rustsec-2020-0159
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2020-11-10 12:00
Modified
2022-08-04 19:52
Summary
Potential segfault in `localtime_r` invocations
Details
Impact
Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.
Workarounds
No workarounds are known.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"code-execution",
"memory-corruption"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "chrono",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/chrono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.4.20"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nUnix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user\u0027s knowledge, notably in a third-party library.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNo workarounds are known.\n\n### References\n\n- [time-rs/time#293](https://github.com/time-rs/time/issues/293)",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2020-0159",
"modified": "2022-08-04T19:52:46Z",
"published": "2020-11-10T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/chrono"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0159.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/chronotope/chrono/issues/499"
}
],
"related": [
"CVE-2020-26235",
"RUSTSEC-2020-0071"
],
"severity": [],
"summary": "Potential segfault in `localtime_r` invocations"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…