Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

Discouraged

Improper Access Control

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

8432 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-FCHG-2FV5-95MC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:51 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:51
VLAI
Details

Apple OS X before 10.10.5 does not properly restrict access to the Date & Time preferences pane, which allows local users to spoof the time by visiting this pane.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-3757"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-16T23:59:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Apple OS X before 10.10.5 does not properly restrict access to the Date \u0026 Time preferences pane, which allows local users to spoof the time by visiting this pane.",
  "id": "GHSA-fchg-2fv5-95mc",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:51:48Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:51:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3757"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT205031"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76340"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033276"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-FCJW-8RHJ-GWWC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-09-11 23:06 – Updated: 2023-01-23 20:12
VLAI
Summary
Authentication Bypass in Devise
Details

An issue was discovered in Plataformatec Devise before 4.7.1. It confirms accounts upon receiving a request with a blank confirmation_token, if a database record has a blank value in the confirmation_token column. (However, there is no scenario within Devise itself in which such database records would exist.)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "devise"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.7.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-16109"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2019-09-11T22:42:42Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-09-08T20:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Plataformatec Devise before 4.7.1. It confirms accounts upon receiving a request with a blank confirmation_token, if a database record has a blank value in the confirmation_token column. (However, there is no scenario within Devise itself in which such database records would exist.)",
  "id": "GHSA-fcjw-8rhj-gwwc",
  "modified": "2023-01-23T20:12:32Z",
  "published": "2019-09-11T23:06:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16109"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/issues/5071"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/pull/5132"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/plataformatec/devise"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/compare/v4.7.0...v4.7.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/devise/CVE-2019-16109.yml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Authentication Bypass in Devise"
}

GHSA-FCM3-CC23-MG3G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:33
VLAI
Details

This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations of ABB MicroSCADA 9.3 with FP 1-2-3. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the access controls for the installed product files. The installation procedure leaves critical files open to manipulation by any authenticated user. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-5097.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-1168"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-732"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-21T14:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations of ABB MicroSCADA 9.3 with FP 1-2-3. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the access controls for the installed product files. The installation procedure leaves critical files open to manipulation by any authenticated user. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-5097.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcm3-cc23-mg3g",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:33:27Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:33:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1168"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://library.e.abb.com/public/7a88a74b12bb492ea138b1f2365d00f6/ABBVU-PGGA-33888_ABB_SoftwareVulnerabilityHandlingAdvisory_Rev_A.pdf?x-sign=MJfu9cHtRUUubpLAYzyWFTmW5W+mg3kZ/nm7F/Jw5HlFTQf4eNyfLAgE8HozRJEC"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-18-141"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCPW-6R74-GRVH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-14 12:31 – Updated: 2026-01-14 12:31
VLAI
Details

Polkit authentication dis isabled by default and a race condition in the Polkit authorization check in versions before v0.69.0 can lead to the same issues as in CVE-2025-66005.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-14338"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-14T12:16:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Polkit authentication dis isabled by default and a race\ncondition in the Polkit authorization check in versions before v0.69.0 can\nlead to the same issues as in CVE-2025-66005.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcpw-6r74-grvh",
  "modified": "2026-01-14T12:31:38Z",
  "published": "2026-01-14T12:31:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14338"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-14338"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.opensuse.org/2026/01/09/inputplumber-lack-of-dbus-auth.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCRQ-RVCV-57CF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-21 18:31 – Updated: 2024-02-21 18:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the Live Data server of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to read and modify data in a repository that belongs to an internal service on an affected device.

This vulnerability is due to insufficient access control implementations on cluster configuration CLI requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a cluster configuration CLI request to specific directories on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read and modify data that is handled by an internal service on the affected device.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-20325"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-21T17:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the Live Data server of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to read and modify data in a repository that belongs to an internal service on an affected device.\n\n This vulnerability is due to insufficient access control implementations on cluster configuration CLI requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a cluster configuration CLI request to specific directories on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read and modify data that is handled by an internal service on the affected device.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcrq-rvcv-57cf",
  "modified": "2024-02-21T18:31:02Z",
  "published": "2024-02-21T18:31:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20325"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-cuic-access-control-jJsZQMjj"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCRW-MPHX-7CXF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-30 15:31 – Updated: 2025-01-31 17:34
VLAI
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider has Improper Access Control
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. The vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.wildfly:wildfly-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "27.0.0.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-30T17:56:01Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-30T15:15:18Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nA flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. \nThe vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcrw-mphx-7cxf",
  "modified": "2025-01-31T17:34:23Z",
  "published": "2025-01-30T15:31:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23367"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23367"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337620"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider has Improper Access Control",
  "withdrawn": "2025-01-31T17:34:23Z"
}

GHSA-FCX6-74V8-HJFH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-23 21:30 – Updated: 2026-01-23 21:30
VLAI
Details

Incorrect access control in the authRoutes function of SpringBlade v4.5.0 allows attackers with low-level privileges to escalate privileges.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-70983"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-23T19:15:53Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Incorrect access control in the authRoutes function of SpringBlade v4.5.0 allows attackers with low-level privileges to escalate privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcx6-74v8-hjfh",
  "modified": "2026-01-23T21:30:43Z",
  "published": "2026-01-23T21:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-70983"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/chillzhuang/SpringBlade/issues/35"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/old6ma/9c4d2ba32cd8f562cb80796538157912"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/chillzhuang/SpringBlade"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCXQ-V2R3-CC8H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-13 19:45 – Updated: 2025-08-14 13:31
VLAI
Summary
External Secrets Operator's Missing Namespace Restriction Allows Unauthorized Secret Access
Details

Summary

A vulnerability was discovered in the External Secrets Operator where the List() calls for Kubernetes Secret and SecretStore resources performed by the PushSecret controller did not apply a namespace selector.
This flaw allowed an attacker to use label selectors to list and read secrets/secret-stores across the cluster, bypassing intended namespace restrictions.


Impact

An attacker with the ability to create or update PushSecret resources and control SecretStore configurations could exploit this vulnerability to exfiltrate sensitive data from arbitrary namespaces.
This could lead to full disclosure of Kubernetes secrets, including credentials, tokens, and other sensitive information stored in the cluster.


Exploitability

To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must:

  1. Have permissions to create or update PushSecret resources.
  2. Control one or more SecretStore resources.

With these conditions met, the attacker could leverage label selectors to list secrets from any namespace and retrieve their contents.


Affected Versions

  • Vulnerable: v0.15.0 – v0.19.1
  • Not Vulnerable: v0.19.2 and later

Fix

The vulnerability was addressed in v0.19.2 by adding namespace restrictions to the List() calls for both PushSecret and SecretStore controllers.
This ensures that only secrets in the intended namespace are accessible.

Relevant fixes: - #5133 – Enforce namespace selector for PushSecret List() calls
- #5109 – Enforce namespace selector for SecretStore List() calls


Mitigation

If upgrading to v0.19.2 or later is not immediately possible, the following mitigations are recommended:

  • Restrict RBAC permissions so that only trusted service accounts can create or update PushSecret and SecretStore resources.
  • Audit existing PushSecret and SecretStore resources to ensure they are controlled by trusted parties.
  • Review Network Policies to prevent data exfiltration

Credit

This vulnerability was reported by @gracedo and @moolen

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.15.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.19.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-55196"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-08-13T19:45:15Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-13T23:15:27Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\nA vulnerability was discovered in the External Secrets Operator where the `List()` calls for Kubernetes Secret and SecretStore resources performed by the `PushSecret` controller did not apply a namespace selector.  \nThis flaw allowed an attacker to use label selectors to list and read secrets/secret-stores across the cluster, bypassing intended namespace restrictions.\n\n---\n\n## Impact\nAn attacker with the ability to create or update `PushSecret` resources and control `SecretStore` configurations could exploit this vulnerability to exfiltrate sensitive data from arbitrary namespaces.  \nThis could lead to full disclosure of Kubernetes secrets, including credentials, tokens, and other sensitive information stored in the cluster.\n\n---\n\n## Exploitability\nTo exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must:\n\n1. Have permissions to create or update `PushSecret` resources.\n2. Control one or more `SecretStore` resources.\n\nWith these conditions met, the attacker could leverage label selectors to list secrets from any namespace and retrieve their contents.\n\n---\n\n## Affected Versions\n- **Vulnerable:** v0.15.0 \u2013 v0.19.1  \n- **Not Vulnerable:** v0.19.2 and later  \n\n---\n\n## Fix\nThe vulnerability was addressed in v0.19.2 by adding namespace restrictions to the `List()` calls for both `PushSecret` and `SecretStore` controllers.  \nThis ensures that only secrets in the intended namespace are accessible.\n\nRelevant fixes:\n- [#5133](https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5133) \u2013 Enforce namespace selector for PushSecret `List()` calls  \n- [#5109](https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5109) \u2013 Enforce namespace selector for SecretStore `List()` calls  \n\n---\n\n## Mitigation\nIf upgrading to v0.19.2 or later is not immediately possible, the following mitigations are recommended:\n\n- Restrict RBAC permissions so that only trusted service accounts can create or update `PushSecret` and `SecretStore` resources.  \n- Audit existing `PushSecret` and `SecretStore` resources to ensure they are controlled by trusted parties.  \n- Review Network Policies to prevent data exfiltration\n\n---\n\n## Credit\nThis vulnerability was reported by @gracedo and @moolen",
  "id": "GHSA-fcxq-v2r3-cc8h",
  "modified": "2025-08-14T13:31:03Z",
  "published": "2025-08-13T19:45:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/security/advisories/GHSA-fcxq-v2r3-cc8h"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55196"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5109"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5133"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/39cdba5863533007b582dc63dd300839326b2f1d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/de40e8f4fa9559c1d770bb674589b285da5ef2d1"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "External Secrets Operator\u0027s Missing Namespace Restriction Allows Unauthorized Secret Access"
}

GHSA-FF5P-PC9J-WJ2W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-20 18:33 – Updated: 2023-07-20 18:33
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Aures Komet up to 20230509. This affects an unknown part of the component Kiosk Mode. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-235053 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-3786"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-07-20T13:15:11Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Aures Komet up to 20230509. This affects an unknown part of the component Kiosk Mode. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-235053 was assigned to this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-ff5p-pc9j-wj2w",
  "modified": "2023-07-20T18:33:43Z",
  "published": "2023-07-20T18:33:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3786"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/40"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.235053"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.235053"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2323"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FF5R-G2GV-9VFQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:32 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:32
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62484"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:19:04Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-ff5r-g2gv-9vfq",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T00:32:30Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T00:32:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

  • Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion

An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.

CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.

CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.

CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof

An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.

CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure

An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.

CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration

An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.

CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment

An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.

CAPEC-550: Install New Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.

CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.

CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.

CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers

When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.

CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable

An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.

CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File

An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.

CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot

An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.

CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon

Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.

CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.