CWE-346
Allowed-with-ReviewOrigin Validation Error
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
786 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-M3R2-M5RW-RGMH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 09:30 – Updated: 2025-03-27 09:30An intent redriction vulnerability exists in the Xiaomi quick App framework application product. The vulnerability is caused by improper input validation and can be exploited by attackers tointent redriction.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45353"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T07:15:38Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An intent redriction vulnerability exists in the Xiaomi quick App framework application product. The vulnerability is caused by improper input validation and can be exploited by attackers tointent redriction.",
"id": "GHSA-m3r2-m5rw-rgmh",
"modified": "2025-03-27T09:30:31Z",
"published": "2025-03-27T09:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45353"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trust.mi.com/zh-CN/misrc/bulletins/advisory?cveId=551"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M3VQ-FGH9-HQ65
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-20 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-26 18:31NLnet Labs Unbound 1.16.2 up to and including version 1.25.0 has a vulnerability of the 'ghost domain names' family of attacks that could extend the ghost domain window by up to one cached TTL configured value. Similar to other 'ghost domain names' attacks, an adversary needs to control a (ghost) zone and be able to query a vulnerable Unbound. A single client NS query can cause Unbound to overwrite the cached expired parent-side referral NS rrset with the child-side apex NS rrset and essentially extend the ghost domain window by up to one cached TTL configured value ('cache-max-ttl'). In configurations where 'harden-referral-path: yes' is used (non-default configuration), no client NS query is required since Unbound implicitly performs that query. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that does not allow extension of TTLs for (parent) NS records regardless of their trust.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-40622"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-20T10:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "NLnet Labs Unbound 1.16.2 up to and including version 1.25.0 has a vulnerability of the \u0027ghost domain names\u0027 family of attacks that could extend the ghost domain window by up to one cached TTL configured value. Similar to other \u0027ghost domain names\u0027 attacks, an adversary needs to control a (ghost) zone and be able to query a vulnerable Unbound. A single client NS query can cause Unbound to overwrite the cached expired parent-side referral NS rrset with the child-side apex NS rrset and essentially extend the ghost domain window by up to one cached TTL configured value (\u0027cache-max-ttl\u0027). In configurations where \u0027harden-referral-path: yes\u0027 is used (non-default configuration), no client NS query is required since Unbound implicitly performs that query. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that does not allow extension of TTLs for (parent) NS records regardless of their trust.",
"id": "GHSA-m3vq-fgh9-hq65",
"modified": "2026-05-26T18:31:39Z",
"published": "2026-05-20T12:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40622"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-40622.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-M49G-CQ5X-4JMC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-19 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-19 18:32Same-origin policy bypass in the Networking: HTTP component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 151 and Firefox ESR 140.11.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-8950"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-19T14:16:51Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Same-origin policy bypass in the Networking: HTTP component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 151 and Firefox ESR 140.11.",
"id": "GHSA-m49g-cq5x-4jmc",
"modified": "2026-05-19T18:32:09Z",
"published": "2026-05-19T15:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-8950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1965430"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-46"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-48"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-50"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-51"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M543-PHJX-RGWV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:44 – Updated: 2024-04-04 00:14If WebRTC permission is requested from documents with data: or blob: URLs, the permission notifications do not properly display the originating domain. The notification states "Unknown origin" as the requestee, leading to user confusion about which site is asking for this permission. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 66.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-9808"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-26T17:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "If WebRTC permission is requested from documents with data: or blob: URLs, the permission notifications do not properly display the originating domain. The notification states \"Unknown origin\" as the requestee, leading to user confusion about which site is asking for this permission. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 66.",
"id": "GHSA-m543-phjx-rgwv",
"modified": "2024-04-04T00:14:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:44:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9808"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434634"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-07"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M66R-FG5X-99CR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-30 00:31 – Updated: 2025-05-31 00:30This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in Safari 18.4, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, visionOS 2.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. A website may be able to bypass Same Origin Policy.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30466"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-29T22:15:21Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in Safari 18.4, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, visionOS 2.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. A website may be able to bypass Same Origin Policy.",
"id": "GHSA-m66r-fg5x-99cr",
"modified": "2025-05-31T00:30:27Z",
"published": "2025-05-30T00:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30466"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/122371"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/122373"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/122378"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/122379"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M67W-FJJ9-RJR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:26 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:26Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 14.0.835.163, allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-2856"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-09-19T12:02:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 14.0.835.163, allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-m67w-fjj9-rjr5",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:26:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:26:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2856"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69883"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14262"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=93416"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2011/09/stable-channel-update_16.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/75558"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M6Q9-P373-G5Q8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-17 18:24 – Updated: 2024-06-24 17:05A potential security flaw in the "checkLoginIframe" which allows unvalidated cross-origin messages, enabling potential DDoS attacks. By exploiting this vulnerability, attackers could coordinate to send millions of requests in seconds using simple code, significantly impacting the application's availability without proper origin validation for incoming messages.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Adriano Márcio Monteiro from BRZTEC for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "22.0.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "23.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "24.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1249"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-17T18:24:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-17T14:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A potential security flaw in the \"checkLoginIframe\" which allows unvalidated cross-origin messages, enabling potential DDoS attacks. By exploiting this vulnerability, attackers could coordinate to send millions of requests in seconds using simple code, significantly impacting the application\u0027s availability without proper origin validation for incoming messages.\n\n#### Acknowledgements\nSpecial thanks to Adriano M\u00e1rcio Monteiro from BRZTEC for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.\n",
"id": "GHSA-m6q9-p373-g5q8",
"modified": "2024-06-24T17:05:16Z",
"published": "2024-04-17T18:24:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-m6q9-p373-g5q8"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1249"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/9d9817e15a07195f16f554b7f60ee3a918369e26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/e3598a53678a1e3698e78eb71e04ba10ca32e5e2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1860"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1862"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1866"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1867"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1868"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2945"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4057"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1249"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262918"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Keycloak\u0027s unvalidated cross-origin messages in checkLoginIframe leads to DDoS"
}
GHSA-M6RX-82HW-RV4G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-26 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-02 00:01In all versions before 7.2.1.4, when proxy settings are configured in the network access resource of a BIG-IP APM system, connecting BIG-IP Edge Client on Mac and Windows is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-23032"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-25T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In all versions before 7.2.1.4, when proxy settings are configured in the network access resource of a BIG-IP APM system, connecting BIG-IP Edge Client on Mac and Windows is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.",
"id": "GHSA-m6rx-82hw-rv4g",
"modified": "2022-02-02T00:01:59Z",
"published": "2022-01-26T00:00:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K30525503"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M9MR-R5G3-7P6R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-12 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-12 12:30Origin Validation Error in Kibana can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery via a forged Origin HTTP header processed by the Observability AI Assistant.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37734"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-12T10:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Origin Validation Error in Kibana can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery via a forged Origin HTTP header processed by the Observability AI Assistant.",
"id": "GHSA-m9mr-r5g3-7p6r",
"modified": "2025-11-12T12:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-11-12T12:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-8-19-7-9-1-7-and-9-2-1-security-update-esa-2025-24/383381"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M9RR-H88H-H8W6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-14 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:40Movim prior to version 0.22 is affected by a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking vulnerability. This was the result of a missing header validation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-2848"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1385",
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-14T12:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Movim prior to version 0.22 is affected by a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking vulnerability. This was the result of a missing header validation.",
"id": "GHSA-m9rr-h88h-h8w6",
"modified": "2024-04-04T07:40:15Z",
"published": "2023-09-14T12:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/movim/movim/commit/49e2012aecdf918bb1d16f278fa9ff42fad29a9d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/movim/movim/commit/96372082acd3e5d778a2522a60a1805bf2af31f6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mov.im/node/pubsub.movim.eu/Movim/a2d05925-0427-4f3f-b777-d20571ddddff"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-160: Exploit Script-Based APIs
Some APIs support scripting instructions as arguments. Methods that take scripted instructions (or references to scripted instructions) can be very flexible and powerful. However, if an attacker can specify the script that serves as input to these methods they can gain access to a great deal of functionality. For example, HTML pages support <script> tags that allow scripting languages to be embedded in the page and then interpreted by the receiving web browser. If the content provider is malicious, these scripts can compromise the client application. Some applications may even execute the scripts under their own identity (rather than the identity of the user providing the script) which can allow attackers to perform activities that would otherwise be denied to them.
CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-510: SaaS User Request Forgery
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, performs malicious actions against a third-party Software as a Service (SaaS) application (also known as a cloud based application) by leveraging the persistent and implicit trust placed on a trusted user's session. This attack is executed after a trusted user is authenticated into a cloud service, "piggy-backing" on the authenticated session, and exploiting the fact that the cloud service believes it is only interacting with the trusted user. If successful, the actions embedded in the malicious application will be processed and accepted by the targeted SaaS application and executed at the trusted user's privilege level.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-89: Pharming
A pharming attack occurs when the victim is fooled into entering sensitive data into supposedly trusted locations, such as an online bank site or a trading platform. An attacker can impersonate these supposedly trusted sites and have the victim be directed to their site rather than the originally intended one. Pharming does not require script injection or clicking on malicious links for the attack to succeed.