rustsec-2024-0332
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2024-04-03 12:00
Modified
2024-04-11 16:16
Summary
Degradation of service in h2 servers with CONTINUATION Flood
Details
An attacker can send a flood of CONTINUATION frames, causing h2 to process them indefinitely.
This results in an increase in CPU usage.
Tokio task budget helps prevent this from a complete denial-of-service, as the server can still respond to legitimate requests, albeit with increased latency.
More details at "https://seanmonstar.com/blog/hyper-http2-continuation-flood/.
Patches available for 0.4.x and 0.3.x versions.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"denial-of-service"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "h2",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/h2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.3.26"
},
{
"introduced": "0.4.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.4.4"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"GHSA-q6cp-qfwq-4gcv"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "An attacker can send a flood of CONTINUATION frames, causing `h2` to process them indefinitely.\nThis results in an increase in CPU usage.\n\nTokio task budget helps prevent this from a complete denial-of-service, as the server can still\nrespond to legitimate requests, albeit with increased latency.\n\nMore details at \"https://seanmonstar.com/blog/hyper-http2-continuation-flood/.\n\nPatches available for 0.4.x and 0.3.x versions.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2024-0332",
"modified": "2024-04-11T16:16:20Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/h2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0332.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seanmonstar.com/blog/hyper-http2-continuation-flood/"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "Degradation of service in h2 servers with CONTINUATION Flood"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…