CWE-346
Allowed-with-ReviewOrigin Validation Error
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
787 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-HHVQ-V5XW-J5Q7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-12 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-12 03:31Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.115 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-12032"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-11T22:16:55Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.115 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)",
"id": "GHSA-hhvq-v5xw-j5q7",
"modified": "2026-06-12T03:31:28Z",
"published": "2026-06-12T00:31:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01962725236.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/518128953"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HHW9-35P2-Q2C5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-01-29 20:51 – Updated: 2021-01-29 20:39Impact
The outdated version 1 of the Steam Socialite Provider doesn't check properly if the login comes from steamcommunity.com, allowing a malicious actor to substitute their own openID server.
Patches
This vulnerability only affects the outdated v1.x versions of the package. These are no longer maintained, users should upgrade to v3 or v4, which use a hardcoded endpoint to verify the login.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in SocialiteProviders/Providers * Email us at socialite@atymic.dev
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 1.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "socialiteproviders/steam"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-01-29T20:39:56Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe outdated version 1 of the Steam Socialite Provider doesn\u0027t check properly if the login comes from `steamcommunity.com`, allowing a malicious actor to substitute their own openID server.\n\n### Patches\nThis vulnerability only affects the outdated v1.x versions of the package. These are no longer maintained, users should upgrade to v3 or v4, which use a hardcoded endpoint to verify the login.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [SocialiteProviders/Providers](https://github.com/SocialiteProviders/Providers)\n* Email us at [socialite@atymic.dev](mailto:socialite@atymic.dev)",
"id": "GHSA-hhw9-35p2-q2c5",
"modified": "2021-01-29T20:39:56Z",
"published": "2021-01-29T20:51:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/SocialiteProviders/Steam/security/advisories/GHSA-hhw9-35p2-q2c5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://packagist.org/packages/socialiteproviders/steam"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Steam Socialite Provider v1 does not correctly validate openid server"
}
GHSA-HHX4-W5QW-2W3G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:48 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:48Inappropriate implementation in storage in Google Chrome prior to 90.0.4430.72 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-21209"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-26T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in storage in Google Chrome prior to 90.0.4430.72 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.",
"id": "GHSA-hhx4-w5qw-2w3g",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:48:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:48:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21209"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2021/04/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_14.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://crbug.com/1143526"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EAJ42L4JFPBJATCZ7MOZQTUDGV4OEHHG"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U3GZ42MYPGD35V652ZPVPYYS7A7LVXVY"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VUZBGKGVZADNA3I24NVG7HAYYUTOSN5A"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202104-08"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4906"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HJPV-WXPG-MVHC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-08 15:32Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted XML file. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11020"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-04T23:17:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted XML file. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
"id": "GHSA-hjpv-wxpg-mvhc",
"modified": "2026-06-08T15:32:43Z",
"published": "2026-06-05T00:31:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11020"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/497440270"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HJVF-Q4W6-QV8P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-18 06:30 – Updated: 2024-12-26 21:30A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-56170"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-18T05:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it\u0027s prone to a rollback to a previous version if it\u0027s served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.",
"id": "GHSA-hjvf-q4w6-qv8p",
"modified": "2024-12-26T21:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-12-18T06:30:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56170"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HM92-R4W5-C3MJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 14:20 – Updated: 2026-06-19 14:20Impact
When using Socks5ProxyAgent, undici reuses a single connection pool across different origins without verifying that the pool's origin matches the requested origin. All requests are dispatched through the pool connected to the first origin, regardless of the intended destination.
This causes cross-origin request routing: credentials and request data intended for origin B are sent to origin A, responses from the wrong origin are trusted, and HTTPS requests may be silently downgraded to HTTP.
Impacted users are applications that use Socks5ProxyAgent (directly or via setGlobalDispatcher) and make requests to more than one origin.
This was introduced in undici 7.23.0 via #4385 and affects all versions through 8.1.0.
Patches
Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.2.0
Workarounds
Use a separate Socks5ProxyAgent instance per origin, or avoid using Socks5ProxyAgent with multiple origins.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.23.0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.28.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6734"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-19T14:20:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T18:18:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Impact\n\nWhen using `Socks5ProxyAgent`, undici reuses a single connection pool across different origins without verifying that the pool\u0027s origin matches the requested origin. All requests are dispatched through the pool connected to the first origin, regardless of the intended destination.\n\nThis causes cross-origin request routing: credentials and request data intended for origin B are sent to origin A, responses from the wrong origin are trusted, and HTTPS requests may be silently downgraded to HTTP.\n\nImpacted users are applications that use `Socks5ProxyAgent` (directly or via `setGlobalDispatcher`) and make requests to more than one origin.\n\nThis was introduced in undici 7.23.0 via [#4385](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/pull/4385) and affects all versions through 8.1.0.\n\n## Patches\n\nUpgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.2.0\n\n## Workarounds\n\nUse a separate `Socks5ProxyAgent` instance per origin, or avoid using `Socks5ProxyAgent` with multiple origins.",
"id": "GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj",
"modified": "2026-06-19T14:20:20Z",
"published": "2026-06-19T14:20:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/pull/5041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "undici vulnerable to cross-origin request routing via SOCKS5 proxy pool reuse"
}
GHSA-HM9H-V525-4CGC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:27 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:27The extension implementation in Google Chrome before 17.0.963.46 does not properly handle sandboxed origins, which might allow remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted extension.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-3956"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-02-09T04:10:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The extension implementation in Google Chrome before 17.0.963.46 does not properly handle sandboxed origins, which might allow remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted extension.",
"id": "GHSA-hm9h-v525-4cgc",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:27:14Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:27:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3956"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=103630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2012/02/stable-channel-update.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HMX9-H7XX-529H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:32 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:32The Auto-Maskin products utilize an undocumented custom protocol to set up Modbus communications with other devices without validating those devices. The originating device sends a message in plaintext, 48:65:6c:6c:6f:20:57:6f:72:6c:64, "Hello World" over UDP ports 44444-44446 to the broadcast address for the LAN. Without verification devices respond to any of these broadcast messages on the LAN with a plaintext reply over UDP containing the device model and firmware version. Following this exchange the devices allow Modbus transmissions between the two devices on the standard Modbus port 502 TCP. Impact: An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary messages to any DCU or RP device through spoofing or replay attacks as long as they have access to the network. Affected releases are Auto-Maskin DCU-210E RP-210E: Versions prior to 3.7 on ARMv7.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-5400"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-10-08T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The Auto-Maskin products utilize an undocumented custom protocol to set up Modbus communications with other devices without validating those devices. The originating device sends a message in plaintext, 48:65:6c:6c:6f:20:57:6f:72:6c:64, \"Hello World\" over UDP ports 44444-44446 to the broadcast address for the LAN. Without verification devices respond to any of these broadcast messages on the LAN with a plaintext reply over UDP containing the device model and firmware version. Following this exchange the devices allow Modbus transmissions between the two devices on the standard Modbus port 502 TCP. Impact: An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary messages to any DCU or RP device through spoofing or replay attacks as long as they have access to the network. Affected releases are Auto-Maskin DCU-210E RP-210E: Versions prior to 3.7 on ARMv7.",
"id": "GHSA-hmx9-h7xx-529h",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5400"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/176301"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.us-cert.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-051-04"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HP2F-G6XR-CFWV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-05 21:31Inappropriate implementation in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11032"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-04T23:17:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
"id": "GHSA-hp2f-g6xr-cfwv",
"modified": "2026-06-05T21:31:56Z",
"published": "2026-06-05T00:31:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/497831111"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HPQM-FQWV-8FFG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:42 – Updated: 2022-09-21 00:00A vulnerability in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) for Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches in Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to disable switching on a small form-factor pluggable (SFP) interface. This vulnerability is due to incomplete validation of the source of a received LLDP packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted LLDP packet on an SFP interface to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to disable switching on the SFP interface, which could disrupt network traffic.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-1231"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-02-24T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) for Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches in Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to disable switching on a small form-factor pluggable (SFP) interface. This vulnerability is due to incomplete validation of the source of a received LLDP packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted LLDP packet on an SFP interface to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to disable switching on the SFP interface, which could disrupt network traffic.",
"id": "GHSA-hpqm-fqwv-8ffg",
"modified": "2022-09-21T00:00:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:42:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1231"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-apic-lldap-dos-WerV9CFj"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-160: Exploit Script-Based APIs
Some APIs support scripting instructions as arguments. Methods that take scripted instructions (or references to scripted instructions) can be very flexible and powerful. However, if an attacker can specify the script that serves as input to these methods they can gain access to a great deal of functionality. For example, HTML pages support <script> tags that allow scripting languages to be embedded in the page and then interpreted by the receiving web browser. If the content provider is malicious, these scripts can compromise the client application. Some applications may even execute the scripts under their own identity (rather than the identity of the user providing the script) which can allow attackers to perform activities that would otherwise be denied to them.
CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-510: SaaS User Request Forgery
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, performs malicious actions against a third-party Software as a Service (SaaS) application (also known as a cloud based application) by leveraging the persistent and implicit trust placed on a trusted user's session. This attack is executed after a trusted user is authenticated into a cloud service, "piggy-backing" on the authenticated session, and exploiting the fact that the cloud service believes it is only interacting with the trusted user. If successful, the actions embedded in the malicious application will be processed and accepted by the targeted SaaS application and executed at the trusted user's privilege level.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-89: Pharming
A pharming attack occurs when the victim is fooled into entering sensitive data into supposedly trusted locations, such as an online bank site or a trading platform. An attacker can impersonate these supposedly trusted sites and have the victim be directed to their site rather than the originally intended one. Pharming does not require script injection or clicking on malicious links for the attack to succeed.