Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-306

Allowed

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

3489 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-2X95-QPV9-C883

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-04 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-04 21:30
VLAI
Details

Microsoft VPN Browser+ 1.1.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to crash the application by submitting oversized input through the search functionality. Attackers can paste a large buffer of characters into the search bar to trigger an unhandled exception that terminates the application.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-25241"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-04T14:16:19Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Microsoft VPN Browser+ 1.1.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to crash the application by submitting oversized input through the search functionality. Attackers can paste a large buffer of characters into the search bar to trigger an unhandled exception that terminates the application.",
  "id": "GHSA-2x95-qpv9-c883",
  "modified": "2026-04-04T21:30:26Z",
  "published": "2026-04-04T15:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-25241"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46198"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/store/productId/9NFFFFS5Z2C7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/microsoft-vpn-browser-denial-of-service"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vpn-browser-denial-of-service"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2XHW-JFHH-P475

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:09 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:09
VLAI
Details

Jira Data Center, Jira Core Data Center, Jira Software Data Center from version 6.3.0 before 8.5.16, from 8.6.0 before 8.13.8, from 8.14.0 before 8.17.0 and Jira Service Management Data Center from version 2.0.2 before 4.5.16, from version 4.6.0 before 4.13.8, and from version 4.14.0 before 4.17.0 exposed a Ehcache RMI network service which attackers, who can connect to the service, on port 40001 and potentially 40011[0][1], could execute arbitrary code of their choice in Jira through deserialization due to a missing authentication vulnerability. While Atlassian strongly suggests restricting access to the Ehcache ports to only Data Center instances, fixed versions of Jira will now require a shared secret in order to allow access to the Ehcache service. [0] In Jira Data Center, Jira Core Data Center, and Jira Software Data Center versions prior to 7.13.1, the Ehcache object port can be randomly allocated. [1] In Jira Service Management Data Center versions prior to 3.16.1, the Ehcache object port can be randomly allocated.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-36239"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-29T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Jira Data Center, Jira Core Data Center, Jira Software Data Center from version 6.3.0 before 8.5.16, from 8.6.0 before 8.13.8, from 8.14.0 before 8.17.0 and Jira Service Management Data Center from version 2.0.2 before 4.5.16, from version 4.6.0 before 4.13.8, and from version 4.14.0 before 4.17.0 exposed a Ehcache RMI network service which attackers, who can connect to the service, on port 40001 and potentially 40011[0][1], could execute arbitrary code of their choice in Jira through deserialization due to a missing authentication vulnerability. While Atlassian strongly suggests restricting access to the Ehcache ports to only Data Center instances, fixed versions of Jira will now require a shared secret in order to allow access to the Ehcache service.  [0] In Jira Data Center, Jira Core Data Center, and Jira Software Data Center versions prior to 7.13.1, the Ehcache object port can be randomly allocated. [1]  In Jira Service Management Data Center versions prior to 3.16.1, the Ehcache object port can be randomly allocated.",
  "id": "GHSA-2xhw-jfhh-p475",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:09:18Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:09:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36239"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiraserver/jira-data-center-and-jira-service-management-data-center-security-advisory-2021-07-21-1063571388.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRASERVER-72566"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDSERVER-8454"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2XQ2-RX3R-PFQ9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-26 12:30 – Updated: 2026-01-26 12:30
VLAI
Details

On the exos 9300 server, a SOAP API is reachable on port 8002. This API does not require any authentication prior to sending requests. Therefore, network access to the exos server allows e.g. the creation of arbitrary access log events as well as querying the 2FA PINs associated with the enrolled chip cards.

Severity
9.3 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-59090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-26T10:16:06Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "On the exos 9300 server, a SOAP API is reachable on port 8002. This API does not require any authentication prior to sending requests. Therefore, network access to the exos server allows e.g. the creation of arbitrary access log events as well as querying the 2FA PINs associated with the enrolled chip cards.",
  "id": "GHSA-2xq2-rx3r-pfq9",
  "modified": "2026-01-26T12:30:28Z",
  "published": "2026-01-26T12:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://r.sec-consult.com/dkexos"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://r.sec-consult.com/dormakaba"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dormakabagroup.com/en/security-advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2XQF-M93C-8P52

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:48 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:01
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the configuration import utility of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to have write access and upload arbitrary data to the filesystem. The vulnerability is due to a failure to delete temporarily uploaded files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious file and uploading it to the affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to fill up the filesystem or upload malicious scripts.

Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-1629"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-06-20T03:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the configuration import utility of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to have write access and upload arbitrary data to the filesystem. The vulnerability is due to a failure to delete temporarily uploaded files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious file and uploading it to the affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to fill up the filesystem or upload malicious scripts.",
  "id": "GHSA-2xqf-m93c-8p52",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T01:01:48Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:48:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1629"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190619-imc-filewrite"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108852"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-323X-WPGH-R8Q4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-30 03:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:18
VLAI
Details

A broken authentication mechanism in the endpoint excel.php of POS Codekop v2.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to download selling data.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-36347"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-06-30T02:15:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A broken authentication mechanism in the endpoint excel.php of POS Codekop v2.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to download selling data.",
  "id": "GHSA-323x-wpgh-r8q4",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T05:18:29Z",
  "published": "2023-06-30T03:30:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36347"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qaIeE2cyO4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://yuyudhn.github.io/pos-codekop-vulnerability"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3258-QMV8-FRP3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 23:02 – Updated: 2026-06-08 20:12
VLAI
Summary
free5GC's SMF UPI management interface lacks auth middleware; unauthenticated topology read/write requests reach handlers
Details

Summary

free5GC's SMF mounts the UPI management route group without OAuth2/bearer-token authorization middleware. A network attacker who can reach SMF on the SBI can hit UPI endpoints with no Authorization header at all, and the requests reach the SMF business handlers. In the running Docker lab this was directly demonstrated for read (GET /upi/v1/upNodesLinks), write (POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks with attacker-controlled UP-node and link payload), and delete (DELETE /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/{nodeID}) operations.

The defect is route-group-scoped: there is no inbound auth middleware on the UPI group at all, while a control comparison against the sibling nsmf-oam group on the same SMF instance shows OAM IS protected (no-token request returns 401 Unauthorized). So this is not a global config gap -- it is specifically that the UPI group was mounted without the auth middleware that the OAM group has.

Details

Validated against the SMF container in the official Docker compose lab. - Source repo tag: v4.2.1 - Running Docker image: free5gc/smf:v4.2.0 - Docker validation date: 2026-03-13

Control comparison on the same SMF instance: - GET /upi/v1/upNodesLinks (no token) -> 200 OK - GET /nsmf-oam/v1/ (no token) -> 401 Unauthorized

This side-by-side proves OAuth2 middleware is wired in for nsmf-oam but not for UPI on the same process.

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/smf): - UPI group mounted WITHOUT auth middleware: NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:76 - OAM group mounted WITH auth middleware (control): NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:95 - UPI business handlers (read / write / delete on upNodesLinks): - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:44 - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:60 - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:84

PoC

Reproduced end-to-end against the running SMF at http://10.100.200.6:8000.

  1. READ UP-nodes/links with NO Authorization header -> 200 OK:
curl -i http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks
  1. WRITE: POST attacker-controlled UPF node and link with NO Authorization header -> 200 OK:
curl -i -X POST http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{"links":[{"A":"gNB1","B":"UPF-POC-20260313","weight":1}],"upNodes":{"UPF-POC-20260313":{"type":"UPF","nodeID":"198.51.100.20","addr":"198.51.100.20","sNssaiUpfInfos":[{"sNssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"dnnUpfInfoList":[{"dnn":"internet"}]}]}}}'
  1. DELETE with FORGED token -> 404 Not Found from business logic (auth was bypassed; the 404 is a business response, not an auth rejection):
curl -i -X DELETE http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks/UPF-POC-20260313 \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token'
  1. CONTROL: same instance, sibling OAM route, no token -> 401 Unauthorized:
curl -i http://10.100.200.6:8000/nsmf-oam/v1/

SMF container logs (docker logs smf) confirm the side-by-side behavior:

[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 200 | GET    | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks
[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 401 | GET    | /nsmf-oam/v1/
[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 404 | DELETE | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/UPF-POC-20260313
[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 200 | POST   | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks

Impact

Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the SMF UPI SBI route group. Severity is scored against the route group's intended capability surface (UP-node and link topology management), which is realized by the demonstrated PoC: an unauthenticated network attacker can already today read SMF's view of the UP-plane topology, inject attacker-controlled UPF nodes and link entries, and target deletions of named entries.

Any party that can reach SMF on the SBI can: - Read SMF's current UP-node and link topology view anonymously. - Inject attacker-controlled UPF entries (with attacker-chosen nodeID / addr / S-NSSAI / DNN), poisoning SMF's view of which UPFs serve which slices/DNNs and biasing subsequent UPF selection / PFCP path establishment for legitimate PDU sessions. - Issue topology delete operations against named UPF entries, denying or disrupting legitimate UPF participation in SMF's selection logic.

The defect is route-group-scoped: there is no auth middleware on the UPI group at all, so every UPI endpoint inside this group inherits the missing inbound auth boundary, and the same-instance OAM control proves this is the UPI mount specifically (not a global SMF config issue).

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/887 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/smf/pull/197

Severity
10.0 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/free5gc/smf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44329"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T23:02:23Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-27T17:16:38Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nfree5GC\u0027s SMF mounts the `UPI` management route group without OAuth2/bearer-token authorization middleware. A network attacker who can reach SMF on the SBI can hit `UPI` endpoints with no `Authorization` header at all, and the requests reach the SMF business handlers. In the running Docker lab this was directly demonstrated for read (`GET /upi/v1/upNodesLinks`), write (`POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks` with attacker-controlled UP-node and link payload), and delete (`DELETE /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/{nodeID}`) operations.\n\nThe defect is route-group-scoped: there is no inbound auth middleware on the UPI group at all, while a control comparison against the sibling `nsmf-oam` group on the same SMF instance shows OAM IS protected (no-token request returns `401 Unauthorized`). So this is not a global config gap -- it is specifically that the UPI group was mounted without the auth middleware that the OAM group has.\n\n### Details\nValidated against the SMF container in the official Docker compose lab.\n- Source repo tag: `v4.2.1`\n- Running Docker image: `free5gc/smf:v4.2.0`\n- Docker validation date: 2026-03-13\n\nControl comparison on the same SMF instance:\n- `GET /upi/v1/upNodesLinks` (no token) -\u003e `200 OK`\n- `GET /nsmf-oam/v1/` (no token) -\u003e `401 Unauthorized`\n\nThis side-by-side proves OAuth2 middleware is wired in for `nsmf-oam` but not for `UPI` on the same process.\n\nCode evidence (paths in `free5gc/smf`):\n- UPI group mounted WITHOUT auth middleware: `NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:76`\n- OAM group mounted WITH auth middleware (control): `NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:95`\n- UPI business handlers (read / write / delete on `upNodesLinks`):\n  - `NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:44`\n  - `NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:60`\n  - `NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:84`\n\n### PoC\nReproduced end-to-end against the running SMF at `http://10.100.200.6:8000`.\n\n1. READ UP-nodes/links with NO `Authorization` header -\u003e `200 OK`:\n```\ncurl -i http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks\n```\n\n2. WRITE: POST attacker-controlled UPF node and link with NO `Authorization` header -\u003e `200 OK`:\n```\ncurl -i -X POST http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  --data \u0027{\"links\":[{\"A\":\"gNB1\",\"B\":\"UPF-POC-20260313\",\"weight\":1}],\"upNodes\":{\"UPF-POC-20260313\":{\"type\":\"UPF\",\"nodeID\":\"198.51.100.20\",\"addr\":\"198.51.100.20\",\"sNssaiUpfInfos\":[{\"sNssai\":{\"sst\":1,\"sd\":\"010203\"},\"dnnUpfInfoList\":[{\"dnn\":\"internet\"}]}]}}}\u0027\n```\n\n3. DELETE with FORGED token -\u003e `404 Not Found` from business logic (auth was bypassed; the 404 is a business response, not an auth rejection):\n```\ncurl -i -X DELETE http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks/UPF-POC-20260313 \\\n  -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token\u0027\n```\n\n4. CONTROL: same instance, sibling OAM route, no token -\u003e `401 Unauthorized`:\n```\ncurl -i http://10.100.200.6:8000/nsmf-oam/v1/\n```\n\nSMF container logs (`docker logs smf`) confirm the side-by-side behavior:\n```\n[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 200 | GET    | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks\n[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 401 | GET    | /nsmf-oam/v1/\n[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 404 | DELETE | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/UPF-POC-20260313\n[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 200 | POST   | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks\n```\n\n### Impact\nMissing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the SMF `UPI` SBI route group. Severity is scored against the route group\u0027s intended capability surface (UP-node and link topology management), which is realized by the demonstrated PoC: an unauthenticated network attacker can already today read SMF\u0027s view of the UP-plane topology, inject attacker-controlled UPF nodes and link entries, and target deletions of named entries.\n\nAny party that can reach SMF on the SBI can:\n- Read SMF\u0027s current UP-node and link topology view anonymously.\n- Inject attacker-controlled UPF entries (with attacker-chosen nodeID / addr / S-NSSAI / DNN), poisoning SMF\u0027s view of which UPFs serve which slices/DNNs and biasing subsequent UPF selection / PFCP path establishment for legitimate PDU sessions.\n- Issue topology delete operations against named UPF entries, denying or disrupting legitimate UPF participation in SMF\u0027s selection logic.\n\nThe defect is route-group-scoped: there is no auth middleware on the UPI group at all, so every UPI endpoint inside this group inherits the missing inbound auth boundary, and the same-instance OAM control proves this is the UPI mount specifically (not a global SMF config issue).\n\nAffected: free5gc v4.2.1.\n\nUpstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/887\nUpstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/smf/pull/197",
  "id": "GHSA-3258-qmv8-frp3",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T20:12:01Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T23:02:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/security/advisories/GHSA-3258-qmv8-frp3"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44329"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/887"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/smf/pull/197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/smf/commit/e23ce97565f285eb99eed153743c62bf4c767c6e"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "free5GC\u0027s SMF UPI management interface lacks auth middleware; unauthenticated topology read/write requests reach handlers"
}

GHSA-326P-RWP7-V23G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 18:31 – Updated: 2025-12-16 18:31
VLAI
Details

D-Link DAP-1325 firmware version 1.01 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to download device configuration settings without authentication. Attackers can exploit the /cgi-bin/ExportSettings.sh endpoint to retrieve sensitive configuration information by directly accessing the export settings script.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53896"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T18:16:06Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "D-Link DAP-1325 firmware version 1.01 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to download device configuration settings without authentication. Attackers can exploit the /cgi-bin/ExportSettings.sh endpoint to retrieve sensitive configuration information by directly accessing the export settings script.",
  "id": "GHSA-326p-rwp7-v23g",
  "modified": "2025-12-16T18:31:35Z",
  "published": "2025-12-16T18:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53896"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dlink.com/hr/hr/products/dap-1325-n300-wifi-range-extender"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51556"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/d-link-dap-hardware-a-unauthenticated-configuration-download"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-32JX-JM5R-C6X7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-31 00:31 – Updated: 2025-12-31 00:31
VLAI
Details

SOUND4 IMPACT/FIRST/PULSE/Eco versions 2.x and below contain an unauthenticated vulnerability that allows remote attackers to access live radio stream information through webplay or ffmpeg scripts. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by calling specific web scripts to disclose radio stream details without requiring authentication.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
6.9 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-50790"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-30T23:15:45Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "SOUND4 IMPACT/FIRST/PULSE/Eco versions 2.x and below contain an unauthenticated vulnerability that allows remote attackers to access live radio stream information through webplay or ffmpeg scripts. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by calling specific web scripts to disclose radio stream details without requiring authentication.",
  "id": "GHSA-32jx-jm5r-c6x7",
  "modified": "2025-12-31T00:31:10Z",
  "published": "2025-12-31T00:31:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50790"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/247923"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/170261/SOUND4-IMPACT-FIRST-PULSE-Eco-2.x-Radio-Steam-Disclosure.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sound4.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sound-impactfirstpulseeco-x-unauthenticated-radio-stream-disclosure"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zeroscience.mk/en/vulnerabilities/ZSL-2022-5734.php"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-32PC-G2WC-V836

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-12 21:30 – Updated: 2024-01-12 21:30
VLAI
Details

NVIDIA DGX A100 BMC contains a vulnerability where a user may cause a missing authentication issue for a critical function by an adjacent network . A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to escalation of privileges, code execution, denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Severity
6.8 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-31033"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-12T19:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "NVIDIA DGX A100 BMC contains a vulnerability where a user may cause a missing authentication issue for a critical function by an adjacent network . A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to escalation of privileges, code execution, denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.",
  "id": "GHSA-32pc-g2wc-v836",
  "modified": "2024-01-12T21:30:19Z",
  "published": "2024-01-12T21:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-31033"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5510"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-32PG-RJQH-FHFP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-20 12:33 – Updated: 2026-07-20 12:33
VLAI
Details

SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain a session hijacking vulnerability where the HTTP /rpc sessions method returns attached session UUIDs without authentication and accepts arbitrary session fields with no ownership verification. Unauthenticated attackers can enumerate session UUIDs and impersonate authenticated sessions to read, write, delete data and escalate privileges.

Severity
8.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63757"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-20T12:19:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain a session hijacking vulnerability where the HTTP /rpc sessions method returns attached session UUIDs without authentication and accepts arbitrary session fields with no ownership verification. Unauthenticated attackers can enumerate session UUIDs and impersonate authenticated sessions to read, write, delete data and escalate privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-32pg-rjqh-fhfp",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T12:33:10Z",
  "published": "2026-07-20T12:33:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/security/advisories/GHSA-5qfp-32cf-69jh"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63757"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/surrealdb-before-session-hijacking-via-rpc-sessions"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
  • Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
  • In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
  • In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
Implementation System Configuration Operation

When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier

This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.

CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values

An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.

CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation

An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.

CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality

An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.

← Back to the CWE list