pysec-2025-55
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2025-05-30 19:15
Modified
2025-06-26 21:23
Details
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Version 0.8.0 up to but excluding 0.9.0 have a Denial of Service (ReDoS) that causes the vLLM server to crash if an invalid regex was provided while using structured output. This vulnerability is similar to GHSA-6qc9-v4r8-22xg/CVE-2025-48942, but for regex instead of a JSON schema. Version 0.9.0 fixes the issue.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | vllm | pkg:pypi/vllm |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "vllm",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/vllm"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "08bf7840780980c7568c573c70a6a8db94fd45ff"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.8.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.8.0",
"0.8.1",
"0.8.2",
"0.8.3",
"0.8.4",
"0.8.5",
"0.8.5.post1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48943",
"GHSA-9hcf-v7m4-6m2j"
],
"details": "vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Version 0.8.0 up to but excluding 0.9.0 have a Denial of Service (ReDoS) that causes the vLLM server to crash if an invalid regex was provided while using structured output. This vulnerability is similar to GHSA-6qc9-v4r8-22xg/CVE-2025-48942, but for regex instead of a JSON schema. Version 0.9.0 fixes the issue.",
"id": "PYSEC-2025-55",
"modified": "2025-06-26T21:23:06.407481+00:00",
"published": "2025-05-30T19:15:30+00:00",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-9hcf-v7m4-6m2j"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/08bf7840780980c7568c573c70a6a8db94fd45ff"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/17623"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/17313"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/17623"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…