CWE-807
Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
CVE-2024-13974 (GCVE-0-2024-13974)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-07-21 13:34
Modified
2025-07-21 15:00
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-807 - Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Summary
A business logic vulnerability in the Up2Date component of Sophos Firewall older than version 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) can lead to attackers controlling the firewall’s DNS environment to achieve remote code execution.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophos | Sophos Firewall |
Version: 0 ≤ |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13974",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-21T15:00:43.012301Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-21T15:00:59.445Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Sophos Firewall",
"vendor": "Sophos",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "21.0 MR1 (21.0.1)",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "The UK\u0027s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA business logic vulnerability in the Up2Date component of Sophos Firewall older than version 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) can lead to attackers controlling the firewall\u2019s DNS environment to achieve remote code execution.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A business logic vulnerability in the Up2Date component of Sophos Firewall older than version 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) can lead to attackers controlling the firewall\u2019s DNS environment to achieve remote code execution."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-598",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-598 DNS Spoofing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "CWE-807 Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-21T13:36:16.384Z",
"orgId": "526a354d-e866-4174-ae7d-bac848e5c4c5",
"shortName": "Sophos"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.sophos.com/en-us/security-advisories/sophos-sa-20250721-sfos-rce"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "526a354d-e866-4174-ae7d-bac848e5c4c5",
"assignerShortName": "Sophos",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13974",
"datePublished": "2025-07-21T13:34:11.656Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-14T09:51:15.265Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-21T15:00:59.445Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-47254 (GCVE-0-2024-47254)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-11-05 09:13
Modified
2025-09-04 08:14
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-807 - Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Summary
In 2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior, an Insufficient
Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability could allow an attacker
to escalate their privileges and gain root access to the system.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2N | 2N Access Commander |
Version: <=3.1.1.2 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:2n:access_commander:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "access_commander",
"vendor": "2n",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.1.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-47254",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-05T14:55:14.974689Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-05T14:55:19.780Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "2N Access Commander",
"vendor": "2N",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c=3.1.1.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In 2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior, an Insufficient \nVerification of Data Authenticity vulnerability could allow an attacker \nto escalate their privileges and gain root access to the system.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In 2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior, an Insufficient \nVerification of Data Authenticity vulnerability could allow an attacker \nto escalate their privileges and gain root access to the system."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "CWE-807 Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T08:14:20.535Z",
"orgId": "f2daf9a0-02c2-4b83-a01d-63b3b304b807",
"shortName": "Axis"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.2n.com/en-GB/download/Access-Commander-Security-Advisory-2024-11"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f2daf9a0-02c2-4b83-a01d-63b3b304b807",
"assignerShortName": "Axis",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-47254",
"datePublished": "2024-11-05T09:13:08.132Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-23T16:37:50.255Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T08:14:20.535Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-5754 (GCVE-0-2024-5754)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-09-13 18:50
Modified
2025-09-17 14:09
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-807 - Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Summary
BT: Encryption procedure host vulnerability
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zephyrproject-rtos | Zephyr |
Version: * |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5754",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-16T14:16:36.994922Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T14:09:48.490Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "Zephyr",
"product": "Zephyr",
"repo": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr",
"vendor": "zephyrproject-rtos",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "*",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "BT: Encryption procedure host vulnerability"
}
],
"value": "BT: Encryption procedure host vulnerability"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T06:05:51.684Z",
"orgId": "e2e69745-5e70-4e92-8431-deb5529a81ad",
"shortName": "zephyr"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-gvv5-66hw-5qrc"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "BT: Encryption procedure host vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e2e69745-5e70-4e92-8431-deb5529a81ad",
"assignerShortName": "zephyr",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-5754",
"datePublished": "2024-09-13T18:50:05.314Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-07T16:59:42.401Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T14:09:48.490Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-49827 (GCVE-0-2025-49827)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-07-15 19:26
Modified
2025-07-15 20:42
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-807 - Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Summary
Conjur provides secrets management and application identity for infrastructure. Conjur OSS versions 1.19.5 through 1.22.0 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) 13.1 through 13.5 and 13.6 are vulnerable to bypass of the IAM authenticator. An attacker who can manipulate the headers signed by AWS can take advantage of a malformed regular expression to redirect the authentication validation request that Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted sends to AWS to a malicious server controlled by the attacker. This redirection could result in a bypass of the Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted IAM Authenticator, granting the attacker the permissions granted to the client whose request was manipulated. This issue affects both Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) and Conjur OSS. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue.
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/cyberark/conjur/security/advisories/GHSA-gmc5-9mpc-xg75 | x_refsource_CONFIRM | |
| https://github.com/cyberark/conjur/releases/tag/v1.22.1 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-49827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-15T20:42:39.221072Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-15T20:42:47.137Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "conjur",
"vendor": "cyberark",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Conjur OSS \u003e= 1.19.5, \u003c 1.22.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) \u003e= 13.1, \u003c 13.5.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) \u003e= 13.6, \u003c 13.6.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Conjur provides secrets management and application identity for infrastructure. Conjur OSS versions 1.19.5 through 1.22.0 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) 13.1 through 13.5 and 13.6 are vulnerable to bypass of the IAM authenticator. An attacker who can manipulate the headers signed by AWS can take advantage of a malformed regular expression to redirect the authentication validation request that Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted sends to AWS to a malicious server controlled by the attacker. This redirection could result in a bypass of the Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted IAM Authenticator, granting the attacker the permissions granted to the client whose request was manipulated. This issue affects both Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) and Conjur OSS. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-15T19:26:06.451Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cyberark/conjur/security/advisories/GHSA-gmc5-9mpc-xg75",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cyberark/conjur/security/advisories/GHSA-gmc5-9mpc-xg75"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cyberark/conjur/releases/tag/v1.22.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cyberark/conjur/releases/tag/v1.22.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-gmc5-9mpc-xg75",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Conjur OSS and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) Vulnerable to Bypass of IAM Authenticator"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-49827",
"datePublished": "2025-07-15T19:26:06.451Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-11T14:33:57.799Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-15T20:42:47.137Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-53882 (GCVE-0-2025-53882)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-07-23 09:31
Modified
2025-09-03 07:23
Severity ?
4.4 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
4.8 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
4.8 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-807 - Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Summary
A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in the logrotate configuration for openSUSE mailman3 package allows the mailman user to sent SIGHUP to arbitrary processes. This issue affects openSUSE Tumbleweed: from ? before 3.3.10-2.1.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | openSUSE Tumbleweed |
Version: ? < 3.3.10-2.1 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-53882",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-29T03:55:20.012924Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-26T18:47:59.147Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "mailman3",
"product": "openSUSE Tumbleweed",
"vendor": "SUSE",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.10-2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "?",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Matthias Gerstner of SUSE"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-15T10:33:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in the logrotate configuration for openSUSE mailman3 package allows the mailman user to sent SIGHUP to arbitrary processes.\u0026nbsp;\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects openSUSE Tumbleweed: from ? before 3.3.10-2.1.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in the logrotate configuration for openSUSE mailman3 package allows the mailman user to sent SIGHUP to arbitrary processes.\u00a0This issue affects openSUSE Tumbleweed: from ? before 3.3.10-2.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-03T07:23:06.351Z",
"orgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"shortName": "suse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-53882"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "The logrotate configuration in the python-mailman of openSUSE allows the mailman user to sent SIGHUP to arbitrary proceess",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"assignerShortName": "suse",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-53882",
"datePublished": "2025-07-23T09:31:18.547Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-11T10:53:52.681Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-03T07:23:06.351Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-55735 (GCVE-0-2025-55735)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-08-19 18:56
Modified
2025-08-19 19:18
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, when creating a post, there's no validation of the content of the post stored in the variable "postContent". The vulnerability arises when displaying the content of the post using the | safe filter, that tells the engine to not escape the rendered content. This can lead to a stored XSS inside the content of the post. The code that causes the problem is in template/routes.html.
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-gj9v-qhc3-gcfx | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DogukanUrker | FlaskBlog |
Version: <= 2.8.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-55735",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-19T19:16:53.312941Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:18:45.395Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FlaskBlog",
"vendor": "DogukanUrker",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 2.8.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, when creating a post, there\u0027s no validation of the content of the post stored in the variable \"postContent\". The vulnerability arises when displaying the content of the post using the | safe filter, that tells the engine to not escape the rendered content. This can lead to a stored XSS inside the content of the post. The code that causes the problem is in template/routes.html."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T18:56:42.600Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-gj9v-qhc3-gcfx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-gj9v-qhc3-gcfx"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-gj9v-qhc3-gcfx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "flaskBlog Stored XSS Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-55735",
"datePublished": "2025-08-19T18:56:42.600Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-14T22:31:17.683Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:18:45.395Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-55736 (GCVE-0-2025-55736)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-08-19 19:04
Modified
2025-08-19 19:29
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, an arbitrary user can change his role to "admin", giving its relative privileges (e.g. delete users, posts, comments etc.). The problem is in the routes/adminPanelUsers file.
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-6q83-vfmq-wf72 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DogukanUrker | FlaskBlog |
Version: <= 2.8.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-55736",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-19T19:28:47.372231Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:29:09.500Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FlaskBlog",
"vendor": "DogukanUrker",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 2.8.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, an arbitrary user can change his role to \"admin\", giving its relative privileges (e.g. delete users, posts, comments etc.). The problem is in the routes/adminPanelUsers file."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-425",
"description": "CWE-425: Direct Request (\u0027Forced Browsing\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-807",
"description": "CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:04:00.564Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-6q83-vfmq-wf72",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-6q83-vfmq-wf72"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-6q83-vfmq-wf72",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "flaskBlog allows arbitrary privilege escalation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-55736",
"datePublished": "2025-08-19T19:04:00.564Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-14T22:31:17.683Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:29:09.500Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation ID: MIT-14
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- Store state information and sensitive data on the server side only.
- Ensure that the system definitively and unambiguously keeps track of its own state and user state and has rules defined for legitimate state transitions. Do not allow any application user to affect state directly in any way other than through legitimate actions leading to state transitions.
- If information must be stored on the client, do not do so without encryption and integrity checking, or otherwise having a mechanism on the server side to catch tampering. Use a message authentication code (MAC) algorithm, such as Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) [REF-529]. Apply this against the state or sensitive data that has to be exposed, which can guarantee the integrity of the data - i.e., that the data has not been modified. Ensure that a strong hash function is used (CWE-328).
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.2
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- With a stateless protocol such as HTTP, use a framework that maintains the state for you.
- Examples include ASP.NET View State [REF-756] and the OWASP ESAPI Session Management feature [REF-45].
- Be careful of language features that provide state support, since these might be provided as a convenience to the programmer and may not be considering security.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
Mitigation ID: MIT-6
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Identify all inputs that are used for security decisions and determine if you can modify the design so that you do not have to rely on submitted inputs at all. For example, you may be able to keep critical information about the user's session on the server side instead of recording it within external data.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.