CWE-680
Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow
The product performs a calculation to determine how much memory to allocate, but an integer overflow can occur that causes less memory to be allocated than expected, leading to a buffer overflow.
CVE-2025-32023 (GCVE-0-2025-32023)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
- CWE-680 - Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-rp2m-q4j6-gr43 | x_refsource_CONFIRM | |
| https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/50188747cbfe43528d2719399a2a3c9599169445 | x_refsource_MISC | |
| https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/6.2.19 | x_refsource_MISC | |
| https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.2.10 | x_refsource_MISC | |
| https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.4.5 | x_refsource_MISC | |
| https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/8.0.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-32023",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-07T15:43:02.576291Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-07T15:43:15.696Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "redis",
"vendor": "redis",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.0.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 7.4-rc1, \u003c 7.4.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 7.0.0, \u003c 7.2.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.8.0, \u003c 6.2.19"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. From 2.8 to before 8.0.3, 7.4.5, 7.2.10, and 6.2.19, an authenticated user may use a specially crafted string to trigger a stack/heap out of bounds write on hyperloglog operations, potentially leading to remote code execution. The bug likely affects all Redis versions with hyperloglog operations implemented. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.0.3, 7.4.5, 7.2.10, and 6.2.19. An additional workaround to mitigate the problem without patching the redis-server executable is to prevent users from executing hyperloglog operations. This can be done using ACL to restrict HLL commands."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-680",
"description": "CWE-680: Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-07T15:22:19.155Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-rp2m-q4j6-gr43",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-rp2m-q4j6-gr43"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/50188747cbfe43528d2719399a2a3c9599169445",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/50188747cbfe43528d2719399a2a3c9599169445"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/6.2.19",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/6.2.19"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.2.10",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.2.10"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.4.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.4.5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/8.0.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/8.0.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rp2m-q4j6-gr43",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Redis allows out of bounds writes in hyperloglog commands leading to RCE"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-32023",
"datePublished": "2025-07-07T15:22:19.155Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-01T21:57:32.955Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-07T15:43:15.696Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-53630 (GCVE-0-2025-53630)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/security/advisories/GHSA-vgg9-87g3-85w8 | x_refsource_CONFIRM | |
| https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/commit/26a48ad699d50b6268900062661bd22f3e792579 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-53630",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-10T20:30:57.116005Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T20:31:07.240Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "llama.cpp",
"vendor": "ggml-org",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 26a48ad699d50b6268900062661bd22f3e792579"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "llama.cpp is an inference of several LLM models in C/C++. Integer Overflow in the gguf_init_from_file_impl function in ggml/src/gguf.cpp can lead to Heap Out-of-Bounds Read/Write. This vulnerability is fixed in commit 26a48ad699d50b6268900062661bd22f3e792579."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-122",
"description": "CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-680",
"description": "CWE-680: Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T19:32:45.296Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/security/advisories/GHSA-vgg9-87g3-85w8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/security/advisories/GHSA-vgg9-87g3-85w8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/commit/26a48ad699d50b6268900062661bd22f3e792579",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/commit/26a48ad699d50b6268900062661bd22f3e792579"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vgg9-87g3-85w8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Integer Overflow in GGUF Parser can lead to Heap Out-of-Bounds Read/Write in gguf"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-53630",
"datePublished": "2025-07-10T19:32:45.296Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-07T14:20:38.389Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T20:31:07.240Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-54623 (GCVE-0-2025-54623)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
- CWE-680 - Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HarmonyOS",
"vendor": "Huawei",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the devicemanager module.\u003cbr\u003eImpact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability."
}
],
"value": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the devicemanager module.\nImpact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-680",
"description": "CWE-680 Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-06T01:44:32.090Z",
"orgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"shortName": "huawei"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/8/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"assignerShortName": "huawei",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-54623",
"datePublished": "2025-08-06T01:44:32.090Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-28T03:55:34.528Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-06T01:44:32.090Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-10: Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the adversary finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
CAPEC-100: Overflow Buffers
Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.
CAPEC-14: Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service. This hostile service is created to deliver the correct content to the client software. For example, if the client-side application is a browser, the service will host a webpage that the browser loads.
CAPEC-24: Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-46: Overflow Variables and Tags
This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The adversary crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
CAPEC-47: Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
In this attack, the target software is given input that the adversary knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
CAPEC-67: String Format Overflow in syslog()
This attack targets applications and software that uses the syslog() function insecurely. If an application does not explicitely use a format string parameter in a call to syslog(), user input can be placed in the format string parameter leading to a format string injection attack. Adversaries can then inject malicious format string commands into the function call leading to a buffer overflow. There are many reported software vulnerabilities with the root cause being a misuse of the syslog() function.
CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call
This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An adversary who has knowledge of known vulnerable libraries or shared code can easily target software that makes use of these libraries. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
CAPEC-9: Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An adversary can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.
CAPEC-92: Forced Integer Overflow
This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.