rustsec-2025-0045
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2025-07-17 12:00
Modified
2025-07-17 14:38
Summary
ConstStaticCell could have been used to pass non-Send values to another thread
Details
ConstStaticCell<T> could have been used to pass non-Send values to another thread, because T was not required to be Send while ConstStaticCell is Send.
This was corrected by introducing a T: Send bound.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"memory-exposure",
"memory-corruption"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": "unsound"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [
"static_cell::ConstStaticCell::new"
],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "static_cell",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/static_cell"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.1-0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.1"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "`ConstStaticCell\u003cT\u003e` could have been used to pass non-`Send` values to another thread, because `T` was not required to be `Send` while `ConstStaticCell` is `Send`.\n\nThis was corrected by introducing a `T: Send` bound.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2025-0045",
"modified": "2025-07-17T14:38:11Z",
"published": "2025-07-17T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/static_cell"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0045.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/embassy-rs/static-cell/issues/19"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "ConstStaticCell could have been used to pass non-Send values to another thread"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…