=3525854%40goodmeet\u0026new=3525854%40goodmeet"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/dc9e818d-811e-4732-9c74-8eb6753a1706?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVHF-CMHG-7M43
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-24 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HuangYe WuDeng Hacklog Remote Image Autosave allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Hacklog Remote Image Autosave: from n/a through 2.1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30576"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-24T14:15:29Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HuangYe WuDeng Hacklog Remote Image Autosave allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Hacklog Remote Image Autosave: from n/a through 2.1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-mvhf-cmhg-7m43",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:00Z",
"published": "2025-03-24T15:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/hacklog-remote-image-autosave/vulnerability/wordpress-hacklog-remote-image-autosave-2-1-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVHR-JGX3-HRV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-29 21:30 – Updated: 2025-09-29 21:30Medical Informatics Engineering Enterprise Health has a cross site request forgery vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick administrative users into clicking a crafted URL and perform actions on behalf of that administrative user. This issue is fixed as of 2025-04-08.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-35030"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-29T20:15:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Medical Informatics Engineering Enterprise Health has a cross site request forgery vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick administrative users into clicking a crafted URL and perform actions on behalf of that administrative user. This issue is fixed as of 2025-04-08.",
"id": "GHSA-mvhr-jgx3-hrv3",
"modified": "2025-09-29T21:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-09-29T21:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-35030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/IT/white/2025/va-25-272-01.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-35030"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVJV-GCHX-QG75
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:05 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:05Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook Web Access (owa/ev.owa) 2007 through SP2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of e-mail users for requests that perform Outlook requests, as demonstrated by setting the auto-forward rule.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-3213"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-09-07T18:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook Web Access (owa/ev.owa) 2007 through SP2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of e-mail users for requests that perform Outlook requests, as demonstrated by setting the auto-forward rule.",
"id": "GHSA-mvjv-gchx-qg75",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:05:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:05:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/60164"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sites.google.com/site/tentacoloviola/pwning-corporate-webmails"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14285"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41462"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-MVMQ-P5XJ-8VJ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-26 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-05 00:00The ThirstyAffiliates Affiliate Link Manager WordPress plugin before 3.10.5 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when creating affiliate links, which could allow any authenticated user, such as subscriber to create arbitrary affiliate links, which could then be used to redirect users to an arbitrary website
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0398"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-25T16:16:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The ThirstyAffiliates Affiliate Link Manager WordPress plugin before 3.10.5 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when creating affiliate links, which could allow any authenticated user, such as subscriber to create arbitrary affiliate links, which could then be used to redirect users to an arbitrary website",
"id": "GHSA-mvmq-p5xj-8vj6",
"modified": "2022-05-05T00:00:37Z",
"published": "2022-04-26T00:00:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0398"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/21aec131-91ff-4300-ac7a-0bf31d6b2b24"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVP7-WP4V-3H3H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:08 – Updated: 2023-07-18 15:30The WooCommerce Stock Manager WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 2.5.7 due to missing nonce and file validation in the /woocommerce-stock-manager/trunk/admin/views/import-export.php file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-34619"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-07-21T15:16:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The WooCommerce Stock Manager WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 2.5.7 due to missing nonce and file validation in the /woocommerce-stock-manager/trunk/admin/views/import-export.php file.",
"id": "GHSA-mvp7-wp4v-3h3h",
"modified": "2023-07-18T15:30:33Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:08:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34619"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/woocommerce-stock-manager/trunk/admin/views/import-export.php?rev=2499178"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2021/06/high-severity-vulnerability-patched-in-woocommerce-stock-manager-plugin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVQM-GV97-F2MC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:48 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:48ZyXEL ZyWALL USG 2.12 AQQ.2 and 3.30 AQQ.7 devices are affected by a CSRF vulnerability via a cgi-bin/zysh-cgi cmd action to add a user account. This account's access could, for example, subsequently be used for stored XSS.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-17550"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-11-10T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ZyXEL ZyWALL USG 2.12 AQQ.2 and 3.30 AQQ.7 devices are affected by a CSRF vulnerability via a cgi-bin/zysh-cgi cmd action to add a user account. This account\u0027s access could, for example, subsequently be used for stored XSS.",
"id": "GHSA-mvqm-gv97-f2mc",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:48:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:48:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17550"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.shellcode.it/article/cve-2017-17550"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MVR4-323R-RH68
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:04 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:04Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control for Linux before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-4106"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-11-02T02:26:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control for Linux before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-mvr4-323r-rh68",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:04:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:04:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4106"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/62859"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42040"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=emr_na-c02573692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44537"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2834"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.