rustsec-2026-0010
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-02-06 12:00
Modified
2026-02-06 18:14
Summary
`polymarket-clients-sdk` was removed from crates.io for malicious code
Details
It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate
polymarket-client-sdk (clients vs client)
and attempting to steal credentials from local files.
The malicious crate had 6 versions published on 2026-02-05 and had been downloaded only 59 times. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.
Thanks to Socket.dev for detecting and reporting this to the crates.io team!
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [],
"cvss": null,
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "polymarket-clients-sdk",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/polymarket-clients-sdk"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate\n[`polymarket-client-sdk`](https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-client-sdk) (`clients` vs `client`)\nand attempting to steal credentials from local files.\n\nThe malicious crate had 6 versions published on 2026-02-05 and had been downloaded only 59 times.\nThere were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.\n\nThanks to [Socket.dev](https://socket.dev/) for detecting and reporting this to the crates.io team!",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0010",
"modified": "2026-02-06T18:14:09Z",
"published": "2026-02-06T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-clients-sdk"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0010.html"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "`polymarket-clients-sdk` was removed from crates.io for malicious code"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…