Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-269

Discouraged

Improper Privilege Management

Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

5632 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-7PG9-W9PQ-869F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:15 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:15
VLAI
Details

Mac Endpoint for Sophos Central before 9.9.6 and Mac Endpoint for Sophos Home before 2.2.6 allow Privilege Escalation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-10947"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-04-17T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Mac Endpoint for Sophos Central before 9.9.6 and Mac Endpoint for Sophos Home before 2.2.6 allow Privilege Escalation.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pg9-w9pq-869f",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:15:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:15:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10947"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.sophos.com/b/security-blog/posts/advisory-cve-2020-10947---sophos-anti-virus-for-macos-privilege-escalation"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sophos.com/en-us.aspx"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-7PJR-QPVH-M339

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-21 20:17 – Updated: 2026-06-10 18:42
VLAI
Summary
Fission builder accepts arbitrary buildcmd strings from Environment.spec.builder.command, allowing the builder pod to invoke arbitrary executables
Details

Summary

Before the round-1 security sweep, pkg/builder/builder.go passed Environment.spec.builder.command directly into exec.Command(...) after a strings.Fields split, with no validation of the executable path or its arguments. A user who could create or update Environment CRDs in a namespace observed by the buildermgr could thereby point the builder pod at any executable inside the builder image (e.g. /bin/sh -c '...') and execute arbitrary code in the builder pod context.

Affected component

  • pkg/builder/builder.go:254 — call site (exec.Command(buildCmd, buildArgs...)).
  • pkg/builder/builder.go:106 — input source: buildCmd, buildArgs = strings.Fields(req.BuildCommand)[0], strings.Fields(req.BuildCommand)[1:].

Impact

A subject with create / update privilege on Environment objects could:

  1. Cause the builder pod for any package using that environment to execute arbitrary code.
  2. Read whatever files the builder pod has access to inside its /packages shared volume (deployment archive payloads for that package).
  3. Write arbitrary content into the /packages shared volume, which the fetcher subsequently uploads as the package deployment archive.

The builder pod runs in the user's namespace with the fission-builder SA (not the more-privileged executor SA), so the impact is bounded to that namespace's package contents and the builder pod's own filesystem. PR:H reflects that creating / modifying Environment CRDs is typically restricted to cluster admins or platform operators.

Root cause

pkg/builder/builder.go's build-command parser did not validate the resulting executable path. Although exec.Command does not invoke a shell, it does locate the executable via $PATH, and strings.Fields splitting allowed multiple flags / sub-arguments to be passed.

Fix

Released in v1.23.0:

  • PR #3364 (commit 0f45c911) introduces Builder.resolveBuildCommand in pkg/builder/builder.go, which:
  • Accepts an empty string (treated as the default /build).
  • Accepts the literal /build.
  • Accepts any absolute path that survives filepath.Clean and contains no .. segments.
  • Rejects anything containing whitespace metacharacters or relative paths.
  • exec.Command still receives only the validated absolute path; sub-arguments continue to come from strings.Fields of the original string but are now passed positionally with no shell expansion.

Mitigation (until upgrade)

  1. Restrict who can create / update Environment CRDs to trusted operators only.
  2. Audit Environment.spec.builder.command values for any non-/build paths.
  3. Run the buildermgr with a tightened ServiceAccount that has no secret access in the builder namespace.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.22.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/fission/fission"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.23.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46618"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-250",
      "CWE-269",
      "CWE-78"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-21T20:17:24Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T18:17:05Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nBefore the round-1 security sweep, `pkg/builder/builder.go` passed `Environment.spec.builder.command` directly into `exec.Command(...)` after a `strings.Fields` split, with no validation of the executable path or its arguments. A user who could create or update `Environment` CRDs in a namespace observed by the buildermgr could thereby point the builder pod at any executable inside the builder image (e.g. `/bin/sh -c \u0027...\u0027`) and execute arbitrary code in the builder pod context.\n\n### Affected component\n\n- `pkg/builder/builder.go:254` \u2014 call site (`exec.Command(buildCmd, buildArgs...)`).\n- `pkg/builder/builder.go:106` \u2014 input source: `buildCmd, buildArgs = strings.Fields(req.BuildCommand)[0], strings.Fields(req.BuildCommand)[1:]`.\n\n### Impact\n\nA subject with `create` / `update` privilege on `Environment` objects could:\n\n1. Cause the builder pod for any package using that environment to execute arbitrary code.\n2. Read whatever files the builder pod has access to inside its `/packages` shared volume (deployment archive payloads for that package).\n3. Write arbitrary content into the `/packages` shared volume, which the fetcher subsequently uploads as the package deployment archive.\n\nThe builder pod runs in the user\u0027s namespace with the `fission-builder` SA (not the more-privileged executor SA), so the impact is bounded to that namespace\u0027s package contents and the builder pod\u0027s own filesystem. `PR:H` reflects that creating / modifying `Environment` CRDs is typically restricted to cluster admins or platform operators.\n\n### Root cause\n\n`pkg/builder/builder.go`\u0027s build-command parser did not validate the resulting executable path. Although `exec.Command` does not invoke a shell, it does locate the executable via `$PATH`, and `strings.Fields` splitting allowed multiple flags / sub-arguments to be passed.\n\n### Fix\n\nReleased in [v1.23.0](https://github.com/fission/fission/releases/tag/v1.23.0):\n\n- **PR #3364** (commit `0f45c911`) introduces `Builder.resolveBuildCommand` in `pkg/builder/builder.go`, which:\n  1. Accepts an empty string (treated as the default `/build`).\n  2. Accepts the literal `/build`.\n  3. Accepts any absolute path that survives `filepath.Clean` and contains no `..` segments.\n  4. Rejects anything containing whitespace metacharacters or relative paths.\n- `exec.Command` still receives only the validated absolute path; sub-arguments continue to come from `strings.Fields` of the original string but are now passed positionally with no shell expansion.\n\n### Mitigation (until upgrade)\n\n1. Restrict who can create / update `Environment` CRDs to trusted operators only.\n2. Audit `Environment.spec.builder.command` values for any non-`/build` paths.\n3. Run the buildermgr with a tightened ServiceAccount that has no secret access in the builder namespace.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pjr-qpvh-m339",
  "modified": "2026-06-10T18:42:10Z",
  "published": "2026-05-21T20:17:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/security/advisories/GHSA-7pjr-qpvh-m339"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46618"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/pull/3364"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/fission/fission"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/releases/tag/v1.23.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Fission builder accepts arbitrary buildcmd strings from Environment.spec.builder.command, allowing the builder pod to invoke arbitrary executables"
}

GHSA-7PQV-WJ3V-FCQ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-12 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-12 12:31
VLAI
Details

OpenWrt luci-app-samba4 read ACL grants file.exec permission on /usr/sbin/smbd, allowing authenticated delegated users to execute the Samba daemon with caller-controlled command-line arguments. Attackers can pass arbitrary Samba global options such as message command to a root smbd process, triggering command execution when SMB protocol messages are processed.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59260"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-12T12:16:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "OpenWrt luci-app-samba4 read ACL grants file.exec permission on /usr/sbin/smbd, allowing authenticated delegated users to execute the Samba daemon with caller-controlled command-line arguments. Attackers can pass arbitrary Samba global options such as message command to a root smbd process, triggering command execution when SMB protocol messages are processed.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pqv-wj3v-fcq3",
  "modified": "2026-07-12T12:31:48Z",
  "published": "2026-07-12T12:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openwrt/luci/security/advisories/GHSA-vx64-mmp7-h36c"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59260"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openwrt-luci-app-samba4-read-acl-remote-code-execution-via-smbd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7PQX-CRH9-HCP7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:07 – Updated: 2023-12-29 00:30
VLAI
Details

Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-31979, CVE-2021-33771.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-34514"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-14T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-31979, CVE-2021-33771.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pqx-crh9-hcp7",
  "modified": "2023-12-29T00:30:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:07:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34514"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34514"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7PVF-3GFC-6366

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:27 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:27
VLAI
Details

IBM API Connect's API Manager 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.12 is vulnerable to privilege escalation. An invitee to an API Provider organization can escalate privileges by manipulating the invitation link. IBM X-Force ID: 185508.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-4638"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-09-03T14:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM API Connect\u0027s API Manager 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.12 is vulnerable to privilege escalation. An invitee to an API Provider organization can escalate privileges by manipulating the invitation link. IBM X-Force ID: 185508.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pvf-3gfc-6366",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:27:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:27:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-4638"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/185508"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6324751"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-7PWX-Q393-6CWF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-10 09:30 – Updated: 2025-06-10 09:30
VLAI
Details

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in upKeeper Solutions upKeeper Instant Privilege Access allows Privilege Abuse.This issue affects upKeeper Instant Privilege Access: before 1.4.0.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-4681"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-10T09:15:24Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in upKeeper Solutions upKeeper Instant Privilege Access allows Privilege Abuse.This issue affects upKeeper Instant Privilege Access: before 1.4.0.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pwx-q393-6cwf",
  "modified": "2025-06-10T09:30:31Z",
  "published": "2025-06-10T09:30:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4681"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.upkeeper.se/hc/en-us/articles/20159882527772-CVE-2025-4681-Improper-Privilege-Management"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7Q2R-9Q4W-229G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:34 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:34
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the access control functionality of Cisco IoT Field Network Director (FND) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view lists of users from different domains that are configured on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper access control. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an API request that alters the domain for a requested user list on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view lists of users from different domains on the affected system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-26077"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-11-18T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the access control functionality of Cisco IoT Field Network Director (FND) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view lists of users from different domains that are configured on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper access control. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an API request that alters the domain for a requested user list on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view lists of users from different domains on the affected system.",
  "id": "GHSA-7q2r-9q4w-229g",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:34:27Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:34:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26077"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-FND-LV-hE4Rntet"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-7QFP-F29R-CQPR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-04 09:30 – Updated: 2025-04-04 09:30
VLAI
Details

The Vehica Core plugin for WordPress, used by the Vehica - Car Dealer & Listing WordPress Theme, is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.97. This is due to the plugin not properly validating user meta fields prior to updating them in the database. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to change escalate their privileges to Administrator.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-3105"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-04T08:15:14Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Vehica Core plugin for WordPress, used by the Vehica - Car Dealer \u0026 Listing WordPress Theme, is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.97. This is due to the plugin not properly validating user meta fields prior to updating them in the database. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to change escalate their privileges to Administrator.",
  "id": "GHSA-7qfp-f29r-cqpr",
  "modified": "2025-04-04T09:30:33Z",
  "published": "2025-04-04T09:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3105"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.vehica.com/support/solutions/articles/101000393710"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0b787d6f-d002-4f09-8336-ebb91321e20b?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7QGX-72CR-WFMF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-05 09:30 – Updated: 2023-01-11 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the ClearPass OnGuard Linux agent could allow malicious users on a Linux instance to elevate their user privileges. A successful exploit could allow these users to execute arbitrary code with root level privileges on the Linux instance in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s): ClearPass Policy Manager 6.10.x: 6.10.7 and below and ClearPass Policy Manager 6.9.x: 6.9.12 and below.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-43534"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-01-05T07:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the ClearPass OnGuard Linux agent could allow malicious users on a Linux instance to elevate their user privileges. A successful exploit could allow these users to execute arbitrary code with root level privileges on the Linux instance in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s): ClearPass Policy Manager 6.10.x: 6.10.7 and below and ClearPass Policy Manager 6.9.x: 6.9.12 and below.",
  "id": "GHSA-7qgx-72cr-wfmf",
  "modified": "2023-01-11T18:30:32Z",
  "published": "2023-01-05T09:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2022-020.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7QHX-CW4F-C3V5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-16 21:32 – Updated: 2024-05-16 21:32
VLAI
Details

Improper input validation in PfrSmiUpdateFw driver in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Server M50FCP Family products may allow a privileged user to enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-24981"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-16T21:16:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper input validation in PfrSmiUpdateFw driver in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Server M50FCP Family products may allow a privileged user to enable escalation of privilege via local access.",
  "id": "GHSA-7qhx-cw4f-c3v5",
  "modified": "2024-05-16T21:32:02Z",
  "published": "2024-05-16T21:32:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24981"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01080.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-48
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.

Mitigation MIT-49
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.

CAPEC-122: Privilege Abuse

An adversary is able to exploit features of the target that should be reserved for privileged users or administrators but are exposed to use by lower or non-privileged accounts. Access to sensitive information and functionality must be controlled to ensure that only authorized users are able to access these resources.

CAPEC-233: Privilege Escalation

An adversary exploits a weakness enabling them to elevate their privilege and perform an action that they are not supposed to be authorized to perform.

CAPEC-58: Restful Privilege Elevation

An adversary identifies a Rest HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permission method allowing them to perform various malicious actions upon server data due to lack of access control mechanisms implemented within the application service accepting HTTP messages.