CVE-2026-34972 (GCVE-0-2026-34972)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-06 20:41 – Updated: 2026-04-07 14:01
VLAI
Title
OpenFGA's BatchCheck within-request deduplication produces incorrect authorization decisions via list-value cache-key collision
Summary
OpenFGA is a high-performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google Zanzibar. From 1.8.0 to 1.13.1, under specific conditions, BatchCheck calls with multiple checks sent for the same object, relation, and user combination can result in improper policy enforcement. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
openfga openfga Affected: >= 1.8.0, < 1.14.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-34972",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-04-07T14:01:13.438567Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T14:01:23.508Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "openfga",
          "vendor": "openfga",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 1.8.0, \u003c 1.14.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "OpenFGA is a high-performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google Zanzibar. From 1.8.0 to 1.13.1, under specific conditions, BatchCheck calls with multiple checks sent for the same object, relation, and user combination can result in improper policy enforcement. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "baseScore": 5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-06T20:41:33.414Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "OpenFGA\u0027s BatchCheck within-request deduplication produces incorrect authorization decisions via list-value cache-key collision"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-34972",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-06T20:41:33.414Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-31T19:38:31.616Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T14:01:23.508Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-34972",
      "date": "2026-07-27",
      "epss": "0.00211",
      "percentile": "0.11448"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-34972\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-04-06T21:16:19.997\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-24T21:10:00.143\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"OpenFGA is a high-performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google Zanzibar. From 1.8.0 to 1.13.1, under specific conditions, BatchCheck calls with multiple checks sent for the same object, relation, and user combination can result in improper policy enforcement. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"OpenFGA es un motor de autorizaci\u00f3n/permisos de alto rendimiento y flexible, dise\u00f1ado para desarrolladores e inspirado en Google Zanzibar. Desde la versi\u00f3n 1.8.0 hasta la 1.13.1, bajo condiciones espec\u00edficas, las llamadas a BatchCheck con m\u00faltiples verificaciones enviadas para la misma combinaci\u00f3n de objeto, relaci\u00f3n y usuario pueden resultar en una aplicaci\u00f3n de pol\u00edtica incorrecta. Esta vulnerabilidad se corrige en la versi\u00f3n 1.14.0.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"openfga\",\"product\":\"openfga\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e= 1.8.0, \u003c 1.14.0\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":3.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-04-07T14:01:13.438567Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-34972\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openfga:helm_charts:*:*:*:*:*:openfga:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"0.2.16\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.2.62\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EABAAAEF-53E1-4ED5-9680-9748EF76A60A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openfga:openfga:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.8.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.14.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9D29D1A0-093C-4775-9409-BED9C6D4CE7E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-30T11:43:25+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-34972",
      "id": "CVE-2026-34972",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-04-06T20:41:33.414000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "2",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "github.com/openfga/openfga: OpenFGA: Improper policy enforcement via specific BatchCheck calls",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-34972.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-34972\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-07T14:01:13.438567Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-07T14:01:18.314Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"OpenFGA\u0027s BatchCheck within-request deduplication produces incorrect authorization decisions via list-value cache-key collision\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"openfga\", \"product\": \"openfga\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 1.8.0, \u003c 1.14.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvj-g8pc-cx45\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenFGA is a high-performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google Zanzibar. From 1.8.0 to 1.13.1, under specific conditions, BatchCheck calls with multiple checks sent for the same object, relation, and user combination can result in improper policy enforcement. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-863\", \"description\": \"CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-06T20:41:33.414Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-34972\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-07T14:01:23.508Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-31T19:38:31.616Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-06T20:41:33.414Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…