rustsec-2025-0023
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2025-04-07 12:00
Modified
2025-10-28 06:02
Summary
Broadcast channel calls clone in parallel, but does not require `Sync`
Details
The broadcast channel internally calls clone on the stored value when
receiving it, and only requires T:Send. This means that using the broadcast
channel with values that are Send but not Sync can trigger unsoundness if
the clone implementation makes use of the value being !Sync.
Thank you to Austin Bonander for finding and reporting this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"memory-corruption"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": "unsound"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "tokio",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/tokio"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.2.5"
},
{
"fixed": "1.38.2"
},
{
"introduced": "1.39.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.42.1"
},
{
"introduced": "1.43.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.43.1"
},
{
"introduced": "1.44.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.44.2"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"GHSA-rr8g-9fpq-6wmg"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "The broadcast channel internally calls `clone` on the stored value when\nreceiving it, and only requires `T:Send`. This means that using the broadcast\nchannel with values that are `Send` but not `Sync` can trigger unsoundness if\nthe `clone` implementation makes use of the value being `!Sync`.\n\nThank you to Austin Bonander for finding and reporting this issue.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2025-0023",
"modified": "2025-10-28T06:02:18Z",
"published": "2025-04-07T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/tokio"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0023.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/pull/7232"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "Broadcast channel calls clone in parallel, but does not require `Sync`"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…